Participant Evaluation of a Prediabetes Intervention Program Designed for Rural Adults.

The type 2 diabetes epidemic is a global crisis threatening the health and economies of many nations. This study aimed to evaluate a prediabetes intervention program designed for rural adults in southwestern Ontario based on the feedback of participants. Rural adults with prediabetes were referred by physicians to an intervention program developed to assist with unique barriers rural adults face related to the built environment and socioeconomic status when adopting a healthy lifestyle. After 6 monthly education sessions offered by a dietitian and a nurse, participants completed a questionnaire to share their program experience. In addition, 6 focus groups consisting of 5-9 participants were conducted to assess program acceptability, feasibility, and practicality. Of 49 enrolled, 35 participants aged 60.8 ± 7.1 (mean ± SD) evaluated the program. Participants reported finding the program to be acceptable, feasible, and practical due to the interactive nature of the sessions, the group setting and the availability of health professionals. This prediabetes lifestyle intervention program was perceived as successfully addressing rural adults' needs in terms of adopting a healthy lifestyle. Feedback received through program evaluation, which included a participant experience survey and focus groups has helped improve this program and may benefit other prediabetes education intervention programs.

Complications of tissue expansion in the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: The authors aim to present a comprehensive review detailing the present state of evidence with regard to complications following tissue expansion in the head and neck. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted to identify all studies reporting complications of tissue expansion in the head and neck between 2000 and 2019. Subgroup comparisons based on expander locations and planes were conducted. RESULTS: A total of 7058 patients were included. Tissue expansion was associated with an overall complication rate of 8.73% (616/7058). The most common complications were extrusion (207/7009; 3.0%) and hematoma (200/7009; 2.9%). Overall complications were highest in the scalp (65/238; 27.3%) and lowest in the mastoid (347/5688; 6.1%). Complications were more common with expansion in the non-subcutaneous plane (63/590; 10.7%). CONCLUSION: In the absence of large clinical trials, systematic reviews such as these can help inform clinical guidelines and provide practitioners with an evidence-based reference to improve informed consent.

Early Identification of Patients Who Will Meet 24-Hour Fluid Output Threshold for Chest Tube Removal After Lung Resection.

Improving evidence-based chest tube removal may reduce the length of stay following surgery. Presently, most chest tube removal protocols include a fluid output threshold based on a 24-hour observation period. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if, within a 24-hour time period, fluid output measurements at 6, 8, and 12 hours could predict if the total 24-hour fluid output would comply with a predetermined volume threshold considered acceptable for safe chest tube removal. Following lung resection, pleural fluid output data were prospectively recorded by a digital drainage system and analyzed retrospectively. Twenty-four-hour fluid output was calculated from every available 6-, 8-, and 12-hour measurement and compared to set 24-hour output criteria for chest tube removal (ie, 400 mL, 250 mL, and 20% of whole-body lymphatic flow). Performance of interim fluid outputs in predicting whether 24-hour fluid output criteria were satisfied was measured. From 2015 to 2018, 150 patients had digital pleural fluid drainage data suitable for analysis. Performance of interim fluid output data in identifying which patients would satisfy 24-hour output criteria ranged from 85% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83-86) to 94% (95% CI = 93-94) for specificity, 75% (95% CI = 73-76) to 92% (95% CI = 90-93) for positive predictive value, and 6% (95% CI = 6-7) to 15% (95% CI = 14-17) for false-positive rate. Potential time saved in duration of drainage using interim fluid output data ranged from 10 to 16 hours. Pleural fluid output measured for 6-, 8-, and 12-hour durations can accurately identify patients who will meet 24-hour fluid output threshold for safe chest tube removal.