Office-based esophagoscopy: a preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: Preliminary study that describes unsedated, transnasal esophagoscopy (TNE) in an office setting. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: TNE was prospectively performed on 14 consecutive out-patients with dysphagia whose initial oropharyngeal dysphagia evaluation was insufficient to reveal the cause of their swallowing problem. TNE was carried out without conscious sedation while the patients were sitting in an examining chair. Ease of endoscope insertion, optical quality of images, and examination findings were assessed. Heart rate before and after the procedure and incidence of epistaxis and airway compromise was also determined. Patients were asked to rate the level of discomfort of TNE on a validated 10-point scale (1 representing none/well tolerated and 10 severe/poorly tolerated). RESULTS: All patients completed TNE with the esophagus readily intubated and esophageal mucosa clearly visualized. Findings included esophageal stricture, patulous upper esophageal sphincter, and Zenker's diverticulum. There were no incidences of epistaxis or airway compromise and no significant changes in heart rate. Overall tolerance of TNE was rated by the patients as 2.0 (SD, 1.2). CONCLUSIONS: TNE is well tolerated and can be safely performed in patients with dysphagia in an office setting. TNE may have a role in the comprehensive evaluation of the dysphagic patient in the office.

Cost-effectiveness of two types of dysphagia care in head and neck cancer: a preliminary report.

We conducted a prospective, preliminary study to compare the cost-effectiveness of two different instrument-based techniques for diagnosing and managing dysphagia in 30 consecutive hospitalized patients with head and neck cancer. The two techniques are videofluoroscopy via modified barium swallow (MBS) and videoendoscopy via flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST). Medicare was the primary insurer of all patients. Fifteen of these patients had their dysphagia diagnosed and managed by MBS and the other 15 by FEESST. Cost-effectiveness was assessed by determining the average Medicare reimbursement for each procedure. We found that the mean reimbursements were $451.01 (+/- $50.55) for MBS and $321.23 (+/- $3.01) for FEESST. The mean reimbursement for FEESST was significantly lower than that for MBS (p < 0.0001; Mann-Whitney U test). We conclude that FEESST appears to be more cost-effective than MBS for the inpatient management of dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer.

Laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux and dysphagia.

There are no reliable means of quantifying the edema that results from acid exposure to the posterior larynx in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). However, it is possible to quantify laryngopharyngeal sensitivity in these patients by endoscopic administration of air pulses to the laryngeal mucosa in order to elicit the laryngeal adductor reflex. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with LPR have sensory deficits in the laryngopharynx, and whether treatment of these patients with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) results in resolution of sensory deficits. Flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing was prospectively performed in 54 patients with dysphagia without neurologic disease and in 25 healthy controls. The laryngopharyngeal sensory level, posterior laryngeal edema, and LPR were assessed. We defined LPR as passage of food material from the esophageal inlet retrograde into the hypopharynx. Patients with LPR were placed on 3 months of omeprazole or lansoprazole and then retested. Patients without LPR were placed on H2 blockers for 3 months and then retested. In the dysphagia group, 48 of 54 patients (89%) had edema of the posterior larynx, and 42 of 54 (78%) had laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits. We noted LPR in 38 of 54 (70%). In the control group, 1 of 25 subjects (4%) had edema, sensory deficits, and LPR. The differences in incidence of edema, sensory deficits, and LPR between the dysphagia group and the control group were significant (p < .001, chi2 test). Twenty-three patients with LPR placed on a PPI returned for follow-up, with improvement in laryngeal edema in 14 of the 21 (67%) who had pretreatment edema and resolution of sensory deficits in 15 of the 19 (79%) who had pretreatment deficits. In the non-LPR, non-PPI group, 11 of 16 patients returned for follow-up, with improvement in laryngeal edema in none of the 11 and improvement in sensory deficits in 1 of the 11 (9.1%). The differences in improvement in laryngeal edema and sensory deficits between the LPR, PPI group, and the non-LPR, non-PPI group were significant (p < .01, Fisher's exact test). We conclude that patients with dysphagia and edema of the posterior larynx as a result of LPR have sensory deficits in the laryngopharynx. Treatment of these patients with a PPI appears to result in resolution of laryngopharyngeal edema and improvement of sensory deficits, both subjectively and objectively.

Endoscopic evaluation of swallowing as an alternative to 24-hour pH monitoring for diagnosis of extraesophageal reflux.

Patients with symptoms of extraesophageal reflux may not be eager to undergo 24-hour pH probe monitoring for the sake of a definitive diagnosis. It has been anecdotally noted that extraesophageal reflux can be detected during an endoscopic swallowing evaluation. The purpose of this pilot study was to demonstrate that flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) can be implemented to identify and subsequently treat patients with extraesophageal reflux. Over a 6-month period, FEESST was prospectively performed in 20 healthy control subjects and in 20 patients with dysphagia. The dysphagic patients did not have a history of stroke or chronic neurologic disease. Attention was specifically directed toward noting the presence or absence of reflux into the laryngopharynx during the endoscopic swallowing evaluation. None of the control subjects were noted to have reflux during FEESST, but 18 of the 20 patients with dysphagia were found to have reflux during the evaluation; this difference was statistically significant (p < .001, Fisher's exact test). We conclude that FEESST is useful as a means of diagnosing extraesophageal reflux in patients with dysphagia.

Prospective, randomized outcome study of endoscopy versus modified barium swallow in patients with dysphagia.

OBJECTIVE: Aspiration pneumonia is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in both acute and long-term care settings While there are many reasons for patients to develop aspiration pneumonia, there exists a strong association between difficulty swallowing, or dysphagia, and the development of aspiration pneumonia The modified barium swallow test (MBS) and endoscopic evaluations of swallowing are considered to be the most comprehensive tests used to evaluate and manage patients with dysphagia in an effort to reduce the incidence of pneumonia. The purpose of this study was to provide an initial investigation of whether flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) or MBS is superior as the diagnostic test for evaluating and guiding the behavioral and dietary management of outpatients with dysphagia. FEESST combines the standard endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with a technique that determines laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination thresholds by endoscopically delivering air pulse stimuli to the mucosa innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, prospective cohort outcome study in a hospital-based outpatient setting. METHODS: One hundred twenty-six outpatients with dysphagia were randomly assigned to either FEESST or MBS as the diagnostic test used to guide dietary and behavioral management (postural changes, small bites and sips, throat clearing). The outcome variables were pneumonia incidence and pneumonia-free interval. The patients were enrolled for 1 year and followed for 1 year. RESULTS: Seventy-eight MBS examinations were performed in 76 patients with 14 patients (18.41%) developing pneumonia; 61 FEESST examinations were performed in 50 patients with 6 patients (12.0%) developing pneumonia These differences were not statistically significant (chi2 = 0.93, P = .33). In the MBS group the median pneumonia-free interval was 47 days; in the FEESST group the median pneumonia-free interval was 39 days Based on Wilcoxon's signed-rank test, this difference was not statistically significant (z = 0.04, P = .96). CONCLUSION: Whether dysphagic outpatients have their dietary and behavioral management guided by the results of MBS or of FEESST, their outcomes with respect to pneumonia incidence and pneumonia-free interval are essentially the same.

Clinical assessment of pharyngolaryngeal sensitivity.

The purpose of this article is to review the ongoing clinical research on assessment of laryngeal and pharyngeal sensitivity with particular emphasis on the technique of endoscopic air pulse stimulation of the laryngopharyngeal mucosa. Studies of laryngopharyngeal sensation in healthy controls and in stroke patients with dysphagia are presented initially. What then follows is a detailed description of a study comparing modified barium swallow and pharyngolaryngeal sensory testing as predictors of aspiration pneumonia after stroke. Finally, the combination of laryngopharyngeal sensory testing with endoscopic swallowing evaluations, termed flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing, and its implications in the office or bedside evaluation of the patient with dysphagia are discussed.

The safety of flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST): an analysis of 500 consecutive evaluations.

We assessed the safety of a new office or bedside method of evaluating both the motor and sensory components of swallowing called flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST). FEESST combines the established endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with a technique that determines laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination thresholds by endoscopically delivering air-pulse stimuli to the mucosa innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve. Endoscopic assessment of laryngopharyngeal sensory capacity followed by endoscopic visualization of deglutition was prospectively performed 500 times in 253 patients with dysphagia over a 2.5-year period in a tertiary care center. The patients had a variety of underlying diagnoses, with stroke and chronic neurological disease predominating (n = 155). To determine the safety of FEESST, the presence of epistaxis, airway compromise, and significant changes in heart rate before and after the evaluation were assessed. Patients were also asked to rate the level of discomfort of the examination; 498 evaluations were completed. There were three instances of epistaxis that were self-limited. There were no cases of airway compromise. There were no significant differences in heart rate between pre- and posttest measurements (p > 0.05). Eighty-one percent of patients noted either no discomfort or mild discomfort as a result of the examination. In conclusion, FEESST is a safe method of evaluating dysphagia in the tertiary care setting and may also have application for the chronic care setting.

Laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing and the laryngeal adductor reflex.

Laryngopharyngeal sensory capacity has been determined by endoscopically administering air pulse stimuli to the mucosa innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve and asking the patient if he or she feels the stimulus. A potential shortcoming of this psychophysical testing (PT) procedure is that it is a subjective test, and patients with impaired cognition may not be able to perform the required task. In the search for an objective measure of laryngeal sensory function, we have observed that the laryngeal adductor reflex (LAR) is evoked at stimulus intensities similar to those capable of eliciting the psychophysical, or perceptual, response. The purpose of this study is to determine if the threshold for eliciting the LAR is the same as that of the sensory threshold. A specially designed endoscope was used to present air pulse stimuli (range 0.0 to 10 mm Hg) to the laryngopharynx in 20 healthy subjects and in 80 patients with dysphagia, using both PT and the LAR. The patients had a variety of underlying diagnoses, with stroke and chronic neurologic disease predominating (n = 65). In the control group and in the group of patients with dysphagia, there was no statistically significant difference between the median laryngopharyngeal sensory thresholds whether we used PT or the LAR (p>.05, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). The intraclass correlation for the total sample was .999 (U = .999, L = .998). Since psychophysical and sensorimotor reflex thresholds were not statistically significantly different and the intraclass correlation was close to a perfect correlation, we conclude that the LAR can be used as an objective and accurate clinical method of endoscopically assessing laryngopharyngeal sensory capacity.

Giant cell tumors of the jugular foramen.

PURPOSE: To review the diagnosis and treatment of giant cell tumors of the jugular foramen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A typical case is reported. Symptoms, signs, and diagnostic studies are reviewed. Photomicrographs and angiographic studies showing the differences between these and glomus jugulare tumors are provided. A coherent approach to their management is presented. RESULTS: These hypervascular, traditionally radioresistant tumors may cause pulsatile tinnitus, conductive hearing loss, and lower cranial nerve paresis. Angiographic studies showed a hypervascular lesion supplied by numerous small branches of the external carotid artery, making embolization difficult. Complete resection was achieved by an infratemporal fossa approach with preoperative embolization. CONCLUSION: Giant cell tumors of the temporal bone may mimic glomus jugulare tumors with respect to anatomic location, cranial nerve deficits, and vascularity.

FEESST: a new bedside endoscopic test of the motor and sensory components of swallowing.

We here introduce an office or bedside method of evaluating both the motor and sensory components of swallowing, called fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST). FEESST combines the established endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with a technique that determines laryngopharyngeal (LP) sensory discrimination thresholds by endoscopically delivering air pulse stimuli to the mucosa innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve. Endoscopic assessment of LP sensory capacity followed by endoscopic visualization of deglutition was prospectively performed 148 times on 133 patients with dysphagia over an 8-month period. The patients had a variety of underlying diagnoses, with stroke and chronic neurologic disease predominating (n = 94). Subsequent to LP sensory testing, a complete dysphagia evaluation was conducted. Various food and liquid consistencies were dyed green, and attention was paid to their management throughout the pharyngeal stage of swallowing. Evidence of latent swallow initiation, pharyngeal pooling and/or residue, laryngeal penetration, laryngeal aspiration, and/or reflux was noted. Recommendations for therapeutic intervention were based on information obtained during the FEESST and often involved the employment of compensatory swallowing strategies, modification of the diet or its presentation, placement on non-oral feeding status, and/or referral to other related specialists. All patients successfully completed the examination. In 111 of the evaluations (75%), severe (>6.0 mm Hg air pulse pressure [APP]) unilateral or bilateral LP sensory deficits were found. With puree consistencies, 31% of evaluations with severe deficits, compared to 5% of evaluations with either normal sensitivity or moderate (4.0 to 6.0 mm Hg APP) LP sensory deficits, displayed aspiration (p < .001, chi2 test). With puree consistencies, 69% of evaluations with severe deficits, compared to 24% with normal or moderate deficits, displayed laryngeal penetration (p < .001, chi2 test). FEESST allows the clinician to obtain a comprehensive bedside assessment of swallowing that is performed as the initial swallowing evaluation for the patient with dysphagia.

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST) in healthy controls.

The purpose of this study was to introduce a new method of bedside assessment of both the motor and sensory components of swallowing called fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing with sensory testing (FEESST). This approach combines the established bedside endoscopic swallowing evaluation with a more recently described technique that allows objective determination of laryngopharyngeal (LP) sensory discrimination thresholds by delivering air pulse stimuli to the mucosa innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve via a flexible endoscope. A prospective study was conducted of FEESST in 20 healthy control subjects, mean age of 34 +/- 11 years. LP sensory thresholds were defined as either normal (< 4.0 mmHg air pulse pressure [APP]), moderate deficit (4.0-6.0 mmHg APP), or severe deficits (> 6.0 mmHg APP). Subsequent to LP sensory testing, food of varying consistencies, mixed with green food coloring, was given and attention was paid to spillage, laryngeal penetration, pharyngeal residue, aspiration, and reflux. Therapeutic maneuvers such as postural changes and airway protection techniques were performed on each subject to determine if the assessed swallowing parameters were affected by maneuvers. All patients completed the study; all had normal LP sensory discrimination thresholds (2.9 +/- 0.7 mmHg APP). There were no instances of spillage, laryngeal penetration, or aspiration. Two of 20 subjects had pharyngeal residue and 2 of 20 had reflux. Institution of therapeutic maneuvers resulted in a predictable change in the endoscopic view of the laryngopharyngeal anatomy. FEESST provides comprehensive, objective sensory and motor information about deglutition in the bedside setting and might have implications for the bedside diagnosis and management of patients with dysphagia.

Laryngopharyngeal sensory testing with modified barium swallow as predictors of aspiration pneumonia after stroke.

Improved diagnostic tests that can accurately identify subjects at high risk for aspiration pneumonia (AP) are needed. One measure of this accuracy is the false-negative rate (FNR), which determines the failure of a test to identify a group at high risk. This study compares FNRs for AP among dysphagic stroke patients for two prognostic techniques: modified barium swallow (MBS) alone and MBS combined with laryngopharyngeal sensory discrimination testing (MBS + LPSDT). MBS and LPSDT were performed within 4 weeks of stroke in 20 subjects who were prospectively followed for at least 2 years to identify the frequency of AP. MBS identified 10 patients as not at risk based on the finding of no aspiration on initial MBS; four of these patients developed AP (FNR = 40%). MBS + LPSDT identified five patients as not at risk based on the findings of neither aspiration nor bilateral sensory deficits; none of these patients developed AP (FNR = 0%). The combination of MBS criterion (aspiration) with the LPSDT criterion (bilateral sensory deficits) improves prognostication of outcome in dysphagic stroke patients by identifying a subgroup at high risk for developing AP (nonaspirators with bilateral deficits).

The management of hyperfunctional facial lines with botulinum toxin. A collaborative study of 210 injection sites in 162 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimum dose and efficacy of botulinum toxin injections in the management of hyperfunctional facial lines. DESIGN: This study included 210 hyperfunctional facial sites in 162 different patients. The patients had preinjection and postinjection photographic documentation and ratings on a 4-point qualitative evaluation scale of lines at rest and with action. The patients then had botulinum toxin type A injections via a monopolar hollow bore, Teflon-coated electromyographic needle into the facial muscles associated with the hyperfunctional lines. The total dose for each region of 1.25 to 25 U was divided into 1.25- to 5-U aliquots representing 0.1 to 0.2 mL per injection site, depending on the site and the prior experience with that patient on using toxin. The patients had their reevaluation at 2 to 3 weeks after injection. Patients returned for further follow-up when the therapeutic effect diminished. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-two patients had 210 hyperfunctional sites evaluated and injected. The group consisted of 25 male patients and 137 female patients ranging in age from 21 to 78 years with a mean (+/-SD) of 46.1 (+/-1.98) years. All patients had cosmetically troubling hyperfunctional lines involving the forehead, glabella, crow's feet (lateral canthal lines), nasolabial area, platysma, and mentalis region. RESULTS: All patients had an effect of toxin within the first 24 to 72 hours. Ninety-five percent of the patients treated had cosmetic improvement of unsightly facial lines or contractions. The best results were achieved in management of the forehead lines, followed by glabella, crow's feet, and nasolabial. The dose for forehead lines was 5 to 25 U (mean +/- SD, 17.3 +/- 6.2 U); glabellar lines, 5 to 20 U (mean +/- SD, 11.1 +/- 3.1 U); crow's feet, 5 to 15 U (mean +/- SD, 6.2 +/- 1.6 U); nasolabial, 2.5 to 5 U (mean +/- SD, 3.12 +/- 1.2 U); and platysma, 10 to 20 (mean +/- SD, 15 +/- 4.0 U). Evaluation by age and site suggested a trend of increased toxin dose with increased age. Effects of the toxin are usually seen 24 to 72 hours after injection, and last from 3 to 6 months, whereon the increased muscular activity returns, as do the hyperfunctional lines. The only morbidity was related to temporary mild weakness of other adjacent facial muscles. There were no systemic side effects noted. CONCLUSION: Botulinum toxin is a safe and important adjunctive technique for the management of patients with symptomatic hyperfunctional facial lines.

Sensory discrimination in the larynx and hypopharynx.

The traditional approach to evaluating swallowing disorders has focused on upper aerodigestive tract motor function. The evaluation of the sensory apparatus in the larynx and pharynx as part of the workup of dysphagia has heretofore not been addressed. The purpose of this work is to discuss a new, noninvasive method to measure sensory discrimination in the supraglottic larynx and hypopharynx. An air pulse, of precise duration and pressure, was delivered through a flexible fiberoptic telescope to the submucosally situated superior laryngeal nerve along the anterior wall of the pyriform sinus. Three hundred sixty trials were conducted in 30 healthy adults. The average sensory discrimination was 2.24 +/- 0.28 mm Hg. Brief air-pulse stimulation is a safe, reliable means of determining supraglottic and hypopharyngeal sensory discrimination thresholds.

Silent laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits after stroke.

Dysphagia and aspiration are two devastating sequelae of stroke. Recent work has shown that laryngopharyngeal (LP) sensory deficits are associated with aspiration in stroke patients with dysphagia. The phenomenon of silent LP sensory deficits, where the patient exhibits no subjective or objective evidence of dysphagia, yet has an LP sensory deficit, has not been previously described. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensory capacity of the laryngopharynx in stroke patients who had no subjective or objective complaints of dysphagia. We determined the sensory threshold in the laryngopharynx using air pulse stimulation of the mucosa of the pyriform sinus and aryepiglottic fold. Eighteen stroke patients (mean age 65.6 +/- 11.5 years) and 18 age-matched controls were prospectively evaluated. Normal thresholds were defined as < 4.0 mm Hg air pulse pressure (APP). Deficits were defined as either a moderate impairment in sensory discrimination thresholds (4.0 to 6.0 mm Hg APP) or a severe sensory impairment (> 6.0 mm Hg APP). Stroke patients were followed up for 1 year to determine the incidence of aspiration pneumonia (AP) as verified by chest radiography. In 11 of the stroke patients studied, either unilateral (n = 6) or bilateral (n = 5) severe sensory deficits were identified. The elevations in sensory discrimination thresholds were significantly greater than those in age-matched controls (7.1 +/- 0.6 mm Hg APP versus 2.5 mm Hg APP; p < .01, Wilcoxon score). Among patients with unilateral deficits, sensory thresholds were severely elevated in all cases on the affected side compared with the unaffected side (p < .01, Wilcoxon score). Moreover, the sensory thresholds of the unaffected side were not significantly different from those of age-matched controls. Aspiration pneumonia did not occur in the patients with normal LP sensation or in the patients with unilateral severe LP sensory deficits. However, in the 5 patients with bilateral, severe LP sensory deficits, 2 developed AP, both within 3 months of their LP sensory test. The results of this study showed, for the first time, that stroke patients without subjective or objective clinical evidence of dysphagia could have silent LP sensory deficits. These impairments could contribute to the development of AP following stroke. The findings in this study suggest that LP sensory discrimination threshold testing should not be restricted only to patients with clinical dysphagia.

Restoration of laryngopharyngeal sensation by neural anastomosis.

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that sensory nerve transposition may be used to reestablish sensation of the laryngopharynx after central nervous system injury and vagal deficit. DESIGN: Prospective preliminary report of 2 patients following brain-stem stroke with aspiration pneumonia confirmed on chest radiography, severe dysphagia and inability to tolerate oral alimentation, and modified barium swallow that demonstrated cricopharyngeal spasm and impaired laryngeal elevation. Both patients also had severe, bilateral laryngopharyngeal sensory deficits as determined by delivery of air pulse stimuli to the mucosa innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve via a fiberoptic telescope. Each patient underwent surgery as part of management of dysphagia after failure of aggressive nonsurgical treatment. INTERVENTION: During a cricopharyngeal myotomy and laryngeal suspension, a unilateral microneurorrhaphy between the greater auricular nerve and the superior laryngeal nerve was performed. OUTCOME MEASURES: Ability to tolerate oral diet without development of aspiration pneumonia and postoperative laryngopharyngeal sensory capacity. RESULTS: By 12 months after surgery, both patients had ipsilateral restoration of laryngopharyngeal sensation, with no further episodes of aspiration pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: In select cases of severe dysphagia after central nervous system injury, sensory nerve transposition may be a useful adjunct to the surgical rehabilitation of the patient with dysphagia.

Effects of aging on sensitivity of the pharyngeal and supraglottic areas.

As one ages, sensory discrimination in the oral cavity progressively diminishes, and dysphagia and aspiration are more likely to occur. Whether similar age-related laryngopharyngeal (LP) sensory abnormalities exist and contribute to dysphagia and aspiration is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if sensory discrimination in the area of the laryngopharynx innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve diminishes with increasing age. By applying a previously described device and technique that utilized endoscopically delivered air pulse stimulation of the anterior wall of the pyriform sinus, sensory discrimination can be reliably determined. LP sensory discrimination testing was performed in 80 healthy adults 23-87 years of age, with a mean age of 47 +/- 20 years. There were 60 men and 20 women. The test subjects were divided into 3 age groups, 20-40, 41-60, and > or =61. For the entire population studied, average LP sensory discrimination thresholds were 2.60 +/- 0.56 mm Hg air pulse pressure (APP). In general, there was a progressive increase in sensory discrimination threshold with each decade of life. A correlation analysis revealed that there were significant increases in pressure thresholds with advancing age (r = 0.62, P <0.0001). For subjects 20-40 years, average threshold was 2.06 +/- 0.20 mm Hg APP, for the 41-60 age group, 2.45 +/- 0.34 mm Hg APP, and for subjects > or =61, 2.97 +/- 0.78 mm Hg APP. Thresholds for the > or =61 group were significantly different from those for the 20-40 and the 41-60 groups (P <0.05). Progressive diminution in LP sensitivity with increasing age might be a contributing factor in the development of dysphagia and aspiration in the elderly.

Supraglottic and pharyngeal sensory abnormalities in stroke patients with dysphagia.

Dysphagia and aspiration are two devastating sequelae of stroke, accounting for nearly 40,000 deaths from aspiration pneumonia each year in the United States. While motor deficits in the larynx and pharynx are thought responsible for dysphagia and aspiration in stroke patients, no prior study has evaluated whether these patients also have sensory deficits. The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensory capacity of the laryngopharynx (LP) in supratentorial or brain stem stroke patients who presented with dysphagia. Fifteen stroke patients (mean age, 66.7 +/- 13.8 [SD] years) were prospectively evaluated by means of our previously described method whereby air pulse stimuli were delivered via a flexible fiberoptic telescope to the mucosa innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve. There were 15 age-matched controls. No LP sensory deficits were found in any of the age-matched controls. In all stroke patients studied, either unilateral (n = 9) or bilateral (n = 6) sensory deficits were identified. Deficits were defined as either a moderate impairment in sensory discrimination thresholds (3.5 to 6.0 mm Hg) or a severe sensory impairment (> 6.0 mm Hg). These sensory discrimination thresholds were significantly greater than in age-matched controls (7.05 +/- 0.17 mm Hg for the supratentorial group and 6.05 +/- 1.22 mm Hg for the infratentorial group versus 2.61 +/- 0.69 mm Hg for the controls). Among patients with unilateral deficits, sensory thresholds were moderately to severely elevated in all 9 cases on the affected side compared with the unaffected side (p < .01, Fisher's exact test). Moreover, the sensory thresholds of the unaffected side were not significantly different from those of age-matched controls (2.51 +/- 0.25 mm Hg versus 2.61 +/- 0.69 mm Hg, respectively). All 6 patients with bilateral deficits had severe impairments. The results of an outcome assessment in 13 of 15 patients revealed that 2 out of 5 patients with moderate LP sensory impairment and 5 out of 8 with severe impairment developed aspiration. Our results show for the first time that stroke patients with dysphagia have significant sensory deficits in the LP and that these impairments are likely to contribute to the development of aspiration.

Age-related changes in pharyngeal and supraglottic sensation.

As one ages, sensory discrimination in the oral cavity progressively diminishes, and dysphagia and aspiration are more likely to occur. Whether similar age-related laryngeal and pharyngeal sensory abnormalities exist and contribute to dysphagia and aspiration is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if sensory discrimination in the area innervated by the superior laryngeal nerve diminishes with increasing age. By applying a previously described new device and technique that utilizes brief air pulse stimulation of the anterior wall of the pyriform sinus, sensory discrimination can be reliably determined. We carried out 672 trials in 56 healthy adults divided into three age groups: 20 to 40, 41 to 60, and 61 to 90 years of age. Overall, the average sensory discrimination was 2.30 +/- 0.50 mm Hg. In subjects 20 to 40 years of age, sensory discrimination was 2.07 +/- 0.20 mm Hg, while in subjects 61 to 90 years of age, sensory discrimination was 2.68 +/- 0.63 mm Hg (p < .05). There also was a statistically significant difference between the 41- to 60-year and 61- to 90-year age groups (p < .05). Progressive diminution in pharyngeal and supraglottic sensitivity with increasing age might be a contributing factor in the development of dysphagia and aspiration in the elderly.