Bilaterally subluxed diffractive intraocular lenses: big expectations and even bigger comorbidities.

A 78-year-old woman with an ocular history of cataract surgery with a diffractive intraocular lens (IOL) in each eye has developed fluctuating vision, greater in the right eye than the left eye, after 4 years. She has a history of inactive central serous retinopathy and a vision potential of 20/25 + 2 in the right eye and 20/25 in the left eye. She has well-controlled diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia. She has enjoyed her spectacle independence for some time and wishes to have her vision restored. On examination, her uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 20/50 in the right eye and 20/25 in the left eye and her uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) was J3 in the right eye and J1 in the left eye. Intraocular pressures (IOPs) measured 22 mm Hg in the right eye and 18 mm Hg in the left eye. Pupils had limited reactivity with irregularity in the right eye but no obvious relative afferent pupillary defect. Motility and confrontation visual fields were unremarkable in both eyes. Retinal acuity meter was 20/20 in both eyes, and manifest refraction was plano -1.25 × 105 20/40, J3 in the right eye and +0.50 × 20/25, J1 in the left eye. Pertinent findings on slitlamp examination included temporal iris atrophy and transillumination defects greater in the right eye than the left eye, peripupillary pseudoexfoliative changes in both eyes, significant inferior subluxation of a diffractive 3-piece posterior chamber IOL in the capsular bag with lens-pitting peripherally and few central, moderate pseudophacodonesis, and an open posterior capsule in the right eye. In the left eye, she had mild inferior subluxation of a single-piece acrylic diffractive IOL in the capsular bag with moderate pseudophacodonesis and an open posterior capsule (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202403000-00019/figure1/v/2024-02-20T193212Z/r/image-tiff). All other anterior segment findings were unremarkable. On dilated posterior examination, she had a cup-to-disc ratio of 0.50 in the right eye and 0.65 in the left eye without edema hemorrhage or pallor. There were attenuated vessels in both eyes, posterior vitreous detachment in both eyes, and a few small drusen peripherally in both eyes. There was retinal pigment epithelium irregularity and dropout parafoveal in the right eye and subfoveal in the left eye (Figure 2). There was no evidence of macular edema, subretinal fluid, choroidal thickening, or neovascular membranes. The periphery was unremarkable in both eyes.JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202403000-00019/figure2/v/2024-02-20T193212Z/r/image-tiff What testing would you obtain preoperatively to help guide your decision-making? How would you counsel the patient regarding comorbid conditions and expectations?

Results of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Implantation in the Second Eye of Monofocal Pseudophakic Patients: A Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the visual results and patient satisfaction after implantation of an extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) in the second eye of patients implanted previously with a monofocal IOL in the first eye. METHODS: The medical records and self-reported questionnaires from patients who were implanted with monofocal IOLs in the first eye and EDOF IOLs in the second eye (group A) and from patients implanted bilaterally with EDOF IOLs (group B) were compared for visual acuity (VA), spectacle independence, patient satisfaction, and photic phenomena. RESULTS: Group A (23 eyes of 23 patients) had similar distance uncorrected VA and intermediate uncorrected VA compared with group B (72 eyes of 36 patients) (0.03±0.05 vs. 0.04±0.16; P =0.136 and 0.660, respectively). There was a tendency toward a better near uncorrected VA in group A compared with group B (0.15±0.14 vs. 0.23±0.17; P =0.074). Patients' perception of their VA was similar between groups. Spectacle independence for distance vision was reported by 16/17 (94.1%) and 35/36 (97.2%) patients ( P =0.543), 13/17 (76.5%) and 32/36 (88.9%) patients ( P =0.252) for intermediate vision, and 4/17 (23.6%) and 22/36 (61.1%) patients for near vision ( P =0.011), in groups A and B, respectively. There was no difference in complaints of photic phenomena between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients previously implanted with a monofocal IOL in 1 eye who are interested in improving their spectacle independence can be considered for an EDOF IOL implantation in the second eye and may have similar results to those implanted bilaterally with EDOF IOLs.

Iris color as a predictive factor for intraoperative floppy iris syndrome.

PURPOSE: To assess the influence of iris color on the predisposition for intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) during cataract surgery. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent cataract surgery in two medical centers between July 2019 and February 2020 were reviewed. Patients younger than 50 years, with preexisting ocular conditions affecting pupillary size or anterior chamber depth (ACD), and combined procedures were excluded. The remaining patients were questioned via telephone regarding their iris color. The association of IFIS occurrence and severity with iris color was tested using univariant and multivariant analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 155 eyes of 155 patients were included, 74 with documented IFIS and 81 without. The mean age was 74.03 ± 7.09 years, and 35.5% were female. The most common iris color among study eyes was brown (110/155, 70.97%), followed by blue (25/155, 16.13%) and green (20/155, 12.90%). Compared to brown-colored eyes, blue irises exhibited a 4.50-fold risk for IFIS (OR = 4.50, 95% CI: 1.73-11.70, p = 0.002), and green irises 7.00-fold risk (OR = 7.00, 95% CI: 2.19-22.39, p = 0.001). After adjusting for possible confounders, the results remained statistically significant (p < 0.01). Light-colored irises tended to exhibit a more severe IFIS compared to the brown iris group (p < 0.001). IFIS bilaterality was also affected by iris color (p < 0.001), with a 10.43-fold risk for fellow eye IFIS in the green iris group compared to eyes with brown irises (OR = 10.43, 95% CI: 3.35-32.54, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Light iris color was associated with a significantly increased risk of IFIS occurrence, severity, and bilaterality on univariate and multivariate analysis in this study.

Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy.

INTRODUCTION: Implantation of toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is still considered relatively contraindicated, without sufficient clinical evidence. Therefore, this study was designed to evaluate the results of toric IOL implantation in patients with FECD. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study of 28 eyes of FECD patients and 84 eyes of healthy control patients who received toric IOLs during routine cataract surgery was performed. The outcome measures were uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent, and refractive residual astigmatism. RESULTS: The mean postoperative uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes were 0.15 ± 0.14 vs. 0.13 ± 0.17, respectively (P = 0.32), and 0.05 ± 0.08 vs. 0.06 ± 0.10, respectively (P = 0.95). The spherical equivalent in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes was - 0.29 ± 0.43 vs. - 0.21 ± 0.50, respectively (P = 0.19). The preoperative corneal centroid astigmatism in the FECD eyes compared to the control eyes was 0.85 D@93° ± 2.42° vs. 0.23 D@68° ± 2.50°, respectively (P = 0.43), and the mean preoperative corneal astigmatism magnitude was 2.26 ± 1.1 D vs. 2.28 ± 1.03 D, respectively (P = 0.82). A trend toward higher postoperative refractive centroid astigmatism was found in the FECD eyes compared with the control eyes: 0.24 D@28° ± 0.57° vs. 0.03 D@127° ± 0.53°, respectively (P = 0.09). However, the mean refractive astigmatism magnitude was similar in FECD eyes and the healthy control eyes: 0.52 ± 0.31 D vs. 0.42 ± 0.31 D, respectively (P = 0.44) (D diopters). CONCLUSION: The postoperative refractive astigmatism (both centroid astigmatism and mean magnitude astigmatism) was no higher than 0.52 D in both groups. Therefore, FECD patients without corneal edema can be considered for toric IOLs.

Comparison of the Barrett toric calculator using measured and predicted posterior corneal astigmatism and the Kane and Abulafia-Koch calculators.

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of the Barrett toric calculator with measured and predicted posterior corneal astigmatism (MPCA and PPCA, respectively), the Abulafia-Koch (AK) formula, and the toric Kane formula. SETTING: Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. METHODS: Consecutive cases of patients who underwent uneventful cataract extraction surgery with implantation of a toric intraocular lens between March 2015 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. 1 eligible eye from each patient was included. The predicted postoperative refractive astigmatism was calculated using each method and compared with the postoperative refractive astigmatism to give the prediction error. RESULTS: 80 eyes of 80 patients were included in this study. The mean centroid and the mean and median absolute prediction errors using Kane (0.25 diopters [D] ± 0.54 @ 6 degrees, 0.50 D ± 0.31 and 0.45 D, respectively) were significantly different compared with MPCA (0.12 D ± 0.52 @ 16 degrees, P < .001, .44 D ± 0.28 and 0.36 D, P = .027, respectively), PPCA (0.09 D ± 0.49 @ 12 degrees, P < .001, .41 D ± 0.27 and 0.35 D, P < .001, respectively), and AK (0.11 D ± 0.49 @ 11 degrees, P < .001, .42 D ± 0.27 and 0.35 D, P = .004, respectively). No significant differences were found between the calculators in the predictability rates within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, ±0.75 D, and ±1.00 D. CONCLUSIONS: The measured posterior corneal curvature in the Barrett calculator yielded comparable outcomes to its prediction by the Barrett and AK formulas. The Kane calculator showed a slight against-the-rule prediction error compared with the other methods, resulting in a small higher median absolute error with marginal clinical importance.

Femtosecond Laser Capsulotomy in Previous Radial Keratotomy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to describe clinical experience using femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy in eyes with previous radial keratotomy. METHODS: Eyes of patients with previous radial keratotomy and cataract-related vision impairment who underwent phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were retrospectively reviewed. Eyes with any vision impairment cause other than cataract or previous radial keratotomy were excluded. RESULTS: Sixteen postradial keratotomy eyes were included. In 5 patients, manual anterior capsulectomy was successfully performed. Six eyes underwent femtosecond laser capsulotomy using routine parameters (incision depth 500 µm and 4 µJ power), of which in 3 eyes capsulotomies were complete, whereas in the other 3 eyes incomplete capsulotomy was evident. In 3 patients, both incision depth and power parameters were doubled (incision depth 1000 µm and 8 µJ power), whereas in 2 patients, only the pulse energy was doubled (8 µJ power) and in all 6 cases, the capsulotomy was successfully completed. At the last follow-up, all capsulotomies were intact without radial tears, and the intraocular lenses were stable and central. CONCLUSIONS: Radial corneal scars after previous radial keratotomy may interfere with femtosecond laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy using routine parameters. Surgeons should be alert and ready to convert to manual anterior capsulectomy. Modification of the laser parameters may overcome this potential complication.

Clinical outcomes of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy.

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is considered a contraindication for the implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs, without sufficient corroborating evidence. A Retrospective, case-control study. Nineteen eyes of ten patients with grade 2-5 FECD (study group) and 57 healthy eyes of 57 patients (control group) who underwent cataract surgery with implantation of presbyopia-correcting IOLs, at the Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, were included. The target refraction was emmetropia for both groups. Two subgroups of IOLs were analyzed separately: extended depth of focus (EDOF), (9 eyes of FECD patients and 27 eyes of control patients) and multifocal IOLs (10 eyes of FECD patients and 30 eyes of control patients). Main outcome measures were visual acuity and refraction 6 weeks after the surgery. Secondary outcomes were patient perceptions of visual acuity, spectacle independence, photic phenomena and satisfaction scores, reported in a self-assessment questionnaire. FECD patients in the EDOF IOL subgroup had inferior uncorrected distance visual acuity (P = 0.007) and better uncorrected near visual acuity (P = 0.001) compared to the controls. They had less spectacle independence for the intermediate range (P = 0.01) and overall (P = 0.006). However, they did not have more photic phenomena. In the multifocal IOL subgroup, no significant differences were found between the FECD and the control group in visual acuity for all ranges and in spectacle independence. FECD patients had more photic phenomena than the controls (P = 0.006), but it did not interfere with daily life activities. There was no difference in post-operative mean spherical equivalent, patient reported visual perception, and general satisfaction between FECD and control patients in both groups. Our results suggest that presbyopia-correcting IOLs can be carefully considered in patients with grade 2-5 FECD, with slightly inferior results compared with healthy eyes.

Assessment of long-term visual outcomes in aphakic children wearing scleral contact lenses.

BACKGROUND: Timely management of aphakic children is critical for the rehabilitation of adequate visual gain. This study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy of scleral contact lenses in terms of visual outcomes, complications, and compliance in aphakic children. METHODS: Retrospective data review of children with congenital or acquired cataract, or subluxated crystalline lenses, who underwent lensectomy from 2004 to 2018 and who used scleral contact lenses for refractive correction. Collected data from the follow up period included recorded aphakic refraction and visual acuity, complications following scleral contact lens wear documented in the clinic and ophthalmic emergency room and compliance to lens wear according to parental feedback on every visit in the clinic. RESULTS: 76% of cases, with final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 or better achieved in seventeen eyes (34%). The rate of amblyopia was 50%. Strabismus developed in 56% of children, and those had less favourable visual outcomes (0.43 ± 0.4 LogMAR without strabismus and 0.8 ± 0.5 LogMAR with strabismus, p = 0.015). No corneal infections were documented during the follow up. Main adverse effect on the ocular surface was superficial punctate keratopathy (n = 16). Compliance was good in 48 children (96%)- except for two cases, the scleral lenses were tolerated well by all children. CONCLUSION: Scleral contact lenses are an effective means of visual rehabilitation in aphakic children after lensectomy and may be used long-term with good compliance of wear, excellent visual outcomes, and tolerable adverse events.

The effect of hypotensive drugs on intraocular lenses clarity.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of hypotensive drugs on light absorbance, discoloration, opacification and precipitate formation of IOLs. METHODS: In this laboratory study, four types of IOLs (two hydrophilic-acrylic-L1 and L2, and two hydrophobic-acrylic-B1 and B2) were soaked in solutions containing Timolol-maleate 0.5%, Dorzolamide 2%, Brimonidine-tartrate 0.2%, Latanoprost 0.005%, Brimonidine-tartrate/Timolol-maleate 0.2%/0.5% and Dorzolamide/Timolol-maleate 2%/0.5%. Non-treated IOLs and IOLs soaked in balanced salt solution (BSS) served as controls. All Treated lenses were sealed in containers and placed in an oven at 82 degrees Celsius for 120 days. Each IOL was examined using four different techniques: light microscopy imaging, light absorbance measurements at 550 nanometers through the optic's center, assessment of by a scanning electron microscope (SEM), and energy dispersive Xray spectrometry (EDX). RESULTS: Ninety-eight IOLs were included. All BSS-soaked IOLs appeared clear with no significant discoloration or precipitate-formation. Light absorbance in these lenses was comparable to that of non-soaked, non-heated IOLs. No calcium or phosphate were detected in either of these groups. Light absorbance differed significantly between the four treated IOL types. The drops most affecting light absorbance differed between IOLs. Gross examination revealed brown and yellow discoloration of all IOLs soaked in Dorzolamide and Brimonidine-tartrate solutions, respectively. SEM demonstrated precipitates that differed in size, morphology and distribution, between different IOL-solution combinations. EDX's demonstrated the presence calcium and phosphor in the majority of precipitates and the presence of sulfur in brown discolored IOLs. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro, interactions between hypotensive drugs and IOLs induce changes in light absorbance, discoloration and precipitate formation.

Deviation from the planned axis of three toric intraocular lenses.

In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the deviation from the planned axis of 3 Toric intraocular lenses (TIOL). Included in the study 190 eyes, operated by two surgeons using two different manual marking techniques. The patients were implanted with either AcrySof IQ Toric SN6AT (Alcon) (n = 90), POD FT (PhysIOL) (n = 50), or TECNIS Symfony Toric (J&J) (n = 50). At least 1 month postoperatively, the IOL was photographed, and the axis was measured using a designed software. The difference between the planned and actual axis was defined as axis deviation. The effect of IOL type, astigmatism direction, and marking techniques on the average degree and direction of the IOL deviation were evaluated and compared. There was no significant difference in the average deviation between the IOLs (TECNIS Symfony: 4.03° ± 4.34, POD FT: 3.52° ± 3.38, and SN6AT: 4.24° ± 4.10), and its direction (55.8%, 39.0%, and 56.6% clockwise (CW) deviation, respectively). With the rule, astigmatism had significantly more CW deviation compared with against the rule and oblique astigmatism (64.3%, 43.8%, and 41.7%, respectively, P = 0.027), but the average deviation was similar. The marking techniques did not influence the degree or direction of the deviation.

Decompensated cornea with epithelial and stromal edema.

A 66-year-old patient underwent surgery for congenital cataract in both eyes in her first year of life without implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL). In 1994, at the age of 39 years, both eyes received secondary Kelman multiflex-style angle-fixated anterior chamber IOLs (AC IOLs). The surgeries were followed by retinal detachments in both eyes, in the left eye in the same year and in the right eye 4 years later, which were successfully repaired. The patient presented with a decompensated cornea with epithelial and stromal edema in the left eye. The AC IOL axis was oriented from 5- to 8-o'clock position with the haptic contacting the cornea. The distal portion of the inferior-nasal haptic was deeply buried and entrapped in a broad iridocorneal synechia extending between 6- and 8-o'clock positions. The synechia also caused adjacent pupillary distortion and pigment leaf eversion (Figure 1JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202205000-00021/figure1/v/2022-04-22T173532Z/r/image-tiff). The AC IOL in the right eye was well positioned, and the cornea was clear with an endothelial cell count (ECC) of 2160 cells/mm2 and central corneal thickness (CCT) of 650 µm. No ECC was obtainable in the left eye, and CCT was 775 µm (Figure 2JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202205000-00021/figure2/v/2022-04-22T173532Z/r/image-tiff). Visual acuity was 0.8 corrected in the right eye and hand motion in the left eye. Both eyes were normotonic. On optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, a broad iridocorneal synechia was visible with a canal corresponding to the deeply buried haptic end of the AC IOL (Figure 3JOURNAL/jcrs/04.03/02158034-202205000-00021/figure3/v/2022-04-22T173532Z/r/image-tiff). Abundant condensed cortical material (Soemmerring's ring) was found behind the iris and above the ciliary body. What would be your surgical options to rehabilitate the patient's left eye considering corneal decompensation caused by haptic contact of an angle-fixated AC IOL and capture of 1 haptic within an iridocorneal synechia extending along 2 clock hours?

Trans-optic suture fixation of malpositioned intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To report a technique for fixating posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCIOLs) to the sclera by passing sutures through the lens material. METHODS: Cases in which PCIOLs were fixated to the sclera using trans-optic sutures were included in this series. Intra and post-operative complications were recorded, and lens position was assessed using slit-lamp examination. RESULTS: Fourteen cases were included in this series. In nine cases, the procedure was performed using 9-0 polypropylene in pseudophakic eyes to correct subluxation, centration, tilt or to replace a broken haptic. In five cases, this technique was used for primary PCIOL fixation using a flanged 6-0 polypropylene suture in aphakic eyes. In all cases, the lenses remained centered and stable at the end of follow-up, and no post-operative complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Trans-optic suturing is a safe and effective alternative method for fixation of IOLs in a variety of pseudophakic and aphakic clinical scenarios.

Visual Performance of a Novel Optical Design of a New Multifocal Intraocular Lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the optical performance and quality of vision of a novel optical design of a new trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) using a proprietary modified algorithm. METHODS: In this prospective, non-randomized, single-armed, single-center, open-label study, a total of 20 patients (40 eyes) who were candidates for multifocal lens implantation were recruited for implantation with the multifocal Intensity SL IOL (Hanita Lenses). Evaluation performed at 1 and 7 to 10 days and 1 and 3 months after implantation included corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuities at far, intermediate (80 cm), and near (40 cm). Monocular and binocular visual acuities, defocus curves, and contrast sensitivity were measured and questionnaires for grading subjective visual quality, satisfaction, and visual function were provided. RESULTS: Three months postoperatively, monocular uncorrected visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near averaged 0.03 ± 0.11, 0.09 ± 0.09, and -0.22 ± 0.09 logMAR, respectively (Snellen 20/21.4, 20/24.6, and 20/12). Corrected monocular visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near averaged -0.07 ± 0.06, 0.03 ± 0.09, and -0.25 ± 0.07 logMAR (20/17, 20/21.4, and 20/11.2), respectively. Binocular corrected visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near was -0.1 ± 0.06, -0.02 ± 0.09, and -0.28 ± 0.04 logMAR (20/15.8, 20/19, and 20/10.5), respectively. Contrast sensitivity was similar to the normal population in photopic and mesopic conditions. Defocus curves showed that this IOL provided visual acuity of 20/28.9 or better between a defocus of +1.00 and -3.50 diopters. The Visual Function Index-14 questionnaire showed that patients reported high satisfaction. Patients specifically noted good quality of vision at near and intermediate distances. CONCLUSIONS: The Intensity SL IOL can provide good quality distance, intermediate, and particularly strong near vision after cataract surgery and independence from spectacles with good patient satisfaction. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(3):150-157.].

Preoperative atropine and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for the prevention of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome.

PURPOSE: To examine the efficacy of preoperative administration of topical atropine 1% and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for prevention of intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent cataract surgery by phacoemulsification between July 2019 and February 2020 in two hospitals were included. Both hospitals are located in central Israel, have similar patient demographics and employ similar surgical techniques. They, however, differ in policy of IFIS prevention. In Meir Medical Center no preventive medications are given pre-operatively, while in Shamir Medical Center patients at-risk for IFIS receive topical atropine 1% once daily and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) thrice daily for 3 days preoperatively. RESULTS: Overall, 207 eyes of 207 patients with history of alpha-antagonist use were included. Mean age was 74.9 ± 7.8 years and 82.1% (n = 170) were male. Among patients from the pretreating center 86.8% (n = 92/106) were pre-treated with either NSAIDs or atropine preoperatively, while in the non-pretreating center no treatment was prescribed (n = 0/101). IFIS rate among the non-pretreating center was 29.7% (n = 30/101) compared to 15.1% (n = 16/106) in the pretreating center (p = 0.012). When strictly comparing treated to untreated patients, the treated group had an IFIS rate of 12.0% compared to 30.4% among untreated (p = 0.001). Adjusted for age and gender results remain consistent (odds ratio 0.329 for treated patients, 95% confidence interval: 0.150-0.720; p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: IFIS rates were significantly lower in the pretreating center compared to the non-pretreating center. When comparing strictly treated to untreated patients, differences were even more pronounced.

Second-generation capsular anchor for subluxated lenses: first clinical results.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of the second-generation capsular anchor in the treatment of subluxated crystalline and synthetic intraocular lenses. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel. DESIGN: Prospective interventional study. METHODS: This study evaluated the second-generation capsular anchor, a 3D poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular implant designed to anchor the lens capsule to the sclera. All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Corrected distance visual acuity, lens centration, and lens tilt were assessed at the final follow-up of 3 months. RESULTS: 10 eyes of 10 patients were included in this study. Mean age was 56.2 (22 to 87) years. The reasons for the lack of zonular support were pseudoexfoliation in 3 cases, trauma in 3 cases, and Marfan, ectopia lentis, and pathologic myopia (1 case each). In 1 case, pseudoexfoliation and a history of recent trauma coexisted. 8 of the 10 surgeries were due to subluxation of crystalline lenses and 2 due to subluxation of intraocular lenses. Vision improved in all patients after surgery. Centration of the IOLs was excellent in all patients at the third postoperative month. One patient developed a retinal detachment at the third postoperative week and underwent successful surgery, and 1 patient developed macular edema at the fifth postoperative month, which resolved with topical medication. CONCLUSIONS: The second-generation capsular anchor, designed to provide significant improvements over the first-generation device, is effective in fixating the capsular bag to the scleral wall in cases with inadequate capsular support.

Outcomes of first 50 cases using a new pupil expander.

PURPOSE: To describe the initial experience with the Assia Pupil Expander 200 (APX-200, APX Ophthalmology) in eyes that underwent phacoemulsification or intraocular lens repositioning surgery that required mechanical pupil expansion. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, Kfar-Saba, and Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel Aviv, Israel. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: The APX-200 is a single-use device, intended for mechanical expansion of the pupil during intraocular surgery. Two devices are inserted through 2 opposite 19-gauge incisions using designated forceps. The surgical course and early postoperative follow-up was recorded in 50 eyes. RESULTS: The study included 50 consecutive eyes, with mean preoperative pupil diameter was 3.7 mm. The APX effectively dilated the pupils in all cases. No complication related to the use of the APX such as hyphema, iridodialysis, or Descemet membrane detachment were noted in this series. A central and round pupil was restored in all eyes at 1-month postoperatively, with 14 eyes (28%) having mild sphincter tears. Pupilloplasty was not required in any of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: The APX-200 was an effective and safe device for pupil expansion during intraocular surgery.

Toric intraocular lens power calculation in cataract patients with keratoconus.

PURPOSE: Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation in eyes with keratoconus typically results in hyperopic postoperative refractive error. The purpose of this study was to investigate the visual and refractive outcomes in patients with keratoconus having cataract surgery with a toric IOL and compare IOL power calculation accuracy of conventional formulas and keratoconus-specific formulas. SETTING: Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel. DESIGN: Retrospective case-series study. METHODS: Postoperative visual acuity and manifest refraction were examined. The error in predicted refraction and IOL power calculation accuracy within a range of 0.50 to 2.00 diopters (D) were compared between different IOL calculating formulas. RESULTS: 32 eyes with keratoconus were included. Visual acuity improved in all cases, and subjective astigmatism decreased from -2.95 ± 2.10 D to -0.95 ± 0.80 D (P < .001). The mean absolute errors were as follows: Barrett True-K formula for keratoconus with measured or predicted posterior corneal power, 0.34 D; Barrett Universal II formula, 0.64 D; Kane formula, 0.69 D; Kane formula for keratoconus, 0.49 D; SRK/T formula, 0.56 D; Haigis formula, 0.72 D; Holladay 1 formula, 0.71 D, and Hoffer Q formula, 0.87 D. Barrett True-K formula with measured posterior corneal power, SRK/T formula, and Kane formula for keratoconus resulted in a prediction error within ±0.50 D of 87.5%, 59.4%, and 53.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cataract removal with a toric IOL significantly improves visual acuity and decreases astigmatism in keratoconic eyes with a topographic central relatively regular astigmatic component. Keratoconus-specific formulas resulted in lower mean error in predicted refraction compared with conventional calculating formulas. Using the posterior corneal power within the Barrett True-K formula for keratoconus improved IOL power prediction accuracy.

Intraocular foreign body and traumatic cataract removal 65 years after penetrating trauma.

We report a case of successful intraocular foreign body/traumatic cataract removal and anterior segment reconstruction surgery of a patient's eye that suffered penetrating injury 65 years earlier. Surgery was not recommended by ophthalmologists that she had earlier consulted. The patient opted for surgery to improve cosmesis due to leukocoria, but the level of regained vision exceeded expectations of both the patient and the surgeon. This case adds further evidence that the duration of occlusion time has no effect on visual potential in patients out of amblyogenic age. The ethical considerations of operating on such an eye with poor prognosis after traumatic injury are also discussed. To our knowledge, our patient has the longest reported duration (65 years) between the time of injury and successful surgery with good outcome.

Pars plana vitrectomy for posteriorly dislocated intraocular lenses: risk factors and surgical approach.

PURPOSE: To present updated risk factors, anatomical and visual outcomes and a surgical approach to posteriorly dislocated intraocular lenses (IOL). METHODS: A retrospective case series review of patients presenting with posteriorly dislocated IOL to the vitreous was performed. All cases were managed surgically with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) followed by IOL repositioning and refixation or IOL exchange. Clinical characteristics, risk factors for IOL dislocation, visual outcomes and intraoperative and postoperative complications were investigated. RESULTS: Forty patients with posteriorly dislocated IOL underwent 3-port PPV and lens retrieval at an average of 6.5 years after cataract surgery. The main causes of IOL dislocation were previous PPV, myopia, pseudoexfoliation syndrome, ocular trauma and recurrent intravitreal injections. The existing IOL was repositioned and secured in 90% of the cases. Visual acuity improved in 34 patients, maintained in 5 and deteriorated in 1. All IOLs were central and stable at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: Posterior intraocular lens dislocation is becoming more prevalent. The main underlying causes found in this series were previous vitrectomy, myopia and recurrent intra-vitreal substance injections. Visual acuity improved in most cases after lens repositioning; however visual outcome is often limited due to associated ocular co-morbidities despite adequate lens position. Despite complete lack of zonular support, a posteriorly dislocated IOL can often be preserved by repositioning and fixation of the lens in the posterior chamber. Pathologies primarily associated with this type of lens malposition include history of vitrectomy, high myopia and multiple intravitreal substance injections.

Late spontaneous posterior capsule rupture after hydrophilic intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To describe and discuss the presentation and management of 4 cases of late (17 to 20 years) postoperative spontaneous posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and intraocular lens (IOL) subluxation in eyes implanted with the same hydrophilic 1-piece IOL. SETTING: Center for Applied Eye Research, Meir Medical Center and the Ein-Tal Eye Center, Israel. DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Four patients presented with spontaneous rupture and posterior dislocation of the same design IOL (B-Lens) 17 to 20 years after implantation. No trauma or any other direct causative factor was identified in any of the cases. RESULTS: Of the 4 cases reported, the IOLs were successfully repositioned to the ciliary sulcus and sutured to the scleral wall (1 case) or the iris (2 cases), and the IOL was stable in the sulcus without the need for further sutured fixation in 1 case, with effective vision restored in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous PCR is a rare postoperative complication and has not been reported, to the authors' knowledge, in cases without predisposing factors. A mechanism of late capsular tear was not confirmed, but the specific design of the IOL might have been a contributing factor.