Practice variation in the diagnosis of acute rejection among pediatric heart transplant centers: An analysis of the pediatric heart transplant society (PHTS) registry.

BACKGROUND: Freedom from rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients is highly variable across centers. This study aimed to assess the center variation in methods used to diagnose rejection in the first-year post-transplant and determine the impact of this variation on patient outcomes. METHODS: The PHTS registry was queried for all rejection episodes in the first-year post-transplant (2010-2019). The primary method for rejection diagnosis was determined for each event as surveillance biopsy, echo diagnosis, or clinical. The percentage of first-year rejection events diagnosed by surveillance biopsy was used to approximate the surveillance strategy across centers. Methods of rejection diagnosis were described and patient outcomes were assessed based on surveillance biopsy utilization among centers. RESULTS: A total of 3985 patients from 56 centers were included. Of this group, 873 (22%) developed rejection within the first-year post-transplant. Surveillance biopsy was the most common method of rejection diagnosis (71.7%), but practices were highly variable across centers. The majority (73.6%) of first rejection events occurred within 3-months of transplantation. Diagnosis modality in the first-year was not independently associated with freedom from rejection, freedom from rejection with hemodynamic compromise, or overall graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Rejection in the first-year after pediatric heart transplant occurs in 22% of patients and most commonly in the first 3 months post-transplant. Significant variation exists across centers in the methods used to diagnose rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients, however, these variable strategies are not independently associated with freedom from rejection, rejection with hemodynamic compromise, or overall graft survival.

Systemic ventricular assist device support in Fontan patients: A report by ACTION.

BACKGROUND: The size of the Fontan population with end-stage heart failure is growing. In this population, heart transplantation has been the only option. This study sought to investigate the efficacy of ventricular assist device (VAD) support in Fontan patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of Fontan patients in the Advanced Cardiac Therapies Improving Outcomes Network. We evaluated patient characteristics, and the clinical and physiologic outcomes after VAD implantation. RESULTS: We identified 45 Fontan patients implanted with VAD. The average age of patients was 10 years (interquartile range: 4.5-18) and 30% were female. The majority had a morphologic right ventricle (69%), moderate or greater ventricular dysfunction (83%), and moderate or greater atrioventricular valve regurgitation (65%). The majority of implants were as a bridge to transplantation (76%), and the majority of patients were Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Profile 2 (56%). The most commonly employed device was the Medtronic HeartWare HVAD (56%). A total of 13 patients were discharged on device support, and 67% of patients experienced adverse events, the most common of which were neurologic (25%). At 1 year after device implantation, the rate of transplantation was 69.5%, 9.2% of patients continued to be VAD supported, and 21.3% of patients had died. Hemodynamically, VAD was effective in decreasing both Fontan and ventricular end-diastolic pressures in some individuals. CONCLUSIONS: VAD is effective in supporting patients with end-stage Fontan failure awaiting heart transplantation. Future research should focus on identifying clinical and physiologic characteristics predictive of a favorable response to VAD support.