Perspectives of Emergency Medicine Physicians on Hidradenitis Suppurativa Care.

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic skin condition that often requires acute care during periods of flares, with many patients visiting the emergency department over 5 times before receiving a proper diagnosis. However, little is known about emergency medicine (EM) providers' experiences and knowledge of HS management. Methods: In this study, an anonymous survey was distributed to EM providers to identify knowledge and practice gaps in HS care. Results: The results showed that most respondents lacked confidence in HS diagnosis and management, especially in knowing available treatment options and managing patients with moderate to severe HS. Attendings were more confident than non-attendings in diagnosing and managing HS, and providers who saw more HS patients per month were more confident in referring patients to appropriate specialists. Over 80% of respondents referred HS patients to dermatology, which is an important initial step in HS management. Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of educating EM providers in HS recognition, timely referral to dermatology, and initial management to improve quality of life among patients and mitigate disease progression.

Gastrointestinal Manifestations and Their Association with Neurologic and Sleep Problems in Long COVID-19 Minority Patients: A Prospective Follow-Up Study.

BACKGROUND: Long-COVID is a condition post SARS-CoV-2 infection with persistent or recurring symptoms affecting multiple organs, and may involve viral persistence, changes to the microbiome, coagulopathies, and alterations to neuro-immune interactions. These factors can disrupt the Gut-Brain Axis, which is a complex system involving bidirectional communication between the central nervous system and the gastrointestinal (GI) system. As a result of these disruptions, individuals with long-COVID may develop post-infectious functional GI disorders, which can cause a range of symptoms affecting the digestive system. AIM: To understand frequency of GI manifestations of Long-COVID and to determine association with sleep or neurological symptoms in a predominantly minority population. METHODS: We included patients with positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR (n = 747) who were hospitalized from Feb. 2020 to May 2021 at Howard University Hospital and followed between 6 and 12 months from discharge. GI, sleep, and neurological symptoms (via the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scoring system) were assessed using a standardized questionnaire. Linear regression analysis, χ2 and Fisher's exact test were utilized to determine the statistical significance of correlations of GI/Neuro/COVID. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 58, with 51.6% females and a predominant African American ethnicity (73.6%, n = 550). A total of 108 patients died during their initial hospital stay, with the remaining 639 patients followed-up. Three hundred fifty (350) patients responded to the questionnaire (57 patients died during the follow-up period). Overall, 39 (13.3%) patients reported GI-related symptoms, out of which 19 (6.4%) had persistent symptoms and 20 (6.8%) developed new onset GI symptoms. Nausea and vomiting were the most common 24/39 (61.5%), followed by abdominal pain 7/39 (18%), diarrhea 5/39 (12.8%), and others 3/39 (7.6%). Patients who presented with vomiting during acute SARS-CoV-2 infection were more likely to have Long-COVID GI manifestations (P = 0.023). Use of ACE inhibitors, abnormal lymphocyte count and elevated ferritin are other variables that showed significant associations with Long-COVID GI manifestations (P = 0.03, 0.006 and 0.03, respectively). During follow-up, a total of 28 (9.5%) patients reported difficulty with sleep and 79 (27%) patients had abnormal MoCA assessment. With further analysis, there was a trend between presentation of GI symptoms on admission with abnormal MoCA assessment, and an association between abnormal LFTs and history of liver disease during hospitalization with subsequent sleep problems. Baseline characteristics, clinical comorbidities, other laboratory values, hospital length of stay, mechanical ventilation, medications during hospitalization, re-admission and Flu or COVID-19 vaccination have not shown any association with Long-COVID GI symptoms in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Dyspeptic symptoms were common GI manifestations in the acute and post COVID periods. GI symptoms, abnormal LFTs and a history of liver disease during the acute infectious phase associates with abnormal MoCA and sleep problems during follow-up. Further large population studies are needed to determine if COVID-19 leads to a GI symptoms-associated Long-COVID phenotypes and other symptoms through the Gut-Brain-Axis.

Efficacy of medical treatments for pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition that has been insufficiently studied in the pediatric population. Timely and effective medical treatments may improve quality of life, mitigate disease burden, and prevent the need for invasive procedural interventions such as surgical excisions. However, there is a paucity of research on the efficacy of medical management strategies for HS in children and adolescents. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of medical treatments for HS in patients <18 years of age. In April 2022, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles on the efficacy of medical treatments for HS in the pediatric population. Between 1984 and 2022, 35 articles (101 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Most patients had Hurley Stage II disease (46.7%, 35/75) followed by Stage I (36%, 27/75), and Stage III (17.3%, 13/75). 100% (23/23) of patients responded to antibiotics, 100% (8/8) to finasteride, 93.9% (31/33) to biologics, 80% (4/5) to oral retinoids, and 50% (6/12) to metformin. Overall, this study demonstrates that medical treatment regimens can improve HS symptoms in pediatric patients, but the extent of improvement is unclear, and the results were largely based on case reports or case series. Prospective studies are warranted to better understand the efficacy and safety of medical treatments for pediatric HS. Clinical trials of HS therapies need to be inclusive of pediatric patients to help define the optimal timing of treatment initiation and guide patient selection.

Efficacy of procedural treatments for pediatric hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful, inflammatory skin disease that has historically been understudied in the pediatric population. Procedural interventions, such as surgical excisions, skin grafts, and lasers, are important for comprehensive HS disease management. However, there is a lack of data on procedural treatments for HS in pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature on the efficacy and safety of procedural treatments for HS in pediatric patients. In April 2022, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for articles on the efficacy of procedural treatments for HS in patients <18 years of age. Two independent reviewers extracted data from relevant studies. From 1974 to 2021, 23 articles with 81 patients were identified. Patients' Hurley stages included stage I (9.1%, 1/11), II (36.4%, 4/11), and III (54.5%, 6/11). The most extensively studied procedural interventions include negative pressure wound therapy (n = 30), surgical excision with skin graft/flap (n = 19), and endoscopic electrode or laser treatment (n = 11). In all, promising response rates for procedural management strategies were observed in the literature but the findings were largely based on case reports/series. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), especially those geared toward minimally invasive procedural treatments, are needed to help guide clinicians on the most efficacious treatment modalities for pediatric patients with HS.

Atopic Dermatitis: A Guide to Transitioning to Janus Kinase Inhibitors.

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) are promising medications that the Food and Drug Administration recently approved for treatment of atopic dermatitis in January 2022. These medications offer a novel therapeutic mechanism and may be an additional treatment avenue for patients who are currently reliant on conventional immunosuppressants, such as cyclosporine A, methotrexate, or mycophenolate mofetil, or newer medications, such as dupilumab. However, redundant treatment puts patients at risk for excessive toxicity and polypharmacy, whereas abrupt tapering of a preexisting regimen may cause flares of the disease. Thus, transitioning to JAKis should be implemented strategically to retain the therapeutic benefit and minimize the risk of flares. Herein, we outline gradual transition schemas for patients needing to transition to JAKis from conventional immunosuppressants or dupilumab. There is no evidence-based guideline to instruct this transition to JAKis, and our recommendations are based on expert experience and the review of efficacy data from pivotal trials.

Bibliometric Analysis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Publication Trends from Asia and Australasia.

INTRODUCTION: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), once an orphan disease, has gained increased interest world-wide. The most highly cited works in HS are from North America and Europe despite known phenotypic and epidemiological differences globally. Herein, we perform a bibliometric analysis to characterize HS publication trends in Asia and Australasia (AA) over the last decade. METHODS: PubMed database was searched to identify HS-related articles and were analyzed for senior authorship, country of origin, article topic, and study design. RESULTS: The search criteria yielded 163 articles from AA. Rapid increase in publications started in 2015 with 75% (123/163) of total articles published in the last half of the decade. Case reports/series were consistently the most published study type yearly and overall (49%, 80/163). Efforts were made to increase high level of evidence publications with both randomized controlled trials from Japan and Turkey including all Asian patients. China, Japan, and India were the leading publishing countries with Australia, Israel, and Turkey increasingly contributing in the last half of the decade. CONCLUSIONS: Advancements in HS research are encouraging with increases in publication numbers and diversity; however, more geographical diversity is needed in order to garner a better understanding of the disease and treatment options.

Medicare and medicaid spending trends for immunomodulators prescribed for dermatologic conditions.

Immunomodulators are the most expensive prescription medications used in dermatology for chronic skin conditions. Each year, rising costs for immunomodulators pose significant financial burdens on patients and the healthcare system as a whole. Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) we collected Medicare Part D (Medicare-D) and Medicaid spending data for immunomodulators with dermatologic indications or off-label use from 2012-2018. The average annual spending and average annual spending per dosage unit (AASPDU) was calculated for each of the thirteen included medications. Combined Medicare-D and Medicaid spending increased 319.9% from $2.5B in 2012 to $10.6B in 2018, with an average of $6.2B spent annually. For both Medicare-D and Medicaid, adalimumab ($1.8B, $968.8 m), etanercept ($1.4B, $467.5 m), and ustekinumab ($258.8 m, $131.0 m) had the highest overall annual spending. Additionally, ustekinumab ($16,825, $15,576), guselkumab ($10,132, $9,543), and ixekizumab ($4,895, $4,673) had the highest AASPDU for both Medicare-D and Medicaid. Medicare-D and Medicaid spending for immunomodulators has grown substantially (319.9%) from 2012-2018 and is likely to continue to rise. Given this increase in federal spending and continued emergence of new immunomodulators, it is important to learn how we can counteract the trends and reduce future expenses for patients and our healthcare system.

Medicaid and Medicare Part B spending on immunomodulators and biosimilars.

INTRODUCTION: Prices for immunomodulators used in dermatological conditions are rising in the United States. While Medicare Part-D solely covers medication costs, Medicare Part-B covers outpatient infusion and injection costs given by medical professionals. We aim to analyze recent trends in Medicare Part-B spending on immunomodulators and their biosimilars used in the treatment of common chronic inflammatory dermatoses. METHODS: The 2012-2018 Medicare Part-B spending data on immunomodulators commonly used for dermatologic conditions were extracted from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database. Inflation was adjusted to reflect 2012-dollar amounts using the Consumer Price Index. RESULTS: Medicare Part-B spending has increased by 27.5% from 2012 to 2018 ($2.5B, $3.2B). Average annual total spending (AATS) is greatest for rituximab ($1,522,757,520), and average annual spending per maintenance dose (AASPMD) is greatest for ustekinumab-90 mg ($12,976). The percent change in AASPMD increased for all immunomodulators with Etanercept-50 mg having the greatest percent change (+64.6%, +$285.70). Infliximab had a greater AATS and AASPMD than its biosimilars. DISCUSSION: Medicare Part-B spending is often overlooked but plays a big role in federal healthcare spending. Exploring the strategic use of less expensive biosimilars could help mitigate spending.

Gender gaps in National Institutes of Health dermatology grant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the demographics and scholarly merit among National Institutes of Health (NIH) award recipients can help guide future applicants in the field of dermatology. OBJECTIVE: Herein, we aimed to explore gender gaps in NIH award recipient demographics and scholarly merits for dermatology-related projects. METHODS: Projects funded by the National Institutes of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases between 2015 and 2019 related to dermatology were extracted using the NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools database. The number of publications and h-index of each award recipient were collected using the Scopus database. The 2019 Blue Ridge Institute for Medical Research report was used to determine the top 20 NIH-funded dermatology departments/divisions. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2019, there were 35.1% more unique male than unique female recipients. Award recipients had an average of 116.7 total publications and an average h-index of 37.1. However, men also had more than half as many publications and a >37% higher average h-index. Gender gaps in research merit, as well as number and type of awards, are reduced among recipients affiliated with a top 20 NIH-funded institution. CONCLUSION: A higher number of awards were granted to male recipients. Men had a higher mean publication number and h-index compared with their female counterparts. Increased support, resources, and mentorship opportunities to women in research may help mitigate these gaps.

Gender differences in sexual health impairment in hidradenitis suppurativa: A systematic review.

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis characterized by painful nodules, sinus tracts, and scarring, with a predilection for intertriginous areas. HS is particularly prevalent in women of childbearing age and can have varying psychological and physical consequences. The chronic and debilitating nature of this disease can lead to significant impairments in patients' sexual health and overall quality of life. This systematic review examines gender differences in the impact of HS on sexual health. In addition, we review gaps in the management of sexual health for patients with HS and outline recommendations to adequately address sexual concerns and optimize care.

Radiotherapy for Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis characterized by painful nodules, abscesses, sinus tracts, and scarring mainly in the intertriginous areas. Patients with HS often experience inadequate responses to traditional treatment consisting of lifestyle modification, topical and systemic antibiotics, hormonal modulators, biologics, and procedural modalities. Low-dose radiotherapy has been used in benign cutaneous conditions, including HS; however, there is a paucity of literature summarizing its evidence. Herein, we systematically review the current literature on the efficacy of radiotherapy for patients with HS. SUMMARY: This systematic review of the published literature reports the patient demographics, treatment regimens, efficacy, and adverse effects of radiotherapy in the treatment of HS. The historic timeline of these publications highlights the changes in management recommendations, introduction of more standardized outcome measures, and enhancements in treatment options. Radiotherapy appears to be an option for patients with treatment-resistant HS or who are poor surgical candidates. However, there remains a paucity of consensus on proper candidate selection, dosing, efficacy, and safety of the short- and long-term effects of radiotherapy.