Current-based transthoracic defibrillation.

This study examines in a prospective, multicenter trial the feasibility and advantage of current-based, transthoracic defibrillation. Current-based, damped, sinusoidal waveform shocks of 18, 25, 30, 35, or 40 amperes (A) were administered beginning with 25 A for polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) or 18 A for monomorphic VT; success rates were compared with those of energy-based shocks beginning at 200 J for VF/polymorphic VT and 100 J for VT. The current-based shocks were delivered from custom-modified defibrillators that determined impedance in advance of any shock using a "test-pulse" technique; the capacitor then charged to the exact energy necessary to deliver the operator-selected current against the impedance determined by the defibrillator. Three hundred sixty-two patients received > 1 shock for VF, polymorphic VT, or monomorphic VT: 569 current- based shocks and 420 energy-based shocks. Current-based shocks of 35/40 A achieved success rates of up to 74% for VF/polymorphic VT; 30 A shocks terminated 88% of monomorphic VT episodes. Energy-based shocks of 300 J terminated 72% of VF/polymorphic VT; 200-J shocks terminated 89% of monomorphic VT. We could not demonstrate a significant increase in the success rate of current-based shocks over energy-based shocks for patients with high transthoracic impedance; this may be due to inadequate sample size. Thus, current-based defibrillation is clinically feasible and effective. A larger study will be needed to test whether current-based defibrillation is superior to energy-based defibrillation.

Noninvasive prediction of efficacy of type IA antiarrhythmic drugs by the signal-averaged electrocardiogram in patients with coronary artery disease and sustained ventricular tachycardia.

This study attempted to determine if specific changes on the signal-averaged electrocardiogram (ECG) after type IA antiarrhythmic therapy are predictive of efficacy in the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT). Scalar and signal-averaged ECGs were obtained at baseline and after type IA drug therapy in 15 patients with coronary artery disease and inducible VT at baseline electrophysiologic testing. Signal-averaged QRS duration, root-mean-square amplitude in the last 40 ms of signal-averaged QRS, and the duration under 40 mu v of the signal-averaged QRS (low-amplitude signal), as well as ventricular effective refractory period at electrophysiologic study, and QTc on the scalar ECG were compared. At drug study, 6 patients (group A) had persistent but slower VT, whereas 9 (group B) had VT rendered noninducible. The baseline signal-averaged QRS duration was longer in group A than in B (136 +/- 10 vs 115 +/- 13 ms; p < 0.05), as was the scalar QRS (115 +/- 19 vs 98 +/- 11 ms; p < 0.05). After antiarrhythmic therapy, group A had a greater prolongation of both signal-averaged QRS (24 +/- 10 vs 8 +/- 3 ms; p < 0.05) and low-amplitude signal (31 +/- 13 vs 3 +/- 7 ms; p < 0.05), whereas group B had a greater increase in ventricular effective refractory period (49 +/- 20 vs 20 +/- 13 ms; p < 0.05) and corrected QT interval (100 +/- 39 vs 43 +/- 23 ms; p < 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ventricular tachycardia rate and morphology determine energy and current requirements for transthoracic cardioversion.

BACKGROUND: The electrical current and energy required to terminate ventricular tachyarrhythmias are known to vary by arrhythmia: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is generally considered to require less energy than ventricular fibrillation (VF). The hypothesis of our study was that current requirements for transthoracic termination of VT are further determined by VT rate and QRS complex morphology. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively studied 203 patients who received a total of 569 shocks for VT or VF by following a current-based protocol. This protocol recommended shocks for VT beginning at 18 A (70 +/- 22 J) and shocks for VF beginning at 25 or 30 A (137 +/- 52 J or 221 +/- 70 J). The ventricular tachyarrhythmias were subclassified as monomorphic VT (MVT): uniform QRS complex morphology on surface electrocardiogram and heart rate greater than 100 beats per minute; polymorphic VT (PVT): nonuniform QRS complex morphology and heart rate less than or equal to 300 beats per minute; or VF: nonuniform QRS complex morphology and heart rate greater than 300 beats per minute. We found that shocks of 18 A and 25 A for terminating MVT had success rates of 69% and 82%, respectively, whereas such low-current shocks were less successful for PVT (33% at 18 A) and for VF (19% at 18 A, 53% at 25 A). High-current shocks of 35 A and 40 A were equally successful for the three ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Subdividing MVT revealed that slower MVT (heart rate less than 200 beats per minute) had a significantly better success rate with low-current shocks of 18 A and 25 A than did faster MVT (greater than 200 beats per minute) (89% versus 72% success, p less than 0.01). Bundle branch block morphology, QRS axis, and duration of ventricular tachyarrhythmia did not alter current requirements. CONCLUSIONS: Heart rate and electrocardiographic degree of organization of ventricular tachycardia are important determinants of transthoracic energy and current requirements for cardioversion and defibrillation. Transthoracic termination of MVT requires relatively low current or energy, but PVT behaves more like VF and requires higher electrical current or energy.

Usefulness of isoproterenol in facilitating atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia during electrophysiologic testing.

In some patients with documented atrioventricular (AV) nodal supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), the arrhythmia is not inducible during a standard stimulation protocol. In these patients the level of sympathetic activity may be an important factor. This study evaluates the influence of isoproterenol on anterograde and retrograde pathway properties in patients with AV nodal SVT and the mechanism by which this SVT is facilitated. Group 1 consisted of 8 consecutive patients, ages 23 to 85 years (mean +/- standard error, 57 +/- 8) who had no inducible AV nodal SVT during electrophysiologic testing until isoproterenol (0.5 to 3.0 micrograms/min) was infused. These patients were compared with 6 patients in the same age range (45 to 78 years, mean +/- standard error, 64 +/- 5) who had inducible AV nodal SVT without isoproterenol and who comprised group 2. In comparing group 1 (before isoproterenol) with group 2, there was no significant difference in the refractory periods of the anterograde slow and fast pathways, although the anterograde block cycle length was longer in group 1 patients (421 +/- 18 vs 362 +/- 14 ms, p less than 0.05). The retrograde block cycle length was also longer in 7 of the 8 group 1 (before isoproterenol) patients in whom it could be measured versus those in group 2 (411 +/- 14 vs 318 +/- 27 ms, p less than 0.05). During isoproterenol, the anterograde and retrograde block cycle lengths in group 1 were not different from group 2. Therefore, AV nodal SVT may not be inducible in some patients during routine electrophysiologic testing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)