Does a three-hour delayed pushing benefit the mode of delivery?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare two strategies for passive second stage management: three-hour vs two-hour delayed pushing after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation on mode of delivery and perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective observational study included low-risk nulliparous women who reatched full cervical dilation under epidural analgesia with a single term fetus in cephalic presentation and normal fetal heart rate, between September and December 2016. Mode of delivery (spontaneous vaginal delivery versus operative delivery including cesarean section and instrumental vaginal delivery) and perinatal outcomes (post-partum hemorrhage, perineal lacerations, 5-min Apgar score, umbilical cord pH and transfer to neonatal intensive care unit) were compared between two maternity units: maternity unit A, where women could have up to a three-hour delayed pushing period after full cervical dilation diagnosis, and maternity unit B, where the delayed pushing period was a maximum of 2 h. Outcomes were compared using univariate and multivariable analyses. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were estimated using a logistic regression multivariable model that included potential cofounders. RESULTS: During the study period, 614 women were included, 305 in maternity unit A and 309 in maternity unit B. Women's pre-existing characteristics were comparable between the two maternity units. Women delivering in the maternity unit A had significantly lower risks of having an operative delivery compared to women delivering in the maternity unit B (respectively 18.4 vs 26.9%; aOR = 0.64; 95%CI [0.43 - 0.96]). Perinatal outcomes were comparable in the two maternity units, particularly in terms of post-partum hemorrhage rates (7.4 vs 7.8%; aOR = 1,19 [0.65 - 2.19]). CONCLUSION: Increasing the possible length of the delayed pushing period from 2 to 3 h after the diagnosis of full cervical dilation in low-risk nulliparous women appears to reduce operative deliveries without adverse effects on maternal or neonatal morbidity.

[Screening and healthcare for pregnant women with psycho-social vulnerability : A French national study]. / Dépistage et parcours de soins en cas de vulnérabilités psycho-sociales maternelles : une enquête nationale française.

INTRODUCTION: Psycho-social vulnerabilities are a medical risk factor for both fetus and mother. Association between socioeconomic status and prenatal follow-up has been well established and inadequate follow-up is associated with higher morbidity and mortality in women in unfavorable situations. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to identify screening strategies and to describe existing systems for pregnant women in psycho-social vulnerability in French maternity hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODES: This is a national survey conducted by questionnaire in all French maternities. RESULTS: Screening by means of targeted questions is carried out by 96.7% of maternity units. Early prenatal interviews are offered systematically by 64% of maternity units and access to them is still difficult for women in vulnerable situations. In order to organize care pathways, 28.7% of maternities have a structured unit within their establishment and 81% state that they have mobilizable caregivers. Multidisciplinary meetings for the coordination of the various stakeholders are held by 85.8% of maternity units. Collaboration with networks and associations is emphasized. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of maternities seek to identify women in situation of psycho-social vulnerabilities and to organize care paths. However, the resources implemented still appear insufficient for many maternity units. Each maternity hospital has resources and is developing initiatives to deal with the difficulties of care.

Clinical profiles of placenta accreta spectrum: the PACCRETA population-based study.

OBJECTIVE: To describe and compare the characteristics of women with placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and their pregnancy outcomes according to the presence of placenta praevia and a prior caesarean section. DESIGN: Prospective population-based study. SETTING: All 176 maternity hospitals of eight French regions. POPULATION: Two hundred and forty-nine women with PAS, from a source population of 520 114 deliveries. METHODS: Women with PAS were classified into two risk-profile groups, with or without the high-risk combination of placenta praevia (or an anterior low-lying placenta) and at least one prior caesarean. These two groups were described and compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Population-based incidence of PAS, characteristics of women, pregnancies, deliveries and pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: The PAS population-based incidence was 4.8/10 000 (95% CI 4.2-5.4/10 000). After exclusion of women lost to follow up from the analysis, the group with placenta praevia and a prior caesarean included 115 (48%) women and the group without this combination included 127 (52%). In the group with both factors, PAS was more often suspected antenatally (77% versus 17%; P < 0.001) and more often percreta (38% versus 5%; P < 0.001). This group also had more hysterectomies (53% versus 21%, P < 0.001) and higher rates of blood product transfusions, maternal complications, preterm births and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Sensitivity analysis showed similar results after exclusion of women who delivered vaginally. CONCLUSION: More than half the cases of PAS occurred in women without the combination of placenta praevia and a prior caesarean delivery, and these women had better maternal and neonatal outcomes. We cannot completely rule out that some of the women who delivered vaginally had placental retention rather than PAS; however, we found similar results among women who delivered by caesarean. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Half the women with PAS do not have both placenta praevia and a prior caesarean delivery, and they have better maternal outcomes.

Perinatal outcome after planned vaginal delivery in monochorionic compared with dichorionic twin pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, according to chorionicity, the perinatal outcome of twin pregnancy in which vaginal delivery is planned. METHODS: JUMODA (JUmeaux MODe d'Accouchement) was a national prospective population-based cohort study of twin pregnancies, delivered in 176 maternity units in France, from February 2014 to March 2015. In this planned secondary analysis, we assessed, according to chorionicity, the perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies, in which vaginal delivery was planned, that delivered at or after 32 weeks of gestation with the first twin in cephalic presentation. In order to select a population with well-recognized indications for planned vaginal delivery, we applied the same exclusion criteria as those in the Twin Birth Study, an international randomized trial. Monochorionic twin pregnancies with twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome or twin anemia-polycythemia sequence were defined as complicated and were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of intrapartum mortality and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to control for potential confounders. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to birth order (first or second twin) and gestational age at delivery (< 37 or ≥ 37 weeks of gestation). RESULTS: Among 3873 twin pregnancies, in which vaginal delivery was planned, that delivered at ≥ 32 weeks' gestation with the first twin in cephalic presentation, meeting the inclusion criteria of the Twin Birth Study, 729 (18.8%) were uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancies and 3144 (81.2%) were dichorionic twin pregnancies. The rate of composite intrapartum mortality and neonatal morbidity and mortality did not differ between uncomplicated monochorionic (27/1458 (1.9%)) and dichorionic (107/6288 (1.7%)) twin pregnancies when adjusting for conception by assisted reproductive technologies (adjusted relative risk, 1.07 (95% CI, 0.66-1.75)). No significant difference in the primary outcome was found between the groups on subgroup analyses according to birth order and gestational age at delivery. CONCLUSION: When vaginal delivery is planned, and delivery occurs at ≥ 32 weeks of gestation with the first twin in cephalic presentation, uncomplicated monochorionic twin pregnancy is not associated with a higher rate of composite intrapartum mortality and neonatal morbidity and mortality compared with dichorionic twin pregnancy. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Short Text]. / Présentation du siège. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF ­ Texte court.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the optimal management of singleton breech presentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted. RESULTS: In France, 5% of women have breech deliveries (Level of Evidence [LE3]). One third of them have a planned vaginal delivery (LE3) of whom 70% deliver vaginally (LE3). External cephalic version (ECV) is associated with a reduced rate of breech presentation at birth (LE2), and with a lower rate of cesarean section (LE3) without increases in severe maternal (LE3) and perinatal morbidity (LE3). It is therefore recommended to inform women with a breech presentation at term that ECV could be attempted from 36 weeks of gestation (Professional consensus). In case of breech presentation, planned vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery might be associated with an increased risk of composite perinatal mortality or serious neonatal morbidity (LE2). No difference has been found between planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery for neurodevelopmental outcomes at two years (LE2), cognitive and psychomotor outcomes between 5 and 8 years (LE3), and adult intellectual performances (LE4). Short and long term maternal complications appear similar in case of planned vaginal compared with planned cesarean delivery in the absence of subsequent pregnancies. A previous cesarean delivery results for subsequent pregnancies in higher risks of uterine rupture, placenta accreta spectrum and hysterectomy (LE2). It is recommended to offer women who wish a planned vaginal delivery a pelvimetry at term (Grade C) and to check the absence of hyperextension of the fetal head by ultrasonography (Professional consensus) to plan their mode of delivery. Complete breech presentation, previous cesarean, nulliparity, term prelabor rupture of membranes do not contraindicate planned vaginal delivery (Professionnal consensus). Term breech presentation is not a contraindication to labor induction when the criteria for acceptance of vaginal delivery are met (Grade C). CONCLUSION: In case of breech presentation at term, the risks of severe morbidity for the child and the mother are low after both planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery. For the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF), planned vaginal delivery is a reasonable option in most cases (Professional consensus). The choice of the planned route of delivery should be shared by the woman and her caregiver, respecting the right to woman's autonomy.

[CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice: Revision of the Methodology]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF : révision méthodologique du processus d'élaboration.

OBJECTIVES: To revise the organization and the methodology of the Practice Clinical Guidelines (PCG) of the French College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF). METHODS: The different available methods of PCG organization and of scientific evidence grading have been consulted after searching in the Medline database. RESULTS: The PCG group of the CNGOF has decided to adopt the AGREE II (for Appraisal of Guidelines for REsearch and Evaluation) methology for PCG organization and the GRADE (for Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system for grading scientific evidence. CONCLUSION: By adopting the AGREE II consortium criteria and grading scientific evidence according to the GRADE system, the CNGOF will increase the quality of the overall process, will deliver more targeted and easy to assimilate recommendations, to facilitate professional decision making.

[Breech Presentation: CNGOF Guidelines for Clinical Practice - Case Selection for Trial of Labour]. / Présentation du siège. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF ­ Critères de sélection des femmes éligibles à une tentative d'accouchement par voie basse.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this chapter is to examine on the basis of the knowledge currently available the criteria available before labour for selecting women who would be eligible for trial of vaginal delivery. METHODOLOGY: Bibliographical research in French and English using the Medline and Cochrane databases between 1980 and 2019 and the recommendations of international societies. RESULTS: It is recommended to offer women who wish to attempt a vaginal delivery at term a pelvimetry to decide with them on their mode of delivery (Grade C). The pelvimetric standards used at the time of the PREMODA study were anteroposterior diameter of inlet≥105mm, a transverse diameter of inlet≥120mm, a transverse interspinous diameter≥100mm. However, since there is no evidence about which pelvic measures to use, nor any evidence to set decision-making thresholds other than those set in published studies, the selected decision-making thresholds can be adjusted according to gestational age at delivery or fetal biometrics (Professional consensus). There is no argument for recommending the practice of pelvimetry in the case of delivery before 37 weeks gestational age (Professional consensus) and in the case of breech presentation discovered at the time of beginning of labour, the absence of pelvimetry alone does not contraindicate the attempt of vaginal delivery (Professional consensus). There is insufficient data to recommend the systematic use of fetal weight estimation and/or biparietal diameter measurement as acceptance criteria for a vaginal delivery attempt. In the event of a known fetal weight estimation before birth greater than 3800g, a cesarean section is to be preferred (Professional consensus). The breech presentation is not in itself a contraindication to an attempt of vaginal delivery for a small fetus for gestational age (Professional consensus). The presentation of the non-frank breech is not in itself a contraindication to an attempt of vaginal delivery (Professional consensus). In the case of premature breech delivery, current data do not allow to recommend one delivery route over another (Professional consensus). It is recommended to check the absence of hyperextension of the fetal head by ultrasound before an attempt of vaginal delivery (Professional consensus) and to prefer a cesarean section if such a position is found (Professional consensus). It is not recommended to propose a caesarean section with the sole reason of nulliparity (Grade C). The history of cesarean section is not in itself a contraindication to an attempt of vaginal delivery in the case of fetal breech presentation (Professional consensus). Premature rupture of the membranes is not in itself a contraindication to an attempt of vaginal delivery (Professional consensus). CONCLUSION: A number of the factors analyzed in this chapter are to be incorporated into the decision-making process in order to choose with the woman whose fetus is in breech presentation the delivery route.

Do obstetricians apply the national guidelines? A vignette-based study assessing practices for the prevention of preterm birth.

OBJECTIVE: To describe spontaneous preterm birth prevention practices self-reported before and after the dissemination of relevant guidelines, and to identify personal and organisational factors associated with adherence. DESIGN: A repeated cross-sectional vignette-based survey study. SETTING: French obstetricians. POPULATION: French obstetricians practicing in public or private maternity units. METHODS: Before and after the dissemination of the 2017 French guidelines on the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth, participants were asked to complete a web-based self-administered questionnaire based on two clinical vignettes. Vignette 1 focused on respondents' attitudes towards strict bed rest, cerclage, and progesterone treatment for women with a short cervix in mid-trimester; vignette 2 focused on attitudes towards strict bed rest and maintenance tocolysis after successful tocolysis for preterm labour. A mixed quantitative and qualitative analysis was conducted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Non-adherence to guidelines for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth in responses to each vignette. RESULTS: We obtained complete responses from 286 obstetricians before and 282 obstetricians after guideline dissemination, including 145 obstetricians participating in both. After dissemination, 51.4% of obstetricians self-reported non-adherent practices for vignette 1 and 22.3% of obstetricians self-reported non-adherent practices for vignette 2. No improvement was observed after dissemination. The quantitative analysis identified factors associated with non-adherence, including older age and practice in non-university or small hospitals, whereas the qualitative analysis highlighted barriers to implementation, including fear of change, habits, work overload, and lack of time. CONCLUSIONS: Adherence to guidelines was generally low, with practices unmodified by their dissemination. Improvement is required, especially regarding applicability. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Adherence to guidelines to prevent spontaneous preterm birth was generally low and remained unmodified after guideline dissemination.

Women and academic careers in obstetrics and gynaecology: aspirations and obstacles among postgraduate trainees - a mixed-methods study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between gender and a career in academic medicine. DESIGN: Mixed-methods study. SETTING: Obstetrics-gynaecology postgraduate training programme in Paris, France. SAMPLE: Postgraduate trainees in obstetrics-gynaecology (n = 204). METHODS: Statistical analysis of quantitative survey data, thematic analysis of qualitative interview data and integrative analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's aspirations and obstacles related to their decision about a career in academic medicine. RESULTS: A career in academic medicine was envisaged by 13% of the women residents and 27% of the men (P = 0.01). Women reported receiving advice from a mentor less often than men (38.8% versus 52.9%, P = 0.002). Overall, 40.6% of women and 2.9% of men reported experiencing gender discrimination (P < 0.001). In response to the question 'Do you have doubts about your ability to pursue or succeed at an academic career?', 62.4% of the women and only 17.7% of the men answered yes (P < 0.001). The global analysis identified the following obstacles: persistent gender stereotypes that produce everyday sexism, lack of identification with male role models, lack of mentors, perceived discrimination, an ideal of professional excellence that is difficult to attain, constraining professional organisational norms, inequality between men and women in the domestic and family spheres, and finally self-censorship and important doubts about their ability to combine a demanding career and a fulfilling personal life. CONCLUSIONS: Women reported the desire to follow a career in academic medicine half as often as men. Improving the presence and visibility of role models for residents and combating workplace discrimination will address some of the barriers to women choosing a career in academic medicine. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Women obstetric trainees in France are only half as likely as men to envisage following an academic path.

[Preterm premature rupture of membranes: CNGOF Guidelines for clinical practice - Short version]. / Rupture prématurée des membranes avant terme : recommandations pour la pratique clinique du CNGOF ­ Texte court.

OBJECTIVE: To determine management of women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). METHODS: Bibliographic search from the Medline and Cochrane Library databases and review of international clinical practice guidelines. RESULTS: In France, PPROM rate is 2 to 3% before 37 weeks of gestation (level of evidence [LE] 2) and less than 1% before 34 weeks of gestation (LE2). Prematurity and intra-uterine infection are the two major complications of PPROM (LE2). Compared to other causes of prematurity, PPROM is not associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality and morbidity, except in case of intra-uterine infection, which is associated with an augmentation of early-onset neonatal sepsis (LE2) and of necrotizing enterocolitis (LE2). PPROM diagnosis is mainly clinical (professional consensus). In doubtful cases, detection of IGFBP-1 or PAMG-1 is recommended (professional consensus). Hospitalization of women with PPROM is recommended (professional consensus). There is no sufficient evidence to recommend or not recommend tocolysis (grade C). If a tocolysis should be prescribed, it should not last more than 48hours (grade C). Antenatal corticosteroids before 34 weeks of gestation (grade A) and magnesium sulfate before 32 weeks of gestation (grade A) are recommended. Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended (grade A) because it is associated with a reduction of neonatal mortality and morbidity (LE1). Amoxicillin, 3rd generation cephalosporins, and erythromycin in monotherapy or the association erythromycin-amoxicillin can be used (professional consensus), for 7 days (grade C). However, in case of negative vaginal culture, early cessation of antibiotic prophylaxis might be acceptable (professional consensus). Co-amoxiclav, aminosides, glycopetides, first and second generation cephalosporins, clindamycin, and metronidazole are not recommended for antibiotic prophylaxis (professional consensus). Outpatient management of women with clinically stable PPROM after 48hours of hospitalization is a possible (professional consensus). During monitoring, it is recommended to identify the clinical and biological elements suggesting intra-uterine infection (professional consensus). However, it not possible to make recommendation regarding the frequency of this monitoring. In case of isolated elevated C-reactive protein, leukocytosis, or positive vaginal culture in an asymptomatic patient, it is not recommended to systematically prescribe antibiotics (professional consensus). In case of intra-uterine infection, it is recommended to immediately administer an antibiotic therapy associating beta-lactamine and aminoside (grade B), intravenously (grade B), and to deliver the baby (grade A). Cesarean delivery should be performed according to the usual obstetrical indications (professional consensus). Expectative management is recommended before 37 weeks of gestation in case of uncomplicated PPROM (grade A), even in case of positive vaginal culture for B Streptococcus, provided that an antibiotic prophylaxis has been prescribed (professional consensus). Oxytocin and prostaglandins are two possible options to induce labor in case of PPROM (professional consensus). CONCLUSION: Expectative management is recommended before 37 weeks of gestation in case of uncomplicated PPROM (grade A).

[Antenatal management in case of preterm premature rupture of membranes before fetal viability: CNGOF Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes Guidelines]. / Prise en charge anténatale en cas de rupture prématurée des membranes avant la viabilité fœtale. RPC Rupture prématurée des membranes avant terme CNGOF.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the maternal, perinatal and long-term prognosis in the event of previable premature rupture of the membranes (PROM) and to specify the interventions likely to reduce the risks and improve the prognosis. METHODS: The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted. RESULTS: Previable PROM is a rare event whose frequency varies from 0.3 to 1% according to estimates (NP4). When occurring as a complication of amniocentesis, the prognosis is generally better than when spontaneous (NP3). Between 23 and 39% of women will deliver in the week following PROM and nearly 40% of women will not have given birth 2 weeks after (NP3). The frequency of medical termination of pregnancy varies greatly according to the studies (NP4), as does that of fetal death (NP4). Hospital survival and survival rates without major morbidity as a proportion of conservatively treated patients range from 17-55% and 26-63%, respectively (NP4). Neonatal prognosis is largely dominated by prematurity and its complications (NP3). The frequency of maternal sepsis varies from 0.8 to 4.8% in the most recent studies (NP4). Only one case of maternal death is reported, although 3 cases were identified in France between 2007 and 2012 (NP3). Information is a major component of the care to be provided to women and their partners (Professional consensus). An initial period of hospitalization may be proposed after previable PROM (Professional consensus). Thereafter, there is no argument to recommend hospital management rather than extra-hospital management when there is no argument in favour of intrauterine infection (Professional consensus). An evaluation of the amount of amniotic fluid by ultrasound may be proposed at the initial consultation and after a period of 7 to 14 days if pregnancy continues (Professional consensus). Prophylactic antibiotic treatment is recommended as soon as PROM is diagnosed (Professional consensus). The gestational age at which corticosteroid therapy may be proposed will depend on the thresholds selected for neonatal resuscitation care. In particular, it will take into account parental positioning (Professional consensus). From the time of the decision to perform neonatal resuscitation until the gestational age of 32 weeks, it is recommended to administer MgSO4 to the woman whose delivery is imminent (Grade A). Tocolysis is not recommended in this context (Professional consensus). In certain situations, meeting strictly the conditions mentioned by the CSP article L. 2213-1, a maternal request for medical interruption of pregnancy may be discussed. CONCLUSION: The levels of evidence of scientific work on the management of previable PROM are low, therefore, most of the recommendations proposed here are based on professional agreement by "reasonable" extension of recommendations valid for later gestational ages.

Cost-effectiveness of vaccination against cytomegalovirus (CMV) in adolescent girls to prevent infections in pregnant women living in France.

BACKGROUND: CMV infections are the most frequent congenital infections worldwide. AIM: Assess the cost-effectiveness of vaccination strategies of adolescent girls vs. current practice (hygiene counseling) to prevent CMV seroconversions during pregnancy in France. METHOD: A Markov decision-tree model simulated overtime the trajectory of a single fictive cohort of 390,000 adolescent women aged 14 years old, living in France. Impact of vaccination was explored until the end of their reproductive live 40 years later. STRATEGIES COMPARED: "S1: No vaccination" (current practice); "S2: Routine vaccination"; "S3: Screening and vaccination of the seronegative". MODEL PARAMETERS: Seroconversion rate without vaccination (0.035%/pregnant woman-week); fetal transmission risk (41%). Vaccine vs. no vaccination: a 50% decrease in maternal seroconversions. OUTCOMES: Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) of the cohort-born babies; discounted costs; Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). RESULTS: S2 was the most effective strategy (with 35,000 QALYs gained) and the most expensive (€211,533,000); S1 was the least effective and least costly (€75,423,000). ICERs of strategy S3 vs. S1, and S2 vs. S3 were 6,000€/QALY gained (95% uncertainty range [2700-13,300]) and 16,000€/QALY [negative ICER (S3 dominated by S2) - 94,000] gained, respectively; highly cost-effective because ICER < 1∗France's GPD/capita = €30,000. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS: If the seroprevalence was >62% (vs. 20% in the base case), S3 would become the most efficient strategy. CONCLUSION: In France, systematic vaccination of adolescent girls was the most efficient strategy to prevent maternal seroconversions. If the population was less than 62% immune, systematic screening and vaccination of susceptibles would become the most cost-effective approach.

Association between inadequate antenatal care utilisation and severe perinatal and maternal morbidity: an analysis in the PreCARE cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Because the effectiveness of antenatal care in reducing pregnancy complications is still discussed despite widespread recommendations of its use, we sought to assess the association between utilisation of recommended antenatal care and severe maternal (SMM) and perinatal morbidity (SPM). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Four maternity units around Paris in 2010-2012. SAMPLE: 9117 women with singleton pregnancies. METHODS: Logistic regression models adjusted for maternal social, demographic and medical characteristics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Antenatal care utilisation was assessed by: (1) initiation of care after 14 weeks, (2) < 50% of recommended visits made, according to gestational age, (3) absence of the first, second or third trimester ultrasounds, (4) two modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilisation indexes, combining these components. The two main outcomes were composite variables of SMM and SPM. RESULTS: According to the modified Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilisation index, 34.6% of women had inadequate antenatal care utilisation; the incidence of severe maternal morbidity (SMM) was 2.9% and severe perinatal morbidity (SPM) 5.5%. A percentage of recommended visits below 50% (2.6% of women) was associated with SMM [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.40 (1.38-4.17)] and SPM [aOR 2.27 (1.43-3.59)]. Late initiation of care (17.0% of women) was not associated with SMM or SPM. Failure to undergo the recommended ultrasounds (16, 17 and 22% of women) was associated with SPM. Inadequate antenatal care utilisation according to the index was associated with SPM [aOR 1.37 (1.05-1.80)]. CONCLUSION: Inadequate antenatal care utilisation is associated with SMM and SPM, to degrees that vary with the component of care and the outcome considered. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Inadequate antenatal care utilisation is associated with severe maternal and perinatal morbidity.

[Perinatal care for extremely preterm infants. Considerations of the "risks in pregnancy" department]. / Prise en charge de la prématurité extrême. Réflexions du département hospitalo-universitaire (DHU) « risques et grossesse ¼.

Decisions regarding whether to initiate or forgo intensive care for extremely premature infants are often based on gestational age alone. However, other factors also affect the prognosis for these patients and must be taken into account. After a short review of these factors, we present the thoughts and proposals of the Risks and Pregnancy department. The proposals are to limit emergency decisions, to better take into account other factors than gestational age and prenatal predicted fetal weight in assessing the prognosis, to introduce multidisciplinary consultation in the evaluation and proposals that will be discussed with the parents, and to separate prenatal steroid therapy from decision-making regarding whether or not to administer intensive care.

[Observational study of a social device for women in precarious situations during pregnancy and post-partum]. / Étude observationnelle d'un dispositif d'aide aux femmes en situation de précarité pendant la grossesse et le post-partum.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of the Regional experimental accompanying nutrition and breast-feeding for pregnant women (PRENAP) 75 social device on the duration of postpartum hospitalization and breast-feeding for pregnant women in precarious situation. METHODS: A retrospective observational study took place between November 2013 and May 2015 in a type III Parisian maternity. Comparison of sociodemographic, perinatal and postpartum characteristics of women in precarious situations (no stable housing and no social care or universal medical coverage or state medical aid) was done according to whether they were included in the system PRENAP or not. RESULTS: Over the study period, 344 (4.6%) women in precarious situations gave birth in this maternity. Among these women, the women included in the PRENAP system were more frequently in a very unfavorable social situation than those who were not included. The inclusion in the PRENAP device did not reduce the hospitalization in post-partum. Breast-feeding was chosen more frequently by the women included in the PRENAP device. CONCLUSION: The PRENAP device seems to favor the use of breast-feeding, but is not associated with a diminution of the hospitalization time in post-partum. This social device, which seems to be beneficial in terms of social and medical support for women in precarious situations, deserves to be evaluated prospectively.

Exploring the hypothesis of differential care for African immigrant and native women in France with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy: a qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse whether prenatal care trajectories among women with hypertensive disorders during pregnancy in France differ between immigrants from sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and native French women. DESIGN: Qualitative interview study. SETTING: Three public maternity units in the Paris region. POPULATION: Women born in SSA or in France of French parents and treated for hypertension or pre-eclampsia during their pregnancy. METHODS: A sociologist conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews of 33 women during their postpartum hospitalisation and collected data from their medical files. n'vivo 10 (QSR International) was used for line-by-line coding of the transcriptions, to identify emerging themes. Strauss's concept of illness trajectories was then applied to these data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Themes derived from interviews. RESULTS: Women reported during the interviews that the blood pressure measurement procedures used by hospital staff varied between the two groups, and their medical records supported this finding. Repeated urinary dipstick testing of proteinuria before laboratory testing was more frequent for African women, as was the failure to further test proteinuria levels requiring additional action. The two groups received similar standardised care after severe complications. Other findings showed that African women were less likely to rely on healthcare services. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest non-medically justified differential prenatal care between African and native women that may have helped delay the diagnosis of hypertension or pre-eclampsia. This study suggests hypotheses for further quantitative studies to explore the potential involvement of this differential care in the higher frequency of severe complications in this subgroup, concordantly reported in European countries hosting SSA migrants. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Differential prenatal care may delay diagnosis of pre-eclampsia among African compared with native French women.

[Prevention of spontaneous preterm birth (excluding preterm premature rupture of membranes): Guidelines for clinical practice - Text of the Guidelines (short text)]. / Recommandations pour la pratique clinique : prévention de la prématurité spontanée et de ses conséquences (hors rupture des membranes) ­ Texte des recommandations (texte court).

OBJECTIVES: To determine the measures to prevent spontaneous preterm birth (excluding preterm premature rupture of membranes)and its consequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PubMed database, the Cochrane Library and the recommendations from the French and foreign obstetrical societies or colleges have been consulted. RESULTS: In France, premature birth concerns 60,000 neonates every year (7.4 %), half of them are delivered after spontaneous onset of labor. Among preventable risk factors of spontaneous prematurity, only cessation of smoking is associated to a decrease of prematurity (level of evidence [LE] 1). This is therefore recommended (grade A). Routine screening and treatment of vaginal bacteriosis in general population is not recommended (grade A). Asymptomatic women with single pregnancy without history of preterm delivery and a short cervix between 16 and 24 weeks is the only population in which vaginal progesterone is recommended (grade B). A history-indicated cerclage is not recommended in case of only past history of conisation (grade C), uterine malformation (Professional consensus), isolated history of pretem delivery (grade B) or twin pregnancies in primary (grade B) or secondary (grade C) prevention of preterm birth. A history-indicated cerclage is recommended for single pregnancy with a history of at least 3 late miscarriages or preterm deliveries (grade A).). In case of past history of a single pregnancy delivery before 34 weeks gestation (WG), ultrasound cervical length screening is recommended between 16 and 22 WG in order to propose a cerclage in case of length<25mm before 24 WG (grade C). Cervical pessary is not recommended for the prevention of preterm birth in a general population of asymptomatic women with a twin pregnancy (grade A) and in populations of asymptomatic women with a short cervix (Professional consensus). Although the implementation of a universal transvaginal cervical length screening at 18-24 weeks of gestation in women with a singleton gestation and no history of preterm birth can be considered by individual practitioners, this screening cannot be universally recommended. In case of preterm labor, (i) it is not possible to recommend one of the methods over another (ultrasound of the cervical length, vaginal examination, fetal fibronectin) to predict preterm birth (grade B); (ii) routine antibiotic therapy is not recommended (grade A); (iii) prolonged hospitalization (grade B) and bed rest (grade C) is not recommended. Compared with placebo, tocolytics are not associated with a reduction in neonatal mortality or morbidity (LE2) and maternal severe adverse effects may occur with all tocolytics (LE4). Atosiban and nifedipine (grade B), contrary to betamimetics (grade C), can be used for tocolysis in spontaneous preterm labour without preterm premature rupture of membranes. Maintenance tocolysis is not recomended (grade B). Antenatal corticosteroid administration is recommended to every woman at risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of gestation (grade A). After 34 weeks, evidences are not consistent enough to recommend systematic antenatal corticosteroid treatment (grade B), however, a course might be indicated in the clinical situations associated with the higher risk of severe respiratory distress syndrome, mainly in case of planned cesarean delivery (grade C). Repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids are not recommended (grade A). Rescue courses are not recommended (Professional consensus). Magnesium sulfate administration is recommended to women at high risk of imminent preterm birth before 32WG (grade A). Cesarean is not recommended in case of vertex presentation (Professional consensus). Both planned vaginal or elective cesarean delivery is possible in case of breech presentation (Professional consensus). A delayed cord clamping may be considered if the neonatal or maternal state so permits (Professional consensus). CONCLUSION: Except for antenatal corticosteroid and magnesium sulfate administration, diagnostic tools or prenatal pharmacological treatments implemented since 30 years to prevent preterm birth and its consequences have not matched expectations of caregivers and families.

[The use of progestatives for the prevention of spontaneous preterm birth]. / Intérêt des progestatifs dans la prévention de la prématurité spontanée.

OBJECTIVES: To identify clinical situations in which progestatives used to reduce the risk of spontaneous preterm delivery and/or reduced adverse neonatal outcomes have been evaluated and identify situations in which 17OHPC or vaginal progesterone might be recommended. METHODS: Bibliographic searches were performed in the Medline and Cochrane databases with the use of a combination of keywords and text words related to "progesterone", "tocolysis", and "preterm labor" from 1956 through July 2016. RESULTS: 17OHPC administrated after 16 weeks gestational age is not associated with an increased risk of birth defect (LE3). Because of discrepancies on the risk associated with first trimester utilization, it is recommended not to use it before 16 weeks (grade C). Utilization of 17OHPC and vaginal progesterone during both second and third trimester is not associated with an increased risk of congenital abnormalities and developmental adverse outcomes (LE3). Utilization of progestatives is not associated with an increased risk of intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (LE3) and gestational diabetes (LE3). 17OHPC is not recommended as a primary prevention of preterm delivery in a population of women with monofetal pregnancy without history of preterm delivery (grade C). Although systematic screening of short cervix is not recommended (Professional consensus), the discovery of a short cervix (<20mm) between 16 and 24 weeks in an asymptomatic woman with monofetal pregnancy without history of preterm delivery indicates the daily administration of vaginal progesterone until 36 weeks gestational age (grade B). In a randomized controlled trial, 17OHPC is associated with a decreased risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks gestationnal age (LE2) and with a reduction of neonatal morbidity (LE3) in women with at least one previous preterm delivery before 34 weeks gestationnal age. It is not possible to recommend the systematic use of 17OHPC on the basis of this sole trial with limited external validity (Professional consensus). Vaginal progesterone do not seem to be associated with a decreased risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks (LE3), a better neonatal outcome (LE3) or a better cognitive development at the age of two (LE3) among asymptomatic patients with an history of preterm delivery (Professional consensus). Utilization of 17OHPC (LE2) in patients with monofetal pregnancy, a short cervix (<25mm) and a history of preterm delivery is not associated with reduced risk of preterm delivery. The utilization of 17OHPC is not recommended in this clinical context (grade B). In this context, vaginal progesterone may be associated with a decreased risk of preterm delivery (NP3) but further studies are needed to recommend its utilization (Professional consensus). Although some studies suggest a tocolytic effect of progestatives in case of preterm labor, qualitative scientific data are lacking to recommend this treatment in this situation (Professional consensus). Utilization of 17OHPC or vaginal progesterone after arrested preterm labor is not associated with a reduction of the risk of preterm delivery (LE1). Utilization of progestatives is not recommended after arrested preterm labor (grade A). In asymptomatic patients with twin pregnancies and normal or unknown cervix length, 17OHPC and vaginal progesterone are not associated with a reduction of the risk of preterm delivery (LE2). The utilization of progestatives is not recommended in this context (grade B). In patients with twin pregnancies with a short cervix (<25mm), the utilization of 17OHPC (LE1) and vaginal progesterone (LE3) is not associated with a reduction of the risk of preterm delivery and better perinatal outcome. The utilization of 17OHPC (grade A) or vaginal progesterone (grade C) is not recommended in this context. Utilization of 17OHPC progesterone is not associated with beneficial effect in patients with triple pregnancy (LE2). The utilization of 17OHPC is not recommended in this context (grade B). CONCLUSION: Asymptomatic women with monofetal pregnancy without history of preterm delivery and a short cervix between 16 and 24 weeks is the only population in which vaginal progesterone is recommended.