On-site substrate characterization in the anaerobic digestion context: A dataset of near infrared spectra acquired with four different optical systems on freeze-dried and ground organic waste.

The near infrared spectra of thirty-three freeze-dried and ground organic waste samples of various biochemical composition were collected on four different optical systems, including a laboratory spectrometer, a transportable spectrometer with two measurement configurations (an immersed probe, and a polarized light system) and a micro-spectrometer. The provided data contains one file per spectroscopic system including the reflectance or absorbance spectra with the corresponding sample name and wavelengths. A reference data file containing carbohydrates, lipid and nitrogen content, biochemical methane potential (BMP) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) for each sample is also provided. This data enables the comparison of the optical systems for predictive model calibration based for example on Partial Least Squares Regression (PLS-R) [1], but could be used more broadly to test new chemometrics methods. For example, the data could be used to evaluate different transfer functions between spectroscopic systems [2]. This dataset enabled the research work reported by Mallet et al. 2021 [3].

Fast at-line characterization of solid organic waste: Comparing analytical performance of different compact near infrared spectroscopic systems with different measurement configurations.

Fast characterization of solid organic waste using near infrared spectroscopy has been successfully developed in the last decade. However, its adoption in biogas plants for monitoring the feeding substrates remains limited due to the lack of applicability and high costs. Recent evolutions in the technology have given rise to both more compact and more modular low-cost near infrared systems which could allow a larger scale deployment. The current study investigates the relevance of these new systems by evaluating four different Fourier transform near-infrared spectroscopic systems with different compactness (laboratory, portable, micro spectrometer) but also different measurement configurations (polarized light, at distance, in contact). Though the conventional laboratory spectrometer showed the best performance on the various biochemical parameters tested (carbohydrates, lipids, nitrogen, chemical oxygen demand, biochemical methane potential), the compact systems provided very close results. Prediction of the biochemical methane potential was possible using a low-cost micro spectrometer with an independent validation set error of only 91 NmL(CH4).gTS-1 compared to 60 NmL(CH4).gTS-1 for a laboratory spectrometer. The differences in performance were shown to result mainly from poorer spectral sampling; and not from instrument characteristics such as spectral resolution. Regarding the measurement configurations, none of the evaluated systems allowed a significant gain in robustness. In particular, the polarized light system provided better results when using its multi-scattered signal which brings further evidence of the importance of physical light-scattering properties in the success of models built on solid organic waste.