International Study of Primary Mucinous Ovarian Carcinomas Managed at Tertiary Medical Centers.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe a large, international cohort of patients diagnosed with primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma (PMOC) across 3 tertiary medical centers to evaluate differences in patient characteristics, surgical/adjuvant treatment strategies, and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective review spanning 1976-2014. All tumors were centrally reviewed by an expert gynecologic pathologist. Each center used a combination of clinical and histologic criteria to confirm a PMOC diagnosis. Data were abstracted from medical records, and a deidentified dataset was compiled and processed at a single institution. Appropriate statistical tests were performed. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-two patients with PMOC were identified; all had undergone primary surgery. Disease stage distribution was as follows: stage I, 163 patients (74%); stage II, 8 (4%); stage III, 40 (18%); and stage IV, 10 (5%). Ninety-nine (45%) of 219 patients underwent lymphadenectomy; 41 (19%) of 215 underwent fertility-preserving surgery. Of the 145 patients (65%) with available treatment data, 68 (47%) had received chemotherapy-55 (81%) a gynecologic regimen and 13 (19%) a gastrointestinal regimen. The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 73%-85%) for patients with stage I to II disease and 17% (95% CI, 8%-29%) for those with stage III to IV disease. The 5-year PFS rate was 73% (95% CI, 50%-86%) for patients who underwent fertility-preserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients (74%) presented with stage I disease. Nearly 50% were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy using various regimens across institutions. The PFS outcomes were favorable for those with early-stage disease and lower but acceptable for those who underwent fertility preservation.

Characteristics and Prognosis of Stage I Ovarian Mucinous Tumors According to Expansile or Infiltrative Type.

BACKGROUND: The present study retrospectively determined the outcomes and prognoses in stage I mucinous ovarian carcinoma according to histological type (ie, expansile or infiltrative). METHODS: A centralized pathologic review of tumors in patients treated from 1976 to 2016 for ovarian mucinous carcinoma was performed by 2 expert pathologists according to the 2014 World Health Organization classification. Only patients with stage I disease were analyzed. Tumors were typed as expansile or infiltrative and oncological issues analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 114 cases were reviewed. Fifty were excluded (stage > I in 30 cases and no accessibility to a pathological review for 20 cases). Thus, 64 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria: 29 had expansile-type and 35 infiltrative-type disease. The characteristics of both groups of patients were comparable, except the use of nodal staging surgery, which was more frequent in patients with infiltrative type. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages in expansile and infiltrative types were as follows: IA in 13 (45%) and 20 (57%), and IC in 16 (55%) and 15 (43%), respectively. Recurrence occurred in 3 patients with expansile type and 6 patients with infiltrative type. Two cases of expansile recurrence had pelvic recurrence and were salvaged after secondary surgery and chemotherapy, whereas 5 cases of infiltrative recurrence had extrapelvic spread and died from disease or were alive with progressive disease. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence occurred in both types of stage I mucinous ovarian cancer. However, lethal recurrences were observed mainly in infiltrative type.

Results of Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Expansile and Infiltrative Mucinous Ovarian Cancers.

BACKGROUND: No series had been reported focusing on the results of fertility-sparing surgery in stage I mucinous ovarian cancers according to histotype (infiltrative vs. expansile). Investigating such outcomes was the aim of the present study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a retrospective analysis of patients treated conservatively with preservation of the uterus and contralateral ovary from 1976 to 2016. The pathology of the tumors was reviewed by two expert pathologists according to the 2014 World Health Organization (WHO) classification criteria. Oncologic and fertility results were analyzed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, twelve with expansile and nine with infiltrative cancer. All patients had a unilateral tumor and underwent unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in one-step (n = 6) or two-step (n = 15) surgeries. All but one had complete peritoneal staging surgery based on cytology, omentectomy, and random peritoneal biopsies. Ten had nodal staging surgery. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages were IA (n = 9), IC1 (n = 6), and IC2 (n = 6); the nuclear grades were grade 1 (n = 9), grade 2 (n = 5), and grade 3 (n = 1). Two patients recurred (one expansile and one infiltrative type) 19 and 160 months after surgery, respectively. One stage IA, nuclear grade 2 expansile tumor recurred on the spared ovary; the patient remains alive. The other stage IA infiltrative tumor recurred as peritoneal spread; the patient is alive with disease. Six patients became pregnant; four with expansile tumors and two with infiltrative tumors. CONCLUSION: The type of mucinous cancer has no impact on the oncologic outcome in this series of patients treated conservatively. Fertility-sparing surgery should be considered for early-stage infiltrative-type tumors. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: According to the most recently updated World Health Organization classification guidelines, mucinous cancers should be classified as either expansile or infiltrative. The infiltrative type has a poorer prognosis, but there are no data about the safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in this context. A collection of 21 cases reviewed by two expert pathologists this study is the first devoted to the conservative treatment of mucinous tumors according to both subtypes. The key result was that the type of mucinous cancer has no impact on the oncologic outcome; thus, FSS may be considered in both subtypes.

Staging surgery in early-stage ovarian mucinous tumors according to expansile and infiltrative types.

The aim of this study is to determine the value of surgical staging for the two histologic types (expansile or infiltrative) of apparent stage I mucinous ovarian carcinoma. We retrospectively analyzed patients treated from 1976 and 2016 for apparent macroscopic stage I ovarian mucinous carcinoma. Extra-ovarian disease and tumors that metastasized to the ovaries were excluded. Two expert pathologists performed pathologic reviews of tumor data, according to 2014 WHO classification criteria. Tumors were typed as expansile or infiltrative and clinical and histologic characteristics were studied. The value of staging procedures (peritoneal and nodal) was based on the rate of microscopic involvement in macroscopically normal specimens. Of 114 cases reviewed, 46 were excluded (26 with macroscopic stage > I; 20 inaccessible for pathologic review). Of 68 patients included, 29 had expansile and 39 had infiltrative types. 27 patients received one-step surgery and 41 received restaging surgery. 52 patients received "complete" peritoneal surgical staging (including cytology, peritoneal biopsies, and an omentectomy or large omental biopsies). 24 underwent appendectomies and 31 underwent lymphadenectomies (8 expansile and 23 infiltrative). Before histologic analyses of staging specimens, 35 had "initial" stage IA and 33 had IC disease. After histologic analyses of lymph nodes, 4 cases (17%, all infiltrative) had nodal involvement, and 2 showed microscopic peritoneal disease (1 omentum and 1 right diaphragm peritoneum). Three patients were upstaged based on isolated positive peritoneal cytology. To conclude, peritoneal staging procedures are required for both types of mucinous ovarian carcinoma. Lymphadenectomy could be omitted in expansile, but required in infiltrative type.

Is uterine preservation combined with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to promote subsequent fertility safe in infiltrative mucinous ovarian cancer?

According to the latest World Health Organization classification (2014), mucinous ovarian cancers should be classified histologically as being either expansile or infiltrative. Compared to other epithelial cancers, both of these mucinous patterns are diagnosed, in the main, at an early stage, although they can affect relatively young patients. The infiltrative subtype is characterized by a morphologically and clinically more aggressive disease versus the expansile form. Consequently, even in young patients who would prefer fertility sparing management, the removal of both ovaries (even for a unilateral tumor) remains a common recommendation. However case reports describing the preservation of the uterus for a further potential pregnancy (following oocyte donation) have now been described. In this series, we present six patients treated for stage I mucinous infiltrative cancer using bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with uterine preservation. All but one patient underwent 1-step (n = 1) or 2-step (n = 4) surgery, including peritoneal and nodal (4 patients) procedures. Disease stages were IA (n = 2), IC1 (n = 1), IC2 (n = 2), or IC3 (n = 1). While two patients subsequently became pregnant, two patients also suffered disease recurrence. For one patient, recurrence was at the pelvic peritoneum. For the second patient, an ultimately lethal disease recurrence involved the uterine serosa with nodal involvement. The results of this short series lead us to question the safety of this uterine-preserving strategy.

Glioblastoma in Tunisia: A retrospective study about 41 cases.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults representing 25% of primary brain tumors in adults. The objective of our study was to report the epidemiologic, clinical and therapeutic features of GB in Tunisia. METHODS: Our retrospective study included 41 patients with histologically confirmed GB treated between 2006 and 2012 at the medical oncology departments of Abderrahmane Mami hospital in Ariana and the military hospital in Tunis. RESULTS: Median age was 54 years (13 to 72 years) and sex-ratio was 2.3. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was <70% in 31.7% of cases, while Recursive partitioning analysis radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG-RPA) classification was III in 11 (26.8%), IV in 19 (46.3%), V in 10 (24.3%) and VI in 1 (2.4%) cases. Complete resection (CR) was achieved in 29 patients (70.7%), partial resection (PR) or tumor debulking in 5 patients (12.2%) and biopsy alone (BA) in 7 patients (17.1%). All patients received brain radiotherapy (RT) at a dose of 60 Gy combined with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ). Nineteen patients (46.3%) received adjuvant TMZ, 8 of them completed 6 cycles. Median overall survival (OS) was 12 months (2 to 56 months). Six, 12, 18 and 24-months OS rates were 84.6%, 57.6%, 35.4% and 20.7%, OS being correlated to age, KPS, RPA and quality of resection. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study is the first African GB series. Despite it included predominantly poor prognosis patients with impaired neurocognitive function and adjuvant treatment discontinuation, our median OS was comparable to Stupp.