Temporal trends and current use of de novo belatacept in kidney transplant recipients in the United States.

The adoption of de novo belatacept in kidney transplant (kTx) recipients was hampered by an increased risk of acute cellular rejection (ACR) with variation in adopted belatacept based immunosuppressive therapies across centers. We used data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to evaluate the temporal trends in belatacept use and describe the associated induction and maintenance regimens in US adult kTx recipients transplanted between June 2011 and December 2018. The number of patients receiving de novo-belatacept based immunosuppressive therapy increased from .74% in 2011 to 3.11% in 2016. In 2016, 66/207 centers used de novo belatacept-based regimen with 3.03% using it in over 50% of their patients. The use of T-cell depleting agents increased with time. Since 2012, the rate of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use in combination with belatacept remained stable around 50% and ∼30% remained under belatacept/CNI combination at 1-year post-transplantation. The adoption of belatacept as de novo immunosuppressive regimen has been slow and its use remains low in the United States. Various regimens have been used to modulate the risk of ACR. Further studies evaluating the long-term outcomes of these regimens and assessing their safety especially with regard to the risk of infection are needed.

CMV high-risk status and posttransplant outcomes in kidney transplant recipients treated with belatacept.

INTRODUCTION: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains associated with poor outcomes after kidney transplantation (kTx). The impact of belatacept on CMV infection remains understudied. In this study, we assessed the impact of belatacept on patient and graft survivals. METHODS: CMV seronegative kTx recipients were included. Patient and graft survival were studied using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test. Cox models were used to compare outcomes by CMV risk and immunosuppressive regimen. Incidence and persistence of CMV viremia under belatacept vs tacrolimus were compared. RESULTS: Among 308 CMV seronegative recipients, 168 CMV high-risk and 203 belatacept-treated patients were included. High-risk CMV status was associated with lower patient survival and graft survival. Among the CMV high-risk group, patients treated with belatacept presented a higher incidence of CMV viremia, a higher rate of first-line treatment failure and a longer time to virus clearance. They had a nonsignificant trend toward a lower graft survival. CONCLUSION: Belatacept-based maintenance immunosuppression is associated with an increased risk of CMV primary-infection and a prolonged course of viral replication in CMV high-risk patients. Further studies are needed to confirm the nonsignificant trend towards a lower graft survival in CMV high-risk patients treated with belatacept and whether it is explained by the higher risk of CMV reactivation and infection.

Superior inhibition of alloantibody responses with selective CD28 blockade is CTLA-4 dependent and T follicular helper cell specific.

Anti-donor antibodies cause immunologic injury in transplantation. CD28 blockade with CTLA-4-Ig has the ability to reduce the incidence of these donor-specific antibodies (DSA), but its mechanism is suboptimal for the inhibition of alloimmunity in that CTLA-4-Ig blocks both CD28 costimulation and CTLA-4 coinhibition. Thus selective CD28 blockade that spares CTLA-4 has potential to result in improved inhibition of humoral alloimmunity. To test this possibility, we utilized a full allogeneic mismatch murine transplant model and T follicular helper (Tfh):B cell co-culture system. We observed that selective blockade with an anti-CD28 domain antibody (dAb) compared to CTLA-4-Ig led to superior inhibition of Tfh cell, germinal center, and DSA responses in vivo and better control of B cell responses in vitro. CTLA-4 blockade enhanced the humoral alloresponse and, in combination with anti-CD28 dAb, abrogated the effects of selective blockade. This CTLA-4-dependent inhibition was Tfh cell specific in that CTLA-4 expression by Tfh cells was necessary and sufficient for the improved humoral inhibition observed with selective CD28 blockade. As CD28 blockade attracts interest for control of alloantibodies in the clinic, these data support selective CD28 blockade as a superior strategy to address DSA via the sparing of CTLA-4 and more potent targeting of Tfh cells.

Circulating T follicular helper cells are a biomarker of humoral alloreactivity and predict donor-specific antibody formation after transplantation.

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) contribute to renal allograft loss. However, biomarkers to guide clinical management of DSA posttransplant or detect humoral alloimmune responses before alloantibodies develop are not available. Circulating T follicular helper (cTfh) cells are CD4+ CXCR5+ Tfh-like cells in the blood that have been associated with alloantibodies in transplant recipients, but whether they precede antibody formation for their evaluation as a predictive biomarker in transplant is unknown. To evaluate the ability of cTfh cells to predict DSA, we used murine transplant models to determine the temporal relationship between cTfh cells, germinal center formation, and DSA development. We observed that donor-reactive CD4+ CXCR5+ cTfh cells expand after allotransplant. These cTfh cells were equivalent to graft-draining lymph node-derived Tfh cells in their ability to provide B cell help for antibody production. cTfh cell expansion and differentiation into ICOS+ PD-1+ cells temporally correlated with germinal center alloreactivity and preceded the generation of DSAs in instances of modified and unmodified alloantibody formation. Importantly, delayed costimulation blockade initiated after the detection of ICOS+ PD-1+ cTfh cells prevented DSAs. These findings suggest that cTfh cells could serve as a biomarker for humoral alloreactivity before the detection of alloantibodies and inform therapeutic approaches to prevent DSAs.

The impact of belatacept on third-party HLA alloantibodies in highly sensitized kidney transplant recipients.

Recent evidence suggests that belatacept reduces the durability of preexisting antibodies to class I and class II human leukocyte antigens (HLAs). In this case series of 163 highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates whose calculated panel-reactive antibody (cPRA) activity was ≥98% to 100%, the impact of belatacept on preexisting HLA antibodies was assessed. Of the 163 candidates, 72 underwent transplantation between December 4, 2014 and April 15, 2017; 60 of these transplanted patients remained on belatacept consecutively for at least 6 months. We observed a decrease in the breadth and/or strength of HLA class I antibodies as assessed by FlowPRA in belatacept-treated patients compared to controls who did not receive belatacept. Specifically, significant HLA antibody reduction was evident for class I (P < .0009). Posttransplant belatacept-treated patients also had a clinically significant reduction in their cPRA compared to controls (P < .01). Collectively, these findings suggest belatacept can reduce HLA class I antibodies in a significant proportion of highly sensitized recipients and could be an option to improve pretransplant compatibility with organ donors.

Abatacept as rescue immunosuppression after calcineurin inhibitor treatment failure in renal transplantation.

A majority of kidney transplant recipients receive calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression. However, some do not tolerate calcineurin inhibitors and require other immunosuppressive strategies. Until recently, alternative approaches have been associated with inferior outcomes, but recent methods have effectively utilized belatacept in calcineurin inhibitor-intolerant patients. Though promising, belatacept uptake has been limited by higher acute rejection rates, unavailability due to production shortages, and logistical challenges as a result of intravenous infusion requirements. Interestingly, its predecessor abatacept is clinically available in subcutaneous formulation to treat autoimmune disorders but has not been used in clinical transplantation. Here we report on a series of 9 calcineurin inhibitor-intolerant transplant recipients converted to abatacept early after transplant as rescue immunosuppression during periods of belatacept unavailability. Retrospective review revealed successful allograft salvage and 100% patient and graft survival (median 115 months) after conversion to abatacept. Patients received abatacept for a median duration of 82 months with stable, long-term renal allograft function, a single cellular rejection episode, and no clinically apparent protective immunity concerns. Hence our findings suggest that future clinical studies utilizing abatacept either de novo or as conversion therapy in transplant recipients should be considered.