Unraveling Racial Disparities in Supportive Care Medication Use among End-of-Life Pancreatic Cancer Patients: Focus on Pain Management and Psychiatric Therapies.

BACKGROUND: Supportive care medication use differences may contribute to racial disparities observed in health-related quality of life in patients with pancreatic cancer. METHODS: In this observation study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database, we sought to examine supportive care medication use disparities in patients with pancreatic cancer from 2005 to 2017 by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: Among 74,309 patients included in the final analysis, racial and ethnic disparities in the use of supportive care medications were identified. After adjustment for confounding factors and compared with non-Hispanic Whites, minorities had significantly less use of opioids [Black: adjusted OR (aOR), 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.88; Asian: aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90), and skeletomuscular relaxants (Black: aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; Hispanic: aOR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.74-0.91; Asian: aOR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.51-0.68), and increased use of non-opioid analgesics (Hispanic: aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01-1.14; Asian: aOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.26-1.49). Racial and ethnic minorities had less use of antidepressants (Black: aOR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.53-0.59; Hispanic: aOR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.73-0.82; Asian: aOR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.44-0.51), anxiolytics (Black: aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.82; Hispanic: aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.71; Asian: aOR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.48-0.57), and antipsychotics (Hispanic: aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.99; Asian: aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of supportive care medications among patients with pancreatic cancer were observed, with the differences unexplained by sociodemographic factors. IMPACT: Future studies should identify strategies to promote equitable use of supportive care medications among racial minorities and explore factors that may influence their use in these populations.

Exploring Trends in Social Vulnerability for Pharmacy Students at a Large Public University.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe trends in social vulnerability (SV) among pharmacy students at a large public college of pharmacy, and to describe differences in SV by race and ethnicity using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). METHODS: The SVI was determined for each student admitted between Fall 2017 and Fall 2022 using the submitted permanent address for each student in a deidentified fashion. International students and students not from the 50 US states were excluded from the analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 1427 pharmacy students met the study inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Students from historically minoritized populations accounted for 53.4% (n = 763/1427) of students. The median SVI score for all students was 0.4091 (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.2091-0.6395), which is consistent with low/moderate SV risk. When considering SVI by race, students from historically minoritized populations had a higher median SVI (0.4807 [IQR: 0.2791-0.7071] vs 0.3562 [IQR: 0.1561-0.5523]), and were more likely to come from moderate/high SV regions compared with White students (odds ratio 2.00 [95% confidence interval: 1.609-2.486]). CONCLUSION: Among pharmacy students at a large public university, a substantial proportion of students had moderate/high SV risk, particularly those from historically minoritized backgrounds. Colleges and schools of pharmacy need to consider the unique needs of students from high SV backgrounds and provide intentional equity-based mitigation strategies to maximize the potential for student success for all.

A Scoping Review on the Relationship between Race/Ethnicity and the Receipt of Supportive Care Medications during Cancer Treatment: Implications for the Clinical Pharmacist.

There is surmounting levels of evidence on the health disparities within cancer treatment in the United States (US). Most of the research focused on cancer specific factors including anticancer incidence, screening, treatment and follow-up, and clinical outcomes such as overall survival (OS). Less is known about the disparities present with supportive care medication use in cancer patients. Supportive care utilization during cancer treatment has been linked to improved quality of life (QoL) and OS among patients. The goal of this scoping review is to summarize findings of current literature on the relationship between race and ethnicity and the receipt of supportive care medications during cancer treatment for pain and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). This scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Our literature search included quantitative studies, qualitative studies, and grey literature written in the English language with clinically relevant outcomes pertaining to pain and CINV management in cancer treatment published from 2001-2021. Articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were considered for inclusion in the analysis. The initial search yielded 308 studies. Following de-duplication and screening, 14 studies met the predefined inclusion criteria, with majority of the studies being quantitative studies (n=13). Collectively, results were mixed results regarding the presence of racial disparities for supportive care medication use. Half of the studies (n=7) supported this finding whereas, the other half (n=7) did not identify any racial disparities. In our review, multiple studies illustrate the existence of disparities in the use of supportive care medications in some cancer types. Clinical pharmacists should strive to eliminate supportive medication use disparities as part of a multidisciplinary team. In order to develop strategies to prevent supportive care medication use disparities in this population, further research and analysis of external factors that influence them are needed.