RESUMO
PURPOSE: Due to the difficulty of using neural tracers in humans, knowledge of the nociceptive system's anatomy is mainly derived from studies in animals and mainly in rats. The aim of this study was to investigate the morphological differences of the ascending spinal nociceptive pathways between the rat and the macaque monkey; in order to evaluate the variability of this anatomy during phylogenesis, and thus to know if the anatomical description of these pathways can be transposed from the rat to the human. METHODS: A review and analysis of the literature were performed. The criteria used for comparison were: origins, pathways, their terminations in target structures, and projections from target structures of ascending spinal nociceptive pathways. The monkey was used as an intermediate species for comparison because of the lack of data in humans. The hypothesis of transposition of anatomy between rat and human was considered rejected if differences were found between rat and monkey. RESULTS: An anatomical difference in termination was found for the spino-annular or spino-periaqueductal grey (spino-PAG) pathway and transposition of its anatomy from rat to human was rejected. No difference was found in other pathways and the transposition of their anatomy from rat to human was therefore, not rejected. CONCLUSION: This work highlights the conservation of most of the ascending spinal nociceptive pathways' anatomy between rat and monkey. Thus, the possibility for a transposition of their anatomy between rat and human is not rejected.
RESUMO
SIGNIFICANCE: To better understand the implication of a potential cognitive change in glaucoma, patients were stimulated in central visual areas considered functionally normal to discard an effect due to the loss of vision during an attentional task. The outcome might improve the follow-up on the impact of the pathology. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of primary open-angle glaucoma on the visual attention system by recording responses of behavioral and oculomotor strategies. METHODS: We included 20 individuals with primary open-angle glaucoma (62.1 ± 7.2 years old), 18 age-matched control subjects (58.4 ± 7.2 years old), and 20 young control subjects (25.7 ± 3.5 years old). The procedure consisted of visual (eye-tracking recordings) and manual detection of a target. All participants had to detect a square with a vertical bar within distractors (squares, triangles, and circles with a horizontal or vertical bar) of identical size of 1.6 × 1.6° visual angle. The shapes were displayed concentrically on a radius of 5° of visual angle. All participants were tested to ensure that their visual field sensitivity was normal within ±5° central vision. RESULTS: In responding manually, glaucoma participants were slower than age-matched control subjects (1723 ± 488 vs. 1263 ± 385 milliseconds; P < .01). Eye-tracking recordings showed that glaucoma participants found the target within the same time frame as age-matched control subjects. Compared with the young group, the scanpath length and average fixation duration on distractors were significantly longer for the glaucoma patients (+235 pixels, +104 milliseconds) and the age-matched control participants (+120 pixels, +39 milliseconds). Impaired contrast sensitivity was correlated with longer response time, longer scanpath, and longer fixation on distractors. CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma affects the manual response times in a visual attention task, but patients can visually detect the target as quickly as age-matched control subjects. Different clinical factors predicted the performances. The age of the patients was associated with longer scanpath. The visual field loss (mean deviation) was linked with longer visual response time. The loss of contrast sensitivity predicted the behavioral change on fixation duration to the distractors, global response time, visual response time, and scanpath length.
