Delayed identification of monoclonal protein is associated with early death in isolated cardiac AL amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Early identification of immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (AL) is crucial due to its rapid progression. Monoclonal light-chain (M-LC) testing is the first step in the diagnostic workup for patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis (CA). We aimed to determine whether the time interval between the first CA suspicion and M-LC testing can be related to AL amyloidosis survival outcomes. METHODS: All patients (n = 94) with isolated cardiac AL amyloidosis diagnosed at our center between 2016 and 2020 were included. Those with pre-existing known monoclonal protein (monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance or smoldering multiple myeloma) were excluded. Time intervals to diagnostic tests and diagnosis were calculated and assessed for their survival prediction ability. RESULTS: The time interval between first CA suspicion (on echocardiography) and M-LC testing correlated with early mortality, and the best cutoff predicting survival, was 6 weeks. The 26 patients (∼28% of entire cohort) who underwent M-LC-studies >6 weeks after first suspicion more frequently presented Mayo stage IIIb (65% vs. 35%, p = .008), showing poorer overall survival than those (n = 68, 72%) referred for early M-LC studies (median 3 vs. 14 months, p = .039). CONCLUSIONS: Monoclonal protein testing should be the first-step in the diagnostic workup for patients with echocardiographic/other instrumental red flags raising CA suspicion.

A real-life study of daratumumab combinations in newly diagnosed patients with light chain (AL) amyloidosis.

Daratumumab-based regimens are the new standard of care for newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis based on the results of the ANDROMEDA study. However, real-world data on daratumumab efficacy in upfront therapy in unselected patients are scanty. In the framework of a prospective observational study, we investigated the efficacy and safety of daratumumab in 88 newly diagnosed patients, including subjects with IIIb cardiac stage (26%) or myeloma defining events (29%). Daratumumab was administered with bortezomib in 50 (56%) patients, lenalidomide in 31 (35%), and monotherapy in 7 (8%). The rate of serious adverse events was low (16%). The overall hematologic response rate was 75% with 52 (59%) patients attaining at least a very good partial response (VGPR) at six months. Amongst patients evaluable for organ response, the rate of cardiac and renal responses at 6 months was 31% and 21%, respectively. Comparing stage IIIb patients with the remaining ones, the rate of profound hematologic response was not significantly different (≥VGPR 57% vs. 59%, p 0.955) likewise the rate of cardiac (33% vs. 30%, p 0.340) and renal (40% vs. 16%, p 0.908) responses. Daratumumab-based regimens demonstrated to be safe and effective in treatment-naïve AL amyloidosis even in advanced stage disease.