A brief performance evaluation and literature review of Abbott ID Now COVID-19 rapid molecular-based test.

The qualitative ID Now COVID-19 assay combines claimed performance and ease of use that seem to position it as a reliable test for urgent patient management. However, the declared limit of detection (LOD) of 125 genome equivalents/mL is not confirmed by the published studies, which observed a range of LOD varying from 276 to 20.000 copies/mL. We decided to establish the LOD value on more robust basis using serial dilutions of a SARS-CoV-2 culture supernatant sample of defined concentration. Afterwards, we tested the analytical performances of the assay with 23 QCMD external quality control measurements. Hence, taking into consideration the additional dilution in the sample receiver cup, we found a lower 95 % LOD of 64 copies/mL. For its intended use and with the new established LOD, ID Now COVID-19 proved to be a suitable test for the diagnosis of COVID-19 in contagious patients, as proposed by the latest Belgian recommendations.

Usefulness of a multiplex immunodot in case of discordant results between automated COVID-19 serological assays.

BACKGROUND: At present, the only reliable test for COVID-19 diagnosis is RT-qPCR. Serological assays have been widely used to increase the detection sensitivity of infected population. Hereby, we report the performance of a new pan-IgG multiplex Enzyme Immunoassay (immunodot) method for exploration of discrepant SARS-COV-2 serological results. METHODS: A retrospective study on 38 residual serum samples from recovered COVID-19 subjects with discordant serological results on Roche and Snibe platforms, were reanalyzed on a new semi-automated pan-IgG immunodot Enzyme Immunoassay, namely COVIDOT-TEST, in order to find the source of discrepancies and to evaluate the latter method. All samples were analyzed on the BlueDiver® Instrument and all strips were read by the BlueScan® Scanner using Dr DOT® Software. RESULTS: Based on our data, subject samples showed specific IgG reactions on ≥ 2 different antigens on immunodot strips. Of these 38 samples, 97.4 % of samples showed specific IgG reaction against S1 + S2 antigens, 89.5 % showed against RBD antigen, 86.8 % against S2 antigen reaction on the COVIDOT-TEST kit. Specific IgG-S1 antigen and IgG-N antigen reactions were detected in 73.7 % and 65.8 % of the samples, respectively. CONCLUSION: The new semi-automated pan-IgG immunodot Enzyme Immunoassay method appeared to be a reliable assay to confirm suspicious COVID-19 serological screening results.