Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Prog Community Health Partnersh ; 10(4): 493-503, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28569674

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In community-based participatory research (CBPR), issues such as creating a setting where community members drive decisions and creating culturally relevant processes remain largely underachieved. The Backyard Initiative (BYI) provided the setting for implementing a community-centered collaborative research process. The BYI is a partnership between Allina Health, the Cultural Wellness Center (CWC), and community residents to improve health. OBJECTIVES: To describe the unique community-centered method used in the 2013 BYI Community Health Survey (CHS) as a viable approach for collecting meaningful and valid health related data. With this approach, the community operates as the agent of change rather than the target. METHODS: At the core was the BYI assessment team, which brought together conventional researchers and community members to collaboratively design, implement, analyze, interpret, and disseminate the CHS results. Focusing on the CHS, this structure and process permitted and facilitated important and difficult discussions about approach, content and outcomes of the research. RESULTS: We held seven sessions (239 participants). Participants were 37% African American/African and 34% Native American, 65% female, and 72% spoke English at home. Achievement of our recruitment goals, participation of groups typically underrepresented in research, and positive community feedback were indications that the BYI approach to survey research was successful. CONCLUSIONS: The BYI CHS community-centered methods built trust among research partners and participants, engaged populations often underrepresented in research, and collected meaningful data. Our success indicates that it is possible to co-design and implement a lengthy survey to inform future research and community activities.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade , Promoção da Saúde , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Comportamento Cooperativo , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Minnesota , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
4.
Circulation ; 131(3): 254-62, 2015 Jan 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25359163

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A large body of epidemiological and experimental evidence suggests that vitamin D deficiency may promote hypertension. This raises the possibility that vitamin D supplementation could be a simple intervention to reduce blood pressure, but data from prospective, randomized trials are limited. METHODS AND RESULTS: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial was conducted at 4 sites in the United States. We enrolled 534 individuals 18 to 50 years of age with low vitamin D status (25-hydroxyvitamin D levels ≤25 ng/mL) and systolic blood pressure of 120 to 159 mm Hg. Participants were randomized to high-dose (4000 IU/d) versus low-dose (400 IU/d) oral vitamin D3 for 6 months. The primary end point was change in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure. Secondary end points included change in ambulatory diastolic blood pressure and clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The median age was 38 years, and 62% of participants were men. Forty-six percent of participants were white, and 48% were black. The median 25-hydroxyvitamin D level at baseline was 15.3 ng/mL. Four-hundred fifty-five participants (85%) had at least 1 follow-up blood pressure measurement; 383 participants (72%) completed the full 6-month study. At the end of the study, there was no significant difference in the primary end point (change in mean 24-hour systolic blood pressure, -0.8 versus -1.6 mm Hg in the high-dose and low-dose arms; P=0.71) or in any of the secondary end points. Furthermore, there was no evidence of association between change in 25-hydroxyvitamin D and change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure at 6 months (Spearman correlation coefficient, -0.05, P=0.34). Results were consistent across prespecified subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin D supplementation did not reduce blood pressure in individuals with prehypertension or stage I hypertension and vitamin D deficiency. Our findings suggest that the association between vitamin D status and elevated blood pressure noted in observational studies is not causal. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01240512.


Assuntos
Colecalciferol/uso terapêutico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Pressão Sanguínea/fisiologia , Colecalciferol/sangue , Colecalciferol/farmacologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipertensão/sangue , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pré-Hipertensão/sangue , Pré-Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Deficiência de Vitamina D/sangue , Deficiência de Vitamina D/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...