CD4+ T cell lymphopenia predicts mortality from Pneumocystis pneumonia in kidney transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PcP) remains a life-threatening opportunistic infection after solid organ transplantation, even in the era of Pneumocystis prophylaxis. The association between risk of developing PcP and low CD4+ T cell counts has been well established. However, it is unknown whether lymphopenia in the context of post-renal transplant PcP increases the risk of mortality. METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of a cohort of kidney transplant patients with PcP (n = 49) to determine the risk factors for mortality associated with PcP. We correlated clinical and demographic data with the outcome of the disease. For CD4+ T cell counts, we used the Wilcoxon rank sum test for in-hospital mortality and a Cox proportional-hazards regression model for 60-day mortality. RESULTS: In univariate analyses, high CRP, high neutrophils, CD4+ T cell lymphopenia, mechanical ventilation, and high acute kidney injury network stage were associated with in-hospital mortality following presentation with PcP. In a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, an optimum cutoff of ≤200 CD4+ T cells/µL predicted in-hospital mortality, CD4+ T cell lymphopenia remained a risk factor in a Cox regression model. CONCLUSIONS: Low CD4+ T cell count in kidney transplant recipients is a biomarker for disease severity and a risk factor for in-hospital mortality following presentation with PcP.

How to Prevent Renal Cachexia? A Clinical Randomized Pilot Study Testing Oral Supplemental Nutrition in Hemodialysis Patients With and Without Human Immunodeficiency Virus Infection.

OBJECTIVE: End-stage renal disease associates with catabolism and sarcopenia. Hypothetically, peroral supplemental nutrition over 6 months prevents catabolism in hemodialysis patients. DESIGN: Prospective randomized pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00687050). SUBJECTS: Twenty-three hemodialysis patients (15 males and 7 females) with or without human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection of 2 ambulatory hemodialysis centers. INTERVENTION: HIV-positive hemodialysis patients (n = 7, Group 1) were started on supplemental nutrition drinks (250 kcal/day), HIV-negative hemodialysis patients (n = 16, Group 2) were randomized to supplemental nutrition drinks (250 kcal/day) or received none. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Body impedance analysis, anthropometric measures, magnetic resonance imaging results for mid-iliopsoas muscle cross-sectional area and laboratory parameters including albumin, cytokines at baseline, and at 6 months follow-up. RESULTS: Seven patients in Group 1 (mean age: 50.6 ± 9.6 years) and 16 patients in Group 2 (mean age: 54.0 ± 13.3 years) were recruited. Serum creatinine (Group 1: 6.4 ± 3.0 mg/dL; Group 2: 10.7 ± 2.5 mg/dL; P < .01), Body impedance analysis-derived phase angle alpha (Group 1: 5.1 ± 1.2; Group 2: 6.9 ± 1.6; P < .01), mid-arm circumference (Group 1: 26.1 ± 1.3 cm; Group 2: 29.6 ± 2.4 cm; P < .01) were less in Group 1 versus Group 2 patients at baseline suggesting that HIV-positive hemodialysis patients had a poorer nutritional status at baseline. At 6-month follow-up, mortality was higher in Group 1 patients (29%) than in Group 2 patients (6%). There was no significant treatment effect on nutritional status in survivors of Group 1 or in the supplemental nutrition arm of Group 2 when compared with baseline or to untreated controls. CONCLUSIONS: A new oral supplemental nutrition over 6 months had no treatment effect in surviving HIV-positive hemodialysis patients or in maintenance hemodialysis patients without HIV infection. The limitations of this study were small study size and unexpected high mortality among HIV-positive hemodialysis patients.

Pretransplant human leukocyte antigen antibodies detected by single-antigen bead assay are a risk factor for long-term kidney graft loss even in the absence of donor-specific antibodies.

Clinical relevance of ELISA- and single-antigen bead assay (SAB)-detected pretransplant HLA antibodies (SAB-HLA-Ab) for kidney graft survival was evaluated retrospectively in 197 patients transplanted between 2002 and 2009 at the University Clinic Frankfurt. Having adjusted for retransplantation and delayed graft function, a significantly increased risk for death-censored graft loss was found in patients with pretransplant SAB-HLA-Ab [HR: 4.46; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.47-13.48; P = 0.008]. The risk for increased graft loss was also significant in patients with pretransplant SAB-HLA-Ab but without SAB-detected donor-specific Ab (SAB-DSA) (HR: 4.91; 95% CI of 1.43-16.991; P = 0.012). ELISA was not sufficient to identify pretransplant immunized patients with an increased risk for graft loss. In immunized patients, graft loss was predominantly present in patients who received transplants with a mismatch on the HLA-DR locus. In conclusion, even if our study is limited due to small sample size, the results show an increased risk for long-term graft loss in patients with pretransplant SAB-HLA, even in the absence of DSA. SAB-HLA-Ab-positive patients, being negative in ELISA or CDC assay, might profit from a well-HLA-DR-matched graft and intensified immunosuppression.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation improves outcome compared to open-heart surgery in kidney transplant recipients requiring aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is the most frequent cause of mortality for kidney transplant recipients. Open heart surgery has particularly high mortality and morbidity. As an alternative to traditional aortic valve replacement (AVR) for patients with high-grade aortic stenosis, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) was developed as an innovative therapy for patients considered at high surgical risk. METHODS: We considered all kidney transplant recipients as high-risk patients, which are candidates for TAVI. In 2010 and 2011, eight kidney transplant recipients with severe aortic stenosis underwent TAVI (6 transfemoral; 2 transapical; group I). The outcome of these patients was compared retrospectively to 18 kidney transplant recipients with aortic stenosis, who underwent conventional AVR (group II). RESULTS: Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, including estimated perioperative risk (EuroSCORE group I vs. group II: 9.5±5.9 vs. 10.4±10.5; p=0.829). All TAVI procedures were performed successfully with excellent functional results. In the TAVI group (group I), all patients were alive at the 12-month follow-up with one cardiovascular event (stroke). In contrast, the surgical group experienced a 30-day-mortality of 11.1% (n=2) and a 1-year-mortality of 16.7% (n=3). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our center's experience, TAVI appears to be an effective and safe alternative to conventional surgery for AVR in patients with prior renal transplantation. Renal transplantation is not currently identified as a risk factor in our traditional scoring system, and may need to be considered independently when weighing alternatives for AVR.

Cholesterol-crystal embolism presenting with delayed graft function and impaired long-term function in renal transplant recipients: two case reports.

INTRODUCTION: Impaired renal function and/or pre-existing atherosclerosis in the deceased donor increase the risk of delayed graft function and impaired long-term renal function in kidney transplant recipients. CASE PRESENTATION: We report delayed graft function occurring simultaneously in two kidney transplant recipients, aged 57-years-old and 39-years-old, who received renal allografts from the same deceased donor. The 62-year-old donor died of cardiac arrest during an asthmatic state. Renal-allograft biopsies performed in both kidney recipients because of delayed graft function revealed cholesterol-crystal embolism. An empiric statin therapy in addition to low-dose acetylsalicylic acid was initiated. After 10 and 6 hemodialysis sessions every 48 hours, respectively, both renal allografts started to function. Glomerular filtration rates at discharge were 26 ml/min/1.73m(2) and 23.9 ml/min/1.73m(2), and remained stable in follow-up examinations. Possible donor and surgical procedure-dependent causes for cholesterol-crystal embolism are discussed. CONCLUSION: Cholesterol-crystal embolism should be considered as a cause for delayed graft function and long-term impaired renal allograft function, especially in the older donor population.