Efficacy of Postoperative Opioid-Sparing Regimens for Hand Surgery: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

PURPOSE: Multiple interventions have been implemented to reduce opioid prescribing in upper extremity surgery. However, few studies have evaluated pain relief and patient satisfaction as related to failure of these protocols. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of limited and nonopioid ("opioid-sparing") regimens for upper extremity surgery as it pertains to patient satisfaction, pain experienced, and need for additional refills/rescue analgesia. METHODS: We aimed to systematically review randomized controlled trials of opioid-sparing approaches in upper extremity surgery. An initial search of studies evaluating opioid-sparing regimens after upper extremity surgery from the elbow distal yielded 1,320 studies, with nine meeting inclusion criteria. Patient demographics, surgery type, postoperative pain regimen, satisfaction measurements, and number of patients inadequately treated within each study were recorded. Outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Nine randomized controlled trials with 1,480 patients were included. Six of nine studies (67%) reported superiority or equivalence of pain relief with nonopioid or limited opioid regimens. However, across all studies, 4.2% to 25% of patients were not adequately treated by the opioid-sparing protocols. This includes four of seven studies (57%) assessing number of medication refills or rescue analgesia reporting increased pill consumption, refills, or rescue dosing with limited/nonopioid regimens. Five of six studies (83%) reporting satisfaction outcomes found no difference in satisfaction with pain control, medication strength, and overall surgical experience using opioid-sparing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-sparing regimens provide adequate pain relief for most upper extremity surgery patients. However, a meaningful number of patients on opioid-sparing regimens required greater medication refills and increased use of rescue analgesia. These patients also reported no difference in satisfaction compared with limited/nonopioid regimens. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic II.

Distal Upper Extremity Arterial Calcification as a Predictor for Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease by Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring.

Several studies have linked calcification of the thoracic and lower extremity arterial trunks to an increased risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD). Calcifications of the radial and/or ulnar artery are regularly identified in hand/wrist x-rays; however, the clinical relevance of these findings as related to identifying subclinical CAD is not well understood. Associations between CAD and upper extremity calcifications have been reported, but the timeline is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between upper extremity arterial calcifications on hand radiographs with CAD by coronary artery calcification (CAC) scoring in patients with no known history of CAD. This is a pilot single-center, prospective, matched cohort study. We included patients with no known history of CAD, related symptoms, or major risk factors. We recruited five patients with calcifications (cal+) and five patients matched by age, race, sex, and medical history but without calcifications (cal-). CAC scores were determined from computed tomography scanning, and lipid profile was evaluated. In the cal+ group, the mean CAC total score was 244.1; in the control (cal-) group, it was 85.2. The mean total cholesterol levels were 220.8 mg per dL and 167 mg per dL in the cal+ and cal- groups, respectively. Two cal+ patients with CAC scores of 937 and 669 died shortly after being enrolled in our study. Preliminary findings suggest that calcifications in the radial or ulnar artery in otherwise asymptomatic patients with no history of CAD may be an independent sign of CAD.

Site of Ambulance Origination and Billing for Out-of-Network Services.

Importance: The No Surprises Act implemented in 2022 aims to protect patients from surprise out-of-network (OON) bills, but it does not include ground ambulance services. Understanding ground ambulance OON and balance billing patterns from previous years could guide legislation aimed to protect patients following ground ambulance use. Objective: To characterize OON billing from ground ambulance services by evaluating whether OON billing risk differs by the site of ambulance origination (home, hospital, nonhospital medical facility, or scene of incident). Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study of the Merative MarketScan dataset between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2020, using claims-based data from employer-based private health insurance plans in the US. Participants included patients who utilized ground ambulances during the study period. Data were analyzed from June to December 2023. Exposure: Medical encounter requiring ground ambulance transportation. Main Outcomes and Measures: Ground ambulance OON billing prevalence was calcuated. Linear probability models adjusted for state-level mixed effects were fit to evaluate OON billing probability across ambulance origins. Secondary outcomes included the allowed payment, patient cost-sharing amounts, and potential balance bills for OON ambulances. Results: Among 2 031 937 ground ambulance services (1 375 977 unique patients) meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 1 072 791 (52.8%) rides transported men, and the mean (SD) patient age was 41 (18) years. Of all services, 1 113 676 (54.8%) were billed OON. OON billing probabilities for ambulances originating from home or scene were higher by 12.0 percentage points (PP) (95% CI, 11.8-12.2 PP; P < .001 for home; 95% CI, 11.7-12.2 PP; P < .001 for scene) vs those originating from hospitals. Mean (SD) total financial burden, including cost-sharing and potential balance bills per ambulance service, was $434.70 ($415.99) per service billed OON vs $132.21 ($244.92) per service billed in-network. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of over 2 million ground ambulance services, ambulances originating from home, the scene of an incident, and nonhospital medical facilities were more likely to result in OON bills. Legislation is needed to protect patients from surprise billing following use of ground ambulances, more than half of which resulted in OON billing. Future legislation should at minimum offer protections for these subsets of patients often calling for an ambulance in urgent or emergent situations.

Considerations for Perioperative Thromboembolic Risk Mitigation in Actively and Recently COVID-19-Positive Patients Undergoing Hand Surgery.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID) induces a hypercoagulable state causing an increased risk of venous and arterial thromboses. Distal limb and microvascular circulation are critical to the success of many hand surgeries, and patients who are actively or recently infected with COVID may be at a higher risk for perioperative thrombotic events. Little information is available regarding how to handle actively or recently infected COVID patients, including preoperative risk assessment, intraoperative decision making, and postoperative considerations regarding thrombotic risk. Our aim was to review the literature to determine how the hand surgeon can best prepare for and manage the actively or recently COVID-positive patients undergoing hand surgeries.

Bone Health Screening Prior to Medicare Eligibility-Osteoporosis Screening and Fracture Prevention After Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 50-59.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend bone mineral density (BMD) testing after fragility fractures in patients aged 50 years or older. This study aimed to assess BMD testing and subsequent fragility fractures after low-energy distal radius fractures (DRFs) among patients aged 50-59 years. METHODS: We used the 2010-2020 MarketScan dataset to identify patients with initial DRFs with ages ranging between 50 and 59 years. We assessed the 1-year BMD testing rate and 3-year non-DRF fragility fracture rate. We created Kaplan-Meier plots to depict fragility fracture-free probabilities over time and used log-rank tests to compare the Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: Among 78,389 patients aged 50-59 years with DRFs, 24,589 patients met our inclusion criteria, and most patients were women (N = 17,580, 71.5%). The BMD testing rate within 1 year after the initial DRF was 12.7% (95% CI, 12.3% to 13.2%). In addition, 1-year BMD testing rates for the age groups of 50-54 and 55-59 years were 10.4% (95% CI, 9.9% to 11.0%) and 14.9% (95% CI, 14.2% to 15.6%), respectively. Only 1.8% (95% CI, 1.5% to 2.1%) of men, compared with 17.1% (95% CI, 16.5% to 17.7%) of women, underwent BMD testing within 1 year after the initial fracture. The overall 3-year fragility fracture rate was 6.0% (95% CI, 5.6% to 6.3%). The subsequent fragility fracture rate was lower for those with any BMD testing (4.4%; 95% CI, 3.7% to 5.2%), compared with those without BMD testing (6.2%; 95% CI, 5.9% to 6.6%; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: We report a low BMD testing rate for patients aged between 50 and 59 years after initial isolated DRFs, especially for men and patients aged between 50 and 54 years. Patients who received BMD testing had a lower rate of subsequent fracture within 3 years. We recommend that providers follow published guidelines and initiate an osteoporosis work-up for patients with low-energy DRFs to ensure early diagnosis. This provides an opportunity to initiate treatment that may prevent subsequent fractures. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognosis II.

Patient Perspectives on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Thumb, Hand, or Wrist Pain and Function: A Survey of 98 Patients.

PURPOSE: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an established option to improve pain and function for many orthopedic conditions. Our purpose was to obtain patient perspectives regarding CBT for thumb, hand, or wrist pain and function. METHODS: Between March and April 2022, we distributed an electronic survey via email to patients in our institution's health system with a diagnosis of arthritic or non-specific thumb, hand, or wrist pain. The survey included the opening statement "Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a non-medication option to help manage pain and improve function" and up to 13 questions pertaining to patients' experiences and perceptions regarding CBT. The survey was anonymous and did not collect protected health information. We used descriptive statistics for the findings. RESULTS: We distributed the survey to 327 patients, yielding a 30% response rate (98/327). Of the respondents, 17 reported already using CBT to specifically help with pain/function. Of these, 15 felt it was helpful and agreed it could help others. Of the subset that used CBT for arthritis, all felt it was helpful. Of the 75 respondents with no CBT experience, 42 indicated "I've never heard of it," 28 responded "I never had it recommended as an option," and 16 marked "I don't know enough about it." Small subsets noted potential personal barriers to CBT implementation, such as cost, time involved, or perceived lack of potential efficacy for themselves. CONCLUSIONS: A small proportion of patients from our institution with thumb, hand, or wrist pain are utilizing CBT, and the majority finds it helpful. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While some patients are already substantially benefiting from CBT to improve their thumb, hand, or wrist pain or function, there is a notable opportunity for providers to increase awareness and recommendations for this option.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis in the Management of Distal Fingertip Amputation and Crush Injury.

Purpose: We sought to investigate the role of prophylactic antibiotics for distal fingertip crush injury or transphalangeal amputation treated outside of an operating room and better understand the factors that contribute to antibiotic-prescribing decisions. We hypothesized that prophylactic antibiotics do not meaningfully reduce the incidence of infection and that antibiotics are prescribed in a predictable way. Methods: This is a retrospective review of all patients treated in a MedStar-affiliated emergency department or urgent care for nonsurgical distal fingertip trauma in 2019. Patient demographics, comorbidities, injury characteristics, interventions, and follow-up details were recorded. Exclusion criteria included signs of infection at the time of presentation, minor injuries not requiring intervention, bite wounds, one-time intravenous antibiotic administration without oral course, and surgical intervention. Outcomes included infection and interventions at follow-up. Chi-square analysis was performed, comparing antibiotic and no-antibiotic groups. A stepwise binomial regression was used to evaluate for variables predictive of antibiotic prescription. Results: We identified eight infections in 323 patients included in the study (2.5% incidence of infection). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of infection between patients treated with antibiotics (2.7%) and those who did not receive antibiotics (2.2%). However, due to the low incidence of infections, we were likely underpowered for this analysis. We also created a model to predict antibiotic prescribing, which achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.86 (P < .0001) based on age, bleeding disorders, depressive disorders, open wound status, amputation, fractures, and encounter type. Conclusions: The low incidence of infection (2.5%) and lack of a meaningful difference between the groups call into question prophylactic antibiotic prescribing after these distal fingertip injuries. Our model does predict provider prescribing habits, identifying areas for potential practice pattern change. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Video-Based Assessment of Microsurgical Trainees: An Evaluation of Gender Bias.

BACKGROUND: Gender bias in graduate medical evaluations remains a challenging issue. This study evaluates implicit gender bias in video-based evaluations of microsurgical technique, which has not previously been described in the literature. METHODS: Two videos were recorded of microsurgical anastomosis; the first was performed by a hand/microsurgery fellow and the second by an expert microsurgeon. A total of 150 surgeons with microsurgical experience were recruited to evaluate the videos; they were told these videos depicted a surgical trainee 1 month into fellowship followed by the same trainee 10 months later. The only variable was the name ("Rachel" or "David") that each participant was randomly assigned to evaluate. Participants were asked to score each video for quality, technique, efficiency, as well as overall progression and development after the second video compared with the initial video. To focus on bias, these outcome measures were selected to be purposefully subjective and all ratings were based on a subjective 1to 10 scale (10 = excellent). RESULTS: The analysis included 150 participants (75% male). There were no statistically significant differences in scores between the "female" and "male" trainee. The trainees received the same median initial (1-month video) and final (11th-month video) scores for all criteria except initial technique, in which the female trainee received a 7 and the male trainee received an 8. Notably, 11-month scores were consistently the same or lower than 1-month scores for both study groups (p < 0.001). There were also no differences within either study group based on participant sex. Microsurgery practitioners overall rated both groups lower than those who do not currently practice microsurgery. CONCLUSION: Our study did not identify a gender bias in this evaluation method. Further investigation into how we assess and grade trainees as well as the presence and impact of implicit biases on varying surgical assessment methods is warranted.

Utility of Ultrasound for Identifying Median Nerve Changes Indicative of Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture.

Purpose: Ultrasound offers a fast and inexpensive way to evaluate the median nerve. However, there is a paucity of data assessing ultrasound in acute trauma. Our study aimed to characterize median nerve changes indicative of acute carpal tunnel syndrome (ACTS) in a cadaveric distal radius fracture (DRF) model. Methods: We used 10 upper-extremity specimens. We induced ACTS (carpal tunnel pressure >40 mm Hg) in a distraction-only model and then used a DRF model as a neutral position, under traction, or wrist extension. We measured the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA), height, and width with ultrasound in each model. We used a novel calculation, height-width ratio (HWR), to describe nerve shape. A low HWR indicates an elliptical shape; as the HWR increases toward one, the shape becomes more circular. The CSA measurements and HWR at pressures >40 mm Hg were used to calculate a 95% confidence interval, which defined the threshold for ACTS. Results: Wrist distraction created carpal tunnel pressures >40 mm Hg in all specimens. Distraction increased CSA compared with baseline (9.1 ± 0.9 mm2 vs 6.3 ± 1.2 mm2, P < .001). Under ACTS-level pressures, the thresholds for CSA and HWR were 8.5 mm2 and 0.41, respectively. HWR significantly increased with distraction compared with baseline (0.47 ± 0.10 vs 0.28 ± 0.09, P = .006). Most neutral DRF models (n = 8, 80%) met the CSA threshold for ACTS, whereas all specimens with a DRF extended or under traction had CSAs above the ACTS threshold. Compared to the baseline, the shape of the median nerve was more circular in all DRFs, including neutral (0.28 ± 0.09 vs 0.39 ± 0.13), under traction (0.43 ± 0.09), and extended (0.45 ± 0.09). Conclusions: ACTS should be suspected in patients with median nerves demonstrating increased CSA and adopting a more circular shape. Fracture positioning impacts median nerve CSA with wrist extension, causing the greatest change. Median nerve HWR may offer an easier ultrasonographic alternative to CSA. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.

Performance of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Detecting Acute Tourniquet-Induced Upper-Extremity Ischemia Across Different Skin Phenotypes.

PURPOSE: Diagnosing acute tissue ischemia is challenging, particularly in patients with higher skin melanin content. We investigated whether near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is effective and consistent in detecting upper extremity ischemia across various skin phenotypes. METHODS: Volunteers underwent tourniquet-induced upper extremity ischemia. Skin color was evaluated by the Fitzpatrick scale (FP, range: I-VI) and the Von Luschan scale (vL, range: 1-36). A NIRS probe was placed on one finger. The tourniquet was inflated to 250 mmHg and perfusion was restricted for 7 minutes, followed by a 10-minute monitored reperfusion period. The percent tissue oxygenation (StO2) was recorded. RESULTS: A total of 55 volunteers were enrolled (22 self-identified as Caucasian, 21 African American, 7 Asian, 2 Latinx, and 2 Biracial). Average starting and ending StO2 for the cohort was 72.2% and 45.9%, respectively. However, there was variability based on skin melanin content. Increasing vL correlated with lower starting StO2, smaller StO2 decrease, and shorter time to reach ischemic steady state. High skin melanin (FP scale IV-VI) was associated with significantly lower starting StO2 (-7.1%) and shorter time to reach ischemic steady state (-0.3 mins). African Americans had lower starting StO2 (-8.6%) and 7.8% lesser total StO2 decrease than other groups. CONCLUSIONS: NIRS can rapidly detect acute onset tissue ischemia in the upper extremity. However, given the lower starting StO2 and smaller total StO2 decrease after tourniquet-induced ischemia for patients with higher skin melanin, using NIRS for clinical detection of acute ischemia may be more challenging in these patients. These inconsistencies may limit use of NIRS clinically for spot identification of ischemia. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Although NIRS has utility in tracking tissue oxygenation, variable performance with different skin melanin content raises concerns as to whether different cutoff/threshold levels are needed for different groups, and whether NIRS is reliable for spot checks in acute events.

Patient interpretations vary for questions in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity.

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (PROMIS-UE) is frequently used in research/clinical care, but how it is understood by patients is unknown. We conducted a qualitative study including 12 cognitive interviews with patients with hand/upper extremity conditions and those purposively sampled for mixed literacy. Using framework analysis, we identified six themes total: difficulty answering questions due to insufficient information; uncertainty about whether to respond with the ability to perform the task with the injured extremity alone, either the injured or healthy extremity, or both; lack of experience doing certain tasks; uncertainty about whether to answer questions based on ability to perform the task with or without adaptive techniques; answering questions based on limitations not related to upper extremity function; and uncertainty regarding whether to answer questions on the basis of ability or pain. This study demonstrates the challenges in completing questionnaires and that variability may limit the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the PROMIS-UE.

Use of Treatments after Recovery from Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Which treatments patients continue to use more than 1 year after primary thumb carpometacarpal arthritis surgery, and how such use relates to patient-reported outcomes, is largely unknown. METHODS: The authors identified patients who had isolated primary trapeziectomy alone or with ligament reconstruction ± tendon interposition and were 1 to 4 years postoperative. Participants completed a surgical site-focused electronic questionnaire about what treatments they still used. Patient-reported outcome measures were the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire and visual analog/numerical rating scales for current pain, pain with activities, and typical worst pain. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria and participated. At a median of 3 years after surgery, over 40% reported current use of at least one treatment for their thumb carpometacarpal surgical site, with 22% using more than one treatment. Of those who still used treatments, 48% used over-the-counter medications, 34% used home or office-based hand therapy, 29% used splinting, 25% used prescription medications, and 4% used corticosteroid injections. A total of 108 participants completed all patient-reported outcome measures. With bivariate analyses, the authors found that use of any treatment after recovering from surgery was associated with statistically and clinically significantly worse scores for all measures. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically relevant proportions of patients continue to use various treatments a median of 3 years after primary thumb carpometacarpal arthritis surgery. Continued use of any treatment is associated with significantly worse patient-reported outcomes for function and pain.

Patient-Reported Data Augment Prediction Models of Persistent Opioid Use after Elective Upper Extremity Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Opioids play a role in pain management after surgery, but prolonged use contributes to developing opioid use disorder. Identifying patients at risk of prolonged use is critical for deploying interventions that reduce or avoid opioids; however, available predictive models do not incorporate patient-reported data (PRD), and it remains unclear whether PRD can predict postoperative use behavior. The authors used a machine learning approach leveraging preoperative PRD and electronic health record data to predict persistent opioid use after upper extremity surgery. METHODS: Included patients underwent upper extremity surgery, completed preoperative PRD questionnaires, and were prescribed opioids after surgery. The authors trained models using a 2018 cohort and tested in a 2019 cohort. Opioid use was determined by patient report and filled prescriptions up to 6 months after surgery. The authors assessed model performance using area under the receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, specificity, and Brier score. RESULTS: Among 1656 patients, 19% still used opioids at 6 weeks, 11% at 3 months, and 9% at 6 months. The XGBoost model trained on PRD plus electronic health record data achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic 0.73 at 6 months. Factors predictive of prolonged opioid use included income; education; tobacco, drug, or alcohol abuse; cancer; depression; and race. Protective factors included preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Physical Health and Upper Extremity scores. CONCLUSIONS: This opioid use prediction model using preintervention data had good discriminative performance. PRD variables augmented electronic health record-based machine learning algorithms in predicting postsurgical use behaviors and were some of the strongest predictors. PRD should be used in future efforts to guide proper opioid stewardship. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.

Evaluating Language Characteristics and Related Gender Bias in Letters of Recommendation for Hand Surgery Fellowship.

PURPOSE: Letters of recommendation (LORs) function as an indicator of competence and future potential for a trainee. Our purpose was to evaluate gender bias in hand surgery fellowship applicant LORs. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all LORs submitted to a hand surgery fellowship program between 2015 and 2020. Demographic data about applicants and letter writers were collected. Linguistic analysis was performed using a text analysis software, and results were evaluated with nonparametric tests, multiple linear regression models, and a mixed effects regression model. RESULTS: Letters of recommendation were analyzed; 720 letters for 188 (23.4%) female applicants and 2,337 letters for 616 (76.6%) male applicants. Compared with LORs written for men, those written for women had more references to categories of anxiety (eg, worried and fearful) and affiliation (eg, ally and friend). Letters for women had more "clout." In subgroup analysis, letters for female plastic surgery applicants had more words signaling power, whereas recommendations for female applicants from orthopedic residencies had more words related to anxiety, achievement, work, and leisure. CONCLUSIONS: Letters of recommendation written for female residents applying to hand fellowship had more references to anxiety but were written with higher clout and more words of affiliation. Subgroup analysis looking at orthopedic and plastic surgery applicants separately found a mixed picture. Overall, these LORs written for applicants to hand fellowship had no notable specific patterns of gender bias in our analyses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because programs look to train the next generation of hand surgeons, alerting letter readers to trends in implicit bias may help in the selection of qualified applicants. Bringing topics of implicit bias forward may help writers think more critically about word choice and topics.

Evaluating the Role of Mentorship in Career Advancement: A Survey of Women in Academic Hand Surgery.

PURPOSE: Despite the increasing percentage of women within the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, women remain underrepresented within leadership in academic hand surgery. Although this disparity in leadership representation may be improving, we aimed to investigate the role mentorship plays in advancing women in academic hand surgery. METHODS: This is a survey-based, mixed-methods study. A written survey assessing themes in personal and professional experiences with mentorship was sent to hand fellowship-trained women. Inclusion criteria were the completion of a hand fellowship and current affiliation with an academic institution. An evolved grounded theory framework was used to evaluate the responses. Themes were identified based on common responses. RESULTS: Of 186 eligible participants, 144 (85.2%) received the survey. The response rate was 48.6%. Respondents indicated that residency was the stage at which mentorship was most impactful (n = 25, 37%), and half of the respondents identified their desire to work in academic hand surgery during residency (n = 35, 50%). Obstacles to finding a mentor included lack of availability (n = 46, 67.7%), hesitance in searching for a mentor (n = 16, 23.5%), and searching for a mentor within an environment that was not conducive to success for trainees (n = 7, 10.3%). Most (84%) cited instances were the ones having the advice of a woman mentor was more impactful than that of a mentor who is a man. The reported need for same-sex mentorship fell into three categories: (1) insight into shared experiences, (2) assistance with conflict/bias management, and (3) support during career navigation. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study demonstrate the need for high-quality mentorship during the residency with a specific emphasis on same-sex mentorship. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our findings provide clear objectives related to improving access to and quality of mentorship. This foundational understanding will enrich mentor-mentee relationships, allowing for greater personal and professional success and satisfaction for both parties.

Diagnostic Biomarkers for Upper Extremity Chronic Pain Conditions.

Hand surgery patients often experience chronic pain conditions. However, there are few reliable ways to measure pain, making diagnosis and subsequent management of these conditions notably challenging for the hand surgeon. Various diagnostic biomarkers have been actively studied in the chronic pain management field with promising results. This review discusses the development of diagnostic biomarkers for chronic pain conditions of the upper extremity, including complex regional pain syndrome, osteoarthritis, and neuropathic pain. Techniques involving the measurements of heart rate variability, molecular biomarkers including inflammatory and noninflammatory molecules, metabolites, and exosomes, magnetic resonance imagining and electroencephalography, as well as skin biopsy, are discussed. Future potential applications are proposed.

Use of Vascularized, Denervated Muscle Targets for Prevention and Treatment of Upper-Extremity Neuromas.

Purpose: Neuroma formation following upper-extremity peripheral nerve injury often results in persistent, debilitating neuropathic pain with a limited response to medical management. Vascularized, denervated muscle targets (VDMTs) offer a newly described surgical approach to address this challenging problem. Like targeted muscle reinnervation and regenerative peripheral nerve targets, VDMTs are used to redirect regenerating axons from an injured nerve into denervated muscle to prevent neuroma formation. By providing a vascularized muscle target that is reinnervated via direct neurotization, VDMTs offer some theoretical advantages in comparison with the other contemporary surgical options. In this study, we followed the short-term pain outcomes of patients who underwent VDMT surgery for neuroma prevention or treatment. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 9 patients (2 pediatric and 7 adult) who underwent VDMTs either for symptomatic upper-extremity neuromas or as a prophylactic measure to prevent primary neuroma formation. In-person and/or telephone interviews were conducted to assess their postoperative clinical outcomes, including the visual analog pain scale simple pain score. Results: Of the 9 patients included in this study, 7 underwent VDMT surgery as a prophylactic measure against neuroma formation, and 2 presented with symptomatic neuromas that were treated with VDMTs. The average follow-up was 5.6 ± 4.1 months (range, 0.5-13.2 months). The average postoperative pain score of the 7 adult patients was 1.1 (range, 0-8). Conclusions: This study demonstrated favorable short-term outcomes in a small cohort of patients treated with VDMTs in the upper extremity. Larger, prospective, and comparative studies with validated patient-reported and objective outcome measures and longer-term follow-ups are needed to further evaluate the benefits of VDMTs in upper-extremity neuroma management and prevention. Type of study/level of evidence: Therapeutic III.

Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for Treatment of Postresection Interdigital Neuroma: A Cadaveric Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic postresection interdigital neuroma is a frustrating problem that causes debilitating foot pain. Implementing the concepts of targeted muscle innervation, this study offers a novel nerve transfer involving the resected third common plantar digital nerve (CPDN) to the motor nerve branch of the third dorsal interosseous muscle (DIMB) to improve postresection pain. METHODS: Ten fresh feet from seven cadaveric donors were used for this study. CPDN and DIMB lengths and diameters were measured, along with nerve overlap after the transfer with ankle in neutral position and in maximal dorsiflexion. Motor entry point to the calcaneal tuberosity and to the fifth metatarsal tuberosity were measured and used to evaluate the ratio relative to foot length. Means, standard deviations, and P values were calculated for each measure and between sexes and feet (right and left). RESULTS: In all specimens, the nerve transfer was technically feasible, without notable size mismatch between the donor and recipient nerves. CPDN, DIMB, and important anatomical reference points were identifiable in all specimens. Average CPDN length was 30.1 ± 8.2 mm. The average DIMB length was 14.4 ± 3.9 mm. The overlap between the donor and recipient in neutral ankle position at the transfer site was 6.4 ± 1.8 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Given their anatomical locations, a nerve transfer between the third CPDN and third DIMB is surgically feasible. This novel technique is a viable option that can be used instead of the conventional technique of muscle implantation or more proximal re-resection for symptomatic postresection interdigital neuroma.

All-Suture Anchor Repair of the Flexor Digitorum Profundus Insertion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Suturing Techniques.

PURPOSE: We compared 2 suturing techniques for reattachment of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) via all-suture anchor. METHODS: We used fresh, matched-pair, cadaveric hands. We disarticulated the fingers at the proximal interphalangeal joints, preserving the proximal FDP. We released the FDPs at their distal insertion and placed an all-suture, 1.0-mm anchor at the center of each FDP footprint. Each anchor's sutures were used to reattach each FDP using 1 of 2 techniques: group H (n = 14) via horizontal mattress; group H + K (n = 12) via horizontal mattress with knots thrown and, with each suture tail, 3 proximal, running-locking, Krackow-type passes on the radial and ulnar FDP sides with the suture ends tied together. We excluded 2 specimens from the H + K group because of improper anchor placement. All other fingers in both groups were individually mounted in an MTS machine for FDP loading in the following sequence for 500 cycles each: (1) to 15 N to simulate passive motion forces; (2) to 19 N for short-arc active motion forces; and (3) to 28 N for full active motion forces. Specimens that had not failed during cyclic testing were then loaded to failure. We measured FDP-to-bone gapping via a digital transducer. We defined failure as >3-mm gapping. RESULTS: The H + K group had significantly less gapping during cyclic loading up to 19 N and significantly higher load to failure. The H + K group failed exclusively at the anchor-bone level; the H group failed mostly by suture-tendon pullout. CONCLUSIONS: The H + K group performed significantly better regarding cyclic and load-to-failure testing after FDP reattachment. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The H + K technique combines the benefits of horizontal-mattress tendon-to-bone apposition and Krackow-tendon locking. It converts the point of failure to the bone level rather than the suture-tendon level.