Computer analysis of individual cataract surgery segments in the operating room.

PURPOSE: Objective feedback is important for the continuous development of surgical skills. Motion tracking, which has previously been validated across an entire cataract procedure, can be a useful adjunct. We aimed to measure quantitative differences between junior and senior surgeons' performance in three distinct segments. We further explored whether automated analysis of trainee surgical videos through PhacoTracking could be aligned with metrics from the EyeSi virtual reality simulator, allowing focused improvement of these areas in a controlled environment. METHODS: Prospective cohort analysis, comparing junior vs. senior surgeons' real-life performance in distinct segments of cataract surgery: continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis (CCC), phacoemulsification, and irrigation and aspiration (I&A). EyeSi metrics that could be aligned with motion tracking parameters were identified. Motion tracking parameters (instrument path length, number of movements and total time) were measured. t-test used between the two cohorts for each component to check for any significance (p < 0.05). RESULTS: A total of 120 segments from videos of 20 junior and 20 senior surgeons were analysed. Significant differences between junior and senior surgeons were found during CCC (path length p = 0.0004; number of movements p < 0.0001; time taken p < 0.0001), phacoemulsification (path length p < 0.0001; number of movements p < 0.0001; time taken p < 0.0001), and irrigation and aspiration (path length p = 0.006; number of movements p = 0.013; time taken p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Individual segments of cataract surgery analysed using motion tracking appear to discriminate between junior and senior surgeons. Alignment of motion tracking and EyeSi parameters could enable independent, task specific, objective and quantitative feedback for each segment of surgery thus mirroring the widely utilised modular training.

Inter-Relationship between Rhinitis and Conjunctivitis in Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis and Associated Risk Factors in Rural UK Children.

OBJECTIVE: Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) is a common condition, especially in childhood. The extent to which it occurs concurrently with or independently from allergic rhinitis (AR) has not been well described. AIM: To examine the inter-relationship between rhinitis and conjunctivitis and the epidemiological risk factors for these conditions in a rural UK population. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of rural school children (aged 5-11 years). Parental questionnaires were used to diagnose allergic outcomes (including conjunctivitis, rhinitis and rhinoconjunctivitis), and to collect data on atopic history, demographic and environmental exposures. Odds ratios of allergic outcome by exposure were examined adjusted for age, sex, breastfeeding, family history of allergy, number of older and younger siblings. RESULTS: Prevalence of conjunctivitis was 17.5%, rhinitis 15.1% and rhinoconjunctivitis 13.0%. Seasonality of symptoms varied by condition: 64.7% of those with conjunctivitis had seasonal symptoms (April-Sept only), 46.7% of those with rhinitis and 92.2% of those with rhinoconjunctivitis. Living on a farm consistently reduced the risk of conjunctivitis (odds ratio 0.47, 95%CI 0.29-0.79, p = 0.004), rhinitis (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.33-1.01, p = 0.05) and rhinoconjunctivitis (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.32-1.03, p = 0.06). Exposure to farm animals (particularly in early life), current consumption of unpasteurised milk and playing in a barn or stable significantly reduced the risk of all three conditions. CONCLUSION: More children had parent-reported conjunctivitis than rhinitis. The majority of children with either condition also reported symptoms with the other condition. Farmers' children have less eye and/or nasal symptoms. A number of farming variables linked with the farm microbial environment are likely to be mediating the protective effect.