Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulins and Systemic Corticosteroids in Patients with Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Experience of a Hospital in Mexico City. / Tratamiento con inmunoglobulina intravenosa y esteroides sistémicos en pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica: Experiencia en un hospital en Ciudad de México.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is the most serious mucocutaneous adverse drug reaction. Multidisciplinary treatment and withdrawal of the causative drug are key to reducing mortality. Few studies have analyzed the use of systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis in Latin America. We describe our experience with 6 cases treated at a dermatology referral hospital in Mexico City. None of the patients died or developed complications in the short or medium term. The most widely used regimen was a combination of IVIG 1 g/kg for 3 to 5 days and methylprednisolone 1 g for 3 to 5 days. Mean hospital stay was 14.8 days. The combined use of systemic corticosteroids and IVIG seems to be a safe treatment option for patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis.

Tratamiento con inmunoglobulina intravenosa y esteroides sistémicos en pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica: Experiencia en un hospital en Ciudad de México / Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulins and Systemic Corticosteroids in Patients with Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Experience of a Hospital in Mexico City

La necrólisis epidérmica tóxica es la reacción secundaria a medicamentos más grave dentro del espectro de las reacciones mucocutáneas. El tratamiento multidisciplinario es clave para disminuir la mortalidad de los pacientes, además de la suspensión del fármaco causal. Existen pocos estudios de tratamientos farmacológicos en pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica en Latinoamérica que combinen el uso de esteroides sistémicos e inmunoglobulina intravenosa (IgIV). Describimos 6 casos de pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica tratados con esteroides sistémicos e IgIV en un hospital de referencia dermatológica en Ciudad de México. Ningún paciente falleció ni presentó complicaciones a corto y mediano plazo de seguimiento. En la mayoría de los casos se empleó una dosis de IgIV de 1g/kg por 3-5 días y 1g de metilprednisolona por 3-5 días. El tiempo de ingreso hospitalario fue de 14,8 días. La combinación de esteroides sistémicos e IgIv parece ser una opción segura en pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica (AU)

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is the most serious mucocutaneous adverse drug reaction. Multidisciplinary treatment and withdrawal of the causative drug are key to reducing mortality. Few studies have analyzed the use of systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis in Latin America. We describe our experience with 6 cases treated at a dermatology referral hospital in Mexico City. None of the patients died or developed complications in the short or medium term. The most widely used regimen was a combination of IVIG 1 g/kg for 3 to 5 days and methylprednisolone 1 g for 3 to 5 days. Mean hospital stay was 14.8 days. The combined use of systemic corticosteroids and IVIG seems to be a safe treatment option for patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis (AU)

[Translated article] Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulins and Systemic Corticosteroids in Patients With Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Experience of a Hospital in Mexico City / Tratamiento con inmunoglobulina intravenosa y esteroides sistémicos en pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica: experiencia en un hospital en Ciudad de México

Toxic epidermal necrolysis is the most serious mucocutaneous adverse drug reaction. Multidisciplinary treatment and withdrawal of the causative drug are key to reducing mortality. Few studies have analyzed the use of systemic corticosteroids and intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) in patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis in Latin America. We describe our experience with 6 cases treated at a dermatology referral hospital in Mexico City. None of the patients died or developed complications in the short or medium term. The most widely used regimen was a combination of IVIG 1g/kg for 3–5 days and methylprednisolone 1g for 3–5 days. Mean hospital stay was 14.8 days. The combined use of systemic corticosteroids and IVIG seems to be a safe treatment option for patients with toxic epidermal necrolysis (AU)

La necrólisis epidérmica tóxica es la reacción secundaria a medicamentos más grave dentro del espectro de las reacciones mucocutáneas. El tratamiento multidisciplinario es clave para disminuir la mortalidad de los pacientes, además de la suspensión del fármaco causal. Existen pocos estudios de tratamientos farmacológicos en pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica en Latinoamérica que combinen el uso de esteroides sistémicos e inmunoglobulina intravenosa (IgIV). Describimos 6 casos de pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica tratados con esteroides sistémicos e IgIV en un hospital de referencia dermatológica en Ciudad de México. Ningún paciente falleció ni presentó complicaciones a corto y mediano plazo de seguimiento. En la mayoría de los casos se empleó una dosis de IgIV de 1g/kg por 3-5 días y 1g de metilprednisolona por 3-5 días. El tiempo de ingreso hospitalario fue de 14,8 días. La combinación de esteroides sistémicos e IgIv parece ser una opción segura en pacientes con necrólisis epidérmica tóxica (AU)

Recuperación nutricional de niños con desnutrición leve y moderada según dos modalidades de atención: seminternado y ambulatoria / Nutritional recovery of mild and moderately malnourished children under two different treatment approaches (ambulatory versus day-care)

This retrospective analysis was conducted between May 1997 and May 2000 at the Centro de Atención Nutricional Infantil de Antímano, CANIA, in Caracas, Venezuela to assess the efficacy of two treatments (ambulatory versus day-care) of mild and moderate malnourished children. Inclusion criteria were: children under 10 years old with mild and moderate malnourishment, who attended a minimum of 3 control visits during a period of 12 months. One hundred fourteen malnourished children were included: fifty seven in ambulatory treatment and fifty seven in day-care treatment paired per nutritional diagnosis, gender and age (thirty nine mild and eighteen moderate malnourished children). The nutritional recovery criterion was weight for height above tenth percentile. No relation was found between treatment approaches and nutritional recovery at 3 and 6 months of treatment. In the group of mild malnourished children, the percentage of recovered patients at 3 months of treatment, that kept their recovered condition at 6 months was 83 (15/18) in the ambulatory treatment and 82 per cent (18/22) in the day-care treatment Age of children, associated disease, acute morbidity, dietetic risk and mother's education and age were not associated with nutritional recovery at 6 months of treatment (p > 0.05). The day-care approach resulted as effective as ambulatory in mild malnourished children. In moderate malnourished new studies will need to be conducted with greater number of patients.