The Transaxillary Approach as a Direct Route in the Management of Upper Thoracic Spine Pathology: A Technical Note with Case Series.

This retrospective case series of prospective data aims to describe the transaxillary approach for the treatment of upper thoracic spine pathology. Various surgical techniques and approaches have been reported across the literature to address upper thoracic spine pathology, including the cervicothoracic approach, anterior transsternal approach, posterolateral approach, supraclavicular approach, and lateral parascapular approaches. These techniques are invasive. A minimally invasive, less morbid, and direct access approach to the pathology of the upper thoracic spine has not been reported in the literature. Patients with pathology affecting the first thoracic vertebra up to the sixth thoracic vertebra were classified into the upper thoracic spine group. Patients with pathology below the sixth thoracic vertebra were excluded. Patients not having a minimum follow-up of 12 months were also excluded. The study analyzed 18 patients. The mean preoperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score was 7.2±1.44, which improved to 10.16±1.2 (p<0.05). The majority (14/18) of the patients had an excellent outcome. Three patients had good outcomes, and one patient had a fair outcome. Five cases of intraoperative dural leak were recorded, and one patient had postoperative neurological deficit. The transaxillary approach is a safe, viable, muscle-sparing, and minimally invasive approach for ventral pathologies of the upper thoracic spine.

Minimally Invasive Surgery Transpedicular Intrabody Cage Technique for the Management of Kummell Disease.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of Kummell disease remains controversial, with a wide variety of options proposed in the literature. This study aims to introduce a unique and minimally invasive approach for the treatment of Kummell disease and present the clinical results of this technique. METHODS: Twenty patients underwent surgery using the minimally invasive surgery transpedicular intrabody cage (MISTIC) technique from 2014 to 2016. Postoperatively, patients were seen at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index scores were collected, and patient outcomes were graded according to the modified MacNab's criteria. Radiological outcomes were assessed through measurements of the anterior vertebral height (AH), mean vertebral body height (BH), and segmental angle (SA) on standing lateral radiographs pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in the SA, AH, and BH postoperatively. The SA improved from 15.2 ± 8.7° of kyphosis to 1.2 ± 5.2° (P < 0.01) in the immediate postoperative period. The AH increased from 13.3 ± 14.6 to 22.6 ± 12.2 mm (P < 0.01), and at the final follow-up, it was 21.9 ± 12.6 mm (P < 0.01). Similarly, the BH increased from 18.5 ± 6.8 to 25.6 ± 7.6 mm (P < 0.01) postsurgery, and at the final follow-up, it was 23.6 ± 4.4 mm (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The MISTIC technique offers significant correction of kyphosis and restoration of the vertebral anatomy following surgery. These results were maintained at 12 months postoperation, with a 100% union rate of the fractures. Additionally, patients experienced significant pain relief and improvement in their ODI scores that were maintained at 12 months.

Idiopathic spinal cord herniation with postoperative paraplegia-A case report.

Key clinical message: Spinal cord herniation is an uncommon diagnosis. There should be a high index of suspicion to diagnose spinal cord herniation when a patient presents with incomplete neurological deficits. Surgical repair of the hernia can have postoperative complications with new neurological deficits and they should be considered during the treatment. Abstract: A 37-year-old male presented with insidious onset upper back pain and altered sensations of pain and temperature over the right half of the body below the nipple for 2 months. MRI of the thoracic spine showed an anterolateral defect (left) at the level of T2-T3 vertebra. The defect was covered by a dural graft and the wound was closed with a drain On the 3rd postoperative day, neurological weakness progressed to paraplegia. Patient was treated by exploration and decompression of the hematoma. The deficits were completely recovered at one-month follow-up. Patients with spinal cord herniation and neurologic deficits when treated timely have good outcomes.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of conventional and interlaminar full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy to treat lumbar spinal stenosis (ENDO-F trial): Protocol for a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial.

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common spinal degenerative condition. Minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic decompressive laminectomy provides greater patient satisfaction and faster recovery than open decompressive laminectomy. The aim of our randomized controlled trial will be to compare the safety and efficacy of interlaminar full-endoscopic laminectomy and open decompressive laminectomy. Our trial will include 120 participants (60 per group) who will undergo surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index measured at 12 months postoperatively. Secondary patient-reported outcomes will include back and radicular leg pain measured via a visual analog scale; the Oswestry Disability Index; the Euro-QOL-5 Dimensions score measured at 2 weeks and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively; and patient satisfaction. The functional measures will include time to return to daily activities postoperatively and walking distance/time. The surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operation time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase (an indicator of muscle injury) level, and postoperative surgical scarring. Magnetic resonance and computed tomography images and simple radiographs will be obtained for all patients. The safety outcomes will include surgery-related complications and adverse effects. All evaluations will be performed by a single assessor at each participating hospital who will be blinded to group allocation. The evaluations will be conducted preoperatively and at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The randomized, multicenter design of the trial, blinding, and justification of the sample size will reduce the risk of bias in our trial. The results of the trial will provide data regarding the use of interlaminar full-endoscopic laminectomy as an alternative to open decompressive laminectomy that results in similar surgical findings with less invasiveness. Trial registration: This trial is registered at cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006198; protocol version 1; 27 May 2021).

Risk factors for ninety-day readmissions following full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy for 1542 patients in the biggest spine institutes in Korea.

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic techniques are becoming popular among spine surgeons because of their advantages. Though the advantages of endoscopic spine surgery are evident and patients can be discharged home within hours of surgery, readmissions can be sought for incomplete relief of leg pain, recurrent disc herniation, and recurrent leg pain. We aim to find out the factors related to the readmission of patients treated for lumbar pathologies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the data between the time duration of 2012 and 2022. Patients in the age group of 18-85 years, with lumbar disc herniation treated by transforaminal endoscopic lumbar procedures, were included. The patients who were readmitted within 90 days were included in the R Group and those who were not were included in the NR group. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to find the risk factors for 90-day readmission. RESULTS: There were a total of 1542 patients enrolled in this study. Sex, number of episodes before admission, hypertension, smoking, BMI, migration, disc height, disc height index, spondylolisthesis, instability, pelvic tilt (PT), and disc cross-sectional area (CSA) were found significant on univariable analysis. Age, spondylolisthesis, instability and muscle CSA were the only variables that were found to be statistically significant on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the elderly age group, presence of spondylolisthesis, segmental instability and decreased muscle cross-sectional area are independent risk factors for 90-day hospital readmissions. Patients having the above risk factors should be carefully counseled regarding the possibility of readmission in the future.

Bibliometric analysis and description of research trends on transforaminal full-endoscopic approach on the spine for the last two-decades.

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to assess the current development status of transforaminal full-endoscopic spine surgery (TFES) by exploring and analyzing the published literature to obtain an overview of this field and discover the evolution and emerging topics that are underrepresented. METHODS: Using Bibliometrix, CiteSpace, and VOSviewer, we analyzed the bibliometric data selected from the Web of Science Core Collection between January 2002 and November 2022. The descriptive and evaluative analyses of authors, institutes, countries, journals, keywords, and references are compiled. The quantity of research productivity was measured by the number of publications that were published. A quality indicator was thought to be the number of citations. In the bibliometric analysis of authors, areas, institutes, and references, we calculated and ranked the research impact by various metrics, such as the h-index and m-index. RESULTS: A total of 628 articles were identified in the field of TFES by the 18.73% annual growth rate of research on the subject from 2002 to 2022, constituting the documents are by 1961 authors affiliated with 661 institutions in 42 countries or regions and published in 117 journals. The USA (n = 0.20) has the highest international collaboration rate, South Korea has the highest H-index value (h = 33), and China is ranked as the most productive country (n = 348). Brown univ., Tongji univ., and Wooridul Spine represented the most productive institutes ranked by the number of publications. Wooridul Spine Hospital demonstrated the highest quality of paper publication. The Pain Physician had the highest h-index (n = 18), and the most cited journal with the earliest publication year in the area of FEDS is Spine (t = 1855). CONCLUSION: The bibliometric study showed a growing trend of research on transforaminal full-endoscopic spine surgery over the past 20 years. It has shown a significant increase in the number of authors, institutions, and international collaborating countries. South Korea, the United States, and China dominate the related areas. A growing body of evidence has revealed that TFES has leapfrogged from its infancy stage and gradually entered a mature development stage.

Full Endoscopic Transpedicular Technique in the Treatment of High Grade Down Migrated Herniated Disc: An Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes at 12 Months Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: High-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation (LDH) such as up-migrated and down-migrated discs are challenging pathologies to treat. High-grade migrated discs are usually sequestered and situated adjacent to the medial pedicle wall. This can be easily addressed if the pedicle is used as an access route. The authors present a retrospective case series of high-grade migrated LDH treated using a full endoscopic transforaminal approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series. The clinical outcomes in the patients were evaluated according to improvement in the symptoms as suggested by improvement in Visual Analog Score (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores in the immediate postoperative period and at the final follow-up. The radiological outcomes were evaluated using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography scans. After the data were collected and tabulated, descriptive statistics were used for continuous variables. The t test was used to determine the significance of changes in the VAS and ODI scores. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS: Five patients underwent discectomy using the transpedicular technique, and the mean preoperative VAS scores for the back and leg were 7.2 ± 0.83 and 8.4 ± 0.54, respectively. The mean VAS scores at the final follow-up for the back was 0.2 ± 0.4 and 0 for the leg (P < 0.05). The mean preoperative ODI score was 72 ± 8.3, which improved to 6 ± 4.69 at the final follow-up (P < 0.05). All patients had a hospital stay of 1 day. CONCLUSIONS: The full endoscopic transpedicular approach is a good option for treating highly migrated LDH. Surgical planning, including pedicle morphometry and the angle of the approach, should be undertaken preoperatively for the best results.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Foraminal Stenosis: Single-Arm Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to conduct a single-arm meta-analysis and comprehensive systematic review to identify the efficacy and safety of transforaminal endoscopic surgery for the treatment of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS). METHODS: The meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. The PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched from inception to February 20, 2022. Primary research results were visual analog scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index scores, MacNab criterion scores, and reported adverse events. Subgroup analyses were performed on the primary outcome to evaluate the potential effects of several clinical factors that affected the results. RESULTS: Of the 2020 studies identified, 9 met the inclusion criteria, and 316 participants were eligible for meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results found that transforaminal endoscopic surgery for the treatment of LFS was associated with a significant improvement in postoperative 12-month clinical indicators: 8 studies reported improvements in visual analog scale scores: -5.38, Oswestry Disability Index scores: -40.44, and MacNab criterion scores: odds ratio = 0.86; 8 studies reported 11.53% adverse events occurred in a total of 295 patients, and the most commonly reported event was transient postoperative dysesthesia, which occurred in 26 patients in a total of 6 studies with 240 patients (10.83%). CONCLUSIONS: Transforaminal endoscopic surgery positively affects postoperative LFS patients' clinical indicators; however, high-level literature with randomized controlled trials is needed to confirm this technique's applicability in LFS.

Comparative Analysis of Transforaminal Endoscopic Thoracic Discectomy and Microscopic Discectomy for Symptomatic Thoracic Disc Herniation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of transforaminal endoscopic thoracic discectomy (TETD) and microscopic discectomy (MD) for the treatment of symptomatic thoracic disc herniation (TDH). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients (mean, 55.9 years; follow-up, 11.2 months) with symptomatic TDH were retrospectively reviewed (39 TETD and 38 MD). Radiological factors and perioperative outcomes were reviewed. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale were used to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using modified MacNab criteria. RESULTS: The levels of surgery and the location of hernia were evenly distributed in the both groups. The operative time (70.6 minutes vs. 175.7 minutes), estimated blood loss (3.8 mL vs. 357.4 mL), and length of hospital stay (7.0 days vs. 13.0 days) were significantly different between the TETD and MD groups (p < 0.05). VAS scores for dorsal back pain and ODI scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.05). Patients who underwent TETD tended to be more satisfied with the outcome in terms of the modified MacNab criteria (89.7% vs. 73.0%, p = 0.059). Two patients in the MD group underwent revision surgery, whereas one patient in the TETD group underwent MD because of incomplete decompression. CONCLUSION: TETD for the symptomatic TDH is a feasible and safe procedure that could be used for a wider range of surgical levels with a shorter operative time and hospital stay and less blood loss. While achieving similar outcomes, TETD achieved better patient satisfaction because of the use of local anesthesia and its minimal invasiveness.

Comparative Analysis of ABM/P-15, Bone Morphogenic Protein and Demineralized Bone Matrix after Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: ABM/P-15 (anorganic bone matrix/15-amino acid peptide fragment) is a commercially available synthetically manufactured P-15 collagen peptide fragment, that is adsorbed on ABM. This study was done to investigate the efficacy of ABM/ P-15 in achieving fusion in the lumbar spine and comparing it with that of recombinant bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) and demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS: A retrospective observational study of prospectively collected data of 140 patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion surgeries in a single specialty spine hospital between 2016 and 2020, with a minimum 6-month follow-up was conducted. Based on the material used for the augmentation of the bone graft at the fusion site, the patients were divided into three categories namely ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM group. RESULTS: ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM were used in 46, 44, and 50 patients, respectively. Patient characteristics like age, gender, bone mineral density, smoking history, and presence of diabetes mellitus were comparable amongst the three groups. Average follow-up was 16.0±5.2, 17.9±9.8, and 26.2±14.9 months, respectively in ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups. The fusion was achieved in 97.9%, 93.2%, and 98% patients while the average time-to-union was 4.05±2.01, 10±4.28, and 9.44±3.49 months (p<0.001), respectively for ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups. The average pre-operative Visual analogue scale score was 6.93±2.42, 7.14±1.97, 7.01±2.14 (p=0.900) for ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2 and DBM groups, respectively, which reduced to 1.02±0.80, 1.21±0.96, and 0.54±0.70 (p=0.112), respectively at the last follow up. Pre-operative Oswestry disability index scores were 52.7±18.02, 55.4±16.8, and 53.56±19.6 (p=0.751) in ABM/P-15, rhBMP-2, and DBM groups, which post-operatively reduced to 33.77±15.52, 39.42±16.47, and 38.3±15.89 (p=0.412) and further to 15.74±8.3, 17.41±10.45, and 16.76±9.81 (p=0.603), respectively at the last follow-up. CONCLUSION: ABM/P-15 appears to achieve union significantly earlier than rhBMP-2 and DBM in lumbar spinal fusion cases while maintaining a comparable clinical and complication profile.

Full Endoscopic Surgery for Thoracic Pathology: Next Step after Mastering Lumbar and Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery?

Thoracic disc herniation and stenosis are relatively rare, and various symptoms make them difficult to diagnose. Due to the complexity of neural and vascular structure, surgical treatment of thoracic pathology is challenging. Endoscopic spine surgery is an emerging minimally invasive surgical option. Based on wide experience on the cervical and lumbar spine, an endoscopic approach for the thoracic pathology can be performed beyond the learning curve. Transforaminal approach for thoracic disc herniation, endoscopic unilateral approach, and bilateral decompression for thoracic stenosis have been reported as favorable and safe surgical options. In the present study, the authors described the detailed surgical procedure as well as tips and tricks.

Comparative study of the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy versus conventional microscopic discectomy in single-level lumbar herniated intervertebral disc (ENDO-F Trial): a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial protocol.

BACKGROUND: Advances in minimally invasive surgery have expanded the indications for interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy. Although the clinical outcomes for this approach may be equivalent to those of conventional microscopic discectomy, the supporting evidence is still based on small, single-center, prospective, and retrospective studies. Therefore, a multicenter randomized controlled trial is warranted. METHODS: This will be a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy to those of conventional microscopic discectomy. The trial will enroll 100 participants with a lumbar disc herniation, 50 in each group. The primary outcome will be the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score at 12 months post-surgery. Secondary outcomes will be back and leg pain (visual analog scale); the ODI; the EuroQol-5-dimension score; patient satisfaction; and walking distance/time and time to return to daily activities post-surgery. Surgical outcomes will include postoperative drainage, operative time, duration of hospital stay, postoperative creatine kinase level as an indicator of muscle injury, and postoperative scarring. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and simple radiography will be performed to evaluate radiographic outcomes between the two surgical approaches. Surgery-related complications and adverse effects will be evaluated as safety outcomes. A single assessor at each participating hospital, blinded to group allocation, will assess the enrolled participants at baseline, at 2 weeks, and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. DISCUSSION: This trial is designed to determine whether interlaminar full-endoscopic discectomy is clinically comparable to microscopic discectomy to treat lumbar disc herniations. All efforts will be made to reduce bias, including adequate sample size, blinded analyses, and multicenter prospective registration. The outcomes will inform practice, providing the evidence needed for using interlaminar full-endoscopic over microscopic discectomy by confirming the potential of this technique to improve patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Research Information Service; cris.nih.go.kr. (KCT0006277); protocol version (v1, June 8, 2021).

Endoscopic decompression of L3 nerve root in a case of adult spinal deformity correction with post-operative neurological deficit: a case report.

Adult spinal deformities (ASD) have a very high incidence of postoperative neurological decline. Spine surgeons all over the world are broadening the indications of endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) with similar/better outcomes to other conventional spine surgeries. In this report we present a case of L3-radiculopathy post ASD correction and its management with ESS. A 78-year-old female operated for ASD presented with backache, and right-side-dominant radiating leg pain. Imaging showed distal junctional failure with left rod fracture between L5-S1 and screw loosening with gross sagittal imbalance. She was treated with L4 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) with T10-iliac posterior fixation with use of satellite rods at PSO site. Post-operatively she developed left-sided L3 motor deficit. Imaging revealed left L3 root compression by bone fragment near the left L3 pedicle screw-head. We presume that, since the L3 pedicular screw had to be inserted deeper than the other screws to accommodate the satellite-rod, the bone in the area near the screw head (part of either the pedicle or facet) caused compression of the left L3 nerve root. The patient was treated with interlaminar ESS under awake anaesthesia and the compressing bone was drilled out. Post-operatively, patient had rapid relief of the radicular pain and improvement in the left quadriceps (L3) power with no recurrence at 1-year follow-up. Thus, post-operative iatrogenic neurological deficits can be treated successfully using ESS when the exact cause of the deficit is identified and is amenable to endoscopic removal. We could successfully treat a case of left-sided L3-radiculopathy, caused due to protruding bony spur after ASD correction surgery with ESS.

Correlation of Paraspinal Muscle Mass With Decompensation of Sagittal Adult Spinal Deformity After Setting of Fatigue Post 10-Minute Walk.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in spinopelvic parameters before and after the setting of muscle fatigue along with its correlation with pre-existing paraspinal and psoas muscle mass. METHODS: Single-center retrospective review of prospectively collected data was conducted on 145-adults with symptomatic loss of lumbar lordosis (LL). Radiographs were taken before and after walking for 10 minutes. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to calculate paraspinal muscle (PSM) cross-sectional area (CSA), mean signal intensity, fatty infiltration (FI), and lean muscle mass at thoracolumbar junction (T12) and lower lumbar level (L4). Psoas CSA was calculated at L3. Patients were divided into 2 groups namely compensated sagittal deformity (CSD) (SVA ≤ 4 cm, PT > 20°) and decompensated sagittal deformity (DSD) (SVA > 4 cm, PT > 20°) based on prewalk measurements. RESULTS: Initial mean SVA was 1.8 cm and 11 cm for CSD and DSD respectively (p < 0.01). After walking, significant deteriorations in SVA, PT-LL (p < 0.01) were observed in CSD without significant change in thoracic kyphosis (TK). All sagittal parameters in DSD deteriorated significantly. DSD group had significantly poorer PSM quality at T12 and L4 compared to CSD group. In CSD group, sagittal decompensation correlated with muscle quality, i.e. , decreases in LL (ΔLL) correlated with CSA of PSM/vertebral body (VB) at L4 (r = -0.412, p = 0.046) while increases in TK (ΔTK) correlated with CSA of PSM/VB at T12 (r = 0.477, p = 0.018). ΔSVA and ΔPT correlated with FI at L4 (r = 0.577, p = 0.003 and r = -0.407, p = 0.048, respectively). DSD group, had weak correlations (-0.3 < r < -0.1) between changes in sagittal and PSM parameters. CONCLUSION: PSM quality in adults with spinal deformity correlates with patients' ability to maintain an upright posture and sagittal decompensation after walking for 10 minutes.

Transumbilical Retroperitoneal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Technical Note and Preliminary Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has advantages over posterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion techniques in that it minimizes damage to the anatomical structure of the posterior spinal segment and enables indirect decompression of the foramen by insertion of a tall cage. However, the predominant abdominal scar tissue reduces patients' satisfaction after ALIF. Herein, we describe the technique of transumbilical lumbar interbody fusion (TULIF) and its preliminary results in a case series. METHODS: A retrospective review of 154 consecutive patients who underwent TULIF between the L2-3 and L4-5 levels was performed. After preoperatively selecting patients by evaluating the location of the umbilicus and vessel anatomy, a vertical skin incision was made on the umbilicus to minimize the abdominal scar tissue. RESULTS: There were 120 single-level (110 L4-5 and 10 L3-4), 31 two-level, and 3 three-level surgeries. All patients were very satisfied with their postoperative abdominal scars, which were noticeably faint compared to those after conventional ALIF. CONCLUSION: TULIF is a feasible, minimally invasive surgical option that can achieve both the treatment of degenerative spinal disease and satisfactory cosmesis. Although it is technically demanding, patients obtain sufficient benefits.

Spinal subdural hematoma after interlaminar full-endoscopic decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a case report and literature review.

The use of full-endoscopic decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis has been increasing recently. It is a minimally invasive surgical procedure that has few complications. Spinal subdural hematoma (SSH) following endoscopic surgery has never been reported. Previously described SSHs have occurred spontaneously or due to surgery-related iatrogenic injury. We describe the first case of SSH after endoscopic decompression. A 68-year-old woman presented with bilateral radiating pain and neurological claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis at the L4-5 level. Full-endoscopic interlaminar decompression was performed without intraoperative complications. Preoperative leg pain improved after endoscopic decompression. However, two days after the index surgery, the patient complained of severe radiating pain in her right leg with urinary retention. The radiologic evaluation showed compressive subdural fluid collection at the index level. Open microscopic decompression was performed. No dural injury was observed. After durotomy, xanthochromic fluid gushed out at a high pressure. We found that the arachnoid was also intact. The patient recovered completely after surgical hematoma evacuation. Although SSH after endoscopic decompression is a very rare event, it is a reminder that suspicion and urgent imaging and intervention are necessary during the postoperative period upon development of unexpected, progressive neurological deterioration regardless of intraoperative problems. Additionally, early surgical decompression is necessary for optimal neurological recovery.

Endoscopic Spine Surgery of the Cervicothoracic Spine: A Review of Current Applications.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic spine surgery in the cervicothoracic spine is generating continued interest in a rapidly evolving field. The authors present 4 techniques for fully endoscopic cervical spine surgery: (1) posterior cervical unilateral laminectomy and bilateral decompression, (2) posterior cervical foraminotomy, (3) anterior cervical discectomy, and (4) anterior transcorporal discectomy. Two techniques for fully endoscopic thoracic spine surgery are also presented: (1) posterior thoracic unilateral laminectomy and bilateral decompression and (2) transforaminal thoracic endoscopic discectomy and foraminotomy. METHODS: We describe 6 different surgical approaches and review the relevant literature about each technique. RESULTS: The clinical application of endoscopic spine surgery techniques has evolved over the past 40 years. Recent data suggest comparable outcomes to other procedures and perhaps fewer complications and quicker recovery when these techniques are used in the cervical and thoracic spine. Significant variability exists in these approaches depending on the goal of canal decompression, root decompression, and the site of the pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Each endoscopic approach in the cervicothoracic spine has its technical nuances, outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages, making fully endoscopic cervicothoracic spine surgery an exciting and growing field.

Novel Simultaneous Decompression Through Single-stage Mini-thoracotomy for Concurrent Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament and Ossification of the Ligamentum Flavum at the Same Thoracic Level: A Technical Report and Literature Review.

STUDY DESIGN: Technical case report. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel technique of decompression through single-stage mini-thoracotomy for removing concurrent ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) at the same thoracic level simultaneously. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Concurrent OPLL and OLF at the same thoracic level is not common. Because these conditions lead to severe thoracic myelopathy, however, they require surgical decompression.To date, several cases with concurrent OPLL and OLF at the same thoracic level and surgical methods to treat these conditions have been described. However, no consensus on the surgical methods for the treatment these conditions has been established and these surgical methods have been also reported to be linked with the incidence of complication like neurological deterioration and the requirement of bone grafting and instrumentation. METHODS: Three consecutive patients who presented with thoracic myelopathy caused by concurrent OPLL and OLF at the same thoracic level were treated by our novel surgical technique of decompression through single-stage mini-thoracotomy. RESULTS: Simultaneous complete removal of OPLL and OLF through single-stage mini-thoracotomy was performed successfully in the three patients. All patients' preoperative symptoms gradually improved during the follow-up period, and no additional complications were associated with removal of OLF through thoracotomy. And there was no kyphotic change or instability in the thoracic spine after more than a year of follow-up although both bone grafting and instrumentation were not performed. CONCLUSION: This novel surgical technique is considered to be able to be a safe and effective alternative to the conventional treatment of selective cases of thoracic myelopathy caused by concurrent OPLL and OLF at the same thoracic level.Level of Evidence: 4.