Percutaneous Thrombectomy using a Computer Assisted Aspiration Device for Deep Vein Thrombosis.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of a computer-assisted large bore thrombectomy (CA-LBT) device aspiration thrombectomy device for treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single institutional retrospective review was performed to include 16 consecutive patients (median age 51.1 years, range 19-77; 5 men and 11 women) who underwent percutaneous thrombectomy using a 16 Fr CA-LBT device (Lightning Flash Aspiration System,Penumbra Inc., Alameda, California, USA) for DVT (12 iliofemoral with or without caval extension [75.0%], 3 axillosubclavian [18.8%], and 1 caval [6.3%) between January 2023 and August 2023. RESULTS: Thrombectomy was performed via the popliteal (n=10, 62.5%), femoral (n=3, 18.8%), saphenous (n=1, 6.3%), brachial (n=1, 6.3%), femoral and brachial (n=1, 6.3%) veins, with a median fluoroscopy time of 17 min (range 7.2-61min) and contrast agent volume of 110 ml (30-175 ml). Restoration of anterograde flow was achieved in all cases (100%, 16/16). Thirteen patients (81.2%) received venoplasty after thrombectomy for residual stenosis. Stents were placed in seven patients (43.8%). With a median clinical follow-up of 77 days (range 3-278 days), symptom improvement was achieved among 13/15 (86.7%) patients that initially presented with DVT associated symptoms. In 14 patients with imaging follow-up, patency was confirmed in 12 patients (85.7%). Of the two patients with complete thrombosis on follow-up imaging (14.3%), one patient was successfully treated with repeated thrombectomy using Flash technology, while the other patient was treated with systemic anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Aspiration thrombectomy with this 16 Fr CA-LBT device may be a feasible option for treatment of proximal or large volume DVT.

Genicular Artery Embolization: Embolic Material and Imaging Review.

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee is a degenerative condition impacting numerous individuals globally. Genicular artery embolization (GAE) has emerged as an effective minimally invasive therapy for managing medically refractory OA-related pain in patients who are not eligible for surgery. This intervention works by disrupting the inflammatory and neoangiogenic pathways that contribute to pain. The efficacy of GAE has been demonstrated in various clinical trials, yielding promising results. This review aims to explore recent advancements in the embolic materials used during GAE, examining their properties and potential benefits. Additionally, it will describe the use of pre-, intra-, and postprocedural imaging-particularly magnetic resonance imaging and other modalities-to optimize GAE outcomes.

Transarterial Radioembolization for Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (Y90) is a growing area of study due to its benefits in early-, intermediate-, and late-stage hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment intent, including curative therapy, bridging to transplant, and downstaging disease, informs treatment approach and dosimetry goals. Radiation lobectomy (RL) and radiation segmentectomy (RS) are the 2 main forms of Y90 administration which have shown improved survival outcomes with the development of personalized dosimetry. RS aims to achieve complete pathological necrosis with dose escalation and RL aims for local disease control as well as induction of contralateral lobe hypertrophy to improve hepatic reserve. Furthermore, TARE has been validated in head-to-head comparison to other locoregional and systemic therapies. Lastly, early potential exists for combination therapy between TARE and immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced stage disease.

Quantifying Change in Perfusion after Genicular Artery Embolization with Parametric Analysis of Intraprocedural Digital Subtraction Angiograms.

PURPOSE: To quantify perfusion changes during genicular artery embolization (GAE) with the qualitatively described "pruning" technique using parametric analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 12 patients underwent unilateral GAE with a total of 36 vessels embolized. Among 34 of the 36 vessels embolized, regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on parent vessels (PVs) and hyperemic target vessels (TVs) before and after GAE. For each ROI, peak intensity (PI), time to arrival (TTA), and area under the curve (AUC) were computed and compared between PV and TV. Volume of embolic administered was correlated with adverse events. RESULTS: No change was seen in PI, TTA, and AUC in the PV after GAE. Reduction in AUC (1,495.7 ± 521.5 vs 1,667.4 ± 574.0; P << .01) and PI (195.1 ± 43.8 vs 224.3 ± 49.2; P << .01) with increase in TTA (3.42 s ± 1.70 vs 1.92 s ± 1.45; P << .01) within the TV were observed after GAE. Median follow-up time was 89 days (range, 21-254 days). Reduction in clinical symptoms was also noted based on the Western-Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index total and pain scale at 1 month (total, 42.9% ± 23.0; pain, 54.4% ± 9.8; P << .01) and 3 months (total, 42.5% ± 14.9; pain, 57.8% ± 10.6; P << .01). Eight total mild adverse events (minor/self-limiting) were noted per Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. A larger volume of embolic was observed in knees with skin changes (3.4 mL ± 0.4 vs 1.7 mL ± 0.4; P << .001). Furthermore, all skin changes were seen with embolic volumes >3.0 mL. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of intraprocedural perfusion changes with GAE demonstrated reduced flow to the TV with maintained flow in the PV and acceptable clinical outcomes. A potential relationship between embolic volume and nontarget embolization was also highlighted.

Impact of Portal Hypertension on Adverse Events after Splenic Arterial Aneurysm Embolization.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of splenic artery aneurysm (SAA) embolization and compare adverse event (AE) rates after embolization in patients with and without portal hypertension (PHTN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent embolization of SAAs at 2 institutions was performed (34 patients from institution 1 and 7 patients from institution 2). Baseline demographic characteristics, preprocedural imaging, procedural techniques, and postprocedural outcomes were evaluated. Thirty-day postprocedural severe and life-threatening AEs were evaluated using the Society of Interventional Radiology guidelines. Thirty-day mortality and readmission rates were also evaluated. t test, χ2 test, and/or Fisher exact test were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between patients with and without PHTN in the location, number, and size of SAA(s). All procedures were technically successful. There were 13 (32%) patients with and 28 (68%) patients without PHTN. The 30-day mortality rate (31% vs 0%; P = .007), readmission rates (61% vs 7%; P < .001), and severe/life-threatening AE rates (69% vs 0%; P < .001) were significantly higher in patients with PHTN than in those without PHTN. CONCLUSIONS: There was a significantly higher mortality and severe/life-threatening AE rate in patients with PHTN than in those without PHTN. SAAs in patients with PHTN need to be managed very cautiously, given the risk of severe/life-threatening AEs after embolization.

Safety and efficacy of repeat Y90 radioembolization to the same hepatic arterial territory.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of repeat transarterial radioembolization (TARE) to similar hepatic arterial territories. METHODS: Between 3/2011 and 4/2019, 26 patients (25 males and 1 Female, Mean Age: 65 yo, SD: 11.7 yo, Range: 18-83.0 yo) received TARE with Y90 glass microspheres to treat recurrent or residual primary disease in similar hepatic arterial lobe or segments. Tumor response was evaluated by imaging using the modified-RECIST criteria. Incidence of RILD and adverse events were categorized by a standardized scale using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0. RESULTS: Mean cumulative activity after the first treatment was 2.50 GBq (SD:1.04 GBq, Range:0.61-4.93 GBq) and second treatment was 2.27 GBq (SD:1.01 GBq, Range:0.92-5.46 GBq). Mean interval time between initial and repeat treatments was 9.6 months (Range: 1-53 months). Tumor responses were complete, partial, or progression in 73% (n = 19/26), 23% (n = 6/26), and 4% (n = 1/26) in repeat treatment patients, respectively. The incidence of RILD was 0%. Toxicity after first and second treatment was seen in 19% (n = 5/26) & 23% (n = 6/26) patients, respectively, and were all of CTCAE Grade 2. No significant predictors of treatment toxicity for repeat treatment were identified except increased MELD score (p = 0.04). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in patients with repeat treatment showed a median survival of 15.0 months (95% CI 8.8-21.1 months) and 19.0 months (95% CI 8.1-29.9 months) in patients who only received one treatment with a p value of 0.485. CONCLUSION: Repeat TARE with glass microspheres was an effective and safe treatment strategy for disease management in patients with residual or recurrent disease to the similar hepatic arterial territories without any major treatment related toxicity. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Although safety and efficacy of repeat radioembolism has been studied, no study has focused on repeat treatment to similar hepatic arterial territories. The current study shows that repeat treatment to the same hepatic arterial territory is as safe as single treatment to the same territory.

Yttrium-90 Radioembolization Therapy for Combined Hepatocellular and Cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To report outcomes of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) using glass microspheres for the treatment of mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) in a propensity-matched study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2013 and 2019, 10 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC-CC received TARE of a targeted territory using glass microspheres as a primary initial treatment. Baseline demographics in addition to tumor distribution, Child Pugh score, and BCLC were recorded. Tumor response was assessed according to modified RECIST criteria. The HCC-CC cohort was matched to the HCC cohort, and objective response and survival analysis was performed. RESULTS: In the HCC-CC cohort, patients had a 70% objective response rate (ORR), and in the HCC cohort, patients had a 90% ORR after matching (p = 0.54). The median overall survival (OS) for HCC patients was 12.3 months (95% CI: 6.0-17.4 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median OS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.98). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for HCC patients was 11.6 months (95% CI: 2.53-19.3 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median PFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.94). The median transplant-free survival (TFS) for HCC patients was 12.3 months (95% CI: 6.0-17.4 months) in the matched population, and for HCC-CC patients, the median TFS was 15.2 months (95% CI: 2.7-20.2 months) (p = 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: While outcomes of combined HCC-CC are poor and optimal treatment remains undefined, TARE appears to represent an effective locoregional treatment with survival outcomes similar to that of HCC treated by TARE.