Impact of emergency department length of stay on in-hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCE: Emergency Department (ED) workload may lead to ED crowding and increased ED length of stay (LOS). ED crowding has been shown to be associated with adverse events and increasing mortality. We hypothesised that ED-LOS is associated with mortality. OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship between ED-LOS and in-hospital mortality. DESIGN: Observational retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: From 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2018, all visits by patients aged 15 or older to one of the two ED at Toulouse University Hospital were screened. Patients admitted to the hospital after ED visits were included. Visits followed by ED discharge, in-ED death or transfer to ICU or another hospital were not included. OUTCOME MEASURE AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome was 30-day in-hospital mortality. ED-LOS was defined as time from ED registration to inpatient admission. ED-LOS was categorised according to quartiles [<303 min (Q1), between 303 and 433 minutes (Q2), between 434 and 612 minutes (Q3) and >612 min (Q4)]. A multivariable logistic regression tested the association between ED-LOS and in-hospital mortality. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 49 913 patients were admitted to our hospital after ED visits and included in the study. ED-LOS was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality. Compared to ED-LOS < 303 min (Q1, reference), odd-ratios (OR) [95% CI] of in-hospital mortality for Q2, Q3, and Q4 were respectively 0.872 [0.747-1.017], 0.906 [0.777-1.056], and 1.137 [0.985-1.312]. Factors associated to in-hospital mortality were: aged over 75 years (OR [95% CI] = 4.3 [3.8-4.9]), Charlson Comorbidity Index score > 1 (OR [95% CI] = 1.3 [1.1-1.5], and 2.2 [1.9-2.5] for scores 2 and ≥ 3 respectively), high acuity at triage (OR [95% CI] = 3.9 [3.5-4.4]), ED visit at Hospital 1 (OR [95% CI] = 1.6 [1.4-1.7]), and illness diagnosis compared to trauma (OR [95% CI] = 2.1 [1.7-2.6]). Night-time arrival was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality (OR [95% CI] = 0.852 [0.767-0.947]). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective cohort study, there was no independent association between ED-LOS before admission to general non-ICU wards and in-patient mortality.

Impact of a personalised care plan for the elderly calling emergency medical services after a fall at home: The RISING-DOM multi-centre randomised controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: A growing number of emergency calls are made each year for elderly people who fall. Many of them are not taken to hospital or are rapidly discharged from the Emergency Department (ED). Evidence shows that, with no further support, this vulnerable population is particularly at risk of injuries, dependency and death. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of a comprehensive geriatric assessment and a tailored intervention in the elderly calling on an Emergency Medical Service (EMS) for a fall at home, but not conveyed to the ED or rapidly discharged from it (less than 24 h from hospitalisation), to the time to institutionalisation or death. METHODS: Rising-Dom is a two-arm randomised (ratio 1:1), interventional, multi-centre and open study. Community-dwelling elderly people (≥ 70 years) who call an EMS for a fall at home are recruited. The intervention group receives home visits by a nurse with a comprehensive fall risk assessment and a personalised intervention care plan with a planned follow-up (six nurse home visits and five nurse phone calls). Subjects enrolled in the usual care-control group continue to receive their routine care for the prevention or treatment of diseases. Primary (time to institutionalisation or death) and secondary (unscheduled hospitalisations, additional EMS calls relating to falls, functional decline and quality of life) outcome data will be collected for both groups through five phone calls made by Clinical Research Associates (CRA) blind to the participants' group during the follow-up period (24-months). Twelve hospital centres in the South-West of France are participating in the study as study sites. The inclusion period started in October 2019 and will end in March 2022. By the end of this period, 1,190 subjects are expected to be enrolled. DISCUSSION: Studies on elderly home falls have rarely concerned people who were not taken to hospital. The Rising-Dom intervention scheme should enhance understanding of features related to this vulnerable population and investigate the impact of a nurse care at home on delaying death and institutionalisation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04132544. Registration date: 18/10/2019. SPONSOR: University Hospital, Toulouse. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04132544?term=rising-dom&draw=2&rank=1.

Factors Associated with Potentially Inappropriate Transfer to the Emergency Department among Nursing Home Residents.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the factors associated with the potentially inappropriate transfer of nursing home (NH) residents to emergency departments (EDs) and to compare hospitalization costs before and after transfer of individuals addressed inappropriately vs those addressed appropriately. DESIGN: Multicenter, observational, case-control study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 17 hospitals in France, 1037 NH residents. MEASURES: All NH residents transferred to the 17 public hospitals' EDs in southern France were systematically included for 1 week per season. An expert panel composed of family physicians, emergency physicians, geriatricians, and pharmacists defined whether the transfer was potentially inappropriate or appropriate. Residents' and NHs' characteristics and contextual factors were entered into a mixed logistic regression to determine factors associated independently with potentially inappropriate transfers. Hospital costs were collected in the national health insurance claims database for the 6 months before and after the transfer. RESULTS: A total of 1037 NH residents (mean age 87.2 ± 7.1, 68% female) were transferred to the ED; 220 (21%) transfers were considered potentially inappropriate. After adjustment, anorexia [odds ratio (OR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.57-3.71], high level of disability (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99), and inability to receive prompt medical advice (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.20-2.32) were significantly associated with increased likelihood of potentially inappropriate transfers. The existence of an Alzheimer's disease special care unit in the NH (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.48-0.92), NH staff trained on advance directives (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.89), and calling the SAMU (mobile emergency medical unit) (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.34-0.66) were significantly associated with a lower probability of potentially inappropriate transfer. Although the 6-month hospitalization costs prior to transfer were higher among potentially inappropriate transfers compared with appropriate transfers (€6694 and €4894, respectively), transfer appropriateness was not significantly associated with hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Transfers from NHs to hospital EDs were frequently appropriate. Transfer appropriateness was conditioned by NH staff training, access to specialists' medical advice, and calling the SAMU before making transfer decisions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02677272.

The Temporal Trend in the Transfer of Older Adults to the Emergency Department for Traumatic Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis According to Their Place of Residence.

OBJECTIVES: There has been an increase in the number of visits by older individuals to emergency departments (EDs). The primary cause of this is trauma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the temporal changes in the use of EDs by older individuals for traumatic injuries, characterize their trauma, and specify the mode of transport to the ED according to their place of residence (community-dwelling or nursing home resident). DESIGN: A monocentric, retrospective study of patients over 65 years of age, admitted to University Center Hospital ED for trauma between 2013 and 2017. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 20,741 patients were included. RESULTS: The mean age was 81.8 years (standard deviation 9.1 years); 11,879 (57.3%) patients were community-living with family, 5077 (24.5%) were nursing home (NH) residents, and 3785 (18.22%) patients were community-dwelling living alone. Overall, 33.3% of the NH residents were transferred during the weekend compared with 28.04% of the community-dwelling individuals (P < .001). Ten percent (1577 patients) of the community-dwelling individuals compared with 21.8% (1109 patients) of the transfers of NH residents to ED occurred late at night (P < .001). The primary reason for use of the ED was head trauma (32.0%), followed by cutaneo-mucous wounds (28.7 %) and limb fractures (25.9%). In most cases, NH residents were transferred by ambulance (5000 residents; 98.4%), compared with community-dwelling individuals (11,118; 70.1%; P < .001). Overall, 7459 (36.0 %) patients were hospitalized. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: In comparison with community-dwelling individuals, ED transfers of NH residents in the context of trauma-related emergency were higher during after-hour periods, lengthes of stay at the ED were longer, and residents were admitted less to the in hospital.

Why are people increasingly attending the emergency department? A study of the French healthcare system.

OBJECTIVE: It is often asserted that the crowding phenomenon in emergency departments (ED) can be explained by an increase in visits considered as non-urgent. The aim of our study was to quantify the increase in ED visit rates and to determine whether this increase was explained by non-severe visit types. METHODS: This observational study covers all ED visits between 2002 and 2015 by adult inhabitants of the Midi-Pyrénées region in France. Their characteristics were collected from the emergency visit summaries. We modelled the visit rates per year using linear regression models, and an increase was considered significant when the 95% CIs did not include zero. The severity of the patients' condition during ED visit was determined through the 'Clinical Classification of Emergency' score. Non-severe visits were those where the patient was stable, and the physician deemed no intervention necessary. Intermediate-severity visits concerned patients who were stable but requiring diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. RESULTS: The 37 studied EDs managed >7 million visits between 2002 and 2015. There was an average increase of +4.83 (95% CI 4.33 to 5.32) visits per 1000 inhabitants each year. The increase in non-severe visit types was +0.88 (95% CI 0.42 to 1.34) per 1000 inhabitants, while the increase in intermediate-severity visit types was +3.26 (95% CI 2.62 to 3.91) per 1000 inhabitants. This increase affected all age groups and all sexes. DISCUSSION: It appears that the increase in ED use is not based on an increase in non-severe visit types, with a greater impact of intermediate-severity visit types requiring diagnostic or therapeutic procedures in ED.

Identifying key factors leading to the optimal care pathway for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Results from the RESCAMIP registry.

BACKGROUND: In France, when someone presents with chest pain, it is recommended to call a health emergency number. The patient talks with an emergency doctor at a medical dispatch centre, who decides whether (or not) to send a Mobile Intensive Care Unit (MICU). Patients with an ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) should have an MICU as their first medical contact, to speed up confirmation of diagnosis and enable them to benefit from reperfusion therapy as quickly as possible. AIM: To evaluate the proportion of patients with STEMI benefiting from an optimal care pathway, and to identify the key factors leading to this pathway. METHODS: RESCAMIP was a multicentre registry conducted between May 2015 and May 2017 in Midi-Pyrénées. All patients treated for STEMI within 12hours of symptoms onset, without initially going into cardiac arrest, were included. RESULTS: Data from 1371 patients with STEMI were analysed; 60% had an MICU as their first medical contact. In-hospital mortality was 4%. Factors associated with calling the medical dispatch centre when presenting chest pain were: age>65 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.83), personal history of cardiovascular disease (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.22-2.96) and having cardiovascular risk factors (OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.35-2.5). Factors associated with sending an MICU as first medical contact were: male sex (OR 2.11, 955 CI 1.49-2.99) and personal history of cardiovascular disease (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.07-2.65). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of patients with STEMI going through non-optimal pathways was 40% in our area. We note that there are sex-based inequalities in accessing MICUs.

Is the use of emergency departments socially patterned?

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the association between patients' socioeconomic position (SEP) and the use of emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: This population-based study included all visits to ED in 2012 by inhabitants of the French Midi-Pyrénées region, recorded by the Regional Emergency Departments Observatory. We compared ED visit rates and the proportion of non-severe visits according to the patients' SEP as assessed by the European Deprivation Index. RESULTS: We analysed 496,388 visits. The annual ED visit rate increased with deprivation level: 165.9 [95% CI (164.8-166.9)] visits per 1000 inhabitants among the most advantaged group, compared to 321.9 [95% CI (320.3-323.5)] per 1000 among the most disadvantaged. However, the proportion of non-severe visits was about 14% of the visits, and this proportion did not differ according to SEP. CONCLUSIONS: Although the study shows a difference of ED visit rates, the probability of a visit being non-severe is not meaningfully different according to SEP. This supports the assumption that ED visit rate variations according to SEP are mainly explained by SEP-related differences in health states rather than SEP-related differences in health behaviours.

Factors predisposing nursing home resident to inappropriate transfer to emergency department. The FINE study protocol.

BACKGROUND: Each year, around one out of two nursing home (NH) residents are hospitalized in France, and about half to the emergency department (ED). These transfers are frequently inappropriate. This paper describes the protocol of the FINE study. The first aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with inappropriate transfers to ED. METHODS/DESIGN: FINE is a case-control observational study. Sixteen hospitals participate. Inclusion period lasts 7 days per season in each center for a total period of inclusion of one year. All the NH residents admitted in ED during these periods are included. Data are collected in 4 times: before transfer in the NH, at the ED, in hospital wards in case of patient's hospitalization and at the patient's return to NH. The appropriateness of ED transfers (i.e. case versus control NH residents) is determined by a multidisciplinary team of experts. RESULTS: Our primary objective is to determine the factors predisposing NH residents to inappropriate transfer to ED. Our secondary objectives are to assess the cost of the transfers to ED; study the evolution of NH residents' functional status and the psychotropic and inappropriate drugs prescription between before and after the transfer; calculate the prevalence of potentially avoidable transfers to ED; and identify the factors predisposing NH residents to potentially avoidable transfer to ED. DISCUSSION: A better understanding of the determinant factors of inappropriate transfers to ED of NH residents may lead to proposals of recommendations of better practice in NH and would allow implementing quality improvement programs in the health organization.

Sex and age differences in ED patients with mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to describe an emergency department (ED) adult population with the chief complaint of mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use and to investigate sex- and age-related differences. METHODS: We analyzed data (2009-2011) from the Regional Observatory of Emergency Medicine ORU-MiP (700000 patients per year) for all patients with a primary diagnosis of mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use. Day data were weighted by the number of days in the year and expressed for 100000 inhabitants of the area. Pearson χ(2) test and Fisher tests were used. The Brown-Mood test was used to compare medians. RESULTS: Of the 1411597 ED visits analyzed, 20838 consults (1.3%) were for primary diagnosis of mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use. The median age (interquartile range) was 41 (28-51) years; 69.5% were men. More women consulted the ED for sedative or hypnotic use (4.9% vs 1.5%, P < 10(-4)) than men, and more men consulted for alcohol consumption (93.5% vs 90%, P < 10(-4)) and cannabinoids (1.4% vs 1.0%, P < 10(-3)) than women. Young consumer visits dramatically increased during weekends (average of 88 visits a day per 100000 inhabitants vs 34 on Mondays to Thursdays). Another difference was found between young adults and middle-aged adults, with a peak in visits at 2 am and 9 pm respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Mental and behavioral disorders due to psychoactive substance use account for 1.3% of ED visits. Older people should be screened for chronic alcohol consumption. Our findings underscore the opportunity provided by the ED for screening and brief intervention in drug- and alcohol-related problems.

Compliance with guidelines in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after implementation of specific guidelines for emergency care: results of RESCA+31 registry.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines emphasize the implementation of local networks with prehospital emergency medical systems to improve the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI); they also define the choice of reperfusion strategies and adjunctive treatments. AIM: To assess the compliance of STEMI emergency care with current French guidelines in a large area of France and to identify predictors of compliance with guidelines. METHOD: The RESCA+31 registry was a 2-year, multicentre, prospective, multidisciplinary study, including 512 consecutive patients with STEMI evolving within 12 hours managed by emergency physicians in the prehospital system or emergency department. Data were recorded during the emergency phase and after admission to cardiology. RESULTS: First medical contact (FMC) was prehospital emergency care for 80% of patients; 97% received reperfusion treatment and 98% were admitted to a cardiology intensive care unit (CICU) with a catheterization laboratory. The mortality rate was 5%. Guidelines were complied with in 41% of patients for reperfusion strategies, in 47% for adjunctive treatments and in 23% for both. The only factor independently associated with guideline compliance was FMC by prehospital emergency system. In 52% of cases, emergency physicians underestimated the delay between FMC and admission to a CICU. CONCLUSION: Despite the implementation of a network, compliance with guidelines for reperfusion strategies and adjunctive treatments was insufficient in our area. However, very few patients did not receive reperfusion therapy and the mortality rate was low. Efforts should be made to improve the estimation of delay before primary percutaneous coronary intervention.