Quality of an Informed Consent Prior to a Surgical Intervention? Experience of a Teaching Hospital.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how far the information given by the physicians for the informed consent prior to the surgical intervention is comprehended by the patients. METHODS: The study was carried out between July 1(st), 2012 and July 1(st), 2013 at Gulhane Medical Faculty. A total of 400 patients, who were in the third postoperative day after various surgical procedures (orthopedics, urology, ophthalmology, plastic surgery and breast surgery), were included in the study. RESULTS: Of all the patients, 73.5% stated that the operative information was provided by physicians, whereas 22.7% claimed that no information was given in this regard. The patients who knew the name of the disease was 78%, while 18.3% did not know. Of all the patients, 25.7% knew the name of the operation, in contrast to of 52.3% who did not know it. About 12.5% of patients stated that they were not informed about the likely complications during the surgery, whereas 13.7% of patients reported that they were not informed about the post-operative complications. CONCLUSION: The verbal information and the written texts, different approaches such as drawings and visual materials (i.e. video's and photographs) should be considered while providing information to the patients. While doing so the level of education of the community should also be taken into account.

What do patients expect from their physicians? Qualitative research on the ethical aspects of patient statements.

This study aimed to examine the thoughts and expectations of patients receiving healthcare from their physicians and evaluate the ethical aspects of these thoughts and expectations. To determine the ethical aspects of the thoughts and expectations of patients, an open-ended question was asked on the web page of the Turkish Armed Forces (TAF) Health Care Command, which is accessible to the users of the TAF intranet system (the internet system used within TAF institutions). The participants were asked to express their thoughts in their own words. A total of 804 participants answered the question by providing their input. The statements of the participants were classified separately by two public health specialists. The classification was made in accordance with the basic principles of patient rights, and they were collected under various headings including expectations about respect and care, good communication, informed consent, and fair and non-privileged distribution of healthcare services. The results show that patients tend to consider the physicians they see as solely responsible for all the negative issues that they encounter during their healthcare. This indicates that there is a need for extensive research on the underlying factors involved in the negative thoughts and feelings toward healthcare professionals in both TAF and Turkey in general.

Military medical graduates' perceptions of organizational culture in Turkish military medical school.

Organizational culture is the term used to describe the shared beliefs, perceptions, and expectations of individuals in organizations. In the healthcare environment, organizational culture has been associated with several elements of organizational experience that contribute to quality, such as nursing care, job satisfaction, and patient safety. A range of tools have been designed to measure organizational culture and applied in industrial, educational, and health care settings. This study has been conducted to investigate the perceptions of military medical graduates on organizational culture at Gülhane Military Medical School. A measurement of organizational culture, which was developed by the researchers from Akdeniz University, was applied to all military medical graduates in 2004. This was a Likert type scale that included 31 items. Designers of the measurement grouped all these items into five main dimensions in their previous study. The items were scored on a five-point scale anchored by 1: strongly agree and 5: strongly disagree. Study participants included all military physicians who were in clerkship training period at Gulhane Military Medical Academy in 2004. A total of 106 graduates were accepted to response the questionnaire. The mean age of participants was 25.2 +/- 1.1. At the time of study only 8 (7.5%) graduates were married. The study results have showed that the measurement tool with 31 items had a sufficient reliability with a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.91. Factor analysis has resulted a final measurement tool of 24 items with five factors. Total score and the scores of five subdimensions have been estimated and compared between groups based on living city and marital status. The study has shown the dimension of symbol received positive perceptions while the dimension of organizational structure and efficiency received the most negative perceptions. GMMS has a unique organizational culture with its weak and strong aspects. Conducting this kind of studies contribute to improve organizational culture in order to increase educational and research capability.

Turkish military personnel's expectations for health care services provided to them.

OBJECTIVE: The goal was to determine the expectations of patients using the health care services provided in the health care institutions of Turkish Armed Forces (TAF). METHODS: This study was performed between August 2002 and March 2003, with an open-ended question placed on the World Wide Web site of TAF Health Command. The framework was an intranet, which is a special Internet structure across the TAF institutions. Eight hundred four TAF personnel answered by typing their own words in response to the open-ended question. RESULTS: In the data obtained from this study, the participants' expectations focused more on the behaviors they encountered during utilization of the services, the health care personnel-patient relationship, and the services provided by the personnel, rather than the technical options and opportunities presented by the hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to the efforts and financial resources dedicated to improving the medical technology used in the health care institutions, providing information to the health care personnel about ethically appropriate behavior and patient-health care professional communication and designing new regulations concerning these issues should contribute greatly to the satisfaction of the people receiving health care services and their relatives.

[Hospitals and other philanthropic foundations in early Byzantine period]. / Erken dönem Bizans hastaneleri ve diger saglik sosyal yardim kurumlari.

Early Byzantine Period includes between A.D. 330 when Constantinople was established and A.D. 518 when Justinus I became emperor. In this time period, a lot of philanthropic foundations such as hospitals, hospices, orphanages, rest homes and soup kitchens are established. Many of patriarchs and religious men opened them. In some of them, it refers to there was patients' care. The oldest hospital in Constantinople was established by Hasios Marcianos, and was next to Saint Irene Church. In addition to this Empress Flacilla wife of Theodosius the Great made hospitals restored and visited patients regularly. Hospitals were not limited in the center of Empire. Hospitals and other philanthropic foundations were established in Antiochia, Alexandria, Nikea, Adrianopolis, Castoria and Jerusalem. The concept of the modern hospital (the actual care, 'hospitality' and treatment of visitors) for the civilian masses in Europe didn't come to fruition until post Constantine and the rise of Christianity. While these early Christian hospitals were grossly over their heads regarding medical capability (they essentially served as last stops for the dying or quarantine centers), the concept of providing care to the public was the actual intent. In this regard, the first civilian hospitals were developed.

A study of the opinions and behaviors of physicians with regard to informed consent and refusing treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the opinions and the self-reported behaviors of physicians regarding the issues of informed consent and refusing treatment. DESIGN: This study was performed between July and September 2003, with 51 physicians selected by simple random sampling. The data were collected by using a questionnaire. SETTING: A training hospital of medicine faculty. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-one clinicians working in the branches of internal medicine and surgery. RESULTS: Although the majority (80.4%) of the participants think that information about diagnosis and treatment should always be disclosed to patients, 60.8% reported that they always disclose information about the diagnosis and 49% did the same for information about treatment. A total of 84.3% think that patients' consent should always be obtained before diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, whereas 47% reported that they always obtain consent in their clinical practice. It was also seen that physicians have doubts concerning the comprehension of the information they disclose to their patients. In addition, most (86.3%) of the participants think that a competent patient always has the right to refuse treatment, regardless of the disease and the outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Although opinions favoring the duties implied by informed consent are in the majority, these do not always reflect the behaviors in daily clinical practice, and there may be problems in carrying out the duties implied by the elements of informed consent. Some recommendations that could be beneficial in addressing these problems are presented at the end of the study.