RESUMO
Standard bariatric surgeries include biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and adjustable gastric banding (AGB). Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is currently favored due to safety, efficacy, and shorter operation time. However, previous literature shows 75.6% weight regain post LSG. Introducing Laparoscopic band sleeve gastrectomy (LBSG) to maintain pouch size is proposed to improve outcomes and reduce weight regain. This study aims to compare the safety and efficacy of LSG vs. LBSG in obese patients. A comprehensive search strategy was executed to identify pertinent literature comparing LBSG and LSG in obese patients. Eligible studies underwent independent screening, and pertinent data were systematically extracted. The analysis employed pooled risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous variables, each accompanied by their respective 95% confidence intervals (CI). Our systematic review and meta-analysis included 15 studies encompassing 3929 patients. Regarding body mass index (BMI), at six, 12, and 24 months, no substantial differences were found between LBSG and LSG groups (p < 0.05). Still, at 36 months, LBSG exhibited significantly lower BMI than LSG (MD = -2.07 [-3.84, -0.29], p = 0.02). Excess Weight Loss (EWL) favored LBSG at 12, 24, and 36 months with MD of 3.30 [0.42, 6.18], 4.13 [1.44, 6.81], and 18.43 [9.44, 27.42], p = 0.02, 0.003, < 0.00001, respectively). Operative time did not significantly differ between the procedures (MD = 2.95, 95%CI [-0.06, 5.95], p = 0.05). Resolution of comorbidities, overall complications, post-operative bleeding, reflux, and early complications did not significantly differ between LBSG and LSG. However, LBSG showed higher post-operative regurgitation than LSG (RR = 2.38, 95%CI [1.25, 4.54], p = 0.008). LBSG showed a substantial decrease in BMI at three-year follow-up and higher EWL at one, two, and three years. However, LBSG procedures exhibited a higher incidence of post-operative regurgitation symptoms than LSG. No substantial differences were noted in BMI at six, 12, or 24 months, EWL at six months, operative time, bleeding, reflux, or overall complications.
RESUMO
Introduction Diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is a prevalent complication of diabetes mellitus (DM), affecting approximately 15% of all diabetic patients. This condition poses significant challenges due to its association with major morbidity, mortality, high costs, and diminished quality of life. The incidence of diabetic foot complications among diagnosed diabetes cases is alarming, making it a primary concern in diabetes management. Diabetes mellitus, a chronic metabolic disorder, impacts nearly every system in the body. Methods In this study, a cross-sectional design was employed to assess the level of knowledge, attitude, and practices related to foot care among 432 diabetic patients in Tabuk City, Saudi Arabia. Results The participants' ages ranged from 18 to above 60 years, with (n = 206, 47.69%) being male and (n = 226, 52.31%) female. Type 2 diabetes was prevalent, constituting (n = 277, 64.12%) of cases, whereas (n = 187, 38.29%) had type 1 diabetes. Approximately (n= 224, 51.9%) of patients had been diagnosed with diabetes for less than 10 years. A significant portion (n= 302, 69.91%) of patients did not report any foot complaints. However, (n= 88, 20.37%) had a history of healed ulcers, and (n= 21, 4.9%) had undergone amputation due to diabetes. The majority of patients (n = 228, 52.78%) were under oral agent treatment. Conclusion The study population demonstrated adequate knowledge about diabetes management and exhibited positive attitudes toward diabetes and its related complications, particularly concerning foot care. While most patients displayed appropriate practices related to diabetic foot care, some participants showed inadequate adherence to essential procedures. Addressing these gaps in knowledge and practices is crucial for enhancing the overall management of diabetic foot complications among patients.