Clinical and Radiographic Results After Treatment of Traumatic Syndesmotic Instability Using a Novel Screw-Suture Syndesmotic Fixation Device.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to report early outcomes of a novel screw-suture syndesmotic device compared with suture button fixation devices when treating traumatic syndesmotic instability. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Single academic Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: All adult patients who had syndesmotic fixation with the novel device [novel syndesmotic repair implant (NSRI) group] compared with a suture button device (SB group) between January 2018 and December 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Medial clear space and tibiofibular overlap measurements were compared immediately postoperatively and at the final follow-up. Patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year or skeletal healing. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (25 female) with an average age of 47 years (range 19-78 years) were in the NSRI group compared with 52 patients (20 female) with an average age of 41 years (range 18-73 years) in the SB group. There were no significant differences when comparing body mass index, diabetes, or smoking status between groups (P > 0.05). There was no difference when comparing the postoperative and final medial clear space measurements in the NSRI group compared with the SB group (P = 0.86; 95% confidence interval, -0.32 to 0.27). There was no difference when comparing the postoperative and final tibiofibular overlap measurements in the NSRI group compared with the SB group (P = 0.79; 95% confidence interval, -0.072 to 0.09). There were 3 cases of implant removal in the NSRI group compared with 2 in the SB group (P = 0.77). There was 1 failure in the NSRI group and none in the SB group. The remaining patients were all fully ambulatory at the final follow-up (P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS: A novel screw-suture syndesmotic implant provides the fixation of a screw, and the flexibility of a suture had similar radiographic outcomes compared with suture button fixation devices in treating ankle syndesmotic instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Opportunistic Use of Computed Tomography to Determine Muscle-Adipose Ratio Reliably Predicts Wound Complications After Kocher-Langenbeck Surgical Exposure of the Acetabulum.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether muscle-to-adipose ratio (MAR) along the course of a Kocher-Langenbeck incision is more accurate at predicting postoperative wound complications after acetabular fixation than waist-to-hip ratio or body mass index (BMI). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients who sustained an acetabular fracture and had fixation through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach from January 1 st , 2008 to December 31 st , 2018. For inclusion, patients had to have a pre-operative and a post-operative CT of the pelvis and a minimum follow up of 12 months. Patients were excluded if an antibiotic other than cefazolin was administered for prophylaxis, if they had a femur fracture treated with an antegrade intramedullary nail, if there was any associated pelvic ring injury requiring surgical treatment of any type, if there were any abdominal or pelvic procedures completed by another surgical service, if the patient underwent pelvic embolization of a vessel, if there was presence of a genitourinary injury or Morel-Lavallée lesion, or if there was a subsequent surgical procedure unrelated to the primary endpoint (e.g., revision fixation). OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Presence of a surgical site infection or a wound healing complication. BMI, WHR and MAR were evaluated and compared for their ability to predict a surgical site infection or a wound healing complication. RESULTS: One-hundred ninety-three patients were included in this study, and the mean follow-up was 17.4 months. Thirty patients (15.5%) developed a wound complication. Seventeen patients (8.8%) developed a superficial infection and 13 (6.7%) developed a deep infection. The mean BMI for those who developed a wound complication was 35.9. The mean MAR was 0.67 for patients who developed a wound complication versus 0.75 for those who did not. Receiver operator characteristic analysis showed an area under curve for BMI to be 0.717 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.577-0.857, P = 0.006) and for MAR to be 0.680 (inverted, 95% CI, 0.507-0.854, P = 0.022). The area under curve for waist-to-hip ratio was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: MAR is a significant predictor of postoperative wound complication in patients undergoing treatment of posterior wall acetabular fractures. The higher rate of wound complications in patients with a low MAR should be considered in the treatment of these patients and may be used to guide discussion regarding the risks of surgery and the potential use of adjuncts to reduce wound healing complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effectiveness of Flat-Panel Fluoroscopy in Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison to Image Intensifier Fluoroscopy With Radiopaque Grid.

Introduction: The use of traditional, image intensifier fluoroscopy with a radiopaque grid during direct anterior total hip arthroplasty (DA THA) has demonstrated reduced variability in component positioning and operative time compared to fluoroscopy without a grid. A disadvantage of image intensifier fluoroscopy is spatial distortion, particularly compared to flat-panel fluoroscopy systems. The purpose of this study is to determine whether flat-panel fluoroscopy decreases variability in component positioning during DA THA compared to the use of traditional grid fluoroscopy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 70 consecutive DA THAs between February 2020 and February 2021: 36 using flat-panel fluoroscopy, and 34 using traditional fluoroscopy with a grid. Radiographs were independently reviewed by 2 authors to identify components exceeding goal parameters: cup abduction of 40 ± 10 degrees, as well as offset and limb lengths within 10 mm of the contralateral side. Binary values for goal parameter achievement were assigned for each THA. Results: No significant difference was observed in the number of hips that met goals for cup abduction (100% vs 97%, P = 1.00), hip offset (88% vs 88%, P = 1.00), limb length (91% vs 94% [ ±10 mm], P = .669, 65% vs 72% [±5 mm], P = .498), or for the number of hips that met all 3 component goals (79% vs 80%, P = 1.00). No significant difference in operative time was noted between the 2 groups (110.2 minutes vs 100.9, P = .76). Conclusions: We demonstrated no significant difference in component positioning in DA THAs utilizing flat-panel fluoroscopy as compared to using traditional fluoroscopy with a grid.

The direct anterior approach for conversion to total hip arthroplasty after acetabular fixation is safe and effective.

INTRODUCTION: Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) after prior acetabular fracture repair is known to be demanding as studies have shown inferior implant survival rates and higher infection rates for these procedures. The direct anterior (DA) approach might help mitigate some of these risks by utilizing a new surgical tissue plane. However, potential criticisms of the DA approach for these surgeries include the inability to access previous acetabular implants or heterotopic ossification (HO) if they were to inhibit implant placement. The goals of this study are to analyze the efficacy of the DA approach for conversion to hip arthroplasty surgery after previous acetabular fixation. METHODS: After reviewing all records at our institution using current procedural terminology codes, we isolated patients with previous acetabular repair who underwent conversion to THA through the DA approach. Patient records were reviewed, and patients were contacted to obtain Harris Hip Scores. RESULTS: 23 patients (16 males and 7 females) were found with a mean follow-up time of 46 months (range 16-156 months). The mean age was 50 (range 28 - 83) and mean BMI was 28.5 (range 15.2 - 39.2). The average blood loss was 400 ml (range 200 - 900). The average operative time was 140 min (range 85-200 min). In 7 cases (32%) implants were encountered during acetabular reaming but the implants were either removed entirely or removed partially with a burr so that the acetabular cup could be positioned within acceptable parameters. In 2 cases pre-operative HO was encountered and was resected. The average Harris Hip Score at final follow-up was 92 (range 75 - 100). There were no deep infections and no neurovascular injuries encountered. 2 patients (9%) underwent revision surgery for aseptic femoral stem loosening. There was 1 anterior dislocation (4.5%) at 3 days post-operatively that was successfully treated with closed reduction and maintenance of hip precautions. Otherwise, the remaining 19 (86%) patients went on to uncomplicated recovery. CONCLUSION: This is the largest known cohort analyzing the DA approach for conversion to hip arthroplasty after previous acetabular fixation. Overall, we demonstrate that the DAA is safe for conversion THA after acetabular fixation.

Positive Correlation Between Social Media Utilization by Orthopaedic Journals and Impact Factor.

INTRODUCTION: Social media use has exploded in popularity over the past decade with over 1.5 billion users on Facebook and 320 million users on Twitter. The aim of this study was to analyze the use of social media by orthopaedic journals and determine whether a relationship exists between social media followers and journal impact factor. METHODS: The Clarivate Analytics Impact Factor tool was used to identify all orthopaedic journals with a 2022 impact factor of greater than 1.5. We then conducted a query on Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Facebook to determine which programs had pages on each platform. RESULTS: Seventeen journals were included across all orthopaedic subspecialties. Of the 17 journals, 14 (82.4%) had a Facebook page, eight (47%) had an Instagram page, 15 (88.2%) had a Twitter account, and 8 (47%) had a LinkedIn profile. When compiling the number of followers by social media platform, Twitter had the most (177,543), followed by Facebook (149,388), Instagram (81,739), and LinkedIn (77,459). We found a significant correlation between the number of social media followers and journal impact factor (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.67; P = 0.003). When analyzing each social media platform independently, we found a significant correlation between the number of Facebook and Twitter followers and journal impact factor (PCC = 0.54; P = 0.02 and PCC = 0.80; P < 0.001, respectively). DISCUSSION: We have shown a notable association between the number of social media followers and a journal's impact factor. With the increasing shift toward online distribution, orthopaedic journals may use our data when evaluating their social media strategy to maintain and potentially increase their exposure and potentially their impact factor.

Fellowship-Trained Orthopaedic Trauma Surgeons Achieve Better Postoperative Radiographic Parameters After Intramedullary Nailing of Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures when Compared With Non-trauma-Trained Surgeons.

INTRODUCTION: Intertrochanteric femoral fractures are common orthopaedic injuries accounting for nearly 30% of all fracture-related hospitalizations. Because many factors predictive of failure are related to technical aspects of the surgery, the purpose of this study was to compare radiographic parameters after fixation, comparing fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons with surgeons who did not complete an orthopaedic trauma fellowship. METHODS: We initiated a search for CPT code 27245 across our hospital network to identify 100 consecutive patients treated by five fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists and 100 consecutive patients treated by community surgeons. Patients were then stratified based on their surgeon's subspecialty training (trauma vs community). Primary outcome variables were neck-shaft angle (NSA), a comparison of the repaired NSA with the uninjured side, tip-apex distance, and reduction quality. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included in each group. The mean age in the community group was 77 years compared with 79 years in the trauma group. The mean tip-apex distance for the trauma group was 10 mm compared with 21 mm for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean postoperative NSA for the trauma group was 133° compared with 127° for the community group ( P < 0.001). The mean difference of the NSA of the repaired side compared with the uninjured side was 2.5° of valgus in the trauma group compared with 5° of varus for the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 93 good reductions in the trauma group compared with 19 in the community group ( P < 0.001). There were 0 poor reductions in the trauma group and 49 in the community group ( P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Overall, we have shown that fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeons achieve better reductions when treating intertrochanteric femur fractures with intramedullary nails. Orthopaedic residency training should emphasize teaching proper techniques and acceptable parameters for reduction and implant placement when treating geriatric intertrochanteric femur fractures.

The Evolution of the Musculoskeletal Trauma Section of the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination.

INTRODUCTION: In 1963, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons administered the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination (OITE), the first and longest running yearly medical specialty examination. There have been no recent studies to evaluate the content of the musculoskeletal trauma section of the OITE. METHODS: We analyzed all questions that were classified by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons as musculoskeletal trauma from 2012 to 2019. We recorded the number of musculoskeletal trauma questions in each examination, the topics and imaging modalities tested, the references cited, and the taxonomy classification of each question. We extrapolated from a similar musculoskeletal trauma study published in 2011 to create the previous examination cohort for comparison. RESULTS: For the current cohort, the average number of musculoskeletal trauma questions was 43.5 questions per examination (18.4%). The most frequently tested topics were proximal tibia fractures, pediatric trauma, hip fractures, and diaphyseal femur fractures, respectively. In previous examinations, questions from T1 and 2 were tested significantly more frequently compared with the current examinations (P < 0.001 and P = 0.02, respectively). In the current cohort, T3 questions were tested significantly more frequently than previous examinations (P = 0.001). Previous examinations had significantly more questions without an image (36 questions per year versus 25 questions per year, P < 0.001). In current versions of the examination, radiographs are tested significantly more frequently than other imaging modalities (P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The musculoskeletal trauma section of the OITE has evolved. To improve and focus study efforts, residents may use this study as a guide when preparing for the examination.

Periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated by retrograde intramedullary nails with a 10-degree distal bend achieve significantly better post-operative radiographic alignment when compared to conventional retrograde nails.

INTRODUCTION: Periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFFs) are a common complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the setting of well-fixed TKA components, treatment options include retrograde intramedullary nailing (rIMN) or lateral locked plating. Treatment with rIMN has historically been associated with potential for extension deformity when using conventional nails. We hypothesized that the PPDFFs treated with an intramedullary nail with a specifically designed 10-degree distal bend for periprosthetic fractures would result in improved post-operative sagittal alignment compared to conventional intramedullary nails. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at a level-1 trauma center over a 12-year period (2010 - 2022). Patients over the age of 18 who sustained a PPDFF treated with rIMN were identified. The primary outcomes of the study were post-operative coronal and sagittal alignment determined by reviewing post-operative radiographs. RESULTS: A total of 50 patients were included. Twenty-three patients were treated with a rIMN with a 10° distal bend. Twenty-seven patients were treated with a rIMN with distal bend of 5° The mean aPDFA for the 10° distal bend group was 81.7° compared to 92.8° in the 5° distal bend group (p<0.001). There were 3/23 (13%) significant sagittal plane deformities the 10° distal bend group compared to 11/27 (41%) in the 5° distal bend group (p = 0.03). There was one patient with a post-operative extension deformity in the 10° distal bend group compared to 11 patients in the 5° distal bend group (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Retrograde intramedullary nailing of PPDFF with a 10° distal bend results in significantly better alignment in the sagittal plane when compared to a conventional 5° nail. The use of a 5° nail resulted in an extension deformity significantly more frequently. We therefore recommend the utilization of a rIMN with a 10° distal bend when treating PPDFFs. SUMMARY: Periprosthetic distal femur fractures are a common complication following total knee arthroplasty. While several studies report on the use of retrograde intramedullary nails in the treatment of periprosthetic distal femur fractures, there are limited reports of the use of a novel retrograde intramedullary nail with a 10° distal bend in the treatment of these injuries. Herein we present a radiographic study comparing coronal and sagittal postoperative alignment following treatment with retrograde intramedullary nails with a 10° distal bend versus conventional retrograde nails with a 5° distal bend.

Treatment of Diaphyseal Tibial Fractures Distal to a Total Knee Arthroplasty by Intramedullary Nailing Is Safe and Effective.

OBJECTIVES: To report the clinical result of a series of patients who underwent intramedullary nailing (IMN) of tibial shaft fractures distal to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Level-1 trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Patients who sustained a tibial shaft fracture distal to a TKA treated with an IMN. INTERVENTION: IMN of tibial shaft fractures distal to a TKA. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Postoperative weight-bearing status, readmissions, and complications or failure of treatment within 90 days; Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores at the final follow-up; failure of treatment; and revision surgery. RESULTS: Nine patients were included. The average age was 71.4 years (range 55-87 years). All TKAs were cemented. The average distance between the tibial keel and the cortical density of the tibial tubercle was 24.1 mm (range 19.5-26.7 mm). Six nails were inserted using an infrapatellar portal, 2 were inserted using a suprapatellar portal, and 1 was inserted using a lateral parapatellar approach. The median nail diameter was 10 mm (range 9-12 mm). All fractures were healed at the final follow-up. There were no infections or arthroplasty-related complications. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores ranged from 100% to 74% (median 82%). CONCLUSION: Overall, we report on the largest cohort in the literature undergoing IMN of a tibial shaft fracture distal to a TKA. We demonstrate that IMN of diaphyseal tibial fractures distal to a TKA can be performed safely. We additionally demonstrate that this treatment is highly effective in achieving fracture union with no arthroplasty-related complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Low interobserver and intraobserver reliability using the Matta radiographic system for intraoperative assessment of reduction following acetabular ORIF.

INTRODUCTION: The system described by Matta for rating acetabular fracture quality of reduction following ORIF has been used extensively throughout the literature. However, the reliability of this system remains to be validated. We sought to determine the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of this system when used by fellowship-trained pelvic and acetabular surgeons to evaluate intraoperative fluoroscopy. METHODS: This is a retrospective evaluation of a prospectively collected acetabular fracture database at an academic level I trauma center. The quality of reduction of all acetabular fractures treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) between May 2013 and December 2015 was assessed using three standard intraoperative fluoroscopic views (anteroposterior and two 45˚ oblique Judets). Displacement of ≤1 mm was considered to be an anatomic reduction, 2-3 mm imperfect, and >3 mm poor according to the system described by Matta. A total of 107 acetabular fractures treated with ORIF with complete intraoperative fluoroscopic images during that time period were available for review. Acetabular fracture reductions were reviewed by the operative surgeon at the time of surgery and subsequently reviewed by two fellowship-trained pelvic and acetabular surgeons. All reduction assessments were performed in a blinded fashion. The primary outcome measure was interobserver reliability for assessing reduction quality. This was evaluated using a weighted kappa (κw) statistic between each evaluator and the operative surgeon and a generalized kappa (κg) for all 3 surgeons. After a 6-week "washout interval," the surgeons reviewed the images again and intraobserver agreement was calculated using a weighted kappa statistic. RESULTS: Interobserver reliability based on the initial assessment was low (κg = 0.09); however, did slightly improve with the second assessment to fair (κg = 0.24). Intraobserver reliability ranged from slight (κw = 0.20) to moderate (κw = 0.53) among the surgeons. DISCUSSION: Low interobserver and intraobserver reliability was found when quality of reduction was assessed with intraoperative fluoroscopic images by the operative and two other pelvic and acetabular surgeons using the Matta system. Given the importance of an anatomic reduction on functional and radiographic outcomes, an accurate and reliable system for assessing intraoperative quality of reduction is essential.

Clinical outcomes in prone positioning for percutaneous fixation of posterior column acetabular fractures.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous retrograde fixation of posterior column acetabular fractures is becoming a commonly practiced technique. Prone positioning provides reliably reproducible intraoperative fluoroscopic images necessary for precise preparation of the osseous fixation corridor necessary for accurate and safe implant placement. Additionally, the prone position facilitates an open posterior approach if an open reduction is necessary. The purpose of this study was to analyze the radiographic and clinical outcomes of retrograde posterior column fixation utilizing the prone position. METHODS: From 2017 to 2020, 41 patients were included in the retrospective study. Clinical outcomes were collected for a minimum of 6 months. Implant placement was assessed on post-operative pelvic computed tomography (CT) scans and fracture union was assessed on routine follow-up radiographs. RESULTS: All (100%) cases achieved union by 4 months, with an average time to union of 3.2 months. Every post-operative CT scan demonstrated screw placement contained throughout the posterior column with no intrusion into the hip joint or sciatic notch. Clinically, one patient reported pain with sitting. No patients required additional surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Prone positioning is a versatile and effective approach for retrograde percutaneous fixation of posterior column acetabular fractures. This study is the first to report clinical outcomes utilizing this technique and contributes to a growing body of the literature supporting the value and safety of percutaneous fixation of acetabular fractures appropriate for this fixation strategy.

Retrograde intramedullary nailing of comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures results in high union rate.

PURPOSE: Retrograde intramedullary nailing of intra-articular distal femur fractures with metaphyseal and/or epiphyseal comminution is controversial and considered a contraindication to nailing. The purpose of this study was to report union rate, complications, and secondary procedures after open reduction and retrograde intramedullary nailing of comminuted, intra-articular, distal femur fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review performed at an urban level one trauma center identified 16 patients AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) 33-C2 and 33-C3 femur fractures treated with open reduction, lag screws, and retrograde intramedullary nail fixation. Radiographic union, complications, secondary operations were reviewed. RESULTS: At the 3-month follow-up 12 (86%) of the 14 patients with radiographs had healed. At last follow-up, all 16 femur fractures achieved radiographic union after the index procedure. No patient required a revision procedure for delayed union or nonunion. Complications occurred in 6 (38%) patients, including failed distal interlocking screws (n = 2), knee arthrofibrosis (n = 3), superficial wound infection (n = 1), and wound dehiscence (n = 1). Three (19%) patients required secondary procedures, which included knee manipulation under anesthesia (n = 3), distal interlocking screw removal (n = 2), and closure of a wound dehiscence (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures that can be successfully treated with retrograde IMN fixation will reliably go on to union with a complication rate that is favorable to that reported for plate fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case-series.

A New Algorithm for Classifying Acetabular Fracture Patterns on Three-dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions Markedly Improves Residents' Ability to Correctly Classify Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: CT and three-dimensional (3D) CT reconstructions have been shown to improve the understanding of acetabular fractures. With the increased availability of 3D pelvic CT reconstructions, our goal for this study was to develop an algorithm to aid residents in the classification of acetabular fractures. We hypothesized that the use of a stepwise algorithm will markedly enhance the trainees' ability to correctly identify acetabular fracture patterns. METHODS: This was a multicenter study that included 33 residents. Residents reviewed 15 sets of 3D reconstructions of the 10 acetabular fracture patterns. Residents completed the first round, and the results were collected electronically. Three weeks later, they were asked to classify the fractures a second time with the use of the algorithm. The number of correct responses from the two sessions was analyzed to determine if the algorithm improved residents' ability to correctly classify fracture patterns. RESULTS: Thirty-three residents classified 15 fractures which yielded 495 unique responses. Residents correctly classified 52.5% (260/495) of fractures without the algorithm, which significantly increased to 77.5% (384/495) (P = 0.001) with the algorithm. When stratified by year in residency, all residents were able to correctly classify markedly more fractures with the algorithm. DISCUSSION: Overall, we believe this method is a reproducible diagnostic tool that will assist residents in classifying acetabular fractures. We were able to demonstrate that with the use of this algorithm, residents' ability to correctly classify acetabular fractures is markedly enhanced, regardless of year in training. This algorithm will be a useful adjunct to assist and advance trainees' education and understanding of a complex topic.

Pediatric and Adolescent Fractures of the Acetabulum Treated With ORIF: What Are Their Functional Outcomes?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the functional outcomes of pediatric and adolescent patients (<18 year old) who sustained acetabulum fractures that were treated with open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Thirty-four pediatric and adolescent patients underwent acetabulum fracture ORIF between 2001 and 2018. Of the operatively treated patients, 21 patients had sufficient follow-up (>6 months), one died after fixation secondary to other traumatic injuries, and 12 patients were lost to follow-up. INTERVENTION: Acetabulum fracture ORIF. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: The SF-36 Health Survey and Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA) were compared with population norms. The modified Merle d'Aubigné clinical hip score, Matta radiologic outcome, and postoperative complications were also documented. RESULTS: Functional outcome data were available at a mean of 5 years 2 months. Mean SF-36 scores were 44.8 and 50.1 for the physical component score and mental component scores, respectively, which did not differ significantly from US population norms (physical component score mean: 50, P = 0.061 and mental component score mean: 50, P = 0.973). Furthermore, the mean SMFA Bother Index score was 18.6, which is not significantly different from the population norm mean of 13.8 (P = 0.268). However, the function index mean was 31.9, which was significantly worse than the population norm mean of 12.7 (P = 0.001). Two patients with a delayed reduction (>6 hours) of an acetabulum fracture dislocation had poor outcomes related to the development of avascular necrosis and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: In this small cohort, 86% (18/21) of these patients had a favorable functional outcome with the exception of the SMFA Functional Index that was significantly less than population norms. Although long-term follow-up is needed, we advocate for operative management of pediatric and adolescent acetabulum fractures when adult displacement and instability criteria are present. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Theme Park Water Slides: A New Mechanism of Causing 61B2.3 Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Case Series.

CASE: We present a series of 3 pelvic ring injuries that occurred on 1 high-speed water slide at a theme park in Orlando, FL. This is the first time this injury has been reported at a water park in the United States. All patients underwent surgical management and had an excellent outcome. CONCLUSION: Pelvic ring injuries usually occur because of high-energy mechanisms, but unique mechanisms of injuries are possible. We aim to draw attention to this unique mechanism of injury because serious injury may occur to riders. Water parks should use the information presented in this study to develop and refine safety requirements for patrons.

Transverse and transverse-variant acetabular fractures with ipsilateral sacroiliac joint injuries: A technical note for reduction and stabilization.

Transverse and T-type acetabular fractures are high energy fractures that may be associated with a disruption of the pelvic ring. While several studies report upon clinical findings and outcomes associated with combination injuries of the pelvic ring and acetabulum, there are limited reports discussing surgical treatment strategies for reduction and stabilization. Herein we focus on describing reduction and stabilization techniques of transverse or transverse-variant acetabular fractures with an associated ipsilateral partial disruption of the sacroiliac joint.

Blunt End Wire and Lateral Sacral View: A Technical Trick to Precisely Terminate Percutaneous Pelvic Brim Screw Fixation in the Posterior Ilium.

SUMMARY: Percutaneous screw fixation in the treatment of a variety of pelvic fractures may involve placement of a pelvic brim or "LC-2" screw. The technique requires the use of the combined obturator oblique inlet view to define the medial and lateral cortical borders of the corridor and an iliac oblique view to define the cranial aspect of the sciatic notch. No technique has been reported on how to safely avoid placement of such percutaneous fixation beyond the posterior cortex of the ilium. A simple technique using the blunt end of a guidewire and a true lateral of the posterior ilium is reported.

A Nomogram for Predicting 30-day Mortality in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: Femoral neck fractures in the elderly are increasingly common as a result of a growing geriatric population with 1-year mortality rates approaching 35%. While preoperative medical optimization and early time to surgery have reduced morbidity and mortality, patients with numerous medical comorbidities remain high risk for death in the perioperative period. Identifying those with greatest risk with a scoring system or nomogram may assist multidisciplinary teams in reducing mortality following hemiarthroplasty. PURPOSE: Identify predictors of 30-day mortality in elderly patients who underwent hemiarthroplasty for a femoral neck fracture to generate a predictive nomogram to determine the probability of post-operative mortality. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation using data from the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2014 with CPT code 27125 for hip hemiarthroplasty. Multiple factors including demographics and comorbidities were compared in patients who experienced 30-day mortality and those who did not. T-test and chi-square tests were used to analyze data and a multivariate model was generated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Advanced age (odds ratio (OR) 1.04), underweight BMI (OR 1.55), male sex (OR 1.80), reduced functional status (OR 2.04), heart failure within 30 days prior to surgery (OR 2.22), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade > 2 (OR > 2.50), disseminated cancer (OR 3.43) were all found to have statistically significant odds ratios for 30-day mortality following hemiarthroplasty. CONCLUSION: A tool based on easily identifiable risk factors, demographics, and comorbidities was developed that can help predict elderly patients who will experience mortality within 30 days of following hemiarthroplasty. In addition to identifying high risk patients, the nomogram can serve as a counseling tool for physicians to use with patients and their families to assist with better understanding of perioperative mortality risk.

Medically Necessary Orthopaedic Surgery During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Safe Surgical Practices and a Classification to Guide Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has rapidly evolved as a viral pandemic. Countries worldwide have been affected by the recent outbreak caused by the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome)-CoV-2 virus. As with prior viral pandemics, health-care workers are at increased risk. Orthopaedic surgical procedures are common in health-care systems, ranging from emergency to elective procedures. Many orthopaedic surgical procedures are life or limb-saving and cannot be postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic because of potential patient harm. Our goal is to analyze how orthopaedic surgeons can perform medically necessary procedures during the pandemic and to help guide decision-making perioperatively. METHODS: We performed a review of the existing literature regarding COVID-19 and prior viral outbreaks to help guide clinical practice in terms of how to safely perform medically necessary orthopaedic procedures during the pandemic for both asymptomatic patients and high-risk (e.g., COVID-19-positive) patients. We created a classification system based on COVID-19 positivity, patient health status, and COVID-19 prevalence to help guide perioperative decision-making. RESULTS: We advocate that only urgent and emergency surgical procedures be performed. By following recommendations from the American College of Surgeons, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the recent literature, safe orthopaedic surgery and perioperative care can be performed. Screening measures are needed for patients and perioperative teams. Surgeons and perioperative teams at risk for contracting COVID-19 should use appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including N95 respirators or powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs), when risk of viral spread is high. When preparing for medically necessary orthopaedic procedures during the pandemic, our classification system will help to guide decision-making. A multidisciplinary care plan is needed to ensure patient safety with medically necessary orthopaedic procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Orthopaedic surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic can be performed safely when medically necessary but should be rare for COVID-19-positive or high-risk patients. Appropriate screening, PPE use, and multidisciplinary care will allow for safe medically necessary orthopaedic surgery to continue during the COVID-19 pandemic. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Increasing Fellow Recruitment: How Can Fellowship Program Websites Be Optimized?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the importance of factors considered by orthopaedic trauma fellowship applicants when evaluating programs. We hypothesized that applicants will prioritize consistent factors when applying to programs. In addition, we assessed how the applicants use the Internet to research potential fellowships. Our goal is to provide fellowships with information to optimize both their fellowship and online contents. METHODS: At the 2018 and 2019 Orthopaedic Trauma Association meetings, a paper survey was given to each attendee of multiple fellowships' informational sessions. The survey consisted of 25 factors that applicants may consider when evaluating fellowships ranked on a 1-to-5 Likert scale. Additional questions were asked to determine how applicants use the Internet and social media when researching fellowships. RESULTS: We received 111 surveys (roughly a 56% response rate). Ninety-eight applicants (88%) indicated that they use fellowship websites to research fellowships. The utilization of fellowship websites was markedly greater than the use of other online resources. The highest rated factors surveyed were surgical experience (mean 4.95; SD 0.26), pelvic and acetabular experience (4.80; 0.52), lower extremity fracture experience (4.75; 0.58), and current faculty at the fellowship (4.55; 0.78). The lowest rated factors were the ability to moonlight (2.04; 1.08), salary (1.88; 1.12), and spine trauma experience (1.45; 0.87). Surgical experience and pelvic/acetabular experience were rated markedly higher than every other factor surveyed. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that most orthopaedic trauma fellowship applicants use fellowship websites when researching programs. Programs may use this study to optimize their fellowship experience to reflect what the applicants value. In addition, programs may use this study as a guide when updating their websites. Fellowships with informative websites that meaningfully highlight their fellowship experience may have a competitive edge in attracting applicants to their programs.