Efficacy of Antibody Drug Conjugates Alone and in Combination with other Agents in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Scoping Review.

INTRODUCTION: Antibody drug conjugates represent a promising class of antineoplastic agents comprised of a monoclonal antibody linked to a potent cytotoxic payload for targeted delivery of chemotherapy to tumors. Various antibody drug conjugates have demonstrated impressive efficacy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma in clinical trials, leading to two FDA approved therapies and several other agents and combinations in clinical development. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive systematic review was undertaken utilizing the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Queried databases included Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Web of Science Core Collection and Cochrane CENTRAL Trials. The search sought to identify prospective therapeutic clinical trials in humans with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with a single-arm or randomized controlled trial design investigating antibody drug conjugate-containing regimens. RESULTS: The literature search yielded 4,929 non-duplicated articles, of which 30 manuscripts and conference abstracts were included, which derived from 15 clinical trials including 19 separate cohorts with efficacy outcome results. Eleven trials investigated ADC monotherapy, while two investigated combination regimens, and the remaining two studies were mixed. Five unique ADC targets were represented including Nectin-4, Trop-2, HER2, Tissue Factor, and SLITRK6. Twelve clinical trial cohorts required prior treatment (63%). Objective response rate was reported for all studies and ranged from 27-52% for ADC monotherapies and 34-75% for ADC plus anti-PD-1 agents. Time to event outcome reporting was highly variable. CONCLUSION: In addition to enfortumab vedotin and sacituzumab govitecan, various HER2-targeted antibody drug conjugates and ADC-anti-PD-1 combination regimens have demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials and are poised for clinical advancement.

ScRNA-seq defines dynamic T-cell subsets in longitudinal colon and peripheral blood samples in immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasingly being used to manage multiple tumor types. Unfortunately, immune-related adverse events affect up to 60% of recipients, often leading to treatment discontinuation in settings where few alternative cancer therapies may be available. Checkpoint inhibitor induced colitis (ICI-colitis) is a common toxicity for which the underlying mechanisms are poorly defined. To better understand the changing colon-specific and peripheral immune environments over the course of progression and treatment of colitis, we collected blood and colon tissue from a patient with Merkel cell carcinoma who developed colitis on treatment with pembrolizumab. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing and T-cell receptor sequencing on samples collected before, during and after pembrolizumab and after various interventions to mitigate toxicity. We report T-cells populations defined by cytotoxicity, memory, and proliferation markers at various stages of colitis. We show preferential depletion of CD8+ T cells with biologic therapy and nominate both circulating and colon-resident T-cell subsets as potential drivers of inflammation and response to immune suppression. Our findings highlight the need for further exploration of the colon immune environment and rationalize future studies evaluating biologics for ICI-colitis, including in the context of ICI re-challenge.

Germline genetic variants are associated with development of insulin-dependent diabetes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically improved survival in patients with cancer but are often accompanied by severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs), which can sometimes be irreversible. Insulin-dependent diabetes is a rare, but life-altering irAE. Our purpose was to determine whether recurrent somatic or germline mutations are observed in patients who develop insulin-dependent diabetes as an irAE. METHODS: We performed RNA and whole exome sequencing on tumors from 13 patients who developed diabetes due to ICI exposure (ICI-induced diabetes mellitus, ICI-DM) compared with control patients who did not develop diabetes. RESULTS: In tumors from ICI-DM patients, we did not find differences in expression of conventional type 1 diabetes autoantigens, but we did observe significant overexpression of ORM1, PLG, and G6PC, all of which have been implicated in type 1 diabetes or are related to pancreas and islet cell function. Interestingly, we observed a missense mutation in NLRC5 in tumors of 9 of the 13 ICI-DM patients that was not observed in the control patients treated with the same drugs for the same cancers. Germline DNA from the ICI-DM patients was sequenced; all NLRC5 mutations were germline. The prevalence of NLRC5 germline variants was significantly greater than the general population (p=5.98×10-6). Although NLRC5 is implicated in development of type 1 diabetes, germline NLRC5 mutations were not found in public databases from patients with type 1 diabetes, suggesting a different mechanism of insulin-dependent diabetes in immunotherapy-treated patients with cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Validation of the NLRC5 mutation as a potential predictive biomarker is warranted, as it might improve patient selection for treatment regimens. Furthermore, this genetic alteration suggests potential mechanisms of islet cell destruction in the setting of checkpoint inhibitor therapy.