PARTIAL DISTAL DUODENECTOMY IN PATIENT WITH ADENOCARCINOMA.

BACKGROUND: Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a small percentage of gastrointestinal neoplasms, around 0.5%, and its treatment is based on resection of the tumor, classically by pancreaticoduodenectomy. In recent years, however, segmental resections of duodenal lesions, that do not involve the second portion or the periampullary region, have gained relevance with good surgical and oncological outcomes as well as the benefit of avoiding surgeries that can result in high morbidity and mortality. AIMS: To report a case of an elderly female patient with malignant neoplastic lesion in the third and fourth duodenal portion, non-obstructive, submitted to surgical treatment. METHODS: The technical option was the resection of the distal duodenum and proximal jejunum with preservation of the pancreas and reconstruction with side-to-side duodenojejunal anastomosis. RESULTS: The evolution was satisfactory and the surgical margins were free of neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental resections of the duodenum are feasible and safe, offering the benefit of preventing complications of pancreaticoduodenectomies.

Partial distal duodenectomy in patient with adenocarcinoma / Duodenectomia distal parcial em paciente com adenocarcinoma

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Duodenal adenocarcinoma is a small percentage of gastrointestinal neoplasms, around 0.5%, and its treatment is based on resection of the tumor, classically by pancreaticoduodenectomy. In recent years, however, segmental resections of duodenal lesions, that do not involve the second portion or the periampullary region, have gained relevance with good surgical and oncological outcomes as well as the benefit of avoiding surgeries that can result in high morbidity and mortality. AIMS: To report a case of an elderly female patient with malignant neoplastic lesion in the third and fourth duodenal portion, non-obstructive, submitted to surgical treatment. METHODS: The technical option was the resection of the distal duodenum and proximal jejunum with preservation of the pancreas and reconstruction with side-to-side duodenojejunal anastomosis. RESULTS: The evolution was satisfactory and the surgical margins were free of neoplasia. CONCLUSIONS: Segmental resections of the duodenum are feasible and safe, offering the benefit of preventing complications of pancreaticoduodenectomies.

RESUMO RACIONAL: O adenocarcinoma duodenal é uma pequena porcentagem das neoplasias gastrointestinais, em torno de 0,5%, e seu tratamento baseia-se na ressecção da massa tumoral, classicamente por pancreatoduodenectomia. Nos últimos anos, porém, as ressecções segmentares de lesões duodenais que não envolvem a segunda porção ou a região periampular têm ganhado relevância com bons resultados cirúrgicos e oncológicos e com o benefício de evitar uma cirurgia que pode apresentar alta morbimortalidade. OBJETIVOS: Reportar o caso de uma paciente feminina, idosa, com lesão neoplásica maligna na terceira e quarta porção duodenal, não obstrutiva, submetida a tratamento cirúrgico. MÉTODOS: A opção técnica foi a ressecção do duodeno distal e jejuno proximal com preservação do pâncreas e reconstrução com anastomose duodenojejunal látero-lateral. RESULTADOS: A evolução foi satisfatória e as margens cirúrgicas foram livres de neoplasia. CONCLUSÕES: As ressecções segmentares do duodeno são factíveis e seguras, com os benefícios de evitar as complicações das pancreatoduodenectomias.

Neoplasia quística mucinosa gigante del páncreas tratada con pancreatectomía corporocaudal y preservación esplénica / Giant mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas undergoing pancreatectomy with splenic preservation

RESUMEN: La neoplasia quística mucinosa del páncreas (NQMP) es un tumor infrecuente, que afecta predominantemente a mujeres (90-95 %), afectando especialmente entre la quinta y séptima década de la vida; cuyo descubrimiento suele ser incidental. Por lo general, son lesiones solitarias, sin compromiso del conducto pancreático principal; poco sintomáticas y asociadas a malignidad (10 % a 40 %). El objetivo de este manuscrito fue reportar un caso de neoplasia quística mucinosa gigante del páncreas intervenida quirúrgicamente y revisar la evidencia existente respecto de sus características morfológicas, terapéuticas y pronósticas. Mujer de 29 años, con masa abdominal poco sintomática. El diagnóstico se verificó por medio de ultrasonografía, tomografía axial computarizada y resonancia nuclear magnética. Se intervino quirúrgicamente, realizándose pancreatectomía corporocaudal con preservación esplénica, sin incidentes. La paciente fue dada de alta al quinto día, sin complicaciones, y evolucionó de forma adecuada, sin complicaciones postoperatorias. La NMQP es una lesión compleja, que puede asociarse a malignidad, pero el diagnóstico preoperatorio de malignidad no puede establecerse con seguridad. El pronóstico depende de un diagnóstico precoz y un tratamiento oportuno.

SUMMARY: Mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas (MCNP) are variable types of tumors, which predominantly affect women (90-95 %), and usually appear incidentally in the 5th to 7th decade of life. They are generally solitary lesions, with no involvement of the main pancreatic duct, rarely symptomatic and are associated with malignancy (10 % to 40 %). The aim of this manuscript was to report a case of giant mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas surgically treated and review the existing evidence regarding its morphological, therapeutic and prognosis characteristics. Patient: A 29-year-old woman with a slightly symptomatic abdominal mass. The diagnosis was verified with ultrasound, computed axial tomography and magnetic nuclear resonance. The patient underwent surgery; an uneventful corporocaudal pancreatectomy with splenic preservation was performed. She was discharged on the fifth day, and has evolved adequately, without postoperative complications. MCNP is a complex lesion, which can be associated with malignancy, but the preoperative diagnosis of malignancy cannot be established with certainty. Its prognosis depends on early diagnosis and timely treatment.

Valor predictivo del sistema BIRADS para detección de cáncer de mama con mamografía en biopsias por punción con aguja gruesa: Revisión de 5 años en un hospital de referencia / Predictive value of breast imaging report and database system (BIRADS) to detect cancer in a reference regional hospital

Background: To validate the BIRADS in mammography, the calculation of its predictive value in each center is required, as recommended by the American College of Radiology. Aim: To determine the predictive value of the BIRADS system in our center. Material and Methods: All ultrasound guided needle percutaneous biopsies, performed at our center between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed. Predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of BIRADS were calculated, with a confidence interval of 95%. Results: Of 1,313 biopsies available, 1,058 met the inclusion criteria. Fifty eight percent of biopsies were performed to women with mammographies classified as BIRADS 4 or 5. The presence of cancer in mammographies classified as BIRADS 0 was 4%. The prevalence of cancer for mammographies BIRADS 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were 0, 3, 2.7, 17.7 and 72.4% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of BIRADS classification were 55 and 92 % respectively. Conclusions: In our institution BIRADS classification 4 and 5 has a high positive predictive value for detecting cancer as in developed countries.

[Predictive value of breast imaging report and database system (BIRADS) to detect cancer in a reference regional hospital]. / Valor predictivo del sistema BIRADS para detección de cáncer de mama con mamografía en biopsias por punción con aguja gruesa: Revisión de 5 años en un hospital de referencia.

BACKGROUND: To validate the BIRADS in mammography, the calculation of its predictive value in each center is required, as recommended by the American College of Radiology. AIM: To determine the predictive value of the BIRADS system in our center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All ultrasound guided needle percutaneous biopsies, performed at our center between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed. Predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of BIRADS were calculated, with a confidence interval of 95%. RESULTS: Of 1,313 biopsies available, 1,058 met the inclusion criteria. Fifty eight percent of biopsies were performed to women with mammographies classified as BIRADS 4 or 5. The presence of cancer in mammographies classified as BIRADS 0 was 4%. The prevalence of cancer for mammographies BIRADS 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 were 0, 3, 2.7, 17.7 and 72.4% respectively. The positive and negative predictive values of BIRADS classification were 55 and 92 % respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our institution BIRADS classification 4 and 5 has a high positive predictive value for detecting cancer as in developed countries.