Six versus 2 weeks treatment with doxycycline in European Lyme neuroborreliosis: a multicentre, non-inferiority, double-blinded, randomised and placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There is limited evidence regarding optimal duration of antibiotic treatment in neuroborreliosis. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of oral doxycycline for 2 and 6 weeks in European Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB). METHODS: The trial had a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority design. Patients with LNB were recruited from eight Norwegian hospitals and randomised to doxycycline 200 mg once daily for 2 weeks, followed by 4 weeks of placebo, or doxycycline 200 mg once daily for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement as measured by difference in a Composite Clinical Score (0-64 points) from baseline to 6 months. The non-inferiority margin was predetermined to 0.5 points. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one patients were included. Fifty-two treated for 2 weeks and 53 for 6 weeks were included in the intention-to-treat analyses, and 52 and 51 in per-protocol analysis. Mean difference in clinical improvement between the groups was 0.06, 95% CI -1.2 to 1.2, p=0.99 in the intention-to-treat population, and -0.4, 95% CI -1.4 to 0.7, p=0.51 in the per-protocol population and non-inferiority could not be established. There were no treatment failures and no serious adverse events. The groups did not differ in secondary outcomes including clinical scores at 10 weeks and 12 months, cerebrospinal fluid data and patient-reported outcome measures. Patients receiving 6 weeks doxycycline reported slightly more side effects in week 5. CONCLUSION: Our results strongly indicate that there are no benefits of doxycycline treatment beyond 2 weeks in European LNB. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2015-001481-25.

Patient-reported outcome after treatment for definite Lyme neuroborreliosis.

OBJECTIVE: To chart patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in Norwegian patients treated for definite neuroborreliosis (NB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adult patients treated for definite NB 1-10 years earlier supplied demographics, symptoms and treatment during NB, and answered validated questionnaires; Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), health-related quality of life questionnaire (RAND-36), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15). RESULTS: A higher proportion of NB-treated persons reported severe fatigue, defined as FSS score ≥ 5, than in Norwegian normative data, but when removing persons with confounding fatigue associated comorbidities (n = 69) from the analyses, there was no difference between groups. Physical health-related quality of life (RAND-36 PCS), mean FSS score, proportions of persons reporting moderate or severe somatic symptom burden (PHQ-15 score ≥ 10), anxiety (HADS-A ≥ 8), or depression (HADS-D ≥ 8) did not differ between NB-treated persons and reference scores. Mental health-related quality of life (RAND-36 MCS) was poorer than in normative data (47.1 vs. 53.3), but associated with anxiety, depression and current moderate or severe somatic symptom burden, and not with NB characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Results on validated PROM questionnaires measuring fatigue, anxiety, depression, self-reported somatic symptom burden, and physical health-related quality did not differ between persons treated for definite NB 1-10 years earlier and reference scores. NB-treated persons tended to report a slightly poorer mental health-related quality of life than found in normative data, but when adjusting for confounders the causative connection is questionable. Overall, the long-term prognosis of definite NB seems to be good.