Long-Term Clinical Outcomes After Filter Protection During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque　- 1-Year Follow up of the VAMPIRE 3 (Vacuum Aspiration Thrombus Reemoval 3) Trial.

BACKGROUND: Selective use of distal filter protection during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndromes (ACS) decreased the incidence of no-reflow phenomena and in-hospital serious adverse cardiac events compared with conventional PCI in patients with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm; however, its long-term clinical outcome remains unknown.Methods and Results:Patients who had ACS with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm were assigned to receive distal protection (DP) (n=98) or conventional treatment (CT) (n=96). The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of death from any cause, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 1 year, was the pre-specified secondary endpoint of the trial. MACE at 1 year occurred in 12 patients (12.2%) in the DP group and 3 patients (3.1%) in the CT group (P=0.029), which was driven by a higher risk of TVR (11 [11.2%] vs. 2 [2.1%], P=0.018). In patients treated with bare-metal stents (n=42), MACE occurred in 25.0% of the patients in the DP group and in none of the patients in the CT group (P=0.029), whereas in patients treated with drug-eluting stents (n=151), rates of MACE were similar in the groups (8.1% vs. 3.9%, P=0.32). CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm, the 1-year rates of MACE were higher in the DP group than in the CT group. This effect might be mitigated by the use of drug-eluting stents.

Prognostic impact of nutritional status and physical capacity in elderly patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

AIMS: Nutritional status as well as physical capacity is related to prognosis in patients with heart failure. The purpose of this study was to explore a simple prognostic indicator in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) by including both nutritional status and physical capacity. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients hospitalized with ADHF (N = 203; mean age, 81 years) were enrolled. We evaluated the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) on hospital admission and at discharge. A GNRI score < 92 was defined as malnutrition. Physical capacity was evaluated by simple walking test to determine if patients could walk 200 m, with a Borg scale score ≤ 13, without critical changes in vital signs. Primary endpoints were mortality and heart failure rehospitalization within 2 years. A total of 49% and 48% of patients showed malnutrition on admission and at discharge, respectively. Malnutrition at discharge was more strongly related to mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 3.382, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.900-6.020, P < 0.0001)] than that on admission (HR 2.448, 95% CI 1.442-4.157, P = 0.001) by univariable analysis. Malnutrition at discharge was related to mortality (HR 2.370, 95% CI 1.166-4.814, P = 0.02), but malnutrition on admission was not related (HR 1.538, 95% CI 0.823-2.875, P = 0.18) by multivariable analysis. Almost half of patients (45%) could not walk 200 m, which was significantly related to mortality by univariable analysis (HR 3.303, 95% CI 1.905-5.727, P < 0.0001), but was not by multivariable analysis (HR 1.990, 95% CI 0.999-3.962, P = 0.05). The combined index including both GNRI and simple walking test was an independent and stronger predictor of mortality than either index alone by multivariable analysis (HR 2.249, 95% CI 1.362-3.716, P < 0.01). Neither malnutrition nor low physical capacity was related to heart failure rehospitalization by univariable analysis (HR 0.702, 95% CI 0.483-1.020, P = 0.06; HR 1.047, 95% CI 0.724-1.515, P = 0.81, respectively). Malnutrition at discharge significantly reduced heart failure rehospitalization by multivariable analysis (HR 0.431, 95% CI 0.266-0.698, P < 0.01). When patients were classified into Group G (both nutritional status and physical capacity at discharge were good), Group E (either was good), and Group B (both were bad), mortality rates were significantly different among the groups (log rank P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A simple indicator including both nutritional status and physical capacity may predict 2 year mortality in elderly patients with ADHF.

Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography utilizing intraprocedural 320-row computed tomography with minimal contrast medium.

Recently developed coronary angiography with intraprocedural 320-row computed tomography can be performed in a catheterization laboratory (XACT) by injecting contrast medium from a place close to the coronary arteries, thereby requiring a minimal amount of contrast medium. However, its clinical application has not yet been established. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of XACT angiography with a minimal volume of contrast medium in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). A total of 167 coronary segments were analyzed in 14 patients (9 males, median age 70 years) with suspected CAD by XACT angiography with 7.5 ml of contrast medium and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with standard techniques. The segmental-based diagnostic accuracy of XACT angiography in detecting stenosis of ≥ 50% and ≥ 75% and visualized by ICA was good (sensitivity: 74% and 62%, specificity: 99% and 99%, positive predictive value: 93% and 80%, and negative predictive value: 97% and 97%, respectively). These results suggest that XACT angiography with a very low amount of contrast medium may have strong clinical utility for screening coronary arteries in patients with renal dysfunction or undergoing clinical procedures such as pacemaker implantation.

Impact of Residual Stenosis on the Angiographic Edge Restenosis of a Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent.

Edge restenosis has gained attention as a main cause of restenosis after first-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of edge restenosis and identify the predictors of edge restenosis after second-generation DES implantation. Data were obtained from several postmarketing surveillance (PMS) studies on a cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent (CoCr-EES; Xience V/PROMUS, Xience Prime, Xience Prime SV, and Xience Expedition SV), a second-generation DES, in Japan. Angiographic analysis was conducted at the baseline and after eight months on the following subsegments: in-stent region, proximal edge, and distal edge. Restenosis was defined as ≥ 50% diameter stenosis (DS) at follow-up. We used multivariate logistic regression (with lesions as a random effect) to compare the instances of restenosis between the proximal and the distal edges. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the risk factors for restenosis were performed for each subsegment. We analyzed 1,966 lesions in 1,687 patients. The restenosis rates at the in-stent region, proximal edge, and distal edge were 4.4%, 3.0%, and 1.1%, respectively. The risk of restenosis at the distal edge was significantly lower than that at the proximal edge, when adjusted for 13 variables. The predictors of restenosis were postprocedural % diameter stenosis (%DS), postprocedural reference diameter, ≥ 45° bending, stent overlap at the proximal edge, and postprocedural %DS at the distal edge. Our analysis of eight-month angiographic outcomes from CoCr-EES PMS demonstrated that postprocedural %DS is a major predictor of edge restenosis. Edge restenosis is more likely attributable to postprocedural angiographic results than to the patient's background.

Relation of Chronic Total Occlusion to In-Hospital Mortality in the Patients With Sudden Cardiac Arrest Due to Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Although the presence of chronic total occlusion (CTO) has been associated with long-term mortality in the patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the influence of having CTO on in-hospital mortality in sudden cardiac arrest (SCA)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients has not been reported. Therefore, we examined the association between the presence of CTO and in-hospital mortality in those patients. Consecutive 106 SCA-ACS patients who received coronary angiography were retrospectively included. The factors associated with in-hospital mortality were analyzed. Among 106 patients, 40 (38%) patients died during hospitalization. Multivariate analysis revealed presence of CTO dependent on infarct-related artery (IRA-dependent-CTO) (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.88, p = 0.004), diabetes mellitus (HR = 2.04, p = 0.044), percutaneous cardiopulmonary support use (HR = 2.22, p = 0.045), successful recanalization (HR = 0.31, p = 0.004), and peak creatine kinase muscle-brain fraction (HR = 1.11, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with mortality. In conclusion, presence of IRA-dependent-CTO was significantly associated with in-hospital mortality in SCA-ACS patients.

Five-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents from the post marketing study of CoCr-EES (XIENCE V/PROMUS) in Japan.

The Cobalt Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent (CoCr-EES) Post Marketing Surveillance (PMS) Japan study is a prospective multicenter registry designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of XIENCE V/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stents in routine clinical practice at 47 centers representative of the clinical environment in Japan. We enrolled 2010 consecutive patients (2649 lesions) who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using CoCr-EES. Clinical outcomes were evaluated through 5 years. Mean age was 68.8 years, 41.9% had diabetes, 4.9% received hemodialysis. Five-year clinical follow up was available for 1704 (84.8%) patients. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 10.7% of patients, including cardiac death (3.8%), myocardial infarction (1.8%), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) (6.0%). Beyond 1 year, annual incidence of clinically driven TLR was 0.5-0.8%. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 9 (0.5%) patients at 5 years. After 1 year, definite stent thrombosis occurred in only 1 patient. Significant predictors for MACE were dialysis (ODDs ratio 4.58, 95% CI 2.75-7.64), prior cardiac intervention (ODDs ratio 2.47, 95% CI 1.75-3.49), total stent length (ODDs ratio 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02), and number of diseased vessels (ODDs ratio 1.66, 95% CI 1.08-2.55). Five-year clinical outcomes from the CoCr-EES PMS Japan study demonstrated a low incidence of clinical events in the daily practice up to 5 years.Clinical Trial Registration Information: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01086228 .

Satisfactory arterial repair 1 year after ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: an angioscopic observation.

The ultrathin strut biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Orsiro, O-SES) exhibits satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, no report to date has documented the intravascular status of artery repair after O-SES implantation. We examined 5 O-SES placed in 4 patients (age 65 ± 12 years, male 75%) presenting with stable angina pectoris due to de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Coronary angioscopy was performed immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention and 1 year later. Angioscopic images were analyzed to determine the following: (1) dominant grade of neointimal coverage (NIC) over the stent; (2) maximum yellow plaque grade; and (3) existence of thrombus. Yellow plaque grade was evaluated both immediately after stent implantation and at the time of follow-up observation. The other parameters were evaluated at the time of follow-up examination. NIC was graded as: grade 0, stent struts exposed; grade 1, struts bulging into the lumen, although covered; grade 2, struts embedded in the neointima, but translucent; grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. Yellow plaque severity was graded as: grade 0, white; grade 1, light yellow; grade 2, yellow; and grade 3, intensive yellow. Angioscopic findings at 1 year demonstrated the following: dominant NIC grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 in 1, 2, and 2 stents, respectively; all stents were covered to some extent; focal thrombus adhesion was observed in only 1 stent. Yellow plaque grade did not change from immediately after stent implantation to follow-up. O-SES demonstrated satisfactory arterial repair 1 year after implantation.

A Randomized Study of Distal Filter Protection Versus Conventional Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque Identified by Intravascular Ultrasound.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of distal protection during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes at high risk for distal embolization. BACKGROUND: The results of previous clinical trials indicated that the routine use of distal protection in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction did not improve clinical outcomes. However, selective use of distal protection by means of a filter-based distal protection system has not been evaluated. METHODS: Two hundred patients with acute coronary syndromes who had native coronary artery lesions and attenuated plaque with longitudinal length ≥5 mm on pre-PCI intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to undergo PCI with distal protection or conventional treatment. RESULTS: The primary endpoint (no-reflow phenomenon) occurred in 26 patients (26.5%) in the distal protection group and 39 patients (41.7%) in the conventional treatment group (p = 0.026), and the corrected TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) frame count after revascularization was significantly lower in the distal protection group (23 vs. 30.5; p = 0.0003). The incidence of cardiac death, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock after revascularization requiring defibrillation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was significantly lower in the distal protection group than in the conventional treatment group (0% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: The use of distal embolic protection applied with a filter device decreased the incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon and was associated with fewer serious adverse cardiac events after revascularization than conventional PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm in length. (Assessment of Distal Protection Device in Patients at High Risk for Distal Embolism in Acute Coronary Syndrome [ACS] [VAMPIRE3]; NCT01460966).

The impact of coronary calcification on angiographic and 3-year clinical outcomes of everolimus-eluting stents: results of a XIENCE V/PROMUS post-marketing surveillance study.

Coronary calcification (CCA) is one of the independent predictors for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in coronary intervention. Post-marketing surveillance study Japan is a prospective registry designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the everolimus-eluting stent (EES, XIENCE V/PROMUS Stent) in routine clinical practice at 47 centers. In this study, 1848 lesions (1546 patients) were assessed using quantitative coronary angiography. In these 1546 patients, renal function data were unknown in 26 patients. Three patients in 70 patients with dialysis and 56 patients in 1450 patients with no dialysis were excluded, because they had multiple lesions with mixed calcification lesions. We evaluated the effects of CCA on 8-month angiographic and 3-year clinical outcomes in dialysis and non-dialysis patients. Moderate-to-severe (Ca group) and none-to-mild CCA (non-Ca group) were observed in 33 lesions (30 patients) and 48 lesions (37 patients) in dialysis patients, and these were observed in 306 lesions (286 patients) and 1303 lesions (1108 patients) in non-dialysis patients, respectively. In non-dialysis patients, the ischemic-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) and MACE rate over the 3 years were significantly higher in the Ca group than in the non-Ca group (5.8 vs. 3.1%, p = 0.025 and 10.0 vs. 5.0%, p = 0.0011). In dialysis patients, ID-TLR and MACE rates were high in both groups (14.3 vs. 17.9%, p = 0.85 and 17.5 vs. 36.1%, p = 0.16). In non-dialysis patients, 8-month angiographic and 3-year clinical outcomes were worse in the Ca group. However, in dialysis patients, both outcomes were worse regardless of CCA.Clinical Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01086228 .

Comparison of early-phase arterial repair following cobalt-chrome everolimus-eluting stent and slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stent: an angioscopic study.

Whether arterial repair following implantation of drug-eluting stents (DES) of the second generation differs among stent types remains unknown. We examined 41 DES placed in 28 patients (age 72 ± 7 years, male 89%) presenting with stable angina pectoris due to de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. Coronary angioscopy was performed 4 ± 1 months after stent implantation. Patients were divided into two groups based on the DES types: 22 cobalt-chrome everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES) in 13 patients and 19 slow-release zotarolimus-eluting stents (R-ZES) in 15 patients. Neointimal coverage (NIC) was graded as: grade 0, stent struts exposed; grade 1, struts bulging into the lumen, although covered; grade 2, struts embedded in the neointima, but translucent; grade 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. NIC was defined as heterogeneous when the NIC grade variation was ≥1. Presence of thrombus was also investigated. Distribution of dominant NIC grade (CoCr-EES: grade 0, 9%; grade 1, 77%; grade 2, 9%; grade 3, 5%; R-ZES: grade 0, 16%; grade 1: 47%; grade 2, 37%; grade 3, 0%, P = 0.38) and heterogeneity of NIC (P = 0.43) were similar between CoCr-EES and R-ZES groups. Existence of thrombus was not significantly different in CoCr-EES and R-ZES (18 versus 42%, P = 0.17). Arterial repair occurred without significant differences between CoCr-EES and R-ZES 4 months after implantation.

Ideal Guiding Catheter Position During Bilaterally Engaged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Using a novel combined angiography computed tomography (CT) system, we evaluated the impact of the intra-aortic root position of a right coronary artery (RCA) catheter on its coaxiality. We retrospectively enrolled 19 patients who underwent CT scans during bilaterally engaged percutaneous coronary intervention. Coaxiality was defined as the angle between the RCA and the RCA catheter. The coaxiality was better when the RCA catheter was placed anterior to the left main coronary artery catheter (median 27.0° vs 53.7°, p = 0.02). The position of the RCA catheter had a significant impact on the coaxiality of it, with a coaxiality improvement ratio of 0.506 (95% confidence interval 0.294 to 0.871, p = 0.017). Three-dimensional reconstructed CT images of the right anterior oblique projection could determine the position of catheters in all cases. In conclusion, the RCA catheter should be placed anterior, rather than posterior, to the left main coronary artery catheter for better coaxiality during bilaterally engaged percutaneous coronary intervention. The right anterior oblique projection is useful for determining the catheter position.

Efficient distal tip size of primary guidewire for antegrade percutaneous coronary intervention in chronic total occlusion: The G-FORCE study.

BACKGROUND: Although several new techniques have been introduced for CTO such as the retrograde approach, the fundamental question of what type of guidewire is the most appropriate as a primary guidewire in the antegrade approach has not been answered. METHODS: The G-FORCE study was designed as a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial to determine the efficient primary guidewire in antegrade approach for chronic total occlusion (CTO). The first guidewire was randomly assigned to a regular size distal tip group (0.014in. size) or tapered tip group (0.010in. or less). The primary endpoint was defined as successful lesion penetration by the first guidewire into distal true lumen. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT00987610. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients were enrolled, with an average age of 66±11years and 16% were female. The average J-CTO score was 1.8±1.1. The primary endpoint was achieved in 38% and 32% of patients using tapered and regular distal tip guidewires, respectively (P=0.80). The final PCI success rate was 81% vs. 85%, respectively (P=0.57). Easy CTO lesions with a J-CTO score=0 exhibited a primary endpoint significantly different between tapered and regular distal tip primary guidewires (79% vs. 40%; P=0.046). Guidewire distal coating or distal tip load did not relate with primary guidewire success rate. CONCLUSION: Tapered and regular distal tip guidewires are equivalent as a first choice for CTO. Tapered guidewires are superior for CTO lesions with a J-CTO score=0.

Effect of Optimal Medical Therapy Before Procedures on Outcomes in Coronary Patients Treated With Drug-Eluting Stents.

It has not been established whether the achievement of optimal medical therapy (OMT) before implantation of a drug-eluting stent has a clinical benefit for patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). This study included 3,004 patients with CAD treated with drug-eluting stent from 123 Japanese participating centers. The achievement of OMT was defined as control of blood pressure <130/80 mm Hg, hemoglobin A1c <7.0%, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <100 mg/dl. The primary end point was target vessel failure, a composite of death related to the target vessel, myocardial infarction, or clinically driven revascularization at 24 months after stent implantation. Immediately before the procedure, only 548 patients (18.2%) had achieved all 3 target criteria (the achieved OMT group), whereas the remaining 2,456 patients failed to achieve one or more criteria (the non-OMT group). At 24 months, the incidence of target vessel failure was 7.0% in the achieved OMT group versus 10.0% in the non-OMT group (hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.96, p = 0.03). The incidence of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction was also lower in the achieved OMT group than in the non-OMT group (0.5% vs 1.5%, p = 0.08). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified that hemoglobin A1c <7.0% was the only protective predictor of 24-month target vessel failure (odds ratio 0.56, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.73, p <0.01). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that in patients with stable CAD scheduled for stent implantation, achievement of OMT before percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduced subsequent cardiac events. Achievement of OMT is still insufficient in modern clinical practice.

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes of Everolimus-Eluting Stents From the Post-Marketing Surveillance Study of Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent (XIENCE V/PROMUS) in Japan.

BACKGROUND: The Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent (CoCr-EES) Post-marketing Surveillance (PMS) is a prospective multicenter registry designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of XIENCE V/PROMUS everolimus-eluting stents in routine clinical practice at 47 centers representative of the clinical environment in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 2,010 consecutive patients (2,649 lesions) who underwent PCI using CoCr-EES. Clinical outcomes were evaluated for up to 3 years. Clinical follow-up was available in 1,930 patients (96%) at 3 years. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) occurred in 6.8% of patients, including cardiac death (1.7%), myocardial infarction (1.5%), and clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR, 4.2%). Late CD-TLR rate was 0.8% from 1 to 2 years, and 0.5% from 2 to 3 years. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 7 patients (0.3%) up to 1 year. There was no very late definite or probable stent thrombosis from 1 to 3 years. Significant independent predictors for MACE were hemodialysis, prior coronary intervention, triple-vessel coronary artery disease, and age >70 years. CONCLUSIONS: Three-year clinical outcomes from the CoCr-EES PMS demonstrated a low incidence of clinical events. There was no major concern about very late stent thrombosis or late catch-up phenomenon in patients treated with EES in routine clinical practice in Japan.

Three-year follow-up outcomes of SES and PES in a randomized controlled study stratified by the presence of diabetes mellitus: J-DEsSERT trial.

BACKGROUND: Three-year clinical follow-up of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) in the Japan-Drug Eluting Stents Evaluation; a Randomized Trial (J-DESsERT) using 2 different drug eluting stents (DES). A recent study demonstrated that efficacy of sirolimus eluting stents (SES) attenuated over time in diabetic patients. METHODS: In the largest trial of its kind, 1724 DM patients out of 3533 enrolled patients were randomized to either SES or paclitaxel eluting stents (PES). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline clinical characteristics aside from hypertension. Incidence of major adverse cardiac cerebrovascular events (MACCE) mainly due to higher target vessel failure (TVF) initially indicated a benefit in SES (MACCE rate at 1 year: SES 9.4%, PES 12.2%, p=0.08); however this had attenuated by the time of the 3-year follow-up (MACCE rate from 1 to 3 years: SES 8.4%, PES 6.1%, p=0.10). A similar pattern was observed in insulin-treated patients: MACCE rate from 1 to 3 years was 10.5% in SES and 6.4% in PES (p=0.25). Angiographic follow-up also resulted in higher major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates at 1 year (presence 11.5%, absence 8.3%, p=0.04); however by 3 years rates were similar regardless of the presence of angiographic follow-up (MACE rate at 3 years: presence 16.0%, absence 14.5%, p=0.35). CONCLUSIONS: The superiority of SES over PES in MACCE at 1 year had attenuated by 3-year follow-up. Eventually, the 3-year safety and efficacy profiles were similar regardless of insulin treatment.

Reproducibility and clinical potential of myocardial mass at risk calculated by a novel software utilizing cardiac computed tomography information.

To select the best revascularization strategy a correct understanding of the ischemic territory and the coronary anatomy is crucial. Stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the gold standard to assess ischemia, however, SPECT has important limitations such as lack of coronary anatomical information or false negative results due to balanced ischemia in multi-vessel disease. Angiographic scores are based on anatomical characteristics of coronary arteries but they lack information on the extent of jeopardized myocardium. Cardiac computed tomography (CCT) has the ability to evaluate the coronary anatomy and myocardium in one sequence, which is theoretically the ideal method to assess the myocardial mass at risk (MMAR) for any target lesion located at any point in the coronary tree. In this study we analyzed MMAR of the three main coronary arteries and three major side branches; diagonal (Dx), obtuse marginal (OM), and posterior descending artery (PDA) in 42 patients with normal coronary arteries using an algorithm based on the Voronoi method. The distribution of MMAR among the three main coronary arteries was 44.3 ± 5.6 % for the left anterior descending artery, 28.2 ± 7.3 % for the left circumflex artery, and 26.8 ± 8.6 % for the right coronary artery. MMAR of the three major side branches was 11.3 ± 3.9 % for the Dx, 12.6 ± 5.2 % for the OM and 10.2 ± 3.4 % for the PDA. Intra- and inter-observer analysis showed excellent correlation (r = 0.97; p < 0.0001 and r = 0.95; p < 0.0001, respectively). In conclusion, CCT-based MMAR assessment is reliable and may offer important information for selection of the optimal revascularization procedure.

Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer: NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data reporting the clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent (BP-BES) compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (DP-EES) beyond 1 year after stent implantation when the polymer is fully degraded. METHODS AND RESULTS: The NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial (NEXT) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing BP-BES with DP-EES in patients scheduled for percutaneous coronary intervention using drug-eluting stent (DES) without any exclusion criteria among 98 participating centers in Japan. The trial was designed to evaluate noninferiority of BP-BES relative to DP-EES in terms of any target-lesion revascularization at 1 year and death or myocardial infarction at 3 years. Between May and October 2011, 3235 patients were randomly assigned to receive either BP-BES (1617 patients) or DP-EES (1618 patients). Complete 3-year follow-up was achieved in 97.6% of patients. At 3 years, the primary safety end point of death or myocardial infarction occurred in 159 patients (9.9%) in the BP-BES group and in 166 patients (10.3%) in the DP-EES group, demonstrating noninferiority of BP-BES relative to DP-EES (P noninferiority<0.0001 and P superiority=0.7). Cumulative incidence of target-lesion revascularization was not significantly different between the 2 groups (7.4% versus 7.1%; P=0.8). By a landmark analysis at 1 year, the cumulative incidences of death or myocardial infarction and target-lesion revascularization were also not significantly different between the 2 groups (4.6% versus 5.2%; P=0.46 and 3.3% versus 2.7%; P=0.39, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Safety and efficacy outcomes of BP-BES were non inferior to those of DP-EES 3 years after stent implantation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01303640.

Extensive arterial repair one year after paclitaxel-coated nitinol drug-eluting stent vs. bare-metal stent implantation in the superficial femoral artery.

Arterial repair differences between paclitaxel-coated nitinol drug-eluting stent (DES) vs. bare-metal stent (BMS) up to 1 year after implantation in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) have not been well characterized. We compared angioscopic findings 1 year after implantation in the SFA of 22 DES in 18 patients and 12 BMS in 9 patients (follow-up period 354 ± 49 vs. 383 ± 81 days, P = 0.20). Neointimal coverage (NIC) was graded as: 0, stent struts exposed; 1, struts bulged into the lumen, although covered; 2, struts embedded by the neointima, but translucent; and 3, struts fully embedded and invisible. NIC was defined as heterogeneous when NIC grade variation was ≥1. Presence of thrombus and yellow plaques (YP) was assessed. Baseline patient and lesion characteristics were similar between the groups. In terms of procedural characteristics, stent diameter was smaller in DES than in BMS (6.5 ± 0.5 vs. 7.4 ± 0.8 mm, P = 0.0020). Both DES (grade 2 5 %, grade 3 95 %) and BMS (grade 3 100 %) revealed dominant NIC grades of 2 or 3 (P = 0.46), however, DES showed greater NIC heterogeneity than BMS (91 vs. 42 %, P = 0.004). Both thrombus and YP were more frequently observed in DES than in BMS (64 vs. 17 %, P = 0.001; 95 vs. 67 %, P = 0.042, respectively). In conclusion, although arterial repair was limited after DES implantation in the SFA, it was extensive at 1 year.

Outcomes of the largest multi-center trial stratified by the presence of diabetes mellitus comparing sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) in patients with coronary artery disease. The Japan drug-eluting stents evaluation: a randomized trial (J-DESsERT).

The Japan drug-eluting stents evaluation: a randomized trial (J-DESsERT) was conducted to compare the effectiveness of 2 different drug-eluting stents (DES). It remains uncertain which is more efficacious in diabetic patients, sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). In this trial, the largest of its kind, 3,533 patients including 1,724 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients were randomized to either SES or PES. Stratification was based on the presence or absence of DM. PES target vessel failure (TVF) non-inferiority at 8 months (primary endpoint) was not demonstrated when compared to SES (SES 4.5 % vs. PES 6.4 %, p = 0.23). In addition, PES TVF superiority at 8 months in the DM subset (secondary endpoint) was not shown (SES 5.6 % vs. PES 7.6 %, p = 0.10). Insulin treatment was associated with increased TVF rates, however, this was less pronounced in the PES group. At 8 months, the similar TVF rates for SES and PES up to that point diverged significantly, favoring SES out to 12 months. Patients undergoing routine angiographic follow-up demonstrated lower TVF prior to the 8-month point, and higher TVF after 8 months, as compared to those followed clinically. In conclusion, the current study failed to demonstrate the proposed superiority of PES for DM patients. In addition, the diversion of TVF at 8 months may reflect an "oculo-stenotic reflex" bias (the tendency to treat lesions found during routine, rather than clinically driven, angiographic follow-up), which could constitute an obstacle for evaluating the true clinical effect of new devices.