RESUMO
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The demand to streamline workflow while increasing patient comfort and satisfaction in the manufacturing of removable complete dentures (CDs) is growing, and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology has gained prominence. However, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical performance and patient-related outcome measures (PROMs) of digitally fabricated complete dentures is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine whether digitally fabricated CDs improve the clinical performance and PROMs compared with conventionally fabricated CDs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This systematic review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023433909). This review aimed to address the question "Do digitally fabricated CDs improve clinical performance and PROMs compared with conventional CDs?" Two independent authors conducted electronic searches up to September 2023. Denture base retention and patient satisfaction were analyzed through the continuous outcome evaluated by mean difference and standard deviation, with 95% confidence intervals. The risk of bias in each study was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions and the Risk of Bias based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. The certainty of evidence was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 1505 articles were found during the search, and 16 were included in this review. The main outcomes were grouped into clinical performance (retention, adaptation or fit, clinician's denture quality assessment, masticatory efficiency, and occlusal force) and PROMs (patient satisfaction, oral health related quality of life, final choice, and willingness-to-pay). In terms of denture base retention, between conventional CDs and printed CDs analyzes, conventional CDs exhibited better retention (P=.02), but no significant difference was found between the conventional CDs and milled CDs (P=.20). In terms of patient satisfaction, no statistically significant difference was found between the manufacturing methods of digitally fabricated CDs (printed CD, P=.55; milled CD, P=.08). CONCLUSIONS: Digitally fabricated CDs showed similar or better clinical performance than conventional CDs, and different types of digital manufacturing processes for complete dentures did not influence PROMs.
RESUMO
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although advances in technology continue to improve the acquisition of patient data and the manufacturing of different oral rehabilitations, the method of transferring clinical information to a virtual environment has not yet been consolidated in the literature. PURPOSE: The purpose of this scoping review was to map the existing literature on different techniques of transferring information from virtual facebows for oral rehabilitation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This scoping review was structured using a 5-step methodology based on guidelines proposed by Arksey and O'Malley: (1) characterization of the research question, (2) identification of relevant studies, (3) selection of studies, (4) mapping of results, and (5) selection, summary and reporting of the data. The Joanna Briggs Manual for Evidence Synthesis was followed and the review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). The guiding question for the development of this review was, "What virtual facebow techniques are being used to transfer anatomic data to the virtual environment?" RESULTS: A total of 1745 articles were found during the search, and 20 were included in this review. Nineteen of the included articles had positive results with the described techniques of registration and transfer of anatomic references to the virtual environment; however, 1 study indicated that the technique was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the findings, facial scanning, 2-dimensional photographs, and cone beam computed tomography are feasible methods of acquiring extraoral anatomic landmarks. The use of a device that allows the convergence of intraoral and extraoral images by superimposing data was revealed to be a promising option.
RESUMO
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Although conventional complete dentures are widely used, a systematic review of their influence on wearers' taste perception is lacking. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether conventional complete dentures influence the taste perception of edentulous patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42022341567), and the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were followed. The guiding question was: "Does the use of complete dentures influence the taste perception of edentulous patients?" Two reviewers searched articles in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and https://clinicaltrials.gov databases up to June 2022. The risk of bias in each study was assessed using the risk of bias in nonrandomized studies of interventions and the risk of bias based on the Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. The certainty of evidence was assessed using grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: A total of 883 articles were found with the search, and 7 were included in this review. Various changes in taste perception were identified in some of these studies. CONCLUSIONS: The use of conventional complete dentures can influence the perception of the 4 primary tastes (sweet, salty, sour, and bitter) of edentulous patients, which may negatively interfere with the perception of flavor.
