Risk of Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Patients With Ipsilateral Infected Arthroplasties.

Background: The risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) subsequently developing at a second site after an initial PJI has been documented to be approximately 18%-20%. To the best of our knowledge, only a single study has evaluated the incidence in ipsilateral joints and if the risk of infection would be different. While this was the only other study to evaluate this specific subfield, we set to re-evaluate and confirm the incidence of developing a second PJI in the setting of an ipsilateral prosthesis and possible associated risk factors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients treated surgically for lower-extremity PJI at our institution by 5 surgeons from 2015 to 2021. Patients with multiple arthroplasties on the ipsilateral extremity were included. Time between initial and subsequent infection, risk factors for infection, bacterial source, and bacteremia were identified. Results: Of 392 patients treated for PJI, 179 (45.6%) had multiple prosthetic joints. Forty-seven of those 179 patients had ipsilateral extremity prosthesis, which made up our study population. Three patients (6.4%) developed a separate infection at an ipsilateral TJA. In total, 10 patients (21.3%) developed a separate PJI. Patients on immunosuppressants had a higher likelihood of developing second PJI on the ipsilateral extremity (P = .02). Conclusions: Our study identified the risk of developing an ipsilateral PJI to not be any greater than that in patients with contralateral TJAs. It appears that sharing an extremity with an infected TJA does not pose substantially increased risk of subsequent infection of the un-involved prosthesis. Furthermore, immunosuppressant use may increase the risk of a separate ipsilateral PJI.

Do Long-Segment Blocking Screws Increase the Stability of Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Proximal Tibia Fractures, Eliminating the "Bell-Clapper Effect?"

OBJECTIVES: To determine change in stiffness and horizontal translation of a geriatric extra-articular proximal tibia fracture model after intramedullary nailing with distal (long)-segment blocking screws versus proximal (short)-segment blocking screws. METHODS: Unstable extra-articular proximal tibia fractures (OTA/AO 41-A3) were created in 12 geriatric cadaveric tibias. Intramedullary nails were locked with a standard construct (4 proximal screws and 2 distal screws). Specimens were then divided into 2 groups (6 matched pairs per group). Group 1 had a blocking screw placed lateral to the nail in the proximal segment (short segment). Group 2 had a blocking screw placed 1 cm distal to the fracture and medial to the nail (long segment). Specimens were then axially loaded and cycled to failure or cycle completion (50,000 cycles). RESULTS: Long-segment blocking screws significantly decreased the amount of horizontal translation at the fracture site compared with short-segment screws (0.77 vs. 2.0 mm, P = 0.039). They also resulted in a greater trend towards greater baseline stiffness, (807.32 ± 216.95 N/mm vs. 583.12 ± 130.1 N/mm, P = 0.072). There was no difference in stiffness after cyclic loading or survival through 50,000 cycles between the long-segment and short-segment groups. CONCLUSION: Long-segment blocking screws added to an intramedullary nail construct resulted in decreased horizontal translation at the fracture site compared with short-segment screws in this model of a geriatric proximal tibia fracture. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Blocking screws are commonly used to aid in fracture alignment during intramedullary nailing of proximal tibia fractures. Even when not required to attain or maintain alignment, the addition of a blocking screw in either the proximal or the distal (long) segment may help mitigate the "Bell-Clapper Effect" in geriatric patients.

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with an expandable interbody device: Two-year clinical and radiographic outcomes.

Background: The use of interbody cages as an adjunct to lumbar spinal fusion remains an important technique to enhance segmental stability, promote solid arthrodesis, maintain neuroforaminal decompression, and preserve/improve segmental lordosis. Appropriate segmental lumbar lordosis and sagittal balance is well-known to be critical for long-term patient outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the radiographic and clinical results of TLIF in patients using an articulating, expandable cage. Primary endpoint was clinical and radiographic outcomes, including complications, at 12 and 24 months. Methods: A total of 37 patients underwent open single-level or 2-level TLIF by a single surgeon using an expandable cage with concomitant bilateral pedicle screws and posterolateral arthrodesis. Clinical outcomes included ODI and VAS for back and legs. Radiographic outcomes included pelvic incidence and tilt, lumbar and segmental lordoses, and disc height at the operative level(s). All outcomes were collected at baseline, 2-weeks, 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and 24-months postop. Results: A total of 28 patients were available for analysis. Nine patients failed to follow-up at 24 months. Mean ODI scores showed significant improvement, from pre-to-postoperative at 24 months (55%; p<.0001). VAS for back and legs was significantly lower at 24 months on average by 72 and 79%, respectively (p<.0001 for both). Both segmental and lumbar lordoses significantly improved by 5.3° and 4.2° (p<.0001 and p=.049), respectively. Average disc height improved by 49% or 6.1 mm (p<.001). No device-related complications nor instances of measured subsidence. One patient had a superficial infection, and another had an intraoperatively repaired incidental durotomy. Conclusions: The use of an expandable cage contributed to improvement in both segmental and lumbar lordosis with no reported complications at 24-month follow-up. All clinical measures significantly improved as well. The expandable cage design represents an effective and safe option to increase cage size and allow significant segmental lordosis correction.

Revision for instability following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and risk factors for failure.

BACKGROUND: Revision of unstable reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is significantly challenging, with recurrence rates ranging from 20% to 40%. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with recurrent instability. The factors studied included (1) indication for revision RSA (failed primary RSA vs. failed revision RSA), (2) previous attempt at stabilization, (3) mechanism of instability, (4) clinical history of instability, and (5) surgical technique. Outcomes were reported in patients with 2-year follow-up. METHODS: All patients undergoing RSA for instability at our institution were identified. A total of 43 surgical procedures in 36 patients were included. Arthroplasty indication prior to instability (14 failed primary RSAs vs. 22 failed revision RSAs), instances of prior attempts at stabilization (14 patients treated at outside institution), mechanism-of-instability classification, clinical history of instability (17 recurrent and 26 chronic cases), and surgical technique were collected. Stability at final follow-up (minimum, 12 months) and clinical outcomes at 2-year follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 32 of 36 patients (89%) required 38 revisions to achieve stability at final follow-up (mean, 53 ± 47 months; range, 12-210 months). On comparison of stability by indication, stability was achieved in 13 of 14 patients (93%) in the failed primary group (mean, 65 ± 59 months; range, 12-210 months) compared with 19 of 22 (86%) in the failed revision group (mean, 45 ± 36 months; range, 12-148 months; P = .365). The average number of procedures per patient was 3 (range, 2-10) in the failed primary group vs. 4.5 (range, 3-7) in the failed revision group (P = .008). Stability was achieved in 12 of 14 patients (86%) with a history of failed stabilization procedures. The most common mechanism leading to persistent instability was loss of compression. Stability was achieved in 14 of 16 patients treated for recurrent instability compared with 18 of 20 treated for chronically locked dislocation (P = .813). Continued instability occurred in 33% of patients who underwent glenoid side-only management, 33% who underwent humeral side-only management, and 10% who underwent bipolar revision tactics. At 2-year follow-up, stability was achieved in 18 of 21 patients, with improvements in the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, forward flexion, abduction, external rotation, and the Simple Shoulder Test score (P = .016, P < .01, P = .01, P < .01, and P = .247, respectively). CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent multiple revisions after failed previous arthroplasty will require more surgical attempts to achieve stability compared with patients who underwent a revision after failed primary RSA. Loss of compression was the most common mechanism of persistent instability. Stabilization was more reliably achieved in cases of recurrent instability than in cases of chronically locked dislocation. Continued instability was noted in one-third of patients who underwent humeral side-only or glenoid side-only revisions and in 10% of those who underwent bipolar revisions. Patients in whom stabilization was successful had improved clinical outcomes.

Identifying areas of screw fixation in glenoids with severe bone loss in shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Severe glenoid bone loss (SGBL) poses significant technical challenges. Adequate fixation of glenoid implants may require the use of alternative screw placement. Although bone volumes for the spine and lateral pillars have previously been defined, insufficient evidence exists regarding the distribution of screw placement for fixation in such regions for cases with SGBL. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the variability of screw placement. We hypothesize that determining this variability and establishing common patterns of glenoid bone loss will allow for recommendations for preoperative planning, and implant design and selection. METHODS: An internal registry of 2 high-volume shoulder and elbow surgeons was queried, and 65 three-dimensional scapulae models exhibiting SGBL were identified. A fellowship-trained shoulder and elbow surgeon simulated the placement of two 3.5 mm × 30 mm screws, one in the scapular spine (CS) bone volume and one in the inferior column (IS) bone volume. Three orthogonal reference planes were created using anatomic reference points: the scapula trigonum, estimated glenoid center, and inferior pole. Screw positions were mapped, and deviations from the reference planes were calculated. Mutual positions of the IS to CS were also computed. Intraobserver reliability was assessed using 10 randomly selected samples. Median and 25th and 75th percentiles were reported for screw orientation distributions. Means and standard deviations were reported for screw head positions. RESULTS: We demonstrated excellent intraobserver reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients, 0.90-0.98). Fifty percent of CS were oriented 10° ± 5° of retroversion from the scapula plane, with 5° ± 5° of inclination. For IS, 50% were positioned 0° ± 4° from the scapula plane, with -33° ± 7° of inclination. The relationship of the IS with the CS was medial and posterior in 49% of cases, lateral and posterior in 45%, and lateral and anterior in 6% of cases. On average, the distance between the CS and IS heads was 25 mm ± 4 mm. DISCUSSION: For SGBL, adequate fixation of glenoid implants can be achieved by placing screws in the spine and lateral columns, with excellent reproducibility. Future implant designs should accommodate CS positioned -16° to -5° from the scapula plane, with 0° to 12° of inclination, and IS positioned -6° to 4° from the scapula plane, with -40° to -25° of inclination. Moreover, mutual screw positions suggested bone loss distributions anteriorly and inferiorly. Future implant designs should consider the potential benefits of augmentation to accommodate interscrew distances of 21-29 mm and anatomic locations of the IS relative to the CS.

Suggestive evidence for association of D2S2188 marker (2q31.1) with autism in 143 Sicilian (Italian) TRIO families.

We have screened 143 Sicilian (Italian) families with one autistic child to verify, by a linkage disequilibrium approach, the involvement of the 2q31.1 region in the cause of the disease in these families. Our study design includes the use of intrafamilial association to prevent a population stratification bias and ethnic homogeneity of the sample. The results of our analysis provided suggestive evidence of the occurrence of transmission disequilibrium between autism and the D2S2188 polymorphism in Sicilian TRIO families, a finding which provides further and independent support to the hypothesis of the existence of a susceptibility gene (or genes) for autism on chromosome 2q.

Continental and subcontinental distributions of mtDNA control region types.

When the mtDNA profile of a crime scene matches that of a suspect, it is necessary to determine the probability of a chance match by consulting the frequencies of the identified allele in a "reference population". The ceiling principle suggests that that population should be chosen in which the allele of the suspect is found at the highest frequency, in order to give the suspect the maximum benefit of doubt. Recently, we advocated the use of a worldwide mitochondrial database combined with a geographical information system to identify the regions of the world with the highest frequencies of matching mtDNA types. Here, we demonstrate that the alternative approach of defining a ceiling reference population on the basis of continent or phenotype (race) is too coarse for a non-negligible percentage of mtDNA control region types.