A novel rapamycin cream formulation improves facial angiofibromas associated with tuberous sclerosis complex: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Facial angiofibromas (FAs) are a major feature of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Topical rapamycin can successfully treat FAs. A new stabilized cream formulation that protects rapamycin from oxidation has been developed in 0.5% and 1% concentrations. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of a novel, stabilized topical rapamycin cream formulation. METHODS: This multicentre double-blind randomized placebo-controlled dose-response phase II/III study with a parallel design included participants aged 6-65 years with FAs of mild or moderate severity according to the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) scale. Participants were randomized to one of three treatment arms: topical rapamycin 0.5%, topical rapamycin 1% or placebo. Treatment was applied once daily for 26 weeks. Safety and efficacy measures were assessed at days 14, 56, 98, 140 and 182. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants achieving IGA scores of 'clear' or 'almost clear' after 26 weeks of treatment. Secondary measures included Facial Angiofibroma Severity Index (FASI) and participant- and clinician-reported percentage-based improvement. Safety measures included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and blood rapamycin concentration changes over time. RESULTS: Participants (n = 107) were randomized to receive either rapamycin 1% (n = 33), rapamycin 0.5% (n = 36) or placebo (n = 38). All treated participants were included in the final analysis. The percentage of participants with a two-grade IGA improvement was greater in the rapamycin 0.5% treatment group (11%) and rapamycin 1% group (9%) than in the placebo group (5%). However, this was not statistically significant [rapamycin 0.5%: odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36-8.18 (P = 0.50); rapamycin 1%: OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.33-8.40 (P = 0.53)]. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of participants treated with rapamycin cream that achieved at least a one-grade improvement in IGA [rapamycin 0.5%: 56% (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.59-14.10; P = 0.005); rapamycin 1%: 61% (OR 5.14, 95% CI 1.70-15.57; P = 0.004); placebo: 24%]. Skin adverse reactions were more common in patients following rapamycin application (64%) vs. placebo (29%). CONCLUSIONS: Both rapamycin cream formulations (0.5% and 1%) were well tolerated, and either strength could lead to clinical benefit in the treatment of FA.

Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling of Acetaminophen and Ibuprofen: the Influence of Body Composition, Formulation and Feeding in Healthy Adult Volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Combined acetaminophen and ibuprofen are common antipyretic and analgesic drugs. Formulation and feeding affect drug absorption. Drug clearance has a nonlinear relationship with total body weight. The covariate effect of fat mass on acetaminophen and ibuprofen pharmacokinetics remains unexplored. This study sought to quantify acetaminophen and ibuprofen pharmacokinetics with intravenous, tablet, sachet and oral suspension formulations in fed and fasted states. METHODS: Pooled time-concentration data for acetaminophen and ibuprofen were available from fasting and fed healthy adults. Data from intravenous, tablet, sachet and suspension formulations were analysed using nonlinear mixed-effects models. Body composition was considered as a covariate on clearances and volumes of distribution (Vd). Size metrics investigated were total body weight, fat and fat-free mass. Theory-based allometry was used to scale pharmacokinetic parameters to a 70 kg individual. A factor on absorption half-life and lag time quantified delays due to feeding for oral formulations. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic simulations were used to explore the time courses of pain response for acetaminophen and ibuprofen for each formulation. RESULTS: Pooled data included 116 individuals (18-49 years, 49-116 kg) with 6095 acetaminophen and 6046 ibuprofen concentrations available for analysis. A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination described disposition for both drugs. Normal fat mass was the best covariate to describe acetaminophen clearance (CL), with a factor for fat contribution (FFATCL) of 0.816. Acetaminophen volume of distribution was described using total body weight. Normal fat mass was the best covariate to describe ibuprofen clearance (FFATCL = 0.863) and volume of distribution: (FFATV = 0.718). Clearance and central volume of distribution were 24.0 L/h/70 kg and 43.5 L/h/70 kg for acetaminophen. Ibuprofen clearance and central volume of distribution were 3.79 L/h/70 kg and 10.5 L/h/70 kg. Bioavailability and absorption half-life were 86% and 12 min for acetaminophen and 94% and 27 min for ibuprofen. Absorption lag times were 5.3 min and 6.7 min for acetaminophen and ibuprofen, respectively. Feeding increased both absorption half-life and absorption lag time when compared to the tablet formulation under fasting conditions. Feeding had the most pronounced effect on the lag time associated with tablet formulation for both drugs. Time to a pain score reduction of 2 points (visual analogue score, 0-10) differed by only 5-10 min across all formulations for acetaminophen and ibuprofen. CONCLUSION: Fat mass was an important covariate to describe acetaminophen and ibuprofen pharmacokinetics. The absorption half-lives of acetaminophen and ibuprofen were increased in fed states. The delay in absorption, quantified by a lag time, was protracted for both drugs.

Extending the safety profile of the post-operative administration of an intravenous acetaminophen/ibuprofen fixed dose combination: An open-label, multi-center, single arm, multiple dose study.

PURPOSE: Postoperative pain is typically treated with multimodal analgesia, using systemic acetaminophen and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in conjunction with opioids as required. The present study aimed to determine the safety and tolerability of repeated doses of an intravenous fixed-dose combination (FDC) of acetaminophen and ibuprofen. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, single arm, multiple dose study was conducted at 4 centers across New Zealand and the United States between July 2019 and July 2020. Adults (>18 years) requiring multiple doses of parenteral nonopioid analgesics over multiple days following non-laparoscopic general, plastic or orthopedic surgery were eligible. The study drug (acetaminophen 1000 mg+ibuprofen 300 mg) was administered 6-hourly as a 5 min infusion for between 48 h and 5 days. Adverse event data was collected throughout the study, in addition to scheduled vital sign assessments, laboratory tests and electrocardiograms. Participants completed a global evaluation of the FDC at the end of the treatment period. FINDINGS: 232 participants received ≥ 1 dose of the FDC. Most were female (62.1%), White (56.5%) or Black or African American (39.2%), and had undergone orthopedic surgery (85.3%). There was a broad age range (19-87 years), with a mean age of 53.4 years, and 26.3% of participants aged ≥ 65 years. The FDC was safe when used for 48 h to 5 days. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) affected 56.0% of participants, the most common were infusion site pain, nausea, infusion site extravasation, constipation, and headache. Minimal changes in vital signs were observed at scheduled timepoints. No clinically significant changes in electrocardiogram assessments occurred. Transient elevations in the hepatic enzymes ALT and AST to < 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) affected 10.5% and 9.6% of subjects, elevations to ≥ 3 times the ULN affected 2.6% and 2.2% of subjects, respectively. There were no apparent differences in the safety profile of the FDC in older participants. The FDC was well tolerated; most TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Five participants discontinued treatment due to TEAEs, none were considered treatment-related. The FDC was perceived well by study participants; the majority rated their experience as 'excellent' (40.1%) or 'very good' (35.3%). IMPLICATIONS: The safety profile was comparable to previous studies with no novel safety concerns. The FDC was safe, well tolerated, and perceived positively by participants treated for acute pain between 48 h and 5 days following orthopedic or plastic surgery, supporting a favorable risk benefit profile.

Efficacy and Safety of an Intravenous Acetaminophen/Ibuprofen Fixed-dose Combination After Bunionectomy: a Randomized, Double-blind, Factorial, Placebo-controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Multimodal analgesia with acetaminophen and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is recommended for the treatment of postoperative pain. Although oral fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) are available, parenteral administration may be clinically justified. The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of an intravenous FDC of ibuprofen and acetaminophen after bunionectomy. METHODS: This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled factorial clinical trial conducted at 2 clinical research centers in the United States between November 2016 and June 2017. Eligible patients (male and female subjects, aged 18-65 years, reporting pain intensity levels ≥40 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) after distal, first metatarsal bunionectomy) were randomized (3:3:3:2) to receive the FDC (ibuprofen 300 mg + acetaminophen 1000 mg), ibuprofen 300 mg, acetaminophen 1000 mg, or placebo (vehicle), administered as 15-minute intravenous infusions every 6 hours for 48 hours. The primary efficacy end point was the time-adjusted sum of pain intensity differences from baseline over 48 hours (SPID48). In addition to VAS pain intensity scores, pain relief scores, time to perceptible and meaningful pain relief, the use of rescue medication, and participant's global evaluations of the study drug were recorded. Adverse events occurring during the 48-hour treatment period were included in the safety analysis. FINDINGS: A total of 276 participants were enrolled; most were female (82%), the mean age was 42.4 years, and the median baseline VAS was 67 mm, indicating moderate to severe pain. SPID48 was significantly higher for the FDC (23.4 [2.5] mm) than for ibuprofen (9.5 [2.5] mm), acetaminophen (10.4 [2.5] mm), and placebo (-1.3 [3.1] mm; all, P < 0.001). The superior analgesic effect of the FDC was supported by a range of secondary end points, including reduced opioid usage rates (75% for FDC, 92% for ibuprofen, 93% for acetaminophen, and 96% for placebo; all, P < 0.005). The safety profile of the FDC was comparable to that of intravenous ibuprofen or acetaminophen alone. Three participants withdrew from the study due to adverse events: 2 in the ibuprofen group and 1 in the acetaminophen group. IMPLICATIONS: The study found that repeated administration of an intravenous FDC of ibuprofen and acetaminophen provided statistically significant improvement in SPID48 over comparable doses of either monotherapy without an increase in adverse events. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02689063.

An integrated safety analysis of combined acetaminophen and ibuprofen (Maxigesic ® /Combogesic®) in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Acetaminophen (APAP) and ibuprofen (IBP) are two analgesic compounds with a long history of use. Both are considered safe at recommended over-the-counter daily doses. Chronic use, high doses, or concomitant medication can produce safety risks for both drugs. APAP is associated with increased risk of hepatic injury, while IBP can produce gastric bleeding and thromboembolic events. Using a combination of APAP and IBP provides superior analgesia without transgressing daily dose limits of each individual drug. METHODS: The present study aimed to determine if treatment with a fixed-dose combination (FDC) containing APAP and IBP results in any unexpected adverse events (AEs) and/or changes in the safety profiles of its two ingredients compared to monotherapy. The analysis will examine clinical safety data obtained from either single dose trials, multiple dose trials, a long-term exposure trial, and post-marketing surveillance data of APAP/IBP FDC tablets (Maxigesic®/Combogesic®, AFT Pharmaceuticals Ltd). The largest dataset was obtained by pooling the four randomized-controlled, multiple-dose clinical studies with either APAP 325 mg + IBP 97.5 mg (FDC 325/97.5, three tablets per dose) or APAP 500 mg + IBP 150 mg (FDC 500/150, two tablets per dose). At maximum doses, the two FDCs are bioequivalent, permitting the pooling of data for the analysis of safety. RESULTS: A safety population of 922 patients who received full doses of either FDC, APAP alone, IBP alone, or placebo was compiled from the four studies. A total of 521 AEs were experienced with the incidence of FDC AEs similar to or below either monotherapy group or placebo. The FDC did not alter the incidence and percentage of the most common AEs, including gastrointestinal events and postoperative bleeding. CONCLUSION: Overall, the FDC is well tolerated and has a strong safety profile at single and multiple doses with improved efficacy over monotherapy.

Analgesic effectiveness, pharmacokinetics, and safety of a paracetamol/ibuprofen fixed-dose combination in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: A randomized, single-blind, parallel group trial.

BACKGROUND: Pain following tonsillectomy is often poorly managed in the home setting. Multimodal analgesia with acetaminophen (paracetamol) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs offers superior analgesia over monotherapy but may be difficult for caregivers to manage. A fixed-dose combination oral suspension product containing paracetamol and ibuprofen has been developed to facilitate pediatric dosing. AIMS: The aims of this study are to determine the analgesic effectiveness, pharmacokinetics, and safety of the fixed-dose combination at two doses in the pediatric population. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blind, parallel group trial, 251 children aged 2-12 years undergoing day-stay (adeno)tonsillectomy were randomized to two dose groups of the fixed-dose combination. A doubled loading dose was given preoperatively, followed by treatment for up to 11 days (Higher dose: paracetamol 15 mg/kg + ibuprofen 4.5 mg/kg, Lower dose: paracetamol 12 mg/kg + ibuprofen 3.6 mg/kg). Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis for up to 6 hours after the loading dose. The analgesic effectiveness was examined on the first day after surgery using both Parents Postoperative Pain Measurement and modified Wong-Baker Faces pain scales. Rescue medication consumption was recorded throughout the study. RESULTS: Differences in maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) and total exposure (AUC0→t ) between the treatment groups for both analytes were consistent with a 25% increase in dose; there was no difference in time to peak concentration (Tmax ). On the first postoperative day, there was no difference in pain scores or rescue medication use between treatment groups (approximately 30% in both groups). The combination was well tolerated by both groups. The most common adverse events were vomiting and nausea. The incidence of postoperative bleeding was 4.4%. CONCLUSION: The shallow dose-response relationship and good tolerability of the fixed-dose combination over an extended study period supports the utility of both doses of the fixed-dose combination in the home setting.

Analgesic Efficacy of an Acetaminophen/Ibuprofen Fixed-dose Combination in Moderate to Severe Postoperative Dental Pain: A Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Acute pain is a significant burden to the individual and to society. There is a clear need for a pain medication that provides improved analgesia over common analgesics, without compromising tolerability. The goal of this study was to determine the efficacy of a new fixed-dose combination of acetaminophen 975 mg and ibuprofen 292.5 mg (FDC 975/292.5) relative to acetaminophen or ibuprofen monotherapy, or placebo. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial included 408 adult volunteers aged 18 to 60 years experiencing moderate to severe pain after surgical removal of at least 2 impacted third molars. Subjects were randomized in a 3:3:3:2 ratio to the following interventions: FDC 975/292.5, acetaminophen 975 mg, ibuprofen 292.5 mg, and placebo. Self-reported pain intensity scores were recorded over a 48-hour double-blind treatment period using a 100-mm visual analog scale. In addition, time to perceptible and meaningful pain relief was assessed by using the two-stopwatch method; use of rescue medication (oxycodone) was recorded; and patients rated their pain relief on a 5-point categorical scale. All adverse events during the 30-day study period were assessed. FINDINGS: The majority of participants were female (67.4%) and white (90.0%), with a mean age of 24.8 years. Demographic and baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups, with a mean baseline pain score of 56.4 mm. The primary end point was the time-adjusted sum of pain intensity differences over 48 hours, which was found to be significantly greater for FDC 975/292.5 than for both monotherapies and placebo (all, P < 0.001). The robustness of the procedures used in the calculation of the primary end point was confirmed in a series of sensitivity analyses. Statistical superiority of the combination was evident in all secondary end points (time to meaningful pain relief, maximum pain score, response rate, participants using supplementary analgesia, time to rescue, oxycodone consumption, and categorical pain relief score) with the exception of time to perceptible pain relief versus monotherapies and the time to peak response versus ibuprofen. The percentage of patients reporting adverse events was 37.3% in the FDC 975/292.5 group, with no significant differences between treatment groups. Nausea was the most common adverse event across all groups. IMPLICATIONS: Overall, the fixed-dose combination of acetaminophen and ibuprofen provided greater and more rapid analgesia than comparable doses of either agent alone or placebo in adults after removal of impacted third molars. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01420653.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioavailability of a Fixed-Dose Combination of Ibuprofen and Paracetamol after Intravenous and Oral Administration.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Previously published studies have suggested the lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between ibuprofen and paracetamol when they are delivered as a fixed-dose oral combination. The aim of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetic profile and safety of a fixed-dose intravenous (IV) combination, containing 3 mg/mL ibuprofen and 10 mg/mL paracetamol, in comparison with its individual components. The study also assessed the relative bioavailability of the same doses of the active ingredients when they were administered as an oral formulation. METHODS: A single-dose, open-label, randomized, five-period cross-over sequence pharmacokinetic study was undertaken in 30 healthy volunteers. Serial plasma samples were assayed for both paracetamol and ibuprofen concentrations, using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry methods. Pharmacokinetic parameters were computed using standard non-compartmental analyses. Adverse events were also assessed. The ratios of the maximum measured plasma concentration (C max), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time zero to the time of the last measurable plasma concentration (AUCt ) and AUC from time zero to infinity (AUC∞) were analysed for bioequivalence as determined by 90% confidence intervals. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of ibuprofen and paracetamol were very similar for the combination and monotherapy IV preparations; the ratios of the C max, AUC t and AUC∞ values fell within the 80-125% acceptable bioequivalence range. Precise dose proportionality for both compounds was also determined for the half dose of the IV formulation in comparison with the full dose. The relative bioavailability of paracetamol (93.78%) and ibuprofen (96.45%) confirmed the pharmacokinetic equivalence of the oral and IV formulations of the fixed-dose combination. CONCLUSION: Concomitant administration of 3 mg/mL ibuprofen and 10 mg/mL paracetamol in a fixed-dose IV combination does not alter the pharmacokinetic profiles of either drug. The IV and oral dose forms of such a combination are pharmacokinetically equivalent.

Potential cardiovascular adverse events when phenylephrine is combined with paracetamol: simulation and narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Increased bioavailability of phenylephrine is reported when combined with paracetamol in over-the-counter formulations for the symptomatic treatment of the common cold and influenza. Such formulations could increase phenylephrine-related cardiovascular adverse events particularly in susceptible individuals. Quantification of the effect of phenylephrine concentration on blood pressure allows simulation of potential adverse combination therapy effects. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for papers discussing or describing any adverse effect, hypersensitivity or safety concerns related to phenylephrine alone or in combination with other drugs. The pharmacodynamic relationship between plasma phenylephrine concentration and mean arterial blood pressure was characterized using published observations of blood pressure changes after ophthalmic eye drops. The resulting pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters were then used to predict mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) changes in that population if given an oral combination of phenylephrine and paracetamol. RESULTS: There were 1172 papers identified for examination. Forty-seven reports fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Increases in blood pressure and decreases in heart rate have been reported with doses over 15 mg. It has been estimated that a 20-mmHg increase in systolic blood pressure would occur with an oral dose of 45 mg phenylephrine in normotensive healthy people. Those taking monoamine oxidase inhibitors report increased systolic blood pressure of greater than 60 mmHg. Blood pressure and heart rate changes are potentiated in patients with underlying hypertension. Simulation showed a modest increase in MAP when phenylephrine 10 mg was co-administered with paracetamol 1 g (4.2 vs 12.3 mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Combination paracetamol phenylephrine oral therapy has potential to increase blood pressure more than phenylephrine alone in those with cardiovascular compromise.

Combination paracetamol and ibuprofen for pain relief after oral surgery: a dose ranging study.

PURPOSE: Combined paracetamol and ibuprofen has been shown to be more effective than either constituent alone for acute pain in adults, but the dose-response has not been confirmed. The aim of this study was to define the analgesic dose-response relationship of different potential doses of a fixed dose combination containing paracetamol and ibuprofen after third molar surgery. METHODS: Patients aged 16 to 60 years with moderate or severe pain after the removal of at least two impacted third molars were randomised to receive double-blind study medication as two tablets every 6 h for 24 h of either of the following: two tablet, combination full dose (paracetamol 1000 mg and ibuprofen 300 mg); one tablet, combination half dose (paracetamol 500 mg and ibuprofen 150 mg); half a tablet, combination quarter dose (paracetamol 250 mg and ibuprofen 75 mg); or placebo. The primary outcome measure was the time-adjusted summed pain intensity difference over 24 h (SPID 24) calculated from the 100-mm VAS assessments collected over multiple time points for the study duration. RESULTS: Data from 159 patients were included in the analysis. Mean (SD) time-adjusted SPID over 24 h were full-dose combination 20.1 (18.0), half dose combination 20.4 (20.8), quarter dose combination 19.3 (20.0) and placebo 6.6 (19.8). There was a significant overall effect of dose (p = 0.002) on the primary outcome. Planned pairwise comparisons showed that all combination dose groups were superior to placebo (full dose vs. placebo p = 0.004, half dose vs. placebo p = 0.002, quarter dose vs. placebo p = 0.002). The overall effect of dose was also significant for maximum VAS pain intensity score (p = 0.048), response rate (p = 0.0094), percentage of participants requiring rescue (p = 0.025) and amount of rescue (p < 0.001). No significant dose effect was found for time to peak reduction in VAS or time to meaningful pain relief. The majority of adverse events recorded were of mild (52.75%) or moderate (40.16%) severity and not related (30.7%) or unlikely related (57.5%) to the study medication. CONCLUSION: All doses of the combination provide safe superior pain relief to placebo in adult patients following third molar removal surgery.

Increased bioavailability of phenylephrine by co-administration of acetaminophen: results of four open-label, crossover pharmacokinetic trials in healthy volunteers.

PURPOSE: Over-the-counter combinations containing acetaminophen and phenylephrine for treatment of the common cold and influenza are widespread, but there are few data about pharmacokinetics of these two drugs used in combination. We aimed to investigate pharmacokinetic interactions between acetaminophen and phenylephrine. METHODS: A series of four randomised, open-label, crossover studies investigating phenylephrine and acetaminophen combination pharmacokinetics were undertaken (n = 28, 30, 6 and 26) using standard non-compartmental analyses. Time-concentration observations from these four studies were pooled to examine the interaction between these two compounds. Data were analysed using non-linear mixed effects models. RESULTS: Non-compartmental analyses showed an approximate doubling of phenylephrine plasma concentration when the standard 10-mg dose was administered in combination with acetaminophen. Population analysis was based on data from 90 subjects with 2050 observations. The relative bioavailability of phenylephrine 10 mg was doubled (Fbio 2.11, 95%CI 1.89, 2.31) when combined with acetaminophen 1000 mg, while the absorption half-time was reduced by 50 %. When combined with 500 mg of acetaminophen, bioavailability increased by 64 % (Fbio 1.64). Phenylephrine 5 mg in combination with acetaminophen 1000 mg produced a phenylephrine plasma time-concentration profile similar to that seen with phenylephrine 10 mg administered alone. CONCLUSIONS: The relative bioavailability of phenylephrine was increased when co-administered with acetaminophen.