Explaining health care providers' perceptions about the integration of palliative care with primary health care; a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Easy access to palliative care is one of the basic needs of cancer patients, and this can be achieved by providing such services at the community level. One approach to provide community-based palliative care is to integrate it with primary health care (PHC). Considering the antiquity and extension of the PHC system in Iran and the importance of being aware of stakeholders' views in order to integrate a palliative care provision model into a country's health care system, we aimed to explain health care providers' perception of the integration of palliative care with PHC. METHODS: The present qualitative research was conducted using the conventional content analysis method in Iran from October 2016 to July 2020. The participants of the study included the stakeholders involved in providing palliative care to cancer patients, as well as PHC system experts. The participants were selected purposefully using the snowball sampling method. Data were collected through holding 21 semi-structured interviews and one focused group session and analyzed based on the method proposed by Lundman and Graneheim. RESULTS: Qualitative data analysis revealed three main categories and ten subcategories. The main categories included the health system's structure as an opportunity (with the subcategories of employing the network system for providing health services, establishment of a referral system, and establishment of the family physician program and manpower diversity), requirements (with the subcategories of the position of home care centers and their relationship with PHC, opioid use management, equipment management, financial support, and legal issues), and outcomes (with the subcategories of facilitated access to services and good death). CONCLUSION: Iran's health system possesses adequate infrastructure for providing palliative care to cancer patients within the context of PHC. Beside available opportunities, there are also problems that need to be resolved so that families can meet their patients' care needs and provide them with an easy death by having access to home-based palliative care.

Prevalence of HFE-related haemochromatosis and secondary causes of hyperferritinaemia and their association with iron overload in 1059 French patients treated by venesection.

BACKGROUND: Venesection is the key therapy in haemochromatosis, but it remains controversial in hyperferritinaemia with moderate iron accumulation. There is substantial evidence that the results of HFE genotyping are routinely misinterpreted, while elevated serum ferritin has become more frequent in recent years in white adult populations following the increase of obesity and metabolic traits. AIMS: To examine the reasons for prescribing venesection in 1,059 French patients during the period 2012-2015, determine the true prevalence of HFE-related haemochromatosis, and compare iron overload profiles between haemochromatosis and non-haemochromatosis patients. RESULTS: Only 258 of the 488 patients referred for haemochromatosis had the p.[Cys282Tyr];[Cys282Tyr] disease causative genotype (adjusted prevalence: 24.4%). Of the 801 remaining patients, 112 (14.0%) had the debated p.[Cys282Tyr];[His63Asp] compound heterozygote genotype, 643 (80.3%) had central obesity, 475 (59.3%) had metabolic syndrome (MetS) and 93 (11.6%) were heavy drinkers. The non-haemochromatosis patients started therapeutic venesection 9 years later than haemochromatosis patients (P < 0.001). Despite similar serum ferritin values, they had lower transferrin saturation (41.1% vs 74.3%; P < 0.001), lower amounts of iron removed by venesection (1.7 vs 3.2 g; P < 0.001) and lower hepatic iron concentrations (107 vs 237 µmol/g; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Haemochromatosis is over-diagnosed and is no longer the main reason for therapeutic venesection in France. Obesity and other metabolic abnormalities are frequently associated with mild elevation of serum ferritin, the MetS is confirmed in ~50% of treated patients. There is a minimal relationship between serum ferritin and iron overload in non-p.Cys282Tyr homozygotes. Our observations raise questions about venesection indications in non-haemochromatosis patients.

Developing an integrated model of community-based palliative care into the primary health care (PHC) for terminally ill cancer patients in Iran.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer commonly experience pain and suffering at the end of life days. Community-based palliative care can improve the quality of life of terminally-ill cancer patients and provide them with a merciful death. The purpose of this study was to develop an integrated model of community-based palliative care into PHC for terminally ill cancer patients. METHOD: This study is a health system research (HSR) that was conducted in three phases from October 2016 to July 2020. In the first phase, dimensions of community-based palliative care were explored in patients with cancer using qualitative methods and conventional content analysis. In the second phase, a scoping review was carried out to complete the collected data from the qualitative phase of the study. Based on the collected data in the first and second phases of the study, a preliminary draft of community-based palliative care was developed for patients with cancer based on the framework of the World Health Organization. Finally, the developed model was validated using the Delphi technique in the third phase of the study. RESULTS: Data analysis indicated that providing community-based care to patients with cancer is influenced by the context of care. According to the developed model, patients are identified as terminally ill, and then are referred to the local comprehensive health center in a reverse manner. After patients' referral, they can receive appropriate healthcare until death by the home care team in relation to the comprehensive health center based on the framework of primary healthcare. CONCLUSIONS: This model was developed based on the current Iranian healthcare structure and the needs of terminally ill cancer patients. According to the model, healthcare is provided in a reverse manner from the subspecialty centers to patients' homes in order to provide easy access to palliative care. It is suggested to use this model as a pilot at the regional level.

Exploring health care providers' perceptions about home-based palliative care in terminally ill cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: According to the World Health Organization, palliative care is one of the main components of healthcare. As the incidence of cancer is increasing in the world, home-based palliative care can be beneficial for many patients. This study was designed to explore health care providers' perceptions about home-based palliative care in terminally ill cancer patients. METHODS: This qualitative study was carried out using the conventional content analysis from October 2016 to September 2018 in Iran. Participants were home care providers who were selected using purposive sampling. The data were collected through 18 individual interviews, and a focus group meeting. Data were analyzed based on the method proposed by Lundman and Graneheim. RESULTS: from the data analysis, 511 initial codes were extracted, which were categorized into the two main categories of challenges and opportunities for home-based palliative care and 10 subcategories. The subcategories of challenges included deficiencies in inter-sectoral and inter-professional cooperation, lack of infrastructures for end-of-life care, challenges related to the management of death, challenges of transferring patients to home, providing non-academic palliative care, lack of political commitment of the government and Spiritual vacuum. The category of opportunities included subcategories of cost-effectiveness, moving towards socializing health, and structure of the health system. CONCLUSIONS: Home-based palliative care requires government and health system support. Structural and process modification in the healthcare can provide conditions in which terminally ill cancer patients receive appropriate care in home and experience death with dignity through support of family, friends and healthcare.

Blood products use in France: a nationwide cross-sectional survey.

BACKGROUND: Blood products use has increased in France between 2000 and 2011. To understand the reasons for this increase, data about transfused patients and transfusion practices needed to be updated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional survey was performed with health care establishments. Diagnoses and indication for the transfusion, pretransfusion laboratory results, and blood products used were collected during a randomly selected 24-hour period in 2011. All patients who received at least one blood product delivered on the survey day were included. RESULTS: A total of 10,794 blood products were requested for 4720 patients: 8688 red blood cell (RBC) units, 842 platelet (PLT) concentrates, and 1264 fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) units. Hematologic and cancer pathologies included 46% of transfused patients, 34% of the patients had transfusions in a surgical context, and 32.4% of transfused patients were receiving medication with an impact on transfusion. Nearly half of RBC transfusions were performed with hemoglobin levels of less than 8 g/dL. PLT transfusions for prophylactic indication were prescribed with PLT counts of less than 20 × 109 and 50 × 109 /L in 56.9 and 86.6% of patients, respectively. RBCs and PLTs transfusion practices were in agreement with national guidelines. FFP units were involved in 8.0% of all prescriptions. Among these, 57.4% were requested in the context of an acute hemorrhage and 8.4% for plasma exchange. The median of FFP use (n = 2) in a nonsurgical context, excluding plasma exchange, suggests an insufficient dosing of FFP. CONCLUSION: Except for insufficient FFP dosing per patient and limitations on assessment of indications for prescribing, transfusion practices were in agreement with national guidelines.