The role of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of oligometastatic disease in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To report about clinical outcome of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in the treatment of oligometastatic disease in elderly patients. METHODS: Patients with 1-4 inoperable metastases were treated with SBRT. Dose prescription ranged from 40 to 75 Gy in 3-8 fractions. SBRT was delivered using the volumetric modulated arc therapy technique with flattening filter-free photon beams. The primary end points were in-field local control (LC) and toxicity. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: 82 patients with 111 total metastases were treated. Median age was 79 years. 64 patients (78%) had a single lesion; the remaining patients had 2-4 lesions. 16 (14.4%) lesions were localized in the abdomen, 50 (45.0%) in the liver and 45 (40.5%) in the lungs. Local response was observed for 87 lesions (78.4%) while local progression was observed in 24 lesions (21.6%). Actuarial 1-year LC was 86.8% ± 3.3%. Actuarial 1-year OS was 93.6% ± 2.7%. 2-year findings were 76.3% ± 4.4% and 72.0% ± 5.6%, respectively. Actuarial 1- and 2-year DSS results were 97.5% ± 2.0% and 81.6% ± 4.9%, respectively. Treatment-related Grade 2-3 toxicity was observed in five patients (4.2%); Grade 1 toxicity in seven patients (5.9%) and no toxicity was observed in 85.4% of the cases. CONCLUSION: SBRT is a safe and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of oligometastatic disease in the elderly with acceptable rates of LC and low treatment-related toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The use of SBRT for oligometastatic disease in the elderly can be considered as a valuable approach, particularly for patients with fragile status or refusing other approaches.

Radiation therapy of anal canal cancer: from conformal therapy to volumetric modulated arc therapy.

BACKGROUND: To appraise the role of volumetric modulated arc (RapidArc, RA) in the treatment of anal canal carcinoma (ACC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis has been conducted on 36 patients treated with RA since 2009 comparing outcome against a group of 28 patients treated with conformal therapy (CRT). RA treatments were prescribed with SIB technique with 59.4 Gy to the primary tumor and nodes and 49.5 Gy to the elective nodes. CRT was sequentially delivered with 45 Gy to the pelvic target and a boost of 14.4 Gy to the primary tumor. RESULTS: Median age of patients was 65 yrs for RA (59 yrs for CRT); 90% had Stage II-III (93% in the CRT group). No statistically significant differences were observed concerning survival or control. 5 yrs disease specific survival was 85.7% and 81.2%, loco-regional control was of 78.1% and 82.1% for RA and CRT respectively. RA treatments lead to lower incidence of higher grade of toxicity events (all retrospectively retrieved from charts as worse events). Grade 2-3 toxicity, compared to CRT, reduced from 89% to 68% for GI, from 39% to 33% for GU and from 82% to 75% for the skin. Late toxicity was as follows: 5/36 (14%) and 3/36 (8%) patients had G1 or G2 GI toxicity in the RA group (1/28 (4%) and 4/28 (14%) in the CRT group). GU late toxicity was observed only in 4/28 (14%) patients of the CRT group: 3/28 (11%) had G2 and 1/28 (4%) had G1. CONCLUSIONS: RA treatments of ACC patients proved to be equally effective than CRT but it was associated to a reduction of toxicity.

Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) in inoperable oligometastatic disease from colorectal cancer: a safe and effective approach.

BACKGROUND: To assess the safety and efficacy of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) in oligometastatic patients from colorectal cancer. METHODS: 82 patients with 1-3 inoperable metastases confined to one organ (liver or lung), were treated with SABR for a total of 112 lesions in an observational study. Prescription dose ranged between 48 and 75 Gy in 3 or 4 consecutive fractions. Primary end-points were local control (LC), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end-point was toxicity. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24 months (range 3-47). One, two and three years LC rate was 90%,80% and 75% (85%,75% and 70% for lung and 95%, 90% and 85% for liver metastases; no statistically significance was found). The difference in LC between the subgroup of lesions treated with ≥ 60 Gy (n = 58) and those irradiated with <60 Gy (n = 52) was statistically significant, with a 1, 2 and 3 yrs LC of 97%,92% and 83% for the higher dose, compared to 85%,70% and 70% for the lower dose (p < 0.04). Median OS was 32 months. Actuarial OS rate at 1, 2 and 3 yrs was 85%,65% and 43%. Univariate analysis showed a correlation only between OS and cumulative GTV > 3 cm (p < 0.02). Median PFS was 14 months, with a PFS rate of 56% at 1 yr and 40% at 2-3 yrs, without correlation with the site and prescription dose (p < 0.48 and p < 0.56). No patients experienced radiation-induced liver disease or grade >3 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: SABR is a safe and feasible alternative treatment of oligometastatic colorectal liver and lung metastases in patients not amenable to surgery or other ablative treatments.

Outcome and toxicity profiles in the treatment of locally advanced lung cancer with volumetric modulated arc therapy.

PURPOSE: To report about the outcome of radiation treatment of advanced lung cancer patients with volumetric modulated arcs [RapidArc (RA)]. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive patients (all stages IIIA and IIIB) were treated with RA. Among them 71 % were men; 25.4 % presented unspecified non-small cell lung cancer, 41.3% adenocarcinoma and 33.3 % squamous cell carcinoma. Of them, 54.7 % received sequential chemotherapy while 45.3% were treated with concomitant regimen. Dose prescription ranged from 54 to 72 Gy. Analysis included survival, local control (LC) and toxicity profiles. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 21.2 months (range 6-75). One- two- and five-year actuarial LC was 91.9 ± 3.2, 79.5 ± 5.7 and 67.4 ± 9.5 %, respectively. Median survival was 19.0 ± 1.1 months. Actuarial survival at 1-2-5 years was 80.0 ± 4.6, 38.5 ± 5.9 and 15.2 ± 4.9 %, respectively. Acute toxicity of G2 was reported in 24, 25.3 and 4.0 % of patients for lung, esophageal and hematological profiles. A total of 2.7 % of patients reported G3 toxicity in the esophagus and 5.3 % of the patients experienced G3-G4 hematological toxicity. Significant differences were observed in all cases between concomitant and sequential chemotherapy regiments. Only 1.3 % (1 patient) showed G2 lung late toxicity. No significant correlation was found between toxicity and organ's irradiation levels. CONCLUSION: RA proved to be a safe and advantageous treatment modality for advanced lung cancer with results in line with expectations from earlier literature.