Antidepressants available in Japan for older people with major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

AIM: To update the major depressive disorder (MDD) treatment guidelines of the Japanese Society of Mood Disorders, we conducted a systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials of available antidepressants in Japan for older adults with MDD. METHODS: Outcome measures included response rate (primary), improvement in depressive symptom scale score, remission rate, all-cause discontinuation, discontinuation due to adverse events, and at least one adverse event. A random-effects model was used to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: Nine double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials (n = 2145) were identified. No study has been conducted in Japan. Our meta-analysis included the following antidepressants: duloxetine, escitalopram, imipramine, sertraline, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine. Antidepressants have significantly higher response rates than placebo (RR [95% CI] = 1.38 [1.04, 1.83], p = 0.02). Antidepressants outperformed placebo in terms of improving depressive symptom scale score (SMD [95% CI] = -0.62 [-0.92, -0.33], p < 0.0001). However, antidepressants were associated with a higher discontinuation rate due to adverse events (RR [95% CI] = 1.94 [1.30, 2.88], p = 0.001) and a higher incidence of at least one adverse event (RR [95% CI] = 1.11 [1.02, 1.21], p = 0.02) compared to placebo. The groups did not differ significantly in terms of remission rate or all-cause discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis concluded that treatment with antidepressants available in Japan is only weakly recommended for moderate to severe MDD in older adults.

Usefulness of mirtazapine and SSRIs in late-life depression: post hoc analysis of the GUNDAM study.

OBJECTIVE: Mirtazapine and SSRIs are widely prescribed as first-line agents for late-life depression. However, evidence for these drugs is mostly based on non-elderly patients. Therefore, we reanalyzed a randomized controlled trial of mirtazapine versus SSRIs for depression in a sub-population of late-life patients. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 141 patients, of whom 41 were elderly, and 100 were non-elderly. This study compared SSRIs and mirtazapine in late-life depression, examined late-onset and early adult-onset separately and compared elderly and non-elderly patients for each drug. Treatment effects and adverse events were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersøgelser Side Effect Rating Scale, respectively. RESULTS: In late-life depression, mirtazapine showed faster HAM-D total score improvement (3.3 points difference, p = 0.021) and higher improvement in insomnia (1.7 points difference, p = 0.001) and appetite (1.2 points difference, p = 0.020). Similar findings were observed for late-onset depression with the HAM-D total score (4.3 points difference, p = 0.007) and appetite (0.9 points difference, p = 0.004), favoring mirtazapine. Depressive symptoms were generally less improved in late-life depression than in non-late-life depression. Regarding the effect of mirtazapine on appetite, late-life depression showed greater improvement (0.7 points difference, p = 0.008). Nausea and micturition disturbances were more common with SSRIs in late-life depression than in non-late-life depression. In contrast, somnolence was less common in late-life depression with mirtazapine. CONCLUSION: The potential usefulness of mirtazapine in elderly patients was demonstrated. The results also showed differences in the treatment response to SSRIs and mirtazapine between elderly and non-elderly patients.

Serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in remission, but not the acute phase, may predict the development from depression to dementia.

OBJECTIVES: Depression may be a risk factor or a prodromal symptom of dementia, and decreased serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) have been observed in both depression and dementia. The aim of the present study was to determine whether serum levels of BDNF in the remitted or acute phase of depression predicted the transition from depression to dementia. METHODS: Serum levels of BDNF were measured in the acute phase of depression (n = 204) and after remission (n = 117), and we followed (mean: 24.3 months) the participants to assess the subsequent onset of dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI). RESULTS: Serum levels of BDNF after remission, but not those in the acute depressive phase, predicted the future development of dementia or MCI. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low serum BDNF levels, even after depression remission, might have an increased risk of developing dementia. These findings suggest a potential association between residual low serum BDNF levels after remission and the prodromal state of dementia, or the involvement of BDNF in the transition from depression to dementia. However, given that this study is low-powered and preliminary, interpretation of the results should be approached with caution.

Treatment strategy for late-life depression.

With the unprecedented aging of the world's population, the number of elderly patients with depression is expected to increase. However, management and treatment of late-life depression (LLD) is more difficult than in early adults. Prior to treatment, diagnosis must take into account the differentiation from, and comorbidity with, organic brain diseases such as dementia and delirium, as well as depression caused by other physical diseases or medications. As clinical features of LLD, treatment response tends to be poor in older patients and recurrence rates are higher than those in early adult patients, therefore psycho-social interventions on the basis of the patient's background and condition are important for LLD. The first-line treatment strategy generally depends on the severity of the depression. Systematic psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioral therapy and problem-solving therapy, have been reported to reduce depressive symptoms in LLD. Regarding pharmacotherapy, newer antidepressants are recommended for LLD, but careful attention to adverse events is required. Treatment using neuromodulation is also reported to be useful for LLD. In the current review, for further-line treatment, treatment strategies were divided according to the level of first-line treatment response. Evidence indicates that LLD is more heterogeneous than depression in younger adults, therefore when treating LLD patients it is necessary to take various conditions and situations into consideration, and to provide detailed treatment that is tailored to each patient.

Clinical course and serum amyloid ß levels in elderly patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Depression is known to be a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Changes in amyloid ß protein (Aß) metabolism have been speculated as a factor contributing to the transition from depression to AD. The aim of this study is to reveal the time course and state-dependency of Aß metabolism. METHODS: Serum Aß levels in 277 elderly (≥60 years) patients with depression (both early- and late-onset) were measured at admission, immediately after remission, and 1 year after remission, and compared them with 178 healthy subjects. RESULTS: The analysis revealed decreased Aß42 levels and increased Aß42/40 ratios in elderly patients with depression at admission compared with healthy subjects. These changes in the acute phase of depression were not normalized immediately after remission; however, they recovered to healthy levels 1 year after remission. LIMITATIONS: There is a possibility that the results may be influenced by antidepressants. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that altered Aß metabolism caused by depression may ameliorate, although after a lengthy period of time after remission. Our findings also suggest that the AD-related pathological changes caused or increased by depression can be reduced by maintaining remission for an extended period of time.

Development and acceptability of a decision aid for major depressive disorder considering discontinuation of antidepressant treatment after remission.

AIM: While evidence-based antidepressant treatment is available for major depressive disorder, standard approaches for discontinuation of antidepressants after remission have not yet been established. Decision aids are structured clinical tools that facilitate shared decision-making between patients and healthcare providers. This study aimed to describe the development process and acceptability of decision aids for major depressive disorder following discontinuation of antidepressant treatment after remission. METHODS: We systematically developed a decision aids according to the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. First, a decision aids prototype was created using the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis previously conducted to identify the consequences of continuing and discontinuing antidepressant treatment. Second, a mixed-methods questionnaire (alpha acceptability testing) was administered to patients and healthcare providers to improve the decision aids prototype and develop it into a final version acceptable for clinical settings. RESULTS: Our decision aids consisted of a description of major depressive disorder, the option to continue or discontinue antidepressant treatment, the advantages and disadvantages of each option, the consequences of each option, and value clarification exercises for each option. The patients (n = 22) reported that the decision aids had acceptable language (91%), adequate information (91%), and a well-balanced presentation (95%). Healthcare providers (n = 20) provided favorable feedback. The final decision aids fulfilled all six International Patient Decision Aid Standards qualifying criteria. CONCLUSION: We successfully developed a decision aids for discontinuation of antidepressant treatment after remission, which could be used during the shared decision-making process. Further studies are needed to verify the effects of using the decision aids during the shared decision-making process.

Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of depression in older adults: A report from the Japanese Society of mood disorders.

The Committee for Treatment Guidelines of Mood Disorders, Japanese Society of Mood Disorders, published a Japanese guideline for the treatment of late-life depression in 2020. Based on that guideline, the present guideline was developed and revised to incorporate the suggestions of global experts and the latest published evidence. In the diagnosis of late-life depression, it is important to carefully differentiate it from bipolar disorders, depressive states caused by physical and organic brain disease, drug effects, and dementia, and to determine the comorbidity between late-life depression and dementia. It is necessary to fully understand the clinical characteristics and psychosocial background of late-life depression, evaluate the patient's condition, and provide basic interventions based on these factors. Problem-solving therapy, reminiscence therapy/life review therapy, and behavioral activation therapy, and other forms of psychotherapy can reduce depressive symptoms. In terms of pharmacotherapy, newer antidepressants or non-tricyclic antidepressants are recommended for late-life depression, and it is recommended that the efficacy of least the minimal effective dosage should first be determined. Switching antidepressants and aripiprazole augmentation can be used to treatment-resistant therapy. Electroconvulsive therapy and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation have demonstrated usefulness for late-life depression. Exercise therapy, high-intensity light therapy, and diet therapy also show some effectiveness and are useful for late-life depression. Continuation therapy should be maintained for at least 1 year after remission.

Apolipoprotein E4 increases the risk of depression recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Possession of the ε4 allele of apolipoprotein E (APOE4) is related to the incidence of depression in old age. We investigated whether the presence of APOE4 is also associated with subsequent depression recurrence in a wide range of age groups. METHODS: Altogether, 163 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) after remission were recruited between August 2004 and March 2016 and followed up prospectively. The patients were divided into two groups: APOE4 carriers and non-carriers. We compared the time to recurrence of depression between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test for trend for survivor functions, and Cox proportional hazard ratio estimates for a multivariate model were conducted to examine the effect of the APOE4 allele on risk of a depression recurrence. RESULTS: Cumulative probability of developing a depression recurrence was higher in APOE4 carriers than non-carriers. Presence of an APOE4 allele remained significantly associated with the incidence of depression recurrence. LIMITATIONS: All patients were treated with one or two different antidepressants, which may have had different effects on patients with MDD. Second, participants in the present study comprised patients with both first and multiple episodes of MDD. Third, we did not have the statistical power to perform a stratified analysis in consideration of heterozygous or homozygous genotypes of APOE4. CONCLUSION: Possession of an APOE4 allele may increase the risk of depression recurrence.

Pharmacological Treatment of Schizophrenia: Japanese Expert Consensus.

INTRODUCTION: Conventional treatment guidelines of schizophrenia do not necessarily provide solutions on clinically important issues. METHODS: A total of 141 certified psychiatrists of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology evaluated treatment options regarding 19 clinically relevant situations in the treatment of schizophrenia with a 9-point scale (1="disagree" and 9="agree"). RESULTS: First-line antipsychotics varied depending on predominant symptoms: risperidone (mean±standard deviation score, 7.9±1.4), olanzapine (7.5±1.6), and aripiprazole (6.9±1.9) were more likely selected for positive symptoms; aripiprazole (7.6±1.6) for negative symptoms; aripiprazole (7.3±1.9), olanzapine (7.2±1.9), and quetiapine (6.9±1.9) for depression and anxiety; and olanzapine (7.9±1.5) and risperidone (7.5±1.5) for excitement and aggression. While only aripiprazole was categorized as a first-line treatment for relapse prevention (7.6±1.0) in patients without noticeable symptoms, aripiprazole (8.0±1.6) and brexpiprazole (6.9±2.3) were categorized as such for social integration. First-line treatments in patients who are vulnerable to extrapyramidal symptoms include quetiapine (7.5±2.0) and aripiprazole (6.9±2.1). DISCUSSION: These clinical recommendations represent the expert consensus on the use of a particular antipsychotic medication for a particular situation, filling a current gap in the literature.

Pharmacological management of bipolar disorder: Japanese expert consensus.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a consensus guideline by certified experts of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology on the psychopharmacological treatment for bipolar disorders I and II (BP-I and BP-II), in order to fill the gap in the literature and provide more concrete guidance for challenging and controversial real-world situations. METHODS: Experts were asked to assess treatment options regarding 19 clinical situations of bipolar disorder with a nine-point Likert scale (one = "disagree" and nine = "agree"). According to the responses from 119 experts, the options were categorized into the first-, second-, and third-line treatments. RESULTS: For the treatment of BP-I, lithium monotherapy was categorized as a first-line treatment for manic episodes (mean ± standard deviation score, 7.0 ± 2.2), depressive episodes (7.1 ± 2.0), and the maintenance phase (7.8 ± 1.8). Combination therapy of lithium and an atypical antipsychotic was endorsed for manic episodes (7.7 ± 1.7), depressive episodes with (7.1 ± 2.0) and without mixed features (6.9 ± 2.2), and the maintenance phase (6.9 ± 2.1). Similarly, in BP-II, lithium monotherapy was categorized as a first-line treatment for hypomanic episodes (7.3 ± 2.2), depressive episodes (7.0 ± 2.2), and the maintenance phase (7.3 ± 2.3), while combination therapy of lithium and an atypical antipsychotic was recommended for hypomanic episodes (6.9 ± 2.4).No antipsychotic monotherapy or antidepressant treatment was categorized as a first-line treatment for any type of episode. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations reflect the current evidence and represent the experts' consensus on using lithium for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Clinicians should consider the effectiveness and adverse effects of antipsychotic and antidepressant medications for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Pharmacological management of depression: Japanese expert consensus.

BACKGROUND: Clinically relevant issues in the real-world treatment of depression have not always been captured by conventional treatment guidelines. METHODS: Certified psychiatrists of the Japanese Society of Clinical Neuropsychopharmacology were asked to evaluate treatment options regarding 23 clinical situations in the treatment of depression using a 9-point Likert scale (1="disagree" and 9="agree"). According to the responses of 114 experts, the options were categorized into first-, second-, and third-line treatments. RESULTS: First-line antidepressants varied depending on predominant symptoms: escitalopram (mean ± standard deviation score, 7.8 ± 1.7) and sertraline (7.3 ± 1.7) were likely selected for anxiety; duloxetine (7.6 ± 1.9) and venlafaxine (7.2 ± 2.1) for loss of interest; mirtazapine for insomnia (8.2 ± 1.6), loss of appetite (7.9 ± 1.9), agitation and severe irritation (7.4 ± 2.0), and suicidal ideation (7.5 ± 1.9). While first-line treatment was switched to either an SNRI (7.7 ± 1.9) or mirtazapine (7.4 ± 2.0) in the case of non-response to an SSRI, switching to mirtazapine (7.1 ± 2.2) was recommended in the case of non-response to an SNRI, and vice versa (switching to an SNRI (7.0 ± 2.0) in the case of non-response to mirtazapine). Augmentation with aripiprazole was considered the first-line treatment for partial response to an SSRI (7.1 ± 2.3) or SNRI (7.0 ± 2.5). LIMITATIONS: The evidence level of expert consensus is considered low. All included experts were Japanese. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations made by experts in the field are useful and can supplement guidelines and informed decision making in real-world clinical practice. We suggest that pharmacological strategies for depression be flexible and that each patient's situational needs as well as the pharmacotherapeutic profile of medications be considered.

Serum levels and mutual correlations of amyloid ß in patients with depression.

AIM: Epidemiological studies have shown that depression is a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although the biological mechanism underlying the link between depression and AD is unclear, altered amyloid ß (Aß) metabolism in patients with depression has been suggested as a potential mechanism. Results from previous studies of Aß metabolism in patients with depression have been inconsistent, and Aß polymerization, which is a crucial process in AD pathology, has not previously been assessed. METHODS: Serum levels of Aß40, Aß42 and Aß oligomers were evaluated in 104 inpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 132 healthy control individuals. RESULTS: Lower serum Aß42 levels were observed in patients with MDD, but there was no difference in serum Aß oligomer levels between the MDD group and the healthy control group, even in older adults. Interestingly, serum Aß oligomer levels in patients with MDD were dependent on serum Aß42 levels, regardless of age, and this relationship was not observed in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that Aß42 is more prone to aggregation and polymerization in patients with depression than in healthy individuals, suggesting a possible mechanism underlying the transition from depression to AD. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2020; 20: 125-129.

Serum levels of TDP-43 in late-life patients with depressive episode.

BACKGROUND: Recent reports have suggested a relationship between affective disorder including depression and bipolar disorder (BP) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD). TAR DNA binding protein (TDP) -43 is a protein found in the brain and peripheral fluid of patients with FTD. To examine a possible association between affective disorders and FTD, serum levels of TDP-43 were evaluated in late-life patients with major depressive episode (MDE). METHODS: The subjects were 74 late-life (≥50 years old) inpatients with DSM-IV or -5 MDE (58 had major depressive disorders and 16 had BP) and 58 healthy subjects. Patients were recruited from Juntendo Koshigaya Hospital, Saitama, Japan, between January 2005 and May 2017. Serum TDP-43 levels were measured using an ELISA kit. RESULTS: Serum levels of TDP-43 were significantly higher in the MDE group than the control group independent of age and sex. LIMITATIONS: All patients were on antidepressant medication. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggests that some depressive patients may be in a prodromal stage of FTD or very-early stage of FTD comorbid with depression.

Increased Serum Levels of α-Synuclein in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder.

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiologic studies have demonstrated that depression is a risk factor for dementia. In particular, dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) has been noted to be highly relevant to depression. It has been suggested that α-synuclein (α-syn), a major component of Lewy bodies, is related to the onset and progression of DLB. To investigate the relationship between depression and DLB, we compared serum α-syn levels of patients with depression to those of healthy subjects. METHODS: The subjects were 103 inpatients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), or DSM-5 major depressive disorder (MDD) and 132 healthy comparisons. Patients were recruited from Juntendo Koshigaya Hospital, Saitama, Japan, between June 2010 and November 2016. Serum α-syn levels were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit. Serum α-syn levels were compared using a 2 (age group [<60 years versus ≥60 years]) × 2 (diagnosis [MDD versus comparison]) analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was no significant main effect of age (F = 1.167, df = 1, 231, p = 0.281). There was a significant main effect of diagnosis (F = 44.657, df = 1, 231, p <0.001), with higher α-syn levels in the MDD group versus the healthy comparison group, regardless of age. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that depression may affect the metabolism of α-syn; there is a possibility that depression is not only a prodromal symptom of DLB but also a causal risk factor for DLB.

[Depression and Apathy].

Apathy and depression are frequently observed in neurological disorders including dementia. Because the symptoms of both these states overlap and apathy is commonly comorbid with depression, the discrimination of these states can be challenging. A method to clinically distinguish between these states may be to focus on the primary motivation underlying mood, emotion, motivation, activity and interests, rather than focusing on the patients' complaints about the 'lack of motivation'.

Glucocorticoid may influence amyloid ß metabolism in patients with depression.

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that depression may be a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, the biological mechanisms of the transition from depression to AD are still not clear. Changes of amyloid ß protein (Aß) metabolism and increased glucocorticoid (GC) levels have been found in both depression and AD. Moreover, several studies in animal models have demonstrated that GC administration changes Aß metabolism. To reveal whether GC affects amyloid metabolism in patients with depression, we evaluated serum levels of Aß40, Aß42 and cortisol at admission in 187 inpatients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 224 healthy comparisons. Additionally, we re-evaluated the serum levels of Aßs in 27 patients with MDD 1 year later. The results of multiple regression analyses revealed that serum cortisol and Aß levels are not correlated at the time of admission. However, serum cortisol levels at admission correlated with serum Aß42 levels and Aß40/Aß42 ratio 1 year later. These findings suggest that increased cortisol in patients with MDD may influence the metabolism of Aß over prolonged periods of time.

Re-analysis of the association of temperature or sunshine with hyperthymic temperament using lithium levels of drinking water.

BACKGROUND: The Japanese archipelago stretches over 4000km from north to south and has four large islands: Hokkaido, Honshu, Shikoku, and Kyushu. Previously, using the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris and San Diego-auto questionnaire version (TEMPS-A), we compared the hyperthymic scores of residents in Sapporo, Obihiro, Takaoka, Koshigaya, and Oita cities (which are located at latitudes of 43°N, 42°N, 36°N, 36°N and 33°N with various combinations of ambient temperament and sunshine in Japan, respectively). We found that latitude predicted significant variance in hyperthymic temperament, and that ambient temperature, but not sunshine, significantly affected hyperthymic temperament scores. However, the analysis failed to consider the effects of naturally occurring low-dose lithium on temperament. METHODS: In addition to the TEMPS-A data previously collected, we measured lithium levels of the five cities. The effect of temperature, sunshine, and lithium levels on hyperthymic temperament was analyzed for the five cities. RESULTS: A stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that lithium levels as well as latitude, but not temperature or sunshine, predicted significant variance in hyperthymic temperament scores. Hyperthymic temperament scores were significantly and positively associated with lithium levels whereas they were significantly and negatively associated with latitude. LIMITATIONS: The light, temperature, lithium exposure that residents actually received was not measured. The number of regions studied was limited. The findings might not be generalized to residents across Japan or other countries. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that lithium in drinking water may positively maintain hyperthymic temperament, and that latitude may negatively maintain it.

[Depression and Bipolar Disorder: Risk Factors and Potential Prevention of Developing Dementia].

Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that suffering from depression and bipolar disorder may be risk factors for developing dementia. A mechanism of interactions of several factors, such as vascular disease and glucocorticoid, has been speculated to play a role in the development of dementia. It is suggested that the onset of dementia can be prevented or delayed by preventing the onset and recurrence of depression and bipolar disorder. In the prevent of depression, the management of daily life, such as diet and exercise, is important. Recently, the possibility of preventive effects of antidepressants and lithium on developing dementia has been suggested, and a future intervention study is expected.