RESUMO
Background Intensive care units frequently contend with infections caused by highly drug-resistant organisms, particularly Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacterales (CRE), which often lead to high mortality rates. Colistin (colomycin) is employed to treat infections, notably extremely drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria. Antibiotic combination treatment is a frequently used tactic in this endeavour. However, the widespread use of antibiotics in synergy could result in the emergence of resistance and a rise in side effects, such as those linked to Clostridium difficile infection. The aim of the study was to assess and contrast the clinical results of intravenous colistin monotherapy with the combination of colistin and meropenem in patients experiencing MDR bacteremia resulting from Acinetobacter Baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacterales (CRE). Methods In this retrospective observational study, an analysis spanning two years, from June 2021 to June 2023, was conducted at a teaching hospital located in Karachi, Pakistan. The research involved the retrospective examination of medical records from 132 patients who had been diagnosed with MDR bacteremia. Patients were divided into two categories based on their treatment regimen, either intravenous colistin monotherapy or intravenous colistin combined with meropenem. Among the 132 patients included in the analysis, 66 underwent colistin monotherapy, while the other 66 received a combination of colistin and meropenem. The primary focus of evaluation in this study centered on the 14-day all-cause mortality, while secondary outcomes encompassed clinical success and microbiologic cure. Results The mean age of patients in both groups was comparable, and there were no noteworthy gender differences. Additionally, the distribution of infection types and the isolated pathogens showed no substantial distinctions between the two groups. The study revealed no statistically significant disparities in 14-day mortality, improvement in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, or the proportion of patients who were cured and survived between the two treatment groups. Conclusion The findings from this study lead to the conclusion that there exists no significant disparity in the efficacy of colistin monotherapy compared to the combination of colistin with meropenem in the treatment of MDR bacteremia stemming from Acinetobacter Baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Enterobacterales (CRE). The results provide a basis for future research and underscore the significance of ongoing endeavors to refine antibiotic treatment strategies in response to the worldwide issue of antibiotic resistance.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of sodium hyaluronate Eye Gel in Dry Eye Disease (DED) patients Methods: A Multi-center, Open-label, Uncontrolled clinical trial was conducted in different centers of Pakistan. Ten ophthalmologists conducted this study in which 250 diagnosed patients with dry eye disease were enrolled after obtaining a written informed consent. Ten patients were dropped out during the study period. All patients were assessed as per following criteria for enrolling a patient into the study: Tear Film Break - up time (TBUT) ≤ 10 seconds, Schirmer Test - 1 ≤ 6 mm / 5 minutes and Positive Corneal Staining. Tolerability/safety was assessed by the monitoring and recording of all adverse events. The physical examination was done at baseline, 4(th) week and 8(th) week. Results : The mean age of the patients was 43.4 ±17.8 years and out of 240 patients 117 (48.7%) were males and 123 (51.3%) females. The Mean duration of symptoms was 19.3±23.9. At the initial visit the foreign body sensation was 50.6%, itching 35.9%, burning 50.6%, watering 42.9%, photophobia 25.3% and feeling of dryness in 14.7% of patients. After 4 weeks (2(nd) visit), the symptoms were decreased to 47.1% foreign body sensation, 32.4% itching, 48.2% burning, 41.8% watering, 25.3% photophobia and 13.5% feeling of dryness. At the 3(rd) visit (after 8 weeks) the frequency of symptoms were: 45.3% foreign body sensation, 30.6% itching, 45.9% burning, 40% watering, 24.7% photophobia and 13.5% feeling of dryness. CONCLUSION: Sodium Hyaluronate can provide a suitable alternate in the treatment of dry eye disease due to its reported efficacy on foreign body sensation, itching, burning, watering, photophobia and feeling of dryness.