Multicentric evaluation of high and low power lasers on RIRS success using propensity score analysis.

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of HPL on different parameters by different centers and urologists. While doing this, we evaluated different parameters by comparing HPL(High Power laser) and LPL(Low-power laser). This is an observational, retrospective, comparative, multicentric study of prospectively organised database. A total of 217 patients who underwent RIRS for kidney stones smaller than 2 cm in three different centers were included in the study. The patients were divided into two groups; LPL used (Group1, n:121 patients) and HPL used (Group2, n:96). Propensity score matching was done in the data analysis part. After matching, a total of 192 patients, 96 patients in both groups, were evaluated. There was no difference between the groups regarding age, gender, stone side, and stone location. The stone-free rate on the first day was 80.3% in Group 1, it was 78.1% in Group 2 (p = 0.9). In the third month, it was 90.7% in Group 1 and 87.5% in Group 2 (p:0.7).Hospitalization duration was significantly higher in Group 1. (2.35 ± 2.27 days vs. 1.42 ± 1.10 days; p < 0.001).The operation duration was 88.70 ± 29.72 min in Group1 and 66.17 ± 41.02 min in Group2 (p < 0.001). The fluoroscopy time (FT) was 90.73 ± 4.79 s in Group 1 and 50.78 ± 5.64 s in Group 2 (p < 0.001). Complications according to Clavien Classification, were similar between the groups(p > 0.05). According to our study similar SFR and complication rates were found with HPL and LPL. In addition, patients who used HPL had lower operation time, hospital stay, and fluoroscopy time than the LPL group. Although high-power lasers are expensive in terms of cost, they affect many parameters and strengthen the hand of urologists thanks to the wide energy and frequency range they offer.

What Is the Ideal Treatment for 20-30 mm Kidney Stones? Comparative Outcomes of 1197 Patients.

Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL), retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS), mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPNL), and standard-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (stPNL) for the treatment of 20-30 mm kidney stones. Methods: The records of 1197 patients (SWL = 149, RIRS = 205, mPNL = 525, and stPNL = 318) from 8 centers were reviewed retrospectively. Four procedures were compared for stone-free rates (SFRs), auxiliary treatment, and associated complications. Results: Initial SFRs were 43.6%, 54.6%, 86.7%, and 87.7% in SWL, RIRS, mPNL, and stPNL, respectively (P < .001), whereas the final SFRs were 71.8%, 80%, 90.5%, and 89.6% (P < .001). The rate of auxiliary treatment in the groups was 38.3%, 26.8%, 5%, and 4.4%, respectively (P < .001). The initial and final SFRs in the mPNL and stPNL groups were higher than those in SWL and RIRS groups (P < .001). The rate for auxiliary treatment was lower in the mPNL and stPNL groups (P < .001). The operation time was longer in the RIRS group (P = .005). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, the complication rate in the SWL group was lower than that in the surgical approaches (P < .001); however, no statistical difference was detected between RIRS, mPNL, and stPNL groups. mPNL and stPNL had a higher success rate than RIRS or SWL for treating 20-30 mm kidney stones. Conclusion: In the treatment of 2-3 cm renal stones, RIRS and PNL were more effective than SWL to obtain a better SFR and less auxiliary treatment rate. Compared with RIRS, mPNL and stPNL provided a higher SFR with similar complication rates.

Could retrograde intrarenal surgery be a safe and effective alternative to mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of relatively large (20-30 mm) stones? A critical evaluation.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients with renal stones sizing 2-3 cm. METHODS: A total of 566 patients from 6 institutions who underwent mPCNL (n = 440) and RIRS (n = 126) procedures were enrolled in our study. The retrospective patient cohort was reviewed and compared. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors predicting success in the RIRS group. RESULTS: The stone-free rates were 91.1 and 77% for the mPCNL and RIRS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). The auxiliary procedure rates were 4.5 and 39.7% in the mPCNL and RIRS groups, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean values of hemoglobin decrease, fluoroscopy time, and hospitalization time were significantly higher in the mPCNL group (p < 0.001). While the Clavien grade 1-2 complication rates were 10.9 and 34.1% (p < 0.001) in two groups, these values were 2.7 and 1.6% (p = 0.539), respectively, for Clavien grade 3-4 complication rates. Although three patients in the mPCNL group received blood transfusions, none of the patients in the RIRS groups were transfused. The stone location and stone density parameters were found to be the independent predictive factors for RIRS success. CONCLUSIONS: mPCNL provided a higher stone-free rate, less need for the auxiliary procedure, and lower complication rates compared to RIRS in patients with 2-3 cm stones. Blood loss, radiation exposure, and a hospital stay of mPCNL can be significantly reduced with the RIRS technique in selected patients.

Predicting ESWL success by determination of Hounsfield unit on non-contrast CT is clinically irrelevant in children.

The necessity of determining stone density by non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) before extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a controversial topic due to the radiation exposure. We aimed to investigate whether stone density is helpful in predicting the success of ESWL in pediatric patients or not. In this retrospective study, database of a single center was used to identify 232 children aged between 2 and 16 years. Patients with abnormal renal anatomy, distal obstruction, a known cystine stone disease, a previous history of an intervention regarding stone, and an insufficient follow-up period (< 3 months) were excluded from the study. A total of 209 patients were included in the study (94 with NCCT, 115 without NCCT). Groups were compared in terms of stone size, stone location, and stone-free rate at 3 months after a single ESWL session. The mean age was 6.17 ± 3.27 years and 120 (57.4%) of the patients were male and 89 (42.6%) were female. Mean stone size was 11.7 mm in NCCT group and 12.3 mm in non-NCCT group (p 0.128). The complete stone clearance rate in NCCT and non-NCCT group at 3 months after ESWL was 57.4% (54/94) and 54.7% (63/115), respectively, and there was no statistically significant difference (p 0.316). In conclusion, unnecessary NCCT use should be avoided before ESWL considering the similar success rates after ESWL and the risk of exposure to radiation.

Does Switching Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Strains During Maintenance Therapy Affect the Outcome in Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer?

OBJECTIVE: To compare the patients who have received 1 type of BCG strain during maintenance therapy with patients treated with multiple BCG strains. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We reviewed 279 patients treated with BCG between January 2012 and May 2019, retrospectively. The primary endpoints of the study were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates among patients receiving same BCG strain (Group-1) and multiple BCG strains (Group-2). Matching analysis was performed to balance the groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for estimating RFS and PFS. The difference between the 2 groups in terms of adverse effects was evaluated using the chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 225 (80.6 %) patients were treated with single BCG strain, and 54 (19.4 %) were treated with multiple BCG strains. Overall, recurrence and progression was observed in 86 (30.8%) and 38 (13.6%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of recurrence-free survival and progression-free survival on both without matching and with propensity score match analysis (log rank; P=.760 and P=.559, P=.533 and P=0509 for non-match and matched analysis respectively). Most of the patients in both groups experienced BCG therapy related side effects, but there was no statistically significant difference between groups (P=.235/.833). CONCLUSIONS: Switching the BCG strain because of unavailability of the induction strain does not decrease the effectiveness of the treatment. When it is not possible to reach the starting BCG strain, treatment can be safely continued with any available strain.

Is it necessary to have a guidewire down through the ureter during mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Single-centre experience with 1052 cases.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, it is aimed to identify the rate of successful placement of a guidewire down through the ureter during PNL and to compare the outcomes of different locations of guidewires in the collecting system following renal puncture in terms of success and complications rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data of 1052 patients who underwent miniPNL in our institution between January 2014 and November 2020 were analysed. Patients were divided into three groups. Group I consisted of patients with the guidewire coiled within the punctured calyx, group II consisted of patients with the guidewire reaching the renal pelvis and group III consisted of patients with the guidewire passed down through the ureter. The groups were compared for successful tract creation and complication rates. RESULTS: There were 303 (28.8%) patients in group I, 330 (31.4%) patients in group II and 419 (39.8%) patients in group III. Successful tract dilation at the first attempt was established in 298 (94.7%) patients in group I, 328 (99.4%) patients in group II and in all of the 419 (100%) patients in group III. Successful tract creation was established in a second attempt in all of the patients failed in the first attempt. The groups were similar for stone-free and complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of guidewire down through the ureter could not be established in more than 60% of the cases. Location of guidewire prior to dilation did not affect the outcomes. Therefore, we suggest to proceed with tract creation even when the guidewire coils within the punctured calyx.

Effect of Active Aspiration and Sheath Location on Intrapelvic Pressure During Miniaturized Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of location of the tip of percutaneous sheath and nephroscope in the collecting system together with active aspiration on the Intrapelvic pressure measurements (IPP) during miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (miniPNL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 20 patients underwent miniPNL in supine position was collected prospectively. IPP measurements were done with an 8 Fr urodynamic pressure measurement catheter in 4 different settings with respect to location of tip of sheath and nephroscope. All 4 settings were repeated with active aspiration. Totally measurements were done and compared in 8 different settings for 90 seconds in each patient. RESULTS: Highest mean IPP measurements were recorded in setting II (35.3 ± 11.8 cm H2O) where the sheath was located in the calyx and the tip of the nephroscope was in the renal pelvis. When active aspiration was applied, the mean pressure measurements were significantly lower than the counterpart settings without aspiration (all P values <.0001). When the active aspiration was applied, intrarenal pressure measurements did not exceed 40 cm H2O in any settings in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: Location of the tip of the sheath and the nephroscope has significant effect on IPP measurements. Active aspiration significantly lowers the IPP and keeps it <40 cm H2O. Endourologists should be aware of possible alterations in IPP during miniPNL and active aspiration should be kept in mind as an effective solution to decrease the risk of complications related to high IPP.

What is the optimum lithotripsy method for high density stones during mini-PNL? Laser, ballistic or combination of both.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is the primary treatment option for renal stones > 20 mm in diameter. Mini-PNL gained popularity with its minimally invasive nature. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of ballistic and laser lithotripsy with the combined use of both techniques. Data of 312 patients underwent mini-PNL for renal stones with Hounsfield Unit > 1000 was investigated retrospectively. We identified 104 patients underwent combined ballistic and laser lithotripsy. Propensity score technique was used to create the laser and ballistic lithotripsy groups. Groups were matched on stone size, stone density, and Guy's stone score. Primary end point of the study was to compare the stone free rate (SFR), complication rates, and duration of surgery. Mean age of the population was 49.4 ± 6.1, stone size was 24.6 ± 6.3 mm, and stone density was 1215 ± 89 HU. The groups were similar for age, stone size, stone density, and Guy's stone score. The SFR and the complication rates of the 3 groups were similar (p = 0.67). The duration of the surgery was shorter in the combined group (46.1 ± 6.3 min) compared to the laser lithotripsy (54.5 ± 6.6 min) and ballistic lithotripsy (57.2 ± 6.9 min) groups. Both laser and ballistic lithotripsy are effective methods for stone fragmentation during mini-PNL. Combined use of both methods has the potential to improve the fragmentation rates and diminish the operative times in case of high density stones.

Prospective evaluation of kidney displacement during supine mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Incidence, significance, and analysis of predictive factors.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney displacement may alter the quality of renal puncture during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The aim of this study was to identify the rate of kidney displacement and parameters associated with kidney displacement in patients who underwent supine mini-PCNL. METHODS: Data of 98 consecutive patients who underwent mini-PCNL was collected prospectively. The patients were grouped as displacement-positive vs. -negative. The parameters collected were age, gender, body mass index, side of the kidney, punctured calyx, fluoroscopy time to successful puncture and tract dilation, stone-free and complication rates, stone diameter, length of the renal artery, and quantity of peri-renal and abdominal fat. Groups were compared for the above listed parameters and logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with kidney displacement. RESULTS: There were 34 and 64 patients in the displacement-positive and -negative groups, respectively. Groups were similar for stone-free and complication rates. Fluoroscopy time to puncture and tract dilation were longer in the displacement-positive group. Groups were different for renal artery length and peri-renal fat measurements. In multivariate analysis, lower pole puncture, renal artery length, and peri-renal fat measurement were found to be independent predictors of kidney displacement. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney displacement does not alter the success and complication rates, but is associated with longer fluoroscopy times during supine PCNL. In the current study, parameters in preoperative non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) associated with kidney displacement were identified. We recommend surgeons evaluate and take into account these parameters during preoperative planning to establish better outcomes and diminish fluoroscopy times.