Comparison of the efficacy of once- and twice-daily colchicine dosage in pediatric patients with familial Mediterranean fever--a randomized controlled noninferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we examined the efficacy and safety of a once-daily dosage schema of colchicine compared with a twice-daily dosage schema in pediatric patients with familial Mediterranean fever (FMF). METHODS: In this 24-week, multicenter, randomized controlled noninferiority trial, pediatric patients newly diagnosed with FMF carrying a homozygous or compound heterozygous mutation and not receiving any treatment were included. Patients were randomly assigned using a block randomization method to receive treatment with a once- or twice-daily dosage. Clinical and laboratory characteristics and medication side effects were recorded and compared between groups. The study was carried out in compliance with Good Clinical Practice and the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement. RESULTS: A total of 92 patients were selected, and 79 patients completed the study. There were 42 patients in the once-daily dosage group and 37 in the twice-daily dosage group. The results indicated that the once-daily dosage was not inferior to the twice-daily dosage regarding decrease in attack frequency and duration as well as improvement in clinical findings and Mor severity scores. Alterations in laboratory findings indicating inflammation, such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, and serum amyloid A, were similar in both groups. The rates of drug side effects were similar between the once- and twice-daily dosage groups, implying comparable safety of colchicine, with the exception of diarrhea, which was slightly higher in the once-daily dosage group. CONCLUSIONS: Using colchicine with either a once- or twice-daily dosage provides similar clinical and laboratory improvements. Considering both efficacy and safety, colchicine can be prescribed with a once-daily dosage. TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02602028 . Registered 5 November 2015.

Dissecting the heterogeneity of macrophage activation syndrome complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To seek insights into the heterogeneity of macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) complicating systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA) through the analysis of a large patient sample collected in a multinational survey. METHODS: International pediatric rheumatologists and hemato-oncologists entered their patient data, collected retrospectively, in a Web-based database. The demographic, clinical, laboratory, histopathologic, therapeutic, and outcome data were analyzed in relation to (1) geographic location of caring hospital, (2) subspecialty of attending physician, (3) demonstration of hemophagocytosis, and (4) severity of clinical course. RESULTS: A total of 362 patients were included by 95 investigators from 33 countries. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and histopathologic features were comparable among patients seen in diverse geographic areas or by different pediatric specialists. Patients seen in North America were given biologics more frequently. Patients entered by pediatric hemato-oncologists were treated more commonly with biologics and etoposide, whereas patients seen by pediatric rheumatologists more frequently received cyclosporine. Patients with demonstration of hemophagocytosis had shorter duration of sJIA at MAS onset, higher prevalence of hepatosplenomegaly, lower levels of platelets and fibrinogen, and were more frequently administered cyclosporine, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), and etoposide. Patients with severe course were older, had longer duration of sJIA at MAS onset, had more full-blown clinical picture, and were more commonly given cyclosporine, IVIG, and etoposide. CONCLUSION: The clinical spectrum of MAS is comparable across patients seen in different geographic settings or by diverse pediatric subspecialists. There was a disparity in the therapeutic choices among physicians that underscores the need to establish uniform therapeutic protocols.

How do we encounter rare factor deficiencies in children? Single-centre results from Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Rare factor deficiencies (RFDs) are autosomal recessively inherited coagulation factor deficiencies encountered at a frequency of between one in 500, 000 and one in two million. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and ninety-two patients, diagnosed as having RFD, followed and treated in our clinic between 1990 and 2013 were retrospectively evaluated in this study. RESULTS: From the 192 patients, 142 had FVII, 15 had FX, 14 had FXI, 10 had fibrinogen, six had FV, two had FXIII, two had FV + FVIII and one had FII deficiency. One hundred and thirty of the cases were boys and 62 were girls. The age range was 2 weeks to 24 years and the ages at the admission were between 2 weeks and 16 years. The rate of consanguinity was 49.4%. Eighty-eight of our patients were asymptomatic (45.8%) and 104 were symptomatic (54.2%). Asymptomatic patients were diagnosed by family histories (39.8%), preoperative laboratory studies (54.6%) and operational bleeding (5.6%). Sixty-eight of our symptomatic patients displayed grade II (65.4%) and 36 displayed grade III bleeding symptoms (34.6%). First bleeding regions were skin (33%), nose (28%), central nervous system (CNS) (15.5%), oral cavity (10.5%), soft tissue (6%), joint (3%), urinary system (2%) and gastrointestinal system (GIS) (2%), respectively. The bleeding prevalence rates of our symptomatic patients are listed as epistaxis 62.5%, skin bleedings 53%, oral cavity bleeding 28.8%, haematomas 18.3%, CNS bleedings 17.3%, haemarthrosis 14.4%, GIS bleedings 3.8%, menorrhagia 2.9%, haematuria 1.9%, bleeding because of operations 1.9% and iliopsoas bleedings 1.9%. CNS bleedings (41%) take the first place among the serious bleedings of our cases, followed by haemarthrosis (36.4%), GIS bleedings (18.1%) and iliopsoas bleedings (4.5%). Prophylaxy was applied to nine patients (five patients with FVII, two patients with fibrinogen and one each with FV and FX deficiency). CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of clinical presentations, first bleeding attacks, bleeding prevalence and severe bleedings as well as prophylactic approaches are discussed in this article.