A novel fluoroscopic method of measuring right-to-left interlead distance as a predictor of reverse left ventricular remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy.

PURPOSE: In spite of technological breakthroughs, the choice of a suitable location for the coronary sinus (CS) lead in biventricular implants is still mostly empiric. The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of a radiological index-the distance between the right ventricular (RV) and CS lead tips on fluoroscopic recordings, measured by means of a new method-as a tool for selecting the most profitable left ventricular (LV) lead position. METHODS: Forty-nine consecutive patients (36 male, 13female; mean age 63 ± 19 year), in whom the LV electrode was implanted in a lateral/postero-lateral position in the CS, were evaluated immediately after implantation. The fluoroscopic distances between the RV and LV lead tips were calculated off-line in antero-posterior (2DAP) and latero-lateral (2DLL) projections by means of integrated software. RESULTS: On 1-year follow-up evaluation, 53 % patients were classed as responders (R) (>15 % reduction in LV end-systolic volume) and 47 % as non-responders (NR). On receiver-operating curve analysis, 2DAP and 2DLL showed cut-off values of 81 mm and 51 mm, respectively. In discriminating between R and NR, 2DAP >81 mm displayed 95 % specificity and 74 % sensitivity, while 2DLL >51 mm displayed 74 % specificity and 92 % sensitivity. On multivariate analysis, the cut-off values of 2DAP and 2DLL were significantly predictive of R to CRT. CONCLUSIONS: In our single-center prospective experience, RV-LV interlead distance measured by means of a novel method on fluorographic recordings correlated with CRT response. The use of this method as an intra-operative guide to identifying suitable lead placement in the CS needs evaluating on-line and on a large scale.

[Management of electrical storm in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients]. / La gestione della tempesta aritmica nel paziente portatore di defibrillatore impiantabile.

The term "electrical storm" (ES) indicates a state of cardiac electrical instability manifested by several episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs) within a short time. In patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), ES is best defined as three appropriate VT detections in 24h, treated by antitachycardia pacing, shock or eventually untreated but sustained in a VT monitoring zone. ES seems to have a low immediate mortality (1%) but frequently (50-80%) leads to hospitalization. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been shown to be very effective in treating ES in patients without ICD, whereas in ICD recipients, device programming is probably a key issue to prevent ES. Since sympathetic overreactivity is an important trigger, the risk of shock delivery should be minimized. Antitachycardia pacing can successfully terminate a significant percentage of fast VTs. Important parameters such as the number of VT cycles needed for VT detection can be increased from nominal values to allow spontaneous termination, and safety features that deliver a shock after a programmable time window independent of programming of antitachycardia pacing (sustained rate duration) should be prolonged or disabled. In some cases it may be advisable to turn off the ICD tachy mode to avoid multiple ineffective shocks. Substrate mapping and VT ablation may be useful for the treatment and prevention of ES.

[Responsibilities for the remote monitoring of heart failure patients]. / La responsabilità nel controllo a distanza del paziente con scompenso cardiaco.

Heart failure patients may frequently undergo repeat hospitalizations, and for this reason recent guidelines recommend a multidisciplinary approach including remote clinical state management through systems such as electronic devices, portable or implantable, with the aim of simplifying patient management and optimizing healthcare resources. This different way of healthcare organization has brought about new levels of responsibility, including device manufacturers responsible for the technical aspects, healthcare facilities responsible for the information systems used for patient clinical data transmission and for ambulatory patient access, and in particular the clinicians who should ensure the process supervision by providing prompt medical assistance if alarm signals are received. The use of telemedicine, however, may engender technical problems of varying difficulties. In terms of responsibility, service providers are not liable for damage deriving from technical default, except in the case of willful misconduct or gross negligence. No less important are the legal issues concerning permissions, conflicts of jurisdiction among nations, problems of service inaccessibility, as well as the identification of medical liability in relation to the activity of a multidisciplinary team, besides issues relating to informed consent and privacy protection. In conclusion, risk management with telemedicine may provide more accurate information and better traceability of operators' activity.