The influence of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae on lumbar lordosis and the angle of pelvic incidence.

Pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis have only normative values for spines comprising five lumbar and five sacral vertebrae. However, it is unclear how pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis are affected by the common segmentation anomalies at the lumbo-sacral border leading to lumbosacral transitional vertebrae, including lumbarisations and sacralisations. In lumbosacral transitional vertebrae it is not trivial to identify the correct vertebral endplates to measure pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis because ontogenetically the first sacral vertebra represents the first non-mobile sacral segment in lumbarisations, but the second segment in sacralisations. We therefore assessed pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis with respect to both of these vertebral endplates. The type of segmentation anomaly was differentiated using spinal counts, spatial relationship with the iliac crest and morphological features. We found significant differences in pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis between lumbarisations, sacralisations and the control group. The pelvic incidence in the sacralised group was mostly below the range of the lubarisation group and the control group when measured the traditional way at the first non-mobile segment (30.2°). However, the ranges of the sacralisation and lubarisation groups were completely encompassed by the control group when measured at the ontogenetically true first sacral vertebra. The mean pelvic incidence of the sacraliation group thus increased from 30.2° to 58.6°, and the mean pelvic incidence of the total sample increased from 45.6° to 51.2°, making it statistically indistinguishable from the control sample, whose pelvic incidence was 50.2°. Our results demonstrate that it is crucial to differentiate sacralisations from lumbarisation in order to assess the reference vertebra for pelvic incidence measurement. Due to their significant impact on spino-pelvic parameters, lumbosacral transitional vertebrae should be evaluated separately when examining pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis.

Comparative Efficacy of Conservative Surgery vs Minor Amputation for Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis.

BACKGROUND: There is uncertainty regarding the optimal surgical intervention for diabetic foot osteomyelitis (DFO). Conservative surgery-amputation-free resection of infected bone and soft tissues-is gaining traction as an alternative to minor amputation. Our primary objective was to explore the comparative effectiveness of conservative surgery and minor amputations in clinical failure risk 1 year after index intervention. We also aimed to explore microbiological recurrence at 1 year, and revision surgery risk over a 10-year study period. METHODS: Retrospective, single-center chart review of DFO patients undergoing either conservative surgery or minor amputation. We used multivariable Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier estimates to explore the effect of surgical intervention on clinical failure (recurrent diabetic foot infection at surgical site within 1 year after index operation), microbiological recurrence at 1 year, and revision surgery risk over a 10-year follow-up period. RESULTS: 651 patients were included (conservative surgery, n = 121; minor amputation, n = 530). Clinical failure occurred in 34 (28%) patients in the conservative surgery group, and in 111 (21%) of the minor amputation group at 1 year (P = .09). After controlling for potential confounders, we found no association between conservative surgery and clinical failure at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.1). We found no between-group differences in microbiological recurrence at 1 year (conservative surgery: 8 [6.6%]; minor amputation: 33 [6.2%]; P = .25; adjusted HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.5-2.6). Over the 10-year period, the conservative group underwent significantly more revision surgeries (conservative surgery: 85 [70.2%]; minor amputation: 252 [47.5%]; P < .01; adjusted HR 1.3, 95% CI 0.9-1.8). CONCLUSION: We found that with comorbidity-based patient selection, conservative surgery in the treatment of DFO was associated with the same rates of clinical failure and microbiological recurrence at 1 year, but with significantly more revision surgeries during follow-up, compared with minor amputations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative effectiveness study.

No Difference in Risk of Amputation or Frequency of Surgical Interventions Between Patients With Diabetic and Nondiabetic Charcot Arthropathy.

BACKGROUND: The cause of Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN) is diabetes in approximately 75% of patients. Most reports on the clinical course and complications of CN focus on diabetic CN, and reports on nondiabetic CN are scarce. No study, to our knowledge, has compared the clinical course of patients initially treated nonoperatively for diabetic and nondiabetic CN. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Among patients with CN, are there differences between patients with diabetes and those without in terms of (1) the frequency of major amputation as ascertained by a competing risks survivorship estimator; (2) the frequency of surgery as ascertained by a competing risks survivorship estimator; (3) frequency of reactivation, as above; or (4) other complications (contralateral CN development or ulcers)? METHODS: Between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2018, we treated 199 patients for diabetic CN. Eleven percent (22 of 199) were lost before the minimum study follow-up of 2 years or had incomplete datasets and could not be analyzed, and another 9% (18 of 199) were excluded for other prespecified reasons, leaving 80% (159 of 199) for analysis in this retrospective study at a mean follow-up duration since diagnosis of 6 ± 4 years. During that period, we also treated 78 patients for nondiabetic Charcot arthropathy. Eighteen percent (14 of 78) were lost before the minimum study follow-up and another 5% (four of 78 patients) were excluded for other prespecified reasons, leaving 77% (60 of 78) of patients for analysis here at a mean of 5 ± 3 years. Patients with diabetic CN were younger (59 ± 11 years versus 68 ± 11 years; p < 0.01), more likely to smoke cigarettes (37% [59 of 159] versus 20% [12 of 60]; p = 0.02), and had longer follow-up (6 ± 4 years versus 5 ± 3 years; p = 0.02) than those with nondiabetic CN. Gender, BMI, overall renal failure, dialysis, and presence of peripheral arterial disease did not differ between the groups. Age difference and length of follow-up were not considered disqualifying problems because of the later onset of idiopathic neuropathy and longer available patient follow-up in patients with diabetes, because our program adheres to the follow-up recommendations suggested by the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot. Treatment was the same in both groups and included serial total-contact casting and restricted weightbearing until CN had resolved. Then, patients subsequently transitioned to orthopaedic footwear. CN reactivation was defined as clinical signs of the recurrence of CN activity and confirmation on MRI. Group-specific risks of the frequencies of major amputation, surgery, and CN reactivation were calculated, accounting for competing events. Group comparisons and confounder analyses were conducted on these data with a Cox regression analysis. Other complications (contralateral CN development and ulcers) are described descriptively to avoid pooling of complications with varying severity, which could be misleading. RESULTS: The risk of major amputation (defined as an above-ankle amputation), estimated using a competing risks survivorship estimator, was not different between the diabetic CN group and nondiabetic CN group at 10 years (8.8% [95% confidence interval 4.2% to 15%] versus 6.9% [95% CI 0.9% to 22%]; p = 0.4) after controlling for potentially confounding variables such as smoking and peripheral artery disease. The risk of any surgery was no different between the groups as estimated by the survivorship function at 10 years (53% [95% CI 42% to 63%] versus 58% [95% CI 23% to 82%]; p = 0.3), with smoking (hazard ratio 2.4 [95% CI 1.6 to 3.6]) and peripheral artery disease (HR 2.2 [95% CI 1.4 to 3.4]) being associated with diabetic CN. Likewise, there was no between-group difference in CN reactivation at 10 years (16% [95% CI 9% to 23%] versus 11% [95% CI 4.5% to 22%]; p = 0.7) after controlling for potentially confounding variables such as smoking and peripheral artery disease. Contralateral CN occurred in 17% (27 of 159) of patients in the diabetic group and in 10% (six of 60) of those in the nondiabetic group. Ulcers occurred in 74% (117 of 159) of patients in the diabetic group and in 65% (39 of 60) of those in the nondiabetic group. CONCLUSION: Irrespective of whether the etiology of CN is diabetic or nondiabetic, our results suggest that orthopaedic surgeons should use similar nonsurgical treatments, with total-contact casting until CN activity has resolved, and then proceed with orthopaedic footwear. A high frequency of foot ulcers must be anticipated and addressed as part of the treatment approach. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Salami-Tactics: when is it time for a major cut after multiple minor amputations?

INTRODUCTION: Repetitive minor amputations carry the concomitant risks of multiple surgical procedures, major amputations have physical and economical major drawbacks. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether there is a distinct number of minor amputations predicting a major amputation in the same leg and to determine risk factors for major amputation in multiple minor amputations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review including 429 patients with 534 index minor amputations between 07/1984 and 06/2019 was conducted. Patient demographics and clinical data including number and level of re-amputations were extracted from medical records and statistically analyzed. RESULTS: 290 legs (54.3%) had one or multiple re-amputations after index minor amputation. 89 (16.7%) legs needed major amputation during follow up. Major amputation was performed at a mean of 32.5 (range 0 - 275.2) months after index minor amputation. No particular re-amputation demonstrated statistically significant elevated odds ratio (a.) to be a major amputation compared to the preceding amputation and (b.) to lead to a major amputation at any point during follow up. Stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed minor re-amputation within 90 days (HR 3.8, 95% CI 2.0-7.3, p <0.001) as the only risk factor for major amputation if at least one re-amputation had to be performed. CONCLUSIONS: There is no distinct number of prior minor amputations in one leg that would justify a major amputation on its own. If a re-amputation has to be done, the timepoint needs to be considered as re-amputations within 90 days carry a fourfold risk for major amputation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective comparative study (Level III).

Endoscopic Treatment of Stump Infection of the Residual Synovial Cavity After Through-the-Knee Amputation: A Case Report.

CASE: We report the case of a 35-year-old patient who presented with a septic residual synovial cavity infection 8 weeks after a through-the-knee amputation because of a parosteal sarcoma. An endoscopic evacuation of the turbid fluid and synovial debridement through parapatellar portals as in a standard knee arthroscopy was performed, in conjunction with appropriate antibiotic therapy. One year postoperatively, there were no signs of residual infection. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment of a septic stump infection of the residual synovial cavity after through-the-knee amputation is feasible. In our case, this approach resulted in rapid wound healing and early prosthesis mobility.

Nonoperative Treatment of Charcot Neuro-osteoarthropathy.

Conservative treatment of Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (CN) aims to retain a stable, plantigrade, and ulcer-free foot, or to prevent progression of an already existing deformity. CN is treated with offloading in a total contact cast as long as CN activity is present. Transition to inactive CN is monitored by the resolution of clinical activity signs and by resolution of bony edema in MRI. Fitting of orthopedic depth insoles, orthopedic shoes, or ankle-foot orthosis should follow immediately after offloading has ended to prevent CN reactivation or ulcer development.

Long-term outcome of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis seeking nonoperative treatment after a mean follow-up of 42 years.

PURPOSE: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) affects up to 3% of otherwise healthy adolescents. The extreme long-term outcomes of nonoperative treatment are underreported. This study aimed to investigate the long-term outcome of nonoperative-treated AIS patients. Comparison between a bracing and an observation approach were performed. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 20 nonoperatively treated AIS patients were observed concerning patient-related outcome measures (PROM) (visual analog scale (VAS), Short Form Health Survey 36 item (SF 36), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS 24), Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index (ODI), Psychological General Well-Being Index (PGWBI)), radiological curve progression and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Baseline characteristics and radiological imaging were collected. At follow-up, anteroposterior and lateral X-rays as well as questionnaires were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty patients (16 females, mean age: 14.6 ± 3.2 years) with a follow-up time of 42 ± 9 years were included. Nine patients (initial Cobb 35° ± 19°) were treated with bracing for a mean time of 26 ± 9 months, while the other 11 patients (initial Cobb 29° ± 11°) were observed. The primary curve progressed from 32° ± 15° to 52° ± 25° in average with no significant difference between the cohorts (p = 0.371). At final follow-up, a mean ODI score of 7 ± 7.9 points with no difference depending on the treatment (p = 0.668) was seen. No significant differences were observed for PROMs. Curve magnitude correlated neither at diagnosis (p = 0.617) nor at follow-up (p = 0.535) with the ODI score at final follow-up. CONCLUSION: After a mean of 42 years, patients with nonoperative treatment of moderate AIS demonstrated a good clinical outcome despite progression of the deformity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Long-term follow-up of conservative treatment of Charcot feet.

BACKGROUND: Charcot arthropathy (CN) can ultimately lead to limb loss despite appropriate treatment. Initial conservative treatment is the accepted treatment in case of a plantigrade foot. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the mid- to long-term clinical course of CN initially being treated conservatively, and to identify risk factors for reactivation and contralateral development of CN as well as common complications in CN. METHODS: A total of 184 Charcot feet in 159 patients (median age 60.0 (interquartile range (IQR) 15.5) years, 49 (30.1%) women) were retrospectively analyzed by patient chart review. Rates of limb salvage, reactivation, contralateral development and common complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed to identify possible risk factors for limb loss, CN reactivation, contralateral CN development, and ulcer development. RESULTS: Major amputation-free survival could be achieved in 92.9% feet after a median follow-up of 5.2 (IQR 4.25, range 2.2-11.25) years. CN recurrence occurred in 13.6%. 32.1% had bilateral CN involvement. Ulcers were present in 72.3%. 88.1% patients were ambulating in orthopaedic footwear without any further aids. Presence of Diabetes mellitus was associated with reactivation of CN, major amputation and ulcer recurrence. Smoking was associated with ulcer development and necessity of amputations. CONCLUSIONS: With consistent conservative treatment of CN with orthopaedic footwear or orthoses, limb preservation can be achieved in 92.9% after a median follow-up of 5.2 years. Patients with diabetic CN are at an increased risk of developing complications and CN reactivation. To prevent ulcers and amputations, every effort should be made to make patients stop smoking. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, long-term retrospective cohort study.

How good are clinicians in predicting the presence of Pseudomonas spp. in diabetic foot infections? A prospective clinical evaluation.

Introduction: The most frequently prescribed empirical antibiotic agents for mild and moderate diabetic foot infections (DFIs) are amino-penicillins and second-generation cephalosporins that do not cover Pseudomonas spp. Many clinicians believe they can predict the involvement of Pseudomonas in a DFI by visual and/or olfactory clues, but no data support this assertion. Methods: In this prospective observational study, we separately asked 13 experienced (median 11 years) healthcare workers whether they thought the Pseudomonas spp. would be implicated in the DFI. Their predictions were compared with the results of cultures of deep/intraoperative specimens and/or the clinical remission of DFI achieved with antibiotic agents that did not cover Pseudomonas. Results: Among 221 DFI episodes in 88 individual patients, intraoperative tissue cultures grew Pseudomonas in 22 cases (10%, including six bone samples). The presence of Pseudomonas was correctly predicted with a sensitivity of 0.32, specificity of 0.84, positive predictive value of 0.18 and negative predictive value 0.92. Despite two feedbacks of the interim results and a 2-year period, the clinicians' predictive performance did not improve. Conclusion: The combined visual and olfactory performance of experienced clinicians in predicting the presence of Pseudomonas in a DFI was moderate, with better specificity than sensitivity, and did not improve over time. Further investigations are needed to determine whether clinicians should use a negative prediction of the presence of Pseudomonas in a DFI, especially in settings with a high prevalence of pseudomonal DFIs.

Long-term results after internal partial forefoot amputation (resection): a retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Internal partial forefoot amputation (IPFA) is a treatment option for osteomyelitis and refractory and recurrent chronic ulcers of the forefoot. The aim of our study was to assess the healing rate of chronic ulcers, risk of ulcer recurrence at the same area or re-ulceration at a different area and revision rate in patients treated with IPFA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent IPFA of a phalanx and/or metatarsal head and/or sesamoids at our institution because of chronic ulceration of the forefoot and/or osteomyelitis from 2004 to 2014 were included. Information about patient characteristics, ulcer healing, new ulcer occurrence, and revision surgery were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted for new ulcer occurrence and revision surgery. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients were included (108 operated feet). 55.6% of our patients had diabetes. In 44 cases, an IPFA of a phalanx was performed, in 60 cases a metatarsal head resection and in 4 cases an isolated resection of sesamoids. The mean follow-up was 40.9 months. 91.2% of ulcers healed after a mean period of 1.3 months. In 56 feet (51.9%), a new ulcer occurred: 11 feet (10.2%) had an ulcer in the same area as initially (= ulcer recurrence), in 45 feet (41.7%) the ulcer was localized elsewhere (= re-ulceration). Revision surgery was necessary in 39 feet (36.1%). Only one major amputation and five complete transmetatarsal forefoot amputations were necessary during the follow-up period. Thus, the major amputation rate was 0.9%, and the minor amputation rate on the same ray was 13.9%. CONCLUSIONS: IPFA is a valuable treatment of chronic ulcers of the forefoot. However, new ulceration is a frequent event following this type of surgery. Our results are consistent with the reported re-ulceration rate after conservative treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. The number of major amputations is low after IPFA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Case Series Study (Level IV).

Resting TcPO2 levels decrease during liner wear in persons with a transtibial amputation.

BACKGROUND: In our clinic, a substantial number of patients present with transtibial residual limb pain of no specific somatic origin. Silicone liner induced tissue compression may reduce blood flow, possibly causing residual limb pain. Thus, as a first step we investigated if the liner itself has an effect on transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO2). METHODS: Persons with unilateral transtibial amputation and residual limb pain of unknown origin were included. Medical history, including residual limb pain, was recorded, and the SF-36 administered. Resting TcPO2 levels were measured in the supine position and without a liner at 0, 10, 20 and 30 minutes using two sensors: one placed in the Transverse plane over the tip of the Tibia End (= TTE), the other placed in the Sagittal plane, distally over the Peroneal Compartment (= SPC). Measurements were repeated with specially prepared liners avoiding additional pressure due to sensor placement. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS. RESULTS: Twenty persons (9 women, 11 men) with a mean age of 68.65 years (range 47-86 years) participated. The transtibial amputation occurred on average 43 months prior to study entry (range 3-119 months). With liner wear, both sensors measured TcPO2 levels that were significantly lower than those measured without a liner (TTE: p < 0.001; SPC: p = 0.002) after 10, 20 and 30 minutes. No significant differences were found between TcPO2 levels over time between the sensors. There were no significant associations between TcPO2 levels and pain, smoking status, age, duration of daily liner use, mobility level, and revision history. CONCLUSION: Resting TcPO2 levels decreased significantly while wearing a liner alone, without a prosthetic socket. Further studies are required to investigate the effect of liner wear on exercise TcPO2 levels.

Extreme long-term outcome of operatively versus conservatively treated patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: We report on outcomes of surgically versus (vs) non-surgically treated patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) after minimum of 29 years. METHODS: AIS patients with a follow-up of ≥ 41 years in the surgical group and ≥ 29 years in the non-surgical group were included. Patients were treated surgically for primary curves ≥ 45° vs non-surgically for curves < 45° or refusal of surgery. Groups were matched for age, gender, comorbidities and primary curve severity. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to measure clinical outcomes and standard radiography to quantify curve severity at final follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 16 patients (8 within each group, 75% females) with a median age of 14 (interquartile range (IQR) 2) years could be included and were followed up after 46 (IQR 12) years. All matched variables were similar for both groups, including the primary curve Cobb angles of 48° (IQR 17°) (surgical) vs 40° (IQR 19°) (non-surgical); p = 0.17). At final follow-up after a median of 47 (IQR 5) years for the surgical and 39 (IQR 19) years for the non-surgical group (p = 0.43), the ODI was similar for both groups (15 (IQR 13) points (surgical) vs 7 (IQR 15) points (non-surgical); p = 0.17) with, however, a primary curve magnitude lower in the surgical compared to the non-surgical group (38° (IQR 3°) vs 61° (IQR 33°); p = 0.01), respectively. CONCLUSION: After around 47 and 39 years, respectively, surgical and non-surgical treatment of moderate AIS showed similar subjective outcomes, but with a relevant smaller curve magnitude with surgical treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Mid-term walking ability after Charcot foot reconstruction using the Ilizarov ring fixator.

BACKGROUND: Failed conservative treatment and complications are indications for foot reconstruction in Charcot arthropathy. External fixation using the Ilizarov principles offers a one-stage procedure for deformity correction and resection of osteomyelitic bone. The aim of this study was to determine whether external fixation with an Ilizarov ring fixator leads reliably to walking ability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 29 patients treated with an Ilizarov ring fixator for Charcot arthropathy were retrospectively analyzed. Radiologic fusion at final follow up was assessed separately on conventional X-rays by two authors. The association between walking ability and the presence of osteomyelitis at the time of reconstruction, and the presence of fusion at final follow up was investigated using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Mean follow up was 35 months (range 5.3-107) months; mean time of external fixation was 113 days. Ten patients (34.5%) reached fusion, but 19 did not (65.5%). Two patients needed below knee amputation. 26 of the remaining 27 patients maintained walking ability, 23 of those without assistive devices. Walking ability was independent from the presence of osteomyelitis at the time of reconstruction and from the presence of fusion. CONCLUSION: Foot reconstruction with an Ilizarov ring fixator led to limb salvage in 93%. The vast majority (96.3%) of patients with successful limb salvage was ambulatory, independent from radiologic fusion, and presence of osteomyelitis at the time of reconstruction. These findings encourage limb salvage and deformity correction in this difficult-to-treat disease, even with underlying osteomyelitis.

Optimization of the antibiotic management of diabetic foot infections: protocol for two randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have addressed the appropriate duration of antibiotic therapy for diabetic foot infections (DFI) with or without amputation. We will perform two randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to reduce the antibiotic use and associated adverse events in DFI. METHODS: We hypothesize that shorter durations of postdebridement systemic antibiotic therapy are noninferior (10% margin, 80% power, alpha 5%) to existing (long) durations and we will perform two unblinded RCTs with a total of 400 DFI episodes (randomization 1:1) from 2019 to 2022. The primary outcome for both RCTs is remission of infection after a minimal follow-up of 2 months. The secondary outcomes for both RCTs are the incidence of adverse events and the overall treatment costs. The first RCT will allocate the total therapeutic amputations in two arms of 50 patients each: 1 versus 3 weeks of antibiotic therapy for residual osteomyelitis (positive microbiological samples of the residual bone stump); or 1 versus 4 days for remaining soft tissue infection. The second RCT will randomize the conservative approach (only surgical debridement without in toto amputation) in two arms with 50 patients each: 10 versus 20 days of antibiotic therapy for soft tissue infections; and 3 versus 6 weeks for osteomyelitis. All participants will have professional wound debridement, adequate off-loading, angiology evaluation, and a concomitant surgical, re-educational, podiatric, internist and infectiology care. During the surgeries, we will collect tissues for BioBanking and future laboratory studies. DISCUSSION: Both parallel RCTs will respond to frequent questions regarding the duration of antibiotic use in the both major subsets of DFIs, to ensure the quality of care, and to avoid unnecessary excesses in terms of surgery and antibiotic use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04081792. Registered on 4 September 2019.

Revision After Total Transmetatarsal Amputation.

Total transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) can be an option for foot salvage in gangrene, sepsis, or infected necrosis. However, the literature concerning predictive outcome factors and bacterial sampling is scarce. To identify potential associations between revision surgery and underlying bacteria or other preoperative selection criteria, we reviewed all patients with TMA who were treated at our institution. We compared the patients with remissions with surgical revisions. Among 96 adult patients with TMA (105 amputations), 42 required a revision surgery (40%), 18 had a further minor proximal surgical reamputation (17%) and 18 had a major proximal surgical reamputation (14%). In group comparisons, a previous infection with Staphylococcus aureus was protective with a lower revision risk (4/26 with revision surgery vs 22/26 without revisions; p = .03). This was the opposite for postoperative persistent soft tissue or bone infections (p < .01) and delayed wound healing (p < .01), which were positively associated with a revision risk. The American Society of Anesthesiologists Score, sex, age, body mass index, diabetes, polyneuropathy, chronic renal failure, dialysis, peripheral arterial disease, smoking status, and antibiotic regimen did not influence this revision risk. These results must be interpreted cautiously because no multiple variable calculations could be conducted as a result of the paucity of cases and confounding could not be evaluated sufficiently. TMA is an option to prevent major amputations, but it may be associated with a subsequent revision risk of 40% in adult patients. In our cohort study, persistent postamputation infection and delayed wound healing were associated with revision. However, no preoperative selection criteria were found that lead to revision surgery except for an infection with Staphylococcus aureus, which protected against revision surgery.

Diabetic calcaneal osteomyelitis.

Diabetic foot infection (DFI), a multi-facetted disease requiring a multidisciplinary approach for successful treatment, mostly affects the forefoot. Calcaneal osteomyelitis (CO) is an uncommon presentation of DFI with a somewhat different epidemiology, clinical features, and approach to management. These patients, compared to those with non-calcaneal DFI, more often require special surgical techniques and off-loading approaches. In this narrative review targeted to non-surgical clinicians, we explore how CO differs from other types of DFI affecting other anatomical locations. Based on our review of the literature and personal experience, we also highlight important issues regarding the management of CO osteomyelitis, including the need for specialized surgical approaches.

The Charcot foot: a pictorial review.

Charcot foot refers to an inflammatory pedal disease based on polyneuropathy; the detailed pathomechanism of the disease is still unclear. Since the most common cause of polyneuropathy in industrialized countries is diabetes mellitus, the prevalence in this risk group is very high, up to 35%. Patients with Charcot foot typically present in their fifties or sixties and most of them have had diabetes mellitus for at least 10 years. If left untreated, the disease leads to massive foot deformation. This review discusses the typical course of Charcot foot disease including radiographic and MR imaging findings for diagnosis, treatment, and detection of complications.

Predictors for reoperation after lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Background: Major amputations in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) carry a high risk for complications, including revision of the amputation, sometimes to a higher level. Determining a safe level for amputation with good wound healing potential depends largely on vascular measurements. This study evaluated potential predictive factors for revision of major lower extremity amputations in patients with PAD. Patients and methods: A retrospective chart review of all major lower extremity amputations at our institution was conducted. Amputations due to trauma or tumor and below-ankle amputations were excluded. Patient demographics, level/type of amputation, level/time of revision, comorbidities and risk factors were extracted. Results: 180 patients with PAD, mean age 66.48 (range: 31-93) years, 125 (69.4%) male were included. Most (154/180, 86.6%) underwent below-knee amputation. 71 (39.4%) patients had coronary arterial disease, 104 (57.8%) had diabetes. More than half of patients, (93/138; 51.7%) had undergone previous balloon angioplasty. 44 (30%) patients required revision surgery: 42/180 (23.3%) were revised at the same level, and in 12/180 (6.7%) a more proximal amputation was necessary. PAD stage was not associated with the level of reamputation (p = 0.4369). Significantly more patients who had previous balloon angioplasty required revision surgery (66.7% versus 45.2%, p = 0.009). 67 (37.2%) patients underwent preoperative TcPO2 measurement: 40/67 (59.7%) had TcPO2 ≥ 40 mmHg; 4/67 (6%) had TcPO2 < 10 mmHG. Three patients with TcPO2 ≥ 40 mmHg, one with 30 mmHg ≤ TcPO2 ≤ 40 mmHg and one with 10 mmHg ≤ TcPO2 ≤ 20 mmHg required re-amputation to a more proximal level. Conclusions: TcPO2 measurements are useful for determining level of lower limb amputation and predicting wound healing problems when an amputation level with TcPO2 < 40 mmHg is chosen. In transtibial amputations, TcPO2 ≥ 40 mmHg does not safely predict wound healing.

Outcome After Surgical Treatment of Calcaneal Osteomyelitis.

BACKGROUND: Surgical procedures for calcaneal osteomyelitis are partial calcanectomy (PC), total calcanectomy (TC), and below-knee amputation (BKA). With calcaneal osteomyelitis, limb-saving surgery was described to have secondary BKA rates of 4% to 20%, while secondary amputation rates after BKA are unknown. The aim of this study was to describe and compare overall revision and secondary amputation rates for each surgical option in our institution's cohort and to identify risk factors for secondary amputation. METHODS: Fifty patients treated between 2002 and 2017 were included. Revisions, secondary amputations, and possible risk factors for secondary amputation and overall revision were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Minor revisions rates were 57.1% in PCs, 100% in TCs, and 27.8% in BKAs. Secondary amputation was performed in 28.6% of the PCs, in 50% of the TCs, and in 5.6% of the BKAs. No statistically significant differences between overall revision and secondary amputation rates were found. C-reactive protein values greater than 5 mg/L at the index procedure were significantly associated with overall revision while we could not identify risk factors for secondary amputation. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest group of patients treated for calcaneal osteomyelitis in the literature. In limb-preserving surgical options, secondary BKA rates are higher than previously known. Primary BKA is a procedure with a low reamputation rate of 5.6%. PC can be considered, with 28.6% needing more proximal amputation. In TC, all patients underwent revision surgery and 50% had to undergo secondary BKA. Therefore, we hesitate to consider total calcanectomy as a surgical option in calcaneal osteomyelitis anymore. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.