Impact of Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program Policy on 30-Day and 90-Day Readmissions in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: A 10-Year Trend From the National Readmissions Database.

Hospital readmissions following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) pose a significant economic burden on health care utilization. The hospital readmission reduction program (HRRP) enacted in 2012 focused on reducing readmissions by penalizing Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare hospitals. We aim to assess the trend of readmissions after AMI hospitalization between 2010 and 2019 and assess the impact of HRRP. The National Readmission Database was queried to identify AMI hospitalizations between 2010 and 2019. In the primary analysis, trends of 30-day and 90-day all-cause and AMI specific readmissions were assessed from 2010 to 2019. In the secondary analysis, trend of readmission means length of stay and mean adjusted total cost were calculated. There were a total of 592,015 30-day readmissions and 787,008 90-day readmissions after an index hospitalization for AMI between 2010 and 2019. The rates of 30-day and 90-day all-cause readmissions decreased significantly from 12.8% to 11.6%, (P = 0.0001) and 20.6 to 18.8, (P = 0.0001) respectively in the decade under study. With regards to HRRP policy intervals, the pre-HRRP period from 2010 to 2012 showed a downward trend in all-cause readmission (12.8% to 11.6%) and similarly a downward trend was also seen in the post HRRP period (2013-2015:11.0%-8.2%, 2016-2019-12.3-11.7%). Secondary analysis showed a trend towards increase in mean length of stay (4.54-4.96 days, P = 0.0001) and adjusted total cost ($13,449-$16,938) in 30-day all-cause readmission for AMI in the decade under review. In our National Readmission Database-based analysis of patients readmitted to hospitals within 30-days and 90-days after AMI, the rate of all-cause readmissions down trended from 2010 to 2019.

Systemic Sclerosis Is Associated With Increased Inpatient Mortality in Patients Admitted for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with and without systemic sclerosis (SSc). The primary outcome was odds of inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay, total hospital charges, rates of cardiovascular procedures, and treatments were secondary outcomes of interest. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 Database. The NIS was searched for hospitalizations for adult patients with ACS (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI], non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [NSTEMI], and unstable angina) as principal diagnosis with and without SSc as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were more than 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. There were 1,319,464 hospitalizations for adult patients with a principal International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code for ACS. There were 1155 (0.09%) of these hospitalizations that had SSc. The adjusted odds ratios for inpatient mortality for ACS, STEMI, and NSTEMI hospitalizations with coexisting SSc compared with those without SSc were 2.02 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-3.43; p = 0.009), 2.47 (95% CI, 1.05-5.79; p = 0.038), and 2.19 (95% CI, 1.14-4.23; p = 0.019), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Acute coronary syndrome hospitalizations with SSc have increased inpatient mortality compared with those without SSc. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and NSTEMI hospitalizations with SSc have increased inpatient mortality compared with STEMI and NSTEMI hospitalizations without SSc, respectively. Acute coronary syndrome hospitalizations with SSc have similar hospital length of stay, total hospital charges, rates of revascularization strategies (percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass surgery, and thrombolytics), and other interventions (such as percutaneous external assist device and intra-aortic balloon pump) compared with those without SSc.

Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Have Better Outcomes Than Non-Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients When Hospitalized for Ischemic Stroke: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for ischemic stroke with and without a secondary diagnosis of RA. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 database. The NIS was searched for hospitalizations for adult patients with ischemic stroke as principal diagnosis with and without RA as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes. The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of receiving tissue plasminogen activator, and mechanical thrombectomy were secondary outcomes of interest. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analyses were used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were more than 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Of 525,570 patients with ischemic stroke, 8670 (1.7%) had RA. Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke with RA had less inpatient mortality (4.7% vs. 5.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.85; p = 0.001), shorter LOS (5.1 vs 5.7 days, p < 0.0001), lower mean total hospital charges ($61,626 vs. $70,345, p < 0.0001), and less odds of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy (3.9% vs. 5.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.72; p < 0.0001) compared with those without RA. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalizations for ischemic stroke with RA had less inpatient mortality, shorter LOS, lower total hospital charges, and less likelihood of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy compared with those without RA. However, the odds of receiving tissue plasminogen activator were similar between both groups. Further studies to understand its mechanism would be helpful.

Outcomes of atrial fibrillation hospitalizations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a report from the national inpatient sample.

This study compares outcomes of patients admitted for atrial fibrillation (AF) with and without coexisting systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of undergoing ablation, pharmacologic cardioversion and electrical cardioversion were secondary outcomes of interest. Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 database. The NIS was searched for adult hospitalizations with AF as principal diagnosis with and without SLE as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. 821,630 hospitalizations were for adult patients, who had a principal diagnosis of AF, out of which, 2645 (0.3%) had SLE as secondary diagnosis. Hospitalizations for AF with SLE had similar inpatient mortality (1.5% vs 0.91%, adjusted OR (AOR): 1.0, 95% CI 0.47 to 2.14, p=0.991), LOS (4.2 vs 3.4 days, p=0.525), total hospital charges ($51,351 vs $39,121, p=0.056), odds of undergoing pharmacologic cardioversion (0.38% vs 0.38%, AOR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.22 to 3.69, p=0.880) and electrical cardioversion (12.9% vs 17.5%, AOR 0.87, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.15, p=0.324) compared with those without SLE. However, SLE group had increased odds of undergoing ablation (6.8% vs 4.2%, AOR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.3 to 2.7, p<0.0001). Patients admitted for AF with SLE had similar inpatient mortality, LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing pharmacologic and electrical cardioversion compared with those without SLE. However, SLE group had greater odds of undergoing ablation.

Systemic Sclerosis Is Associated With Increased Inpatient Mortality in Patients Admitted for Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of patients primarily admitted for atrial fibrillation (AFib) with and without a secondary diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). The primary outcome was inpatient mortality. Hospital length of stay (LOS), total hospital charges, odds of undergoing ablation, and electrical cardioversion were secondary outcomes of interest. METHODS: Data were abstracted from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2016 and 2017 Database. The NIS was searched for adult hospitalizations with AFib as principal diagnosis with and without SSc as secondary diagnosis using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariate logistic and linear regression analysis was used accordingly to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: There were over 71 million discharges included in the combined 2016 and 2017 NIS database. Of 821,630 AFib hospitalizations, 750 (0.09%) had SSc. The adjusted odds ratio for inpatient mortality for AFib with coexisting SSc compared with without coexisting SSc was 3.3 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-8.52; p = 0.014). Atrial fibrillation with coexisting SSc hospitalizations had similar LOS (4.2 vs 3.4 days; p = 0.767), mean total hospital charges ($40,809 vs $39,158; p = 0.266), odds of undergoing ablation (2.7% vs 4.2%; p = 0.461), and electrical cardioversion (12.0% vs 17.5%; p = 0.316) compared with without coexisting SSc. CONCLUSIONS: Patients admitted primarily for AFib with a secondary diagnosis of SSc have more than 3 times the odds of inpatient death compared with those without coexisting SSc. Hospital LOS, total hospital charges, likelihood of undergoing ablation, and electrical cardioversion were similar in both groups.