Does hyperthermic povidone-iodine lavage increase the apoptotic rate of residual cancer cell in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma?-a prospective pilot study.

Background: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an incurable, late presenting primary cancer, conferring a survival of 8-14 months. Different intrapleural treatments have been tested as part of a multimodality approach to treat a select group of patients with limited disease, increasing survival. Recently, povidone-iodine has been shown to induce apoptosis in microscopic tumour cells in vitro, with no reported complications. This is the first in vivo study assessing the apoptotic rate caused by intraoperative hyperthermic betadine lavage using routine immunohistochemistry combined with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Methods: We included surgically fit patients aged >18, undergoing minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) pleural biopsy between December 2016 and February 2018, for confirmed or presumed pleural malignancy. Parietal pleural biopsies were obtained at 7.5, 15 and 30 minutes after hyperthermic betadine lavage, and compared to pre-lavage biopsy samples, for apoptotic changes. Viable tumour samples underwent histological, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis as well as TEM for features of apoptosis. Results: N=6. Median age was 76 years. Median overall survival was 26.7 months. There was no statistical impact on survival of side of disease (left vs. right). There was no significant difference in expressions of markers of apoptotic index pre and post betadine treatment upon immunohistochemical analysis. There was no discernible effect on morphological features of apoptosis seen with betadine treatment, on TEM analysis. No side effects were identified post betadine lavage. Conclusions: Although hyperthermic betadine lavage is a safe antiseptic solution with no toxicity when performed intraoperatively, it confers no effect on apoptotic rate or necrosis. It is therefore unlikely that hyperthermic betadine lavage will have an impact on reducing the microscopic residual disease after pleurectomy decortication and enhancing survival.

Does Sleeve Gastrectomy Expose the Distal Esophagus to Severe Reflux?: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to appraise the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), esophagitis, and Barrett's esophagus (BE) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. BACKGROUND: The precise prevalence of new-onset or worsening GERD after SG is controversial. Subsequent esophagitis and BE can be a serious unintended sequalae. Their postoperative prevalence remains unclear. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies evaluating postoperative outcomes in primary SG for morbid obesity. The primary outcome was prevalence of GERD, esophagitis, and BE after SG. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate combined prevalence. RESULTS: A total of 46 studies totaling 10,718 patients were included. Meta-analysis found that the increase of postoperative GERD after sleeve (POGAS) was 19% and de novo reflux was 23%. The long-term prevalence of esophagitis was 28% and BE was 8%. Four percent of all patients required conversion to RYGB for severe reflux. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative prevalence of GERD, esophagitis, and BE following SG is significant. Symptoms do not always correlate with the presence of pathology. As the surgical uptake of SG continues to increase, there is a need to ensure that surgical decision-making and the consent process for this procedure consider these long-term complications while also ensuring their postoperative surveillance through endoscopic and physiological approaches. The long-term outcomes of this commonly performed bariatric procedure should be considered alongside its weight loss and metabolic effects.

Does the addition of postoperative radiotherapy to adjuvant chemotherapy offer any benefit in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and mediastinal lymphadenopathy?

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the addition of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) to adjuvant chemotherapy offers any benefit in patients undergoing curative resection for non-small cell lung cancer found to harbour mediastinal lymphadenopathy. A total of 77 papers were identified using the reported search, of which 11 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. Only studies reporting on survival data of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with and without PORT were included in this analysis. The authors, date, journal, country, study type, population, outcomes and key results are tabulated. Six studies reported a statistically significant positive impact of PORT on long-term or disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.048-0.0001). Five more studies found no difference in terms of survival between patients receiving and not receiving PORT. Among the 11 studies, only two were randomized controlled, with one of them reporting improved disease-free (P = 0.041) but not overall survival (P = 0.073), while the other finding no difference in survival. Furthermore, three more studies reported on DFS and/or locoregional recurrence of the disease. One of these studies reported a significantly improved DFS among patients receiving PORT (P = 0.003), while two of them reported a reduced rate of locoregional recurrence in this group (P = 0.032-0.009). Many studies report a positive effect of PORT when combined in parallel or sequentially with adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of long-term, disease free survival or locoregional control of the disease in patients who have undergone surgical resection of NSCLC and are found to harbour N2 disease. However, these reports are counterbalanced by an almost equal number of studies which show no difference between PORT and no PORT. Only one study reported significantly increased radiation related adverse effects in patients undergoing chemotherapy and PORT.