Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Int J Obstet Anesth ; 34: 28-36, 2018 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29366538

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Epidural re-siting is one of the significant events during labour epidural analgesia that may result in decreased patient satisfaction. The aim of our study was to investigate the incidence of and factors associated with epidural re-siting in parturients using epidural analgesia, with an emphasis on those with breakthrough pain. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 10170 parturients who received labour epidural analgesia. The primary outcome was the incidence of epidural re-siting (binary data). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to find associated risk factors for re-siting. RESULTS: Less than 1% (0.85%, 86/10170) of the women in the study had their epidural re-sited. Amongst the subset of women with breakthrough pain, the incidence of epidural re-siting was higher (4.7%, 68/1454). Most of the women who had their epidural re-sited had experienced breakthrough pain (79%, 68/86). Amongst all parturients, the presence of breakthrough pain (OR=21.31), hypotension (OR=4.18) and venous puncture (OR=2.74) were significantly associated with re-siting. Amongst the parturients with breakthrough pain who required epidural re-siting, lower cervical dilatation (OR=0.81), higher number of episodes of breakthrough pain (OR=1.83) and patchy block (OR=4.37) were significantly associated with re-siting. The areas-under-curves of two multivariate models were 0.894 and 0.806 respectively. CONCLUSION: In our institution, the incidence of epidural catheter re-siting was low in all patients. However, the majority of patients whose catheters were re-sited had exhibited breakthrough pain. The risk factors associated with the need for re-siting of catheters in all patients differed from those who had breakthrough pain.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Dor Irruptiva/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Irruptiva/epidemiologia , Posicionamento do Paciente/efeitos adversos , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Hipotensão/etiologia , Incidência , Gravidez , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
3.
Anaesthesia ; 73(4): 499-511, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29044483

RESUMO

Both isobaric and hyperbaric bupivacaine have been used for spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section, but it is not clear if one is better than the other. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness and safety of hyperbaric bupivacaine compared with isobaric bupivacaine administered during spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. We included 10 studies with 614 subjects in the analysis. There was no evidence of differences either in the risk of conversion to general anaesthesia, with a relative risk (95%CI) of 0.33 (0.09-1.17) (very low quality of evidence), or in the need for supplemental analgesia, the relative risk (95%CI) being 0.61 (0.26-1.41) (very low quality of evidence). There was also no evidence of a difference in the use of ephedrine, the amount of ephedrine used, nausea and vomiting, or headache. Hyperbaric bupivacaine took less time to reach a sensory block height of T4, with a mean difference (95%CI) of -1.06 min (-1.80 to -0.31). Due to the rarity of some outcomes, dose variability, use of adjuvant drugs and spinal technique used, future clinical trials should look into using adequate sample size to investigate the primary outcome of the need for supplemental analgesia.


Assuntos
Anestesia Obstétrica/métodos , Raquianestesia/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Bupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Cesárea , Anestesia Geral , Anestésicos Locais/química , Bupivacaína/química , Feminino , Humanos , Gravidez
4.
Anaesthesia ; 70(6): 691-8, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25627651

RESUMO

Hypotension occurs commonly during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section, associated with maternal and fetal adverse effects. We developed a double-vasopressor automated system with a two-step algorithm and continuous non-invasive haemodynamic monitoring using the Nexfin device. The system delivered 25 µg phenylephrine every 30 s when systolic blood pressure was between 90% and 100% of baseline, or 2 mg ephedrine at this blood pressure range and heart rate < 60 beats.min(-1) ; and 50 µg phenylephrine or 4 mg ephedrine when systolic blood pressure was < 90% of baseline with the same heart rate criterion. Fifty-seven women received standardised spinal anaesthesia. Twenty-seven (47.4%) had at least one reading of hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure < 80% baseline. Systolic blood pressure was within 20% of the baseline in a mean (SD) of 79.8 (20.9)% of measurements. Fifty-three (93.0%) women required phenylephrine before delivery while 10 (17.5%) required ephedrine. Six women (10.5%) experienced nausea and three (5.3%) vomited. The system was able to achieve a low incidence of maternal hypotension with good maternal and fetal outcomes.


Assuntos
Raquianestesia/instrumentação , Cesárea/instrumentação , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Monitorização Intraoperatória/instrumentação , Assistência Perioperatória/instrumentação , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Anestesia Obstétrica , Raquianestesia/métodos , Automação , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Cesárea/métodos , Efedrina/administração & dosagem , Efedrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Hipotensão/tratamento farmacológico , Recém-Nascido , Monitorização Intraoperatória/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Fenilefrina/administração & dosagem , Fenilefrina/uso terapêutico , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/epidemiologia , Gravidez , Complicações Cardiovasculares na Gravidez/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado da Gravidez , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Eur J Neurol ; 22(1): 150-5, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25142829

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Whilst there is evidence implicating small vessel cerebrovascular disease in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), its specific contribution to the pathophysiology of AD remains unclear. The burden of small vessel cerebrovascular disease visualized as white matter hyperintensity (WMH) and its association with medial temporal atrophy (MTA) at different stages of AD was studied. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-five cognitively normal (CN) community controls, 103 mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients, 141 mild AD patients and 68 moderate-severe AD patients were studied. Clinical, cognitive and risk factor data were collected, and WMH and MTA were quantified by trained raters. The Jonckheere-Terpstra test for ordered alternatives was used to study the association between WMH and MTA in different stages of AD. RESULTS: The burden of total WMH increased significantly with increasing severity of AD, even after correcting for confounders. The proportion of CN, MCI, mild AD and moderate-severe AD subjects with severe burden of WMH was 6.7%, 9.7%, 28.4%, and 39.7%, respectively. A strong positive association between WMH severity and MTA was evident amongst MCI (P = 0.011) and mild AD (P = 0.003) subjects, but not in CN (P = 0.953) and moderate-severe AD subjects (P = 0.301). CONCLUSIONS: The burden of WMH increased significantly from the stage of CN to MCI to AD. The association between WMH and MTA was greatest at the stage of MCI and mild AD. This has implications on the strategy to slow the progression of AD, where measures to reduce WMH, including control of vascular risk factors, need to be optimized at the stage of MCI and mild AD.


Assuntos
Doença de Alzheimer/patologia , Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais/patologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/patologia , Lobo Temporal/patologia , Substância Branca/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doença de Alzheimer/epidemiologia , Atrofia/epidemiologia , Atrofia/patologia , Doenças de Pequenos Vasos Cerebrais/epidemiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/epidemiologia , Comorbidade , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Singapura/epidemiologia
6.
JBI Libr Syst Rev ; 8(20): 793-825, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27820506

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is unclear if the use of external cooling to treat fever contributes to better patient outcomes. Despite this, it is a common practice to treat febrile patients using external cooling methods alone or in combination with pharmacological antipyretics. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness and complications of external cooling methods in febrile adults in acute care settings. INCLUSION CRITERIA: We included adults admitted to acute care settings and developed elevated body temperature.We considered any external cooling method compared to no cooling.We considered randomised control trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised trials and controlled trials with concurrent control groups SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched relevant published or unpublished studies up to October 2009 regardless of language. We searched major databases, reference lists, bibliographies of all relevant articles, and contacted experts in the field for additional studies. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, and retrieved all potentially relevant studies. CRITICAL APPRAISAL: Two reviewers independently conducted the assessment of methodological quality of included studies. DATA ANALYSIS: The results of studies where appropriate was quantitatively summarised. Relative risks or weighted mean difference and their 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the random effects model in Review Manager 5. For each pooled comparison, heterogeneity was assessed using the chi-squared test at the 5% level of statistical significance, with I statistic used to assess the impact of statistical heterogeneity on study results. Where statistical summary was not appropriate or possible, the findings were summarised in narrative form. RESULTS: We found six RCTs that compared the effectiveness and complications of external cooling methods against no external cooling. There was wide variation in the outcome measures between the included trials. We performed meta-analyses on data from two RCTs totalling 356 patients testing external cooling combined with antipyretics versus antipyretics alone, for the resolution of fever. The results did not show a statistically significant reduction in fever (relative risk 1.12, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.31; P=0.35; I =0%).The evidence from four trials suggested that there was no difference in the mean drop in body temperature post treatment initiation, between external cooling and no cooling groups. The results of most other outcomes also did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference. However summarising the results of five trials consisting of 371 patients found that the external cooling group was more likely to shiver when compared to the no cooling group (relative risk 6.37, 95% CI 2.01 to 20.11; P=0.61; I =0%).Overall this review suggested that external cooling methods (whether used alone or in combination with pharmacologic methods) were not effective in treating fever among adults admitted to acute care settings. Yet they were associated with higher incidences of shivering. These results should be interpreted in light of the methodological limitations of available trials. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Given the current available evidence, the routine use of external cooling methods to treat fever in adults may not be warranted until further evidence is available. They could be considered for patients whose conditions are unable to tolerate even slight increase in temperature or who request for them. Whenever they are used, shivering should be prevented. IMPLICATION FOR FURTHER RESEARCH: Well-designed, adequately powered, randomised trials comparing external cooling methods against no cooling are needed.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...