Communication between general practitioners and radiologists: opinions, experience, promises, pitfalls.

PURPOSE: Studies encompassing the views and aspirations of general practitioners (GPs) concerning the radiology report are rare. We present the results of a large-scale survey among GPs in Flanders, Belgium, and examine its implications for the communication between radiologists and GPs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: GPs were invited by e-mail to participate in a survey on the radiology report. Respondents could state their degree of agreement with 46 statements. Besides that, they could freely make suggestions to improve the report. Quantitative results were examined to determine majority convictions. Free text suggestions were searched for motives and convictions. RESULTS: Of 1323 GPs invited, 282 completed forms were prepared for analysis. 96.8% considered the report an indispensable tool. 85.5% were satisfied with it. Itemized reporting of complex examinations was favoured by a very large majority. 83 GPs (29.4%) made suggestions for improvement. Much emphasis was put upon the clinical role of the radiologist. The need to mark key images, to mention meaningful normal findings, to structure the report and to facilitate communication was also frequently mentioned. CONCLUSION: GPs expect the radiologist to think as a clinician and offer clinical answers. An automated electronic information chain may contribute to realize this objective but direct communication should always remain possible.

[Diabetes and fasting during Ramadan. A observational study among Turkish immigrants in Belgium]. / Diabète et jeûne pendant le ramadan. Etude observationnelle parmi les migrants d'origine turque en Belgique.

AIMS: To investigate (i) Ramadan participation, (ii) provision of Ramadan related advice by healthcare providers (iii) medication use during Ramadan fasting among Turkish migrants with diabetes in Belgium. METHODS: This pilot observational study was conducted among a convenience sample of 52 Turkish migrants with diabetes in Belgium. Two questionnaires collected information on socio-demographic characteristics, diabetes related characteristics, current hypoglycaemic medication with dosing regimen, participation in the past Ramadan, reasons for (non)participation, use of hypoglycaemic medication during the past Ramadan, advice from their healthcare providers about fasting during Ramadan and follow up of this advice. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (31%) had fasted during the past Ramadan. Main reason for Ramadan participation was reinforcement of faith (12/15), while the main reason for non participation was having diabetes (34/36). About 56% of the study population had received recommendations from their healthcare provider(s) about fasting and diabetes during Ramadan. The most commonly provided advice was not to participate in Ramadan, followed by modification of drug therapy. Only 3 patients ignored the advice of their healthcare professionals. In addition, only 60% of those who actually fasted received recommendations about intake of diabetes medication during the ramadan. Most fasters continued their medication dose unchanged (87% of OHA users and 80% of the insulin users). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study found a low prevalence of Ramadan fasting among Turkish migrants with diabetes in Belgium. We also found that provision of advice by healthcare providers could be improved. Larger scale studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Voluntary outreach counselling and testing for HIV and STI among men who have sex with men in Antwerp.

BACKGROUND: High risk settings for transmission of HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STI) offer an opportunity for screening of difficult to reach risk groups. METHODS: Free, anonymous counselling and testing for HIV, syphilis, Chlamydia and hepatitis B/C were offered to visitors in two selected gay venues in Antwerp, by a multidisciplinary team. Participants completed an anonymous questionnaire. The STI-test results were communicated by cell phone using standardised text messages. RESULTS: In total, 137 MSM were tested. Facilitators of risky sexual behaviour (alcohol and drug use) were reported by 34 and 21%, respectively. Four men (3%) were newly diagnosed with HIV; 25 men (18%) had an active, transmittable STI. Infected MSM were significantly less often registered with a fixed general practitioner (GP). CONCLUSIONS: Outreach testing in gay venues is a suitable method to detect MSM at risk for HIV/STI. Although the outreach approach is very labour intensive, it shows a high yield of new STI-diagnoses that are not detected in the regular health system.

Risk factors for cervical cancer development: what do women think?

BACKGROUND: The current cervical cancer prevention strategy is exclusively directed towards screening, without taking into account any relationship with sexual risk factors. The introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) detection into the screening procedure implicates that we should give attention to this relationship. The aim of this study was to investigate what knowledge women have of the relation between HPV and cervical cancer. METHODS: Rather than asking about HPV specifically, we suggested 20 risk factors for the development of cervical cancer, including viral infection, and asked 73 women visiting their general practitioner, 67 women visiting a lecture on risk factors for cervical cancer and 28 female students in biomedical sciences to rate the importance of these risk factors on a scale of 1-5. RESULTS: Genetic factors were rated highest with a mean score of 4.5. Bacterial infection ranked second highest with a mean score of 3.8. Smoking ranked fourth at a mean score of 3.6, whereas viral infection shared the sixth place with number of sexual partners with a mean score of 3.4. The presence of high voltage power lines and physical activity appropriately scored the last two places at 2.4 and 2.2, respectively. Twenty-one women suggested a role for sexually transmitted agents, but only five women (3.1%) could actually pinpoint HPV. CONCLUSION: This enquiry indicates that the risk factor 'genetic factors' was over-rated, while knowledge of the most important risk factors, i.e. smoking and sexual habits and (sexually transmitted) infections, would appear to be present to a moderate level in our population. However, knowledge of the role of HPV in cervical cancer development is lacking.

Chlamydial infection: an accurate model for opportunistic screening in general practice.

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in women in general practice and to assess risk factors associated with infection. METHODS: The study was carried out in 2001-2 in different general practices in Antwerp, Belgium. Sexually active women, visiting their general practitioner for routine gynaecological care (mostly pill prescription or PAP smear), were offered opportunistic screening for chlamydia. 787 participants aged 15-40 delivered a self taken vaginal sample and filled in a questionnaire which included questions on demographic variables, urogenital symptoms, sexual history, and sexual behaviour. Samples were tested for presence of chlamydial DNA by means of a ligase chain reaction (LCR) assay, and positives were confirmed by two other amplification assays (PCR and SDA). RESULTS: Overall prevalence was 5.0% (95% CI: 3.5 to 6.5). Determinants of infection in logistic regression analysis were age 18-27 years, >1 partner in the past year, no use of contraceptives, frequent postcoital bleeding, having a symptomatic partner, painful micturition, and living in the inner city. The area under the ROC curve in the full model was 0.88. Selective screening based on a combination of the five first determinants detects 92.3% of infections in this sample; 37.5% of the population would need to be screened. CONCLUSION: Targeted screening for chlamydial infection is possible, even in a heterogeneous group of general practice attendants. Implementing this model would require considerable communication skills from healthcare providers.

Performance of the recommendations of a British advisory group for screening for chlamydia in a sample of women in general practice.

In this study the performance of the guidelines produced by the British Chief Medical Officer's expert advisory group for selective screening for Chlamydia trachomatis was evaluated. The guidelines were applied to a sample of 777 women in general practice in Antwerp, Belgium. The accuracy of the screening/testing recommendations was suboptimal. The model detected 90% of infections but failed to identify a high-risk population; the population to be screened was reduced by only 21%. The focus on young age as the most important determinant for screening was not appropriate. More attention should be paid to risky sexual behaviour.

Discussing STIs: doctors are from Mars, patients from Venus.

BACKGROUND: Primary care plays an important role in promoting sexual health, but in this setting counselling regarding sexually transmitted infections (STIs) is rarely performed and often inadequate. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to identify and quantify the barriers physicians encounter in discussing STIs with their patients. METHODS: A postal questionnaire-based survey was carried out in a random sample of 200 primary care physicians in Antwerp, Belgium. RESULTS: The response rate was 68%. Among the 122 respondents, only 44.3% provide some form of counselling (asking about sexual history, informing about safe sex or informing about STIs) regularly, at least once a week. Major barriers are language and comprehension problems (for 74.2% of respondents), ethnic differences (68.4%), insufficient training (69.4%), lack of time (60.8%), presence of the patient's partner (89.2%) or mother (94.2%), first contact with a patient (60.8%), fear of embarrassing the patient (30.6%) and a patient without genital complaints (71.4%). About half of the GPs fail to counsel an asymptomatic patient with obvious STI risk, and as many give no safe sex advice in a first contraception consultation. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians have many and various barriers to discussing STIs with their patients. Features of contemporary STI counselling and solutions to its problems are discussed. Education of health care providers should be given priority.

Lower incidence of the upper respiratory tract infections among general practitioners as compared to their patients.

A retrospective cohort study suggest that general practitioners (GPs) run a significant reduced risk (more then 50%) to develop an upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) with fever compared to their patients. This difference can't be explained by variables such as gender, age, children and particularly young children, vaccination against influenza, presence of chronic illness or allergies, medication taken on a regular basis, smoking habits and regular physical exercise.

Contraceptive knowledge and expectations by adolescents: an explanation by focus groups.

To determine the needs and expectations of adolescent girls concerning contraceptive use as well as their attitude to health care providers, a qualitative research was performed with four focus groups of 17-year-old girls of different education levels. All 26 girls except one were of Belgian origin. There was a fixed scenario for each group. The discussions were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed via content analysis. Knowledge concerning the daily use and side-effects of contraceptives was insufficient. A school physician is not the person they want to talk to. The influence of the peer in the group is very important. The general practitioner is the most frequently consulted health care provider for the first pill prescription, but for a gynaecological examination they thought they had to visit a gynaecologist. The girls expected confidentiality from their general practitioner and wanted sufficient consultation time. Factors inhibiting the visits for obtaining contraceptives were the cost, waiting time and fear of the gynaecological examination. Adolescents intended to visit their general practitioner for contraceptives, but the family practice had to be easily accessible. It is a challenge for general practitioners to provide good contraceptives to adolescents and to promote compliance.