Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging to physical examination for syndesmotic injury after lateral ankle sprain.

BACKGROUND: Clinical assessment of syndesmotic injury usually consists of two tests: the ankle external rotation test and squeeze test. This study sought to determine the sensitivity and specificity of both for syndesmotic injury secondary to lateral ankle sprain. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with sprained ankles underwent clinical examination for syndesmotic injury with the aforementioned tests. Clinical findings were compared against magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the ankle. Sprains were graded on anatomical and functional classification scales, and correlation and agreement between both scales were assessed. RESULTS: The MRI prevalence of syndesmotic injury in patients with lateral ankle sprains was 17.8%. Sensitivity and specificity were 30% and 93.5% for the squeeze test, and 20% and 84.8% for the external rotation test, respectively. Using the anatomical scale for sprain grading, 40% of syndesmotic injuries occurred in Grade I, 40% in Grade II, and 20% in Grade III sprains. Ten percent of patients with syndesmotic injury had no lateral ligament injury on MRI, 70% had injury of the anterior talofibular (ATFL) ligament, and 20% had injury to the ATFL and calcaneofibular (CFL). CONCLUSION: The sensitivity of the squeeze test and external rotation test was low, suggesting that physical examination often fails to diagnose syndesmotic injury. Conversely, specificity was very high; nearly all patients with a positive test actually had syndesmotic injury. Severity of ankle sprain was not associated with prevalence of syndesmotic injury.

Characteristics of acute asthma patients attended frequently compared with those attended only occasionally in an emergency department.

Asthma patients that depend on emergency department (ED) services are generally considered to have extremely poor disease control and prognosis. It is important to identify characteristics related to poor disease control and frequent visits to the ED to apply appropriate clinical management. This study comprised a cross-sectional survey of consecutive patients with asthma exacerbation (age > or = 12 years) presenting at the adult ED of a large, tertiary care, university-affiliated hospital over a 2-month period. The frequent visitors (FV) were defined by > or = 3 visits to the ED in the preceding year, and the occasional visitors (OV) by < or = 2 visits. Eighty-six patients (61 females and 25 males) were included in the study (mean age 38 +/- 18 years). Of these patients, 51.2% were FV and 48.8% were OV. Sixty-nine percent had annual income lower than A dollar 3000 and 66.3% had < or = 8 years of the formal education. Only 18.6% had used inhaled corticosteroids, 79.1% identified the asthma attack severity, 70.9% increased or initiated inhaled beta-agonist, 20.9% increased or initiated steroid therapy, and 55.8% had an asthma action plan for attack. The number of hospital admissions in past year (OR 4.3, P = .02), use of home nebulizer (OR 3.6, P = .05) and the lack of a written asthma action plan (OR 3.3, P = .03) were independently associated with frequent visits to the ED. We conclude that a substantial proportion of the patients that visit the ED are FV. These patients are more likely to have hospital admission in the past year, to use a home nebulizer, and to lack a written asthma action plan. They should be considered the most important target for asthma education.