The introduction of a paediatric anaesthesia information leaflet: an audit of its impact on parental anxiety and satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: A paediatric anaesthesia information leaflet was produced to address preoperative parental anxiety and to facilitate informed parental consent. METHODS: An audit was undertaken to assess the impact of introducing the leaflet. This addressed the information needs and expectations of parents of children undergoing anaesthesia, parental satisfaction with information provision and parental preoperative anxiety. RESULTS: The audit revealed that parents expect to be provided with information, although not necessarily in written form. However, the majority who received the information leaflet concluded that verbal information alone would not have been sufficient. The information leaflet was found to be accessible, informative and useful and those who received it reported greater satisfaction with information provision than a control group. Many parents perceived that it resulted in lower levels of preoperative anxiety CONCLUSIONS: A decision was therefore undertaken that routine use of the leaflet would continue on all of the paediatric surgical wards. However, the study also indicated that leaflets should not replace verbal communication with nursing and medical staff, who remain important sources of information.

A study of clinical opinion and practice regarding circumcision.

AIM: To establish clinical opinion regarding appropriate indications for circumcision and to examine actual clinical practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all NHS hospital consultants in the Yorkshire region of the UK identified as having a role to play in the management of boys (under 16 years of age) requiring circumcision. Retrospective data on actual clinical practice during a three month study period were also collected via a simple proforma. RESULTS: Of 153 questionnaires sent, 64 were returned. Responses revealed varying opinions regarding appropriate indications for circumcision within each consultant group, and between paediatricians and surgeons. Surgeons were generally more inclined to recommend circumcision for each of the indications listed in the questionnaire. Analysis of clinical practice revealed that almost two thirds of procedures were carried out for phimosis, and nearly half of these children were under the age of 5 years. CONCLUSION: There are differences in the clinical opinions of surgeons and paediatricians on what constitutes an appropriate indication for circumcision. Paediatricians' opinions are generally more in line with current evidence than those of surgeons, possibly resulting in many unnecessary circumcisions.