Understanding Patient Utilization Patterns of Cochlear Implant Processors.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent of benefit the second processor provides and to better understand utilization patterns regarding cochlear implant (CI) sound processors. BACKGROUND: Institutional contracts determine the external CI sound processor hardware that a patient is eligible for. Despite the high prevalence of CI worldwide, there is a paucity in the literature regarding patient preferences and how patients utilize provided external hardware. METHODS: A close-ended, multiple-choice survey was mailed to all patients over the age of 18 years who underwent CI between 2016 to 2020 at a tertiary academic medical center. Patients who received their CI hardware prior to 2018 were provided 2 processors, whereas those who received their hardware in 2018 or later were provided 1 processor. RESULTS: A total of 100/263 surveys were returned for a response rate of 38.0%. Of the cohort with 1 processor, 31.3% experienced a period without a functioning processor and access to sound compared to 5.6% of the cohort with 2 processors (P = -.003). Of the cohort with 2 processors, 24.3% noted that they often or always utilize their second processor. When asked how important having a second processor was, 62.9% of the 2-processor group responded that it was very important (P = .001). The most common reason for utilizing the second processor was a damaged primary processor. Patients who received 2 processors had a significantly lower number of postoperative audiology clinic visits for device troubleshooting (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients who have 2 CI external processors identify this as being very important to them and experience significantly less time without access to sound due to lack of a functioning processor. As institutional contracts often dictate whether a patient will receive 1 or 2 sound processors with their CI hardware, it is important to understand patient preferences and utilization patterns in order to guide patient-centric policies.

Expanding Understanding of Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implantation: Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder With Normal Pure Tone Average.

Objective: Describe the preoperative decision-making, intraoperative electrocochleographic (ECoG) findings, and outcome of cochlear implantation (CI) in a patient with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) and normal pure-tone thresholds. Patients: A 19-year-old with a history of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and seizures was referred for hearing rehabilitation in the setting of typical hearing by pure tone audiometry but poor speech understanding. A diagnosis of ANSD was made based on acoustic brainstem response (ABR), distortion product otoacoustic emission, and acoustic reflex testing. Imaging revealed no central cause of hearing impairment. Interventions: Right-sided CI. Main Outcome Measures: Preoperative and postoperative audiometric data. Intraoperative ECoG. Results: Preoperatively the patient underwent comprehensive audiologic testing with behavioral audiometry, ABR testing, and CI candidacy evaluation. In the right ear, the pure tone average (PTA) was 15 dB and word recognition score was 36%. ABR confirmed ANSD. Preoperative CNC and AzBio in quiet were 8% and 0%, respectively. Intraoperative ECoG amplitudes and audiometry showed responses in the 100 uV range and estimated PTA of 42 dB HL. Postoperative testing at 1-month post-initial activation revealed PTA of 45 dB HL and unchanged word and sentence scores. However, the patient cites an improved ability to communicate and increased confidence and averages over 14 hours of device use daily. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of CI in an ear with normal PTA. Given that nearly all presently available ECoG data comes from patients with greater degrees of hearing loss, this unique case adds to our understanding of hearing preservation in CI.

Perigeniculate Giant Cell Tumor of Temporal Bone.

Giant cell tumors of bone (GCTBs) are benign osteolytic neoplasms that can be treated with either gross-total resection or subtotal resection with adjuvant radiotherapy. For the rare GCTB of the temporal bone, close proximity to critical structures can produce functional deficits and make gross-total resection difficult to achieve without significant morbidity. We present the case of a 28-year-old woman with progressive facial paresis, otalgia, neck pain, imbalance, and subjective hearing loss. She was found to have a facial nerve mass centered at the geniculate ganglion extending into the labyrinthine segment and vestibule. We achieved gross-total resection with preserved facial nerve function as the tumor did not originate from the facial nerve and could be dissected free from the nerve. Final pathology was consistent with GCTB.

Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Known Cognitive Impairment: What Are the Benefits?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in adults with preoperatively diagnosed cognitive impairment. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary-care academic center. PATIENTS: Adults undergoing CI with preexisting cognitive impairment. INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) Hearing improvement after CI; 2) morbidity and mortality associated with surgery. RESULTS: Eight patients met inclusion criteria with mean age 77.8 years (SD, 9.6 y) at time of implantation; 7 were included in subsequent analysis as one did not have speech recognition scores. Average preoperative MoCA cognitive score of 22.6 (SD, 3.9, ≤25 demonstrates cognitive impairment). Average follow-up was 29.0 months (SD, 33.3 mo). Two patients passed away at an average 58.0 months (SD, 31.1 mo) after surgery. Median preoperative pure tone average was 86.3 dB HL ( interquartile range 31.3 dB HL) compared with 33.8 dB HL (IQR 5.0 dB HL) postoperatively ( p = <0.001). Median preoperative speech testing score (AzBio/HINT) was 21% (IQR, 24%) compared with 44% (IQR, 21%) postoperatively ( p = <0.001). There were no observed surgical complications during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that patients with cognitive impairment before CI can experience improved hearing, no increased risk of complications, and good longevity after CI. Further prospective studies are needed to further define the utility of CI in patients with impaired cognition.

Cognitive and behavioral effects of hearing loss.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Hearing loss is one of the largest modifiable risk factors for developing dementia, accounting for up to 9% of the overall modifiable risk. The neuropsychologic and psychosocial impacts of hearing loss are becoming increasingly appreciated. The objective of this review is to explore the recent literature regarding the cognitive and behavioral effects of hearing loss and the role of hearing rehabilitation, particularly in older adults. RECENT FINDINGS: Cognitive decline may begin while patients have subclinical hearing loss, earlier than previously thought. Hearing rehabilitation, either via hearing amplification, middle ear surgery, or cochlear implantation, likely plays a role in preventing or slowing the rate of cognitive decline in patients with hearing loss. Hearing loss can increase the likelihood of social isolation, loneliness and depression in older adults, but it is unclear at this time what effect hearing rehabilitation has on these domains. SUMMARY: Hearing loss is one of the largest modifiable risk factors for cognitive decline, and hearing rehabilitation can play a significant role in preserving cognitive function. Understanding the cognitive and psychosocial impact of hearing loss can help facilitate the development of approaches for prevention and treatment.

The Impact of Cochlear Implantation: Cognitive Function, Quality of Life, and Frailty in Older Adults.

This review examines the relationship between cochlear implantation and cognition and quality of life in older adults, as well as how frailty affects outcomes for older patients with cochlear implants. A growing body of evidence suggests that there is a strong association between hearing loss and cognitive impairment. Preliminary studies suggest that cochlear implantation in older adults may be protective against cognitive decline. While studies have observed a positive impact of cochlear implantation on quality of life, currently it is unclear what factors contribute the most to improved quality of life. Frailty, as a measurement of general health, likely plays a role in complication rates and quality-of-life outcomes after cochlear implantation, though larger prospective studies are required to further elucidate this relationship.

Clinical significance of tumor mitotic rate and lack of epidermal attachment in melanoma of the head and neck.

BACKGROUND: The primary purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic role of primary dermal melanoma and tumor mitotic rate in melanomas of the head and neck. METHODS: A retrospective review of the histopathologic, clinical, and demographic data of 256 patients was performed to investigate the impact of primary dermal melanoma and tumor mitotic rate on sentinel lymph node positivity, recurrence, and 5-year overall and disease-free survival. RESULTS: Increased tumor mitotic rate, but not primary dermal melanoma, is a significant predictor of sentinel lymph node positivity and higher likelihood of recurrence. Survival analysis demonstrated that both increased tumor mitotic rate and primary dermal melanoma decreased the 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates of patients with head and neck melanoma lesions. CONCLUSION: Tumor mitotic rate and primary dermal melanoma may have prognostic significance for both overall and disease-free survival in patients with head and neck melanoma. A larger prospective study is warranted to further elucidate prognostic factors for melanoma in the head and neck region.