Radiotherapy combined with nivolumab or temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma with unmethylated MGMT promoter: An international randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to radiotherapy (RT) improves overall survival (OS) in patients with glioblastoma (GBM), but previous studies suggest that patients with tumors harboring an unmethylated MGMT promoter derive minimal benefit. The aim of this open-label, phase III CheckMate 498 study was to evaluate the efficacy of nivolumab (NIVO) + RT compared with TMZ + RT in newly diagnosed GBM with unmethylated MGMT promoter. METHODS: Patients were randomized 1:1 to standard RT (60 Gy) + NIVO (240 mg every 2 weeks for eight cycles, then 480 mg every 4 weeks) or RT + TMZ (75 mg/m2 daily during RT and 150-200 mg/m2/day 5/28 days during maintenance). The primary endpoint was OS. RESULTS: A total of 560 patients were randomized, 280 to each arm. Median OS (mOS) was 13.4 months (95% CI, 12.6 to 14.3) with NIVO + RT and 14.9 months (95% CI, 13.3 to 16.1) with TMZ + RT (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.09 to 1.58; P = .0037). Median progression-free survival was 6.0 months (95% CI, 5.7 to 6.2) with NIVO + RT and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.9 to 6.7) with TMZ + RT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.65). Response rates were 7.8% (9/116) with NIVO + RT and 7.2% (8/111) with TMZ + RT; grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) rates were 21.9% and 25.1%, and any-grade serious TRAE rates were 17.3% and 7.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not meet the primary endpoint of improved OS; TMZ + RT demonstrated a longer mOS than NIVO + RT. No new safety signals were detected with NIVO in this study. The difference between the study treatment arms is consistent with the use of TMZ + RT as the standard of care for GBM.ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02617589.

Matching Quantitative MRI Parameters with Histological Features of Treatment-Naïve IDH Wild-Type Glioma.

Quantitative MRI allows to probe tissue properties by measuring relaxation times and may thus detect subtle changes in tissue composition. In this work we analyzed different relaxation times (T1, T2, T2* and T2') and histological features in 321 samples that were acquired from 25 patients with newly diagnosed IDH wild-type glioma. Quantitative relaxation times before intravenous application of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), T1 relaxation time after GBCA as well as the relative difference between T1 relaxation times pre-to-post GBCA (T1rel) were compared with histopathologic features such as the presence of tumor cells, cell and vessel density, endogenous markers for hypoxia and cell proliferation. Image-guided stereotactic biopsy allowed for the attribution of each tissue specimen to its corresponding position in the respective relaxation time map. Compared to normal tissue, T1 and T2 relaxation times and T1rel were prolonged in samples containing tumor cells. The presence of vascular proliferates was associated with higher T1rel values. Immunopositivity for lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) involved slightly longer T1 relaxation times. However, low T2' values, suggesting high amounts of deoxyhemoglobin, were found in samples with elevated vessel densities, but not in samples with increased immunopositivity for LDHA. Taken together, some of our observations were consistent with previous findings but the correlation of quantitative MRI and histologic parameters did not confirm all our pathophysiology-based assumptions.

Chemotherapy for adult patients with spinal cord gliomas.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of spinal cord gliomas, particularly in adults is low, and the role of chemotherapy has remained unclear. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, retrospective study of 21 patients diagnosed with spinal cord glioma who received chemotherapy at any time during the disease course. Benefit from chemotherapy was estimated by magnetic resonance imaging. Data on radiotherapy were taken into consideration. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were diagnosed with astrocytic gliomas World Health Organization (WHO) grades 1-4, the remaining eight patients with ependymomas WHO grades 1 or 3. Most patients had more than one neurosurgical intervention. Median age at time of first chemotherapy was 33 years (range 21-67 years). Seven patients had chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy as first-line treatment. Two patients had chemoradiotherapy at recurrence, without prior tumor-specific treatment beyond surgery. One patient received chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment and 2 patients had chemotherapy alone at recurrence, without prior treatment. Nine patients had received radiation therapy at an earlier time and chemotherapy was given at time of further recurrences. Best responses in astrocytomas were as follows: chemotherapy alone-2 stable disease (SD) and 3 progressive disease (PD); chemoradiotherapy-1 complete response, 3 SD, and 4 PD. Best responses in ependymomas were as follows: chemotherapy alone-1 partial response, 5 SD, and 1 PD; chemoradiotherapy-1 SD. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal cord gliomas represent a heterogeneous group of tumors. Survival outcomes in response to chemotherapy in adult spinal cord glioma patients vary substantially, but individual patients appear to derive benefit from chemotherapy.

Phase I Assessment of Safety and Therapeutic Activity of BAY1436032 in Patients with IDH1-Mutant Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: BAY1436032, an inhibitor of mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (mIDH1), was active against multiple IDH1-R132X solid tumors in preclinical models. This first-in-human study was designed to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of BAY1436032, and to evaluate its potential pharmacodynamics and antitumor effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised of dose escalation and dose expansion cohorts. BAY1436032 tablets were orally administered twice daily on a continuous basis in subjects with mIDH1 solid tumors. RESULTS: In dose escalation, 29 subjects with various tumor types were administered BAY1436032 across five doses (150-1,500 mg twice daily). BAY1432032 exhibited a relatively short half-life. Most evaluable subjects experienced target inhibition as indicated by a median maximal reduction of plasma R-2-hydroxyglutarate levels of 76%. BAY1436032 was well tolerated and an MTD was not identified. A dose of 1,500 mg twice daily was selected for dose expansion, where 52 subjects were treated in cohorts representing four different tumor types [lower grade glioma (LGG), glioblastoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and a basket cohort of other tumor types]. The best clinical outcomes were in subjects with LGG (n = 35), with an objective response rate of 11% (one complete response and three partial responses) and stable disease in 43%. As of August 2020, four of these subjects were in treatment for >2 years and still ongoing. Objective responses were observed only in LGG. CONCLUSIONS: BAY1436032 was well tolerated and showed evidence of target inhibition and durable objective responses in a small subset of subjects with LGG.

A 25-year retrospective, single center analysis of 343 WHO grade II/III glioma patients: implications for grading and temozolomide therapy.

PURPOSE: Classification and treatment of WHO grade II/III gliomas have dramatically changed. Implementing molecular markers into the WHO classification raised discussions about the significance of grading and clinical trials showed overall survival (OS) benefits for combined radiochemotherapy. As molecularly stratified treatment data outside clinical trials are scarce, we conducted this retrospective study. METHODS: We identified 343 patients (1995-2015) with newly diagnosed WHO grade II/III gliomas and analyzed molecular markers, patient characteristics, symptoms, histology, treatment, time to treatment failure (TTF) and OS. RESULTS: IDH-status was available for all patients (259 mutant, 84 IDH1-R132H-non-mutant). Molecular subclassification was possible in 173 tumors, resulting in diagnosis of 80 astrocytomas and 93 oligodendrogliomas. WHO grading remained significant for OS in astrocytomas/IDH1-R132H-non-mutant gliomas (p < 0.01) but not for oligodendroglioma (p = 0.27). Chemotherapy (and temozolomide in particular) showed inferior OS compared to radiotherapy in astrocytomas (median 6.1/12.1 years; p = 0.03) and oligodendrogliomas (median 13.2/not reached (n.r.) years; p = 0.03). While radiochemotherapy improved TTF in oligodendroglioma (median radiochemotherapy n.r./chemotherapy 3.8/radiotherapy 7.3 years; p < 0.001/ = 0.06; OS data immature) the effect, mainly in combination with temozolomide, was weaker in astrocytomas (median radiochemotherapy 6.7/chemotherapy 2.3/radiotherapy 2.0 years; p < 0.001/ = 0.11) and did not translate to improved OS (median 8.4 years). CONCLUSION: This is one of the largest retrospective, real-life datasets reporting treatment and outcome in low-grade gliomas incorporating molecular markers. Current histologic grading features remain prognostic in astrocytomas while being insignificant in oligodendroglioma with interfering treatment effects. Chemotherapy (temozolomide) was less effective than radiotherapy in both astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas while radiochemotherapy showed the highest TTF in oligodendrogliomas.

Gliomatosis Cerebri Growth Pattern: Association of Differential First-Line Treatment with Overall Survival in WHO Grade II and III Gliomas.

INTRODUCTION: Gliomatosis cerebri (GC) is defined by diffuse, widespread glial tumor growth affecting three or more cerebral lobes. Previous studies in gliomas found no distinct histological or molecular GC subtype, yet the presence of GC is associated with worse median overall survival (OS). Here, we explored whether differing therapeutic strategies in first-line treatment could account for this. METHODS: From our University Cancer Center database, 47 patients with histological diagnosis of WHO grade II or III glioma and GC imaging pattern were identified. GC criteria were confirmed by independent review. Patients with WHO grade II or III glioma with non-GC pattern served as control cohort (n = 343). RESULTS: Within the GC patient cohort, lower WHO grade, mutated isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) status, and absence of contrast enhancement were associated with better OS. Compared to the control cohort, patients with GC had significantly shorter OS independent of histological diagnosis or IDH1 mutation status. Patients with GC preferentially received chemotherapy alone (62 vs. 18%), and less frequently radiochemotherapy (21 vs. 27%). OS was significantly shorter in the GC cohort compared to the non-GC cohort both for chemotherapy (3.9 vs. 7.6 years, p = 0.0085) and for combined radiochemotherapy (1.1 vs. 8.4 years, p < 0.0001). However, when only patients who received biopsy plus chemotherapy were analyzed, the differences lost statistical significance (3.5 vs. 6.6 years, p = 0.196). CONCLUSION: We found major differences in the selection of first-line therapies of GC versus non-GC patients. Our results suggest that these differences may partly account for the worse prognosis of GC patients.

Linking epigenetic signature and metabolic phenotype in IDH mutant and IDH wildtype diffuse glioma.

AIMS: Changes in metabolism are known to contribute to tumour phenotypes. If and how metabolic alterations in brain tumours contribute to patient outcome is still poorly understood. Epigenetics impact metabolism and mitochondrial function. The aim of this study is a characterisation of metabolic features in molecular subgroups of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutant (IDHmut) and isocitrate dehydrogenase wildtype (IDHwt) gliomas. METHODS: We employed DNA methylation pattern analyses with a special focus on metabolic genes, large-scale metabolism panel immunohistochemistry (IHC), qPCR-based determination of mitochondrial DNA copy number and immune cell content using IHC and deconvolution of DNA methylation data. We analysed molecularly characterised gliomas (n = 57) for in depth DNA methylation, a cohort of primary and recurrent gliomas (n = 22) for mitochondrial copy number and validated these results in a large glioma cohort (n = 293). Finally, we investigated the potential of metabolic markers in Bevacizumab (Bev)-treated gliomas (n = 29). RESULTS: DNA methylation patterns of metabolic genes successfully distinguished the molecular subtypes of IDHmut and IDHwt gliomas. Promoter methylation of lactate dehydrogenase A negatively correlated with protein expression and was associated with IDHmut gliomas. Mitochondrial DNA copy number was increased in IDHmut tumours and did not change in recurrent tumours. Hierarchical clustering based on metabolism panel IHC revealed distinct subclasses of IDHmut and IDHwt gliomas with an impact on patient outcome. Further quantification of these markers allowed for the prediction of survival under anti-angiogenic therapy. CONCLUSION: A mitochondrial signature was associated with increased survival in all analyses, which could indicate tumour subgroups with specific metabolic vulnerabilities.

Non-Invasive Measurement of Drug and 2-HG Signals Using 19F and 1H MR Spectroscopy in Brain Tumors Treated with the Mutant IDH1 Inhibitor BAY1436032.

BACKGROUND: BAY1436032 is a fluorine-containing inhibitor of the R132X-mutant isocitrate dehydrogenase (mIDH1). It inhibits the mIDH1-mediated production of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) in glioma cells. We investigated brain penetration of BAY1436032 and its effects using 1H/19F-Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS). METHODS: 19F-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy was conducted on serum samples from patients treated with BAY1436032 (NCT02746081 trial) in order to analyze 19F spectroscopic signal patterns and concentration-time dynamics of protein-bound inhibitor to facilitate their identification in vivo MRS experiments. Hereafter, 30 mice were implanted with three glioma cell lines (LNT-229, LNT-229 IDH1-R132H, GL261). Mice bearing the IDH-mutated glioma cells received 5 days of treatment with BAY1436032 between baseline and follow-up 1H/19F-MRS scan. All other animals underwent a single scan after BAY1436032 administration. Mouse brains were analyzed by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). RESULTS: Evaluation of 1H-MRS data showed a decrease in 2-HG/total creatinine (tCr) ratios from the baseline to post-treatment scans in the mIDH1 murine model. Whole brain concentration of BAY1436032, as determined by 19F-MRS, was similar to total brain tissue concentration determined by Liquid Chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), with a signal loss due to protein binding. Intratumoral drug concentration, as determined by LC-MS/MS, was not statistically different in models with or without R132X-mutant IDH1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive monitoring of mIDH1 inhibition by BAY1436032 in mIDH1 gliomas is feasible.

Effect of Nivolumab vs Bevacizumab in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma: The CheckMate 143 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Clinical outcomes for glioblastoma remain poor. Treatment with immune checkpoint blockade has shown benefits in many cancer types. To our knowledge, data from a randomized phase 3 clinical trial evaluating a programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor therapy for glioblastoma have not been reported. Objective: To determine whether single-agent PD-1 blockade with nivolumab improves survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma compared with bevacizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this open-label, randomized, phase 3 clinical trial, 439 patients with glioblastoma at first recurrence following standard radiation and temozolomide therapy were enrolled, and 369 were randomized. Patients were enrolled between September 2014 and May 2015. The median follow-up was 9.5 months at data cutoff of January 20, 2017. The study included 57 multicenter, multinational clinical sites. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to nivolumab 3 mg/kg or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or death. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 369 patients were randomized to nivolumab (n = 184) or bevacizumab (n = 185). The MGMT promoter was methylated in 23.4% (43/184; nivolumab) and 22.7% (42/185; bevacizumab), unmethylated in 32.1% (59/184; nivolumab) and 36.2% (67/185; bevacizumab), and not reported in remaining patients. At median follow-up of 9.5 months, median OS (mOS) was comparable between groups: nivolumab, 9.8 months (95% CI, 8.2-11.8); bevacizumab, 10.0 months (95% CI, 9.0-11.8); HR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.83-1.30); P = .76. The 12-month OS was 42% in both groups. The objective response rate was higher with bevacizumab (23.1%; 95% CI, 16.7%-30.5%) vs nivolumab (7.8%; 95% CI, 4.1%-13.3%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar between groups (nivolumab, 33/182 [18.1%]; bevacizumab, 25/165 [15.2%]), with no unexpected neurological TRAEs or deaths due to TRAEs. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the primary end point was not met in this randomized clinical trial, mOS was comparable between nivolumab and bevacizumab in the overall patient population with recurrent glioblastoma. The safety profile of nivolumab in patients with glioblastoma was consistent with that in other tumor types. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02017717.

Quantitative T1 mapping indicates tumor infiltration beyond the enhancing part of glioblastomas.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether maps of quantitative T1 (qT1) differences induced by a gadolinium-based contrast agent (CA) are better suited than conventional T1-weighted (T1w) MR images for detecting infiltration inside and beyond the peritumoral edema of glioblastomas. Conventional T1w images and qT1 maps were obtained before and after gadolinium-based CA administration in 33 patients with glioblastoma before therapy. The following data were calculated: (i) absolute qT1-difference maps (qT1 pre-CA - qT1 post-CA), (ii) relative qT1-difference maps, (iii) absolute and (iv) relative differences of conventional T1w images acquired pre- and post-CA. The values of these four datasets were compared in four different regions: (a) the enhancing tumor, (b) the peritumoral edema, (c) a 5 mm zone around the pathology (defined as the sum of regions a and b), and (d) the contralateral normal appearing brain tissue. Additionally, absolute qT1-difference maps (displayed with linear gray scaling) were visually compared with respective conventional difference images. The enhancing tumor was visible both in the difference of conventional pre- and post-CA T1w images and in the absolute qT1-difference maps, whereas only the latter showed elevated values in the peritumoral edema and in some cases even beyond. Mean absolute qT1-difference values were significantly higher (P < 0.01) in the enhancing tumor (838 ± 210 ms), the peritumoral edema (123 ± 74 ms) and in the 5 mm zone around the pathology (81 ± 31 ms) than in normal appearing tissue (32 ± 35 ms). In summary, absolute qT1-difference maps-in contrast to the difference of T1w images-of untreated glioblastomas appear to be able to visualize CA leakage, and thus might indicate tumor cell infiltration in the edema region and beyond. Therefore, the absolute qT1-difference maps are potentially useful for treatment planning.

Regorafenib CSF Penetration, Efficacy, and MRI Patterns in Recurrent Malignant Glioma Patients.

(1) Background: The phase 2 Regorafenib in Relapsed Glioblastoma (REGOMA) trial indicated a survival benefit for patients with first recurrence of a glioblastoma when treated with the multikinase inhibitor regorafenib (REG) instead of lomustine. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate REG penetration to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), treatment efficacy, and effects on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas. (2) Methods: Patients were characterized by histology, adverse events, steroid treatment, overall survival (OS), and MRI growth pattern. REG and its two active metabolites were quantified by liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry in patients' serum and CSF. (3) Results: 21 patients mainly with IDH-wildtype glioblastomas who had been treated with REG were retrospectively identified. Thirteen CFS samples collected from 3 patients of the cohort were available for pharmacokinetic testing. CSF levels of REG and its metabolites were significantly lower than in serum. Follow-up MRI was available in 19 patients and showed progressive disease (PD) in all but 2 patients. Two distinct MRI patterns were identified: 7 patients showed classic PD with progression of contrast enhancing lesions, whereas 11 patients showed a T2-dominant MRI pattern characterized by a marked reduction of contrast enhancement. Median OS was significantly better in patients with a T2-dominant growth pattern (10 vs. 27 weeks respectively, p = 0.003). Diffusion restrictions were observed in 13 patients. (4) Conclusion: REG and its metabolites were detectable in CSF. A distinct MRI pattern that might be associated with an improved OS was observed in half of the patient cohort. Treatment response in the total cohort was poor.

Tumor Vessel Normalization, Immunostimulatory Reprogramming, and Improved Survival in Glioblastoma with Combined Inhibition of PD-1, Angiopoietin-2, and VEGF.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a non-T-cell-inflamed cancer characterized by an immunosuppressive microenvironment that impedes dendritic cell maturation and T-cell cytotoxicity. Proangiogenic cytokines such as VEGF and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) have high expression in glioblastoma in a cell-specific manner and not only drive tumor angiogenesis and vascular permeability but also negatively regulate T-lymphocyte and innate immune cell responses. Consequently, the alleviation of immunosuppression might be a prerequisite for successful immune checkpoint therapy in GBM. We here combined antiangiogenic and immune checkpoint therapy and demonstrated improved therapeutic efficacy in syngeneic, orthotopic GBM models. We observed that blockade of VEGF, Ang-2, and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) significantly extended survival compared with vascular targeting alone. In the GBM microenvironment, triple therapy increased the numbers of CTLs, which inversely correlated with myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T cells. Transcriptome analysis of GBM microvessels indicated a global vascular normalization that was highest after triple therapy. Our results propose a rationale to overcome tumor immunosuppression and the current limitations of VEGF monotherapy by integrating the synergistic effects of VEGF/Ang-2 and PD-1 blockade to reinforce antitumor immunity through a normalized vasculature.

Health-related quality of life and neurocognitive functioning with lomustine-temozolomide versus temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT-methylated glioblastoma (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The CeTeG/NOA-09 trial showed significantly longer overall survival with combined lomustine-temozolomide therapy compared with standard temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter. The trial also aimed to investigate the effect of lomustine-temozolomide therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and neurocognitive function, which we report here. METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial, newly diagnosed, chemoradiotherapy-naive patients with MGMT-methylated glioblastoma, aged 18-70 years, with a Karnofsky performance score of 70% or higher, were recruited and enrolled at 17 university hospitals in Germany. Patients received standard radiotherapy (60 Gy) and were randomly assigned (1:1, stratified by centre by allocating complete blocks of six to a centre, without masking) to either six 6-week courses of oral combined lomustine (100 mg/m2 on day 1) plus temozolomide (100-200 mg/m2 on days 2-6) or standard oral temozolomide (75 mg/m2 daily during radiotherapy plus six 4-week courses of temozolomide [150-200 mg/m2] on days 1-5, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was overall survival. HRQOL, assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire core-30 and the EORTC brain cancer module (BN20); and neurocognitive function, assessed using the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), plus a neurocognitive test battery (NOA-07), including Trail Making Test A and B (TMT-A and B), working memory tests, and tests for lexical (Controlled Oral Word Association [COWA]) and semantic verbal fluency, were secondary endpoints analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population (mITT; all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study chemotherapy). We used linear mixed-model analyses to investigate differences between treatment groups regarding HRQOL (clinically relevant ≥10 points) and MMSE scores (clinically relevant ≥3 points). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01149109. FINDINGS: Between June 17, 2011 and April 8, 2014, 141 patients were randomly assigned and 129 patients began treatment and were included in the mITT population (63 in the temozolomide and 66 in the lomustine-temozolomide group). Median follow-up for HRQOL (the item global health) was 19·4 months (IQR 7·8-38·6), for MMSE was 15·3 months (4·1-29·6), and for COWA was 11·0 months (0-27·5). We found no significant impairment regarding any item of HRQOL in the lomustine-temozolomide group (difference between the groups for global health 0·30 [95% CI -0·23 to 0·83]; p=0·26). Differences in MMSE were in favour of the temozolomide group (difference -0·11 [95% CI -0·19 to -0·03]; p=0·0058) but were not clinically relevant (1·76/30 points over 4 years). We found no significant difference between the groups in any subtest of the neurocognitive test battery (difference for COWA 0·04 [95% CI -0·01 to 0·09]; p=0·14). INTERPRETATION: The absence of systematic and clinically relevant changes in HRQOL and neurocognitive function combined with the survival benefit of lomustine-temozolomide versus temozolomide alone suggests that a long-term net clinical benefit exists for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylation of the MGMT promoter and supports the use of lomustine-temozolomide as a treatment option for these patients. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

Baseline T1 hyperintense and diffusion-restricted lesions are not linked to prolonged survival in bevacizumab-treated glioblastoma patients of the GLARIUS trial.

PURPOSE: The phase II GLARIUS trial assigned patients with newly diagnosed, O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter non-methylated glioblastoma to experimental bevacizumab/irinotecan (BEV/IRI) or standard temozolomide (TMZ). To identify subpopulations with a particularly favorable course, we assessed the prognostic potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers before treatment onset. METHODS: MRIs at baseline (before treatment onset) were analyzed for T1-hyperintense and diffusion-restricted lesions; as well as the presence of both hyperintense and diffusion-restricted (double positive) lesions. The MRI findings were correlated with overall and progression-free survival. RESULTS: MRI scans were evaluable in 71% of the GLARIUS modified intention-to-treat population (n = 121 of 170; 88 patients in the BEV/IRI arm, and 33 patients in the TMZ control arm). Diffusion-restricted and T1 hyperintense lesions were present in 60% and 65% of patients in BEV/IRI arm, while 57% and 63% were found in the TMZ arm, respectively. Double positive lesions were found in 37% of BEV/IRI patients and in 39% of TMZ patients. Neither the presence of T1-hyperintense, diffusion-restricted lesions, nor double positive lesions were associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline T1-hyperintense and diffusion-restricted lesions are not suitable to predict progression-free or overall survival of patients treated with bevacizumab/irinotecan or temozolomide.

Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: There is an urgent need for more effective therapies for glioblastoma. Data from a previous unrandomised phase 2 trial suggested that lomustine-temozolomide plus radiotherapy might be superior to temozolomide chemoradiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylation of the MGMT promoter. In the CeTeG/NOA-09 trial, we aimed to further investigate the effect of lomustine-temozolomide therapy in the setting of a randomised phase 3 trial. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients from 17 German university hospitals who were aged 18-70 years, with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter, and a Karnofsky Performance Score of 70% and higher. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a predefined SAS-generated randomisation list to standard temozolomide chemoradiotherapy (75 mg/m2 per day concomitant to radiotherapy [59-60 Gy] followed by six courses of temozolomide 150-200 mg/m2 per day on the first 5 days of the 4-week course) or to up to six courses of lomustine (100 mg/m2 on day 1) plus temozolomide (100-200 mg/m2 per day on days 2-6 of the 6-week course) in addition to radiotherapy (59-60 Gy). Because of the different schedules, patients and physicians were not masked to treatment groups. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the modified intention-to-treat population, comprising all randomly assigned patients who started their allocated chemotherapy. The prespecified test for overall survival differences was a log-rank test stratified for centre and recursive partitioning analysis class. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01149109. FINDINGS: Between June 17, 2011, and April 8, 2014, 141 patients were randomly assigned to the treatment groups; 129 patients (63 in the temozolomide and 66 in the lomustine-temozolomide group) constituted the modified intention-to-treat population. Median overall survival was improved from 31·4 months (95% CI 27·7-47·1) with temozolomide to 48·1 months (32·6 months-not assessable) with lomustine-temozolomide (hazard ratio [HR] 0·60, 95% CI 0·35-1·03; p=0·0492 for log-rank analysis). A significant overall survival difference between groups was also found in a secondary analysis of the intention-to-treat population (n=141, HR 0·60, 95% CI 0·35-1·03; p=0·0432 for log-rank analysis). Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 32 (51%) of 63 patients in the temozolomide group and 39 (59%) of 66 patients in the lomustine-temozolomide group. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that lomustine-temozolomide chemotherapy might improve survival compared with temozolomide standard therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter. The findings should be interpreted with caution, owing to the small size of the trial. FUNDING: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research.

In vivo Metabolic Profiles as Determined by 31P and short TE 1H MR-Spectroscopy : No Difference Between Patients with IDH Wildtype and IDH Mutant Gliomas.

PURPOSE: Previous ex vivo spectroscopic data from tissue samples revealed differences in phospholipid metabolites between isocitrate dehydrogenase mutated (IDHmut) and IDH wildtype (IDHwt) gliomas. We investigated whether these changes can be found in vivo using 1H-decoupled 31P magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) with 3D chemical shift imaging (CSI) at 3 T in patients with low and high-grade gliomas. METHODS: The study included 33 prospectively enrolled, mostly untreated patients who met spectral quality criteria according to the World Health Organization (WHO II n = 7, WHO III n = 17, WHO IV n = 9; 25 patients IDHmut, 8 patients IDHwt). The MRSI protocol included 1H decoupled 31P MRSI with 3D CSI (3D 31P CSI), 2D 1H CSI and a 1H single voxel spectroscopy sequence (TE 30 ms) from the tumor area. For 1H MRS, absolute metabolite concentration values were calculated (phantom replacement method). For 31P MRS, metabolite intensity ratios were calculated for the choline (C) and ethanolamine (E)-containing metabolites. RESULTS: In our patient cohort we did not find significant differences for the ratio of phosphocholine (PC) and phosphoethanolamine (PE), PC/PE, (p = 0.24) for IDHmut compared to IDHwt gliomas. Furthermore, we found no elevated ratios of glycerophosphocholine (GPC) and glycerophosphoethanolamine (GPE), GPC/GPE, (p = 0.68) or GPC/PE (p = 0.12) for IDHmut gliomas. Even the ratio (PC+GPC)/(PE+GPE) showed no significant differences with respect to mutation status (p = 0.16). Nonetheless, changes related to tumor grade regarding intracellular pH (pHi) and phospholipid metabolism as well as absolute metabolite concentrations of co-registered 2D 1H CSI data for tumor and control tissue showed the anticipated results. CONCLUSION: Using 3D-CSI data acquisition, in vivo 31P MR spectroscopic measurement of phospholipid metabolites could not distinguish between IDHmut and IDHwt.

Fitting algorithms and baseline correction influence the results of non-invasive in vivo quantitation of 2-hydroxyglutarate with 1 H-MRS.

1 H-MRS enables non-invasive detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG), an oncometabolite accumulating in gliomas carrying mutations in the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) genes. Reliable 2-HG quantitation requires reproducible post-processing, deployment of fitting algorithms and quantitation methods. We prospectively enrolled 38 patients with suspected or recently diagnosed gliomas (IDH mutated n = 26). The MRI protocol included a 1 H single voxel PRESS sequence with volumes of usually 8 mL or more (20 × 20 × 20 mm3 ) at TE  = 97 ms and 180° pulse spacing. Our aim was to evaluate the reliability of 2-HG quantitation comparing two frequently used software tools and their respective options of baseline correction (jMRUI with the time domain methods AQSES and QUEST, and LCModel, which analyzes the frequency domain data). For AQSES, degrees of freedom for baseline correction constrains were varied. For LCModel, baseline correction was obtained with and without correction of the unknown background term (predefined macromolecules, lipids). Tissue concentrations were calculated based on the phantom replacement method. Quantitation of 2-HG levels showed similar mean 2-HG tissue concentrations for IDH mutated tumors (2.65mM, range 3.06-2.20) for all methods. Bland-Altman plots (difference plots) did not reveal a systematic bias (fixed bias) for any of the algorithms tested, and we were able to show a significant correlation regarding 2-HG concentration at the same echo time with few statistical outliers (parametric correlation). However, evaluation of outliers suggested that in vivo quantitation of 2-HG is affected not only by the fitting domain (time or frequency), but also by the baseline correction, which is a major contributing factor to the result of 2-HG fitting. Clinical application of 2-HG quantitation as a prognostic or predictive biomarker, particularly in multicenter trials, requires standardized use of fitting methods and baseline correction procedures.

Ventriculoperitoneal Shunts Equipped with On-Off Valves for Intraventricular Therapies in Patients with Communicating Hydrocephalus due to Leptomeningeal Metastases.

Ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with a reservoir and a valve to manually switch off the shunt function can be used for intraventricular injections of therapeutics in patients suffering from a communicating hydrocephalus caused by leptomeningeal metastases. These shunt devices avoid the risk of injecting therapeutics through the distal leg of the shunt system into the intraperitoneal space, which may cause toxicity. Furthermore, regular intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics help to maintain sufficient concentrations in the ventricular space. Therefore, ventriculoperitoneal shunts equipped with an on-off valve are a useful tool to reliably inject chemotherapeutics into the ventricles. In order to systematically assess feasibility, safety, and efficacy of this procedure, we performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with leptomeningeal metastases who had received a shunt system at our institution. In total, six adult patients had a ventriculoperitoneal shunt equipped with an on-off valve implanted. Out of these six patients, two patients subsequently received intraventricular injections of chemotherapeutics. The configuration of the valve setting and the intraventricular injections were easily feasible in the setting of a neuro-oncology department. The complication of a shunt leakage occurred in one patient following the first intraventricular injection. No extra-central nervous system (CNS) toxicities were observed. In summary, ventriculoperitoneal shunts with on-off valves are useful tools for reliable intraventricular administration of therapeutics.

Tumor growth patterns of MGMT-non-methylated glioblastoma in the randomized GLARIUS trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated patterns of tumor growth in patients with newly diagnosed MGMT-non-methylated glioblastoma who were assigned to undergo radiotherapy in conjunction with bevacizumab/irinotecan (BEV/IRI) or standard temozolomide (TMZ) within the randomized phase II GLARIUS trial. METHODS: In 142 patients (94 BEV/IRI, 48 TMZ), we reviewed magnetic resonance imaging scans at baseline and first tumor recurrence. Based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, we assessed tumor growth patterns and tumor invasiveness. Tumor growth patterns were classified as either multifocal or local at baseline and recurrence; at first recurrence, we additionally assessed whether distant lesions appeared. Invasiveness was determined as either diffuse or non-diffuse. Associations with treatment arms were calculated using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: At baseline, 115 of 142 evaluable patients (81%) had a locally confined tumor. Between treatment arms, there was no significant difference in the fraction of tumors that changed from an initially local tumor growth pattern to a multifocal pattern (12 and 13%, p = 0.55). Distant lesions appeared in 17% (BEV/IRI) and 13% (TMZ) of patients (p = 0.69). 15% of patients in the BEV/IRI arm and 8% in the TMZ arm developed a diffuse growth pattern from an initially non-diffuse pattern (p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The tumor growth and invasiveness patterns do not differ between BEV/IRI and TMZ-treated MGMT-non-methylated glioblastoma patients in the GLARIUS trial. BEV/IRI was not associated with an increased rate of multifocal, distant, or highly invasive tumors at the time of recurrence.

"Two is not enough" - Impact of the number of tissue samples obtained from stereotactic brain biopsies in suspected glioblastoma.

OBJECTIVE: Stereotactic procedures are performed in many neurosurgical departments in order to obtain tumor tissue from brain lesions for histopathological evaluation. Biopsies can be performed frame-guided and frame less. Some departments use a biopsy needle (cylinder probe), others a forceps for repetitive smaller tissue samples. Although the applied techniques are somehow different, it is still unclear how many tissue samples have to be taken to establish reliably a final diagnosis based on histopathological and genetic examinations. Only precise histopathological diagnosis results in adequate therapy. METHODS: We included 43 consecutive patients who underwent stereotactic biopsy of a suspected glioblastoma between 02/2013 and 07/2015. All patients showed contrast enhancing tumors in the MRI. The patients underwent stereotactic biopsy with the Leksell frame attached to their head. All stereotactic procedures were performed in the presence of a neuropathologist. Target and Entry Points were calculated with BrainLab iplan software (BrainLab iplan 1.0, Munich, Germany). First the two samples 5mm before the Target (pre-target) and the "Targetpoint" itself were analyzed (group 1), then a histopathological evaluation of all samples was performed (group 2). RESULTS: Mean number of extracted samples was 14. Using classical hematoxylin-eosin stainings, in group 1 histopathological diagnosis was correct in only 30 cases accounting for 73%. Contrariwise a final diagnosis was made in 100% in group 2. CONCLUSION: If only two tissue samples were evaluated in this group of patients with suspected glioblastoma, a correct diagnosis was possible in only 73% of the cases. We conclude that two samples are not enough to establish a final diagnosis even in a subgroup of suspected glioblastoma.