Successful prioritisation of inguinal herniotomies in children during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise emergency presentations.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disrupted the delivery of elective surgery in children. We introduced guidance to mitigate this impact. By reviewing the outcomes for inguinal herniotomies, we aimed to determine if this guidance has enabled us to prevent an increase in the elective surgery wait time and therefore the need for emergency surgery for incarcerated hernias. This report aims to share our learnt lessons about responding to a crisis limiting accessibility to elective surgery. Results: We performed a retrospective review of all elective and emergency herniotomies performed between April 1 and September 30, 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and the same period in 2020 (post-COVID-19). We compared the data on wait time from referral to clinic review/elective surgery and incarceration rates. During the study period in 2019, 76 elective herniotomies were performed compared to 46 in 2020. We did not observe a simultaneous increase in emergency herniotomies in 2020 (27 [2020] vs 25 [2019], OR [95% CI] = 1.53 [0.79-2.9]; p = 0.2). The median time from referral to elective surgery in 2019 compared to 2020 did not differ (56 vs 59 days, respectively; p = 0.61). In 2020, 72% of children that required emergency surgery had not been previously referred to our service and the median age (interquartile range) at which they presented with an incarcerated hernia was 2.8 months (2.1-13.7 months). Conclusion: By adhering to local guidelines for resumption of elective activity, the pandemic did not result in children waiting longer to be seen by a surgeon for a suspected inguinal hernia. As a result, we did not perform more emergency herniotomies. Urgent prioritisation of hernias in infants, from birth up to 3 months old, was a beneficial strategy. Public health education on childhood hernias will improve outcomes. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43159-023-00243-1.

Extubation strategies after esophageal atresia repair.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Early extubation following repair of esophageal atresia (EA) is desirable unless the anastomosis is under tension, in which case paralysis and post-operative ventilation may reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. However, complications from emergency reintubations do occur with either strategy. We aim to examine the risk/benefit balance of early and delayed extubation following EA repair. METHODS: A seven-year retrospective review of all babies that underwent EA repair was performed. Babies extubated within 24 h of surgery were classified as early extubation (EE). Babies intubated beyond the first 24 h were classified as delayed extubation (DE). The EE group was subdivided into babies extubated in operating room (EIOR), and babies who returned to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) intubated but extubated within 24 h (EW24). RESULTS: Forty-six babies were analyzed, and overall 15 (32.6%) required 24 reintubation episodes. Eight (28.6%) babies in the EE group required reintubation. The EIOR group (n = 12) had significantly increased risk of requiring reintubation (OR:7, 95%CI:1.08 to 45.16:p = 0.04) compared to the EW24 group (n = 16). Seven (38.9%) babies in the DE group required reintubation. The complication rate from reintubation after EA repair was 17%. CONCLUSIONS: Extubation on the NICU within 24 h of surgery carried the lowest risk of reintubation. For babies with a tight anastomosis, elective postoperative ventilation appeared to confer a protective benefit without incurring a high risk of complications from reintubation.

Incidence of Low-Grade Testicular Injury in Orchidectomy Specimens Post-testicular Torsion.

INTRODUCTION: Following detorsion and orchidopexy for testicular torsion, predominantly animal studies have reported a risk of autoimmune and reperfusion injury to the contralateral testis. As a result, when testicular viability is compromised, orchidectomy is readily performed. This practice increases the likelihood of testes with potentially reversible injury being excised. We aim to determine the incidence of such occurrences and review the available evidence for and against early orchidectomy when testicular viability is doubtful. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data for a 15-year period from two pediatric institutions on testicular torsion in children younger than 16 years were reviewed. Using a previously published grading system, the orchidectomy specimens in this cohort with early low-grade injury were analyzed. Low-grade injury suggests the possibility of restitutio ad integrum implying restoration of exocrine and endocrine function of the affected testes. RESULTS: Between both institutions, 222 scrotal explorations were performed for testicular torsion; 20 neonatal and 202 outside the neonatal period (age range [median]: 1-28 days [3 days] and 3 months-16 years [13 years], respectively). Of these scrotal explorations, 17 neonatal and 66 nonneonatal orchidectomies were required (85 vs. 33%, respectively; p < 0.0001). From these orchidectomy specimens, 5 (6%) were found to have low-grade injury. The ages of these five children ranged from 9 to 16 years (median 15, mean 13.6 years). Their symptom duration ranged from 8 to 37 hours (median 14, mean 18 hours) and two of these children had a preoperative ultrasound documenting no flow to the testis. CONCLUSION: The finding of histopathological features that may represent salvageability of a torted testis occurs relatively rarely. Because of this possibility, appropriate intraoperative steps to check for reperfusion must be undertaken prior to orchidectomy. More evidence for the use of antioxidants and tunica albuginea decompression to improve testes salvage rates is required. The potential for exocrine and endocrine function if partial testicular atrophy occurs and the evidence for contralateral autoimmune testicular damage in pre- and postpubertal males require further investigation.

Incidence and outcome of retained Port-A-Cath fragments during removal.

PURPOSE: Port-A-Cath devices are frequently used for long-term venous access. We postulate that long-term use predisposes them to getting stuck and retained in a central vein at the time of removal. We aim to report the incidence and outcome of this complication. METHODS: Between January 2006 and July 2016, a retrospective review of all Port-A-Cath removals that were performed at our centre was conducted. At the time of removal, catheters that could not be removed from the vein were considered retained. RESULTS: During the study period, 107 children had 174 episodes of silicone Sitimplant (Vygon, Ecouen, France) Port-A-Cath insertions. These children required 135 removal episodes and there were 3 (2.2%) instances whereby the catheter fragment was retained. These episodes of retained catheters only occurred in children with factor VIII deficiency (4.1% incidence in this cohort). For each episode of catheter insertion and removal, the catheters had been left in situ for a mean duration of 43 months in children with factor deficiency and no retained fragments, and the mean duration was 91 months in children with factor deficiency and retained catheter fragments (p = 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: Port-A-Caths that are retained after attempted removal is a complication encountered predominantly in catheters that have been in use for a prolonged duration. Furthermore, factor replacement therapy in haemophiliacs may be a risk factor for this complication.

Does Functional Outcome Improve with Time Postsurgery for Hirschsprung Disease?

PURPOSE: Constipation and incontinence are significant problems following pull-through surgery for Hirschsprung disease (HD). There is evidence that these problems improve with time. However, there is also evidence showing no improvements and furthermore, significant long-term data are lacking for the newer endorectal pull-through. We aim to determine if there is clinical evidence that show improvements in functional outcomes with time after an endorectal pull-through surgery for HD. METHODS: We utilized the validated pediatric incontinence and constipation scoring system (PICSS) to score 51 consecutive children 3 months to 15 years posttransabdominal or transanal endorectal pull-through for HD. Cases of total colonic aganglionosis and Down syndrome were excluded. PICSS scores below the age-specific lower limit 95% confidence interval scores represent incomplete continence or constipation, respectively. We performed linear regression to analyze the relationship between PICSS scores and the follow-up duration and then compared the demographics of children with and without incomplete continence and constipation, respectively. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The median age at PICSS interview was 71 months (range, 6-191 months). Incontinence scores obtained from 42 children older than 35 months showed a positive relationship with the follow-up duration (p = 0.03). Constipation scores obtained from 51 children were unrelated to follow-up duration (p = 0.486). When demographics were compared, the continent children had longer follow-up than those with incomplete continence (mean, 111.64 vs. 69.19 months; p = 0.051), however follow-up duration did not differ in the group of constipated children compared with the nonconstipated group (mean, 61.88 vs. 71.80 months; p = 0.321). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that after an endorectal pull-through, improved continence should be expected with time but constipation often continues to be an ongoing problem.

Comparative review of functional outcomes post surgery for Hirschsprung's disease utilizing the paediatric incontinence and constipation scoring system.

PURPOSE: We aim to analyze differences in functional outcomes in children operated on for Hirschsprung's disease (HD) using the Paediatric incontinence/constipation scoring system (PICSS) validated in a normative group. METHODS: A retrospective review of the records of all children operated on for HD between 1997 and 2010 was performed. Patients had either a Soave or transanal endorectal pull-through. Children with total colonic aganglionosis and Down's syndrome were excluded. Utilizing the PICSS children who scored below their age-specific lower limit 95 % confidence interval PICSS scores were considered to have incomplete continence or constipation. The rates of incomplete continence and constipation were compared between groups. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: PICSS analysis could be completed in 51 (Soave 35, transanal 16). The median age at interview was 71 months (range 6-191 months). The rate of incomplete continence was 75 % (n = 21) and 71 % (n = 10) for the Soave and transanal groups, respectively (p = 1.00). The constipation rate was 34 % (n = 12) and 25 % (n = 4) for the Soave and transanal groups, respectively (p = 0.74). The overall rates of incomplete continence and constipation rates were 74 and 31 %, respectively, compared with 14 and 10 %, respectively, when rates were calculated by review of records. CONCLUSION: The PICSS is a sensitive tool for assessing functional outcome post HD surgery. The Soave and transanal procedures have similar functional outcomes.