Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Child Abuse Negl ; 149: 106651, 2024 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38325162

RESUMO

For infants that present with intracranial hemorrhage in the setting of suspected abusive head trauma (AHT), the standard recommendation is to perform an evaluation for a bleeding disorder. Factor XIII (FXIII) deficiency is a rare congenital bleeding disorder associated with intracranial hemorrhages in infancy, though testing for FXIII is not commonly included in the initial hemostatic evaluation. The current pediatric literature recognizes that trauma, especially traumatic brain injury, may induce coagulopathy in children, though FXIII is often overlooked as having a role in pediatric trauma-induced coagulopathy. We report an infant that presented with suspected AHT in whom laboratory workup revealed a decreased FXIII level, which was later determined to be caused by consumption in the setting of trauma induced coagulopathy, rather than a congenital disorder. Within the Child Abuse Pediatrics Research Network (CAPNET) database, 85 out of 569 (15 %) children had FXIII testing, 3 of those tested (3.5 %) had absent FXIII activity on qualitative testing, and 2 (2.4 %) children had activity levels below 30 % on quantitative testing. In this article we review the literature on the pathophysiology and treatment of low FXIII in the setting of trauma. This case and literature review demonstrate that FXIII consumption should be considered in the setting of pediatric AHT.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Craniocerebrais , Deficiência do Fator XIII , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática , Criança , Humanos , Lactente , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/complicações , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/diagnóstico , Fator XIII , Deficiência do Fator XIII/complicações , Deficiência do Fator XIII/diagnóstico , Deficiência do Fator XIII/congênito , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Intracraniana Traumática/etiologia
2.
Acad Pediatr ; 24(1): 78-86, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37178908

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Suspicion for child abuse is influenced by implicit biases. Evaluation by a Child Abuse Pediatrician (CAP) may reduce avoidable child protective services (CPS) referrals. Our objective was to investigate the association of patient demographic, social and clinical characteristics with CPS referral before consultation by a CAP (preconsultation referral). METHODS: Children<5years-old undergoing in-person CAP consultation for suspected physical abuse from February 2021 through April 2022 were identified in CAPNET, a multicenter child abuse research network. Marginal standardization implemented with logistic regression analysis examined hospital-level variation and identified demographic, social, and clinical factors associated with preconsultation referral adjusting for CAP's final assessment of abuse likelihood. RESULTS: Among the 61% (1005/1657) of cases with preconsultation referral, the CAP consultant had low concern for abuse in 38% (384/1005). Preconsultation referrals ranged from 25% to 78% of cases across 10 hospitals (P < .001). In multivariable analyses, preconsultation referral was associated with public insurance, caregiver history of CPS involvement, history of intimate partner violence, higher CAP level of concern for abuse, hospital transfer, and near-fatality (all P < .05). The difference in preconsultation referral prevalence for children with public versus private insurance was significant for children with low CAP concern for abuse (52% vs 38%) but not those with higher concern for abuse (73% vs 73%), (P = .023 for interaction of insurance and abuse likelihood category). There were no differences in preconsultation referral based on race or ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Biases based on socioeconomic status and social factors may impact decisions to refer to CPS before CAP consultation.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Serviços de Proteção Infantil , Criança , Humanos , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Proteção da Criança , Pediatras , Encaminhamento e Consulta
3.
Acad Pediatr ; 23(2): 402-409, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35840086

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Examine the epidemiology of subspecialty physical abuse evaluations within CAPNET, a multicenter child abuse pediatrics research network. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of children <10 years old who underwent an evaluation (in-person or remote) by a child abuse pediatrician (CAP) due to concerns for physical abuse at ten CAPNET hospital systems from February 2021 through December 2021. RESULTS: Among 3667 patients with 3721 encounters, 69.4% were <3 years old; 44.3% <1 year old, 59.1% male; 27.1% Black; 57.8% White, 17.0% Hispanic; and 71.0 % had public insurance. The highest level of care was outpatient/emergency department in 60.7%, inpatient unit in 28.0% and intensive care in 11.4%. CAPs performed 79.1% in-person consultations and 20.9% remote consultations. Overall, the most frequent injuries were bruises (35.2%), fractures (29.0%), and traumatic brain injuries (TBI) (16.2%). Abdominal (1.2%) and spine injuries (1.6%) were uncommon. TBI was diagnosed in 30.6% of infants but only 8.4% of 1-year old children. In 68.2% of cases a report to child protective services (CPS) was made prior to CAP consultation; in 12.4% a report was made after CAP consultation. CAPs reported no concern for abuse in 43.0% of cases and mild/intermediate concern in 22.3%. Only 14.2% were categorized as definite abuse. CONCLUSION: Most children in CAPNET were <3 years old with bruises, fractures, or intracranial injuries. CPS reports were frequently made prior to CAP consultation. CAPs had a low level of concern for abuse in majority of cases.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Contusões , Fraturas Ósseas , Lactente , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Estudos Transversais , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Encaminhamento e Consulta
4.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 39(5): 329-334, 2023 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35413039

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bilateral skull fractures in infancy often raise suspicion for abuse. Nevertheless, literature suggests that they may occur accidentally. However, empiric data are lacking. OBJECTIVE: This multicenter retrospective review aimed to characterize bilateral skull fractures in a large sample. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: Medical records for infants younger than 24 months with bilateral skull fractures involving hospital consultation with a child abuse pediatrician (CAP) were reviewed from 2005 to 2020 at 13 nationally represented institutions. METHODS: Standardized data collection across institutions included historical features, fracture characteristics, and additional injuries, as well as the CAP's determination of accident versus abuse. Pooled data were analyzed for descriptive and bivariate analyses. RESULTS: For 235 cases, 141 were accidental, and 94 abuse. The majority occurred in young infants, and a history of a fall was common in 70% of cases. More than 80% involved both parietal bones. Bilateral simple linear fractures were more common in accidental cases, 79% versus 35%, whereas a complex fracture was more frequent in abuse cases, 55% versus 21% ( P < 0.001). Almost two thirds of accidental cases showed approximation of the fractures at the sagittal suture, compared with one third of abuse cases ( P < 0.001). Whereas focal intracranial hemorrhage was seen in 43% of all cases, diffuse intracranial hemorrhage was seen more in abuse cases (45%) than accidents (11%). Skin trauma was more common in abusive than accidental injury (67% vs 17%, P < 0.001), as were additional fractures on skeletal survey (49% vs 3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A fall history was common in bilateral skull fractures deemed accidental by a CAP. Most accidental cases involved young infants with biparietal simple linear fractures, without skin trauma or additional fractures. A skeletal survey may aid in the determination of accidental or abusive injury for unwitnessed events resulting in bilateral skull fractures in infants.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Fraturas Cranianas , Lactente , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/etiologia , Cabeça , Hemorragia , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Hemorragias Intracranianas
5.
Child Abuse Negl ; 131: 105653, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35779985

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The pediatric subspecialty of Child Abuse Pediatrics (CAP) was certified by the American Board of Medical Subspecialties in 2006. Relative to its impact on pediatric health, CAP-focused research has been relatively under-funded. Multi-center networks related to CAP-focused research have made important advances, but have been limited in scope and duration. CAPNET is multi-center network whose mission is to support CAP-focused research. OBJECTIVE: To describe the rationale, development, and scope of the CAPNET research network infrastructure, the CAPNET data registry and associated data resources. METHODS: Based on existing priorities for CAP-focused research, we used consensus building and iterative testing to establish inclusion criteria, common data elements, data quality assurance, and data sharing processes for children with concerns of physical abuse. RESULTS: We describe the rationale, methods and intended scope for the development of the CAPNET research network and data registry. CAPNET is currently abstracting data for children <10 years (120 months) old who undergo sub-specialty evaluation for physical abuse at 10 US pediatric centers (approximately 4000 evaluations/year total) using an online data capture form. Data domains include: demographics; visit timing and providers, medical/social history, presentation, examination findings, laboratory and radiographic testing, diagnoses, outcomes, and data for contact children. We describe the methods and criteria for collecting and validating data which are broadly available to CAP investigators. CONCLUSIONS: CAPNET represents a new data resource for the CAP research community and will increase the quantity and quality of CAP-focused research.


Assuntos
Maus-Tratos Infantis , Abuso Físico , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Consenso , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
6.
J Forensic Leg Med ; 74: 102006, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012309

RESUMO

Long bone fractures at the infant growth plate, known as classic metaphyseal lesions (CMLs), raise a strong suspicion for abusive injury. CMLs persist as a hallmark for inflicted injury although a handful of documented cases of CMLs created by other, non-abusive mechanisms within various healthcare settings are scattered throughout the past few decades of medical literature. The forces required to sustain a CML are typically defined as a combination of tensile, compressive, or rotational energy applied to the metaphyseal regions of an infant's long bones. Recently, two separate child protection teams each encountered a case of CML discovered after reported motor vehicle collisions (MVC). This provoked a critical appraisal of the medical literature to inform clinical practice regarding MVCs as a potential mechanism for this fracture type and to remind clinicians that there is no single injury pathognomonic for abuse.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito , Fêmur/lesões , Lâmina de Crescimento/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas do Rádio/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Salter-Harris/diagnóstico por imagem , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Fêmur/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Lactente , Radiografia , Fraturas do Rádio/etiologia , Fraturas Salter-Harris/etiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...